Literature DB >> 29570815

Identifying auditory cortex encoding abnormalities in schizophrenia: The utility of low-frequency versus 40 Hz steady-state measures.

J C Edgar1, Charles L Fisk1, Yu-Han Chen1, Breannan Stone-Howell2,3, Song Liu1, Michael A Hunter2,3, Mingxiong Huang4,5, Juan Bustillo2, José M Cañive2,3, Gregory A Miller6.   

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and EEG have identified poststimulus low frequency and 40 Hz steady-state auditory encoding abnormalities in schizophrenia (SZ). Negative findings have also appeared. To identify factors contributing to these inconsistencies, healthy control (HC) and SZ group differences were examined in MEG and EEG source space and EEG sensor space, with better group differentiation hypothesized for source than sensor measures given greater predictive utility for source measures. Fifty-five HC and 41 chronic SZ were presented 500 Hz sinusoidal stimuli modulated at 40 Hz during simultaneous whole-head MEG and EEG. MEG and EEG source models using left and right superior temporal gyrus (STG) dipoles estimated trial-to-trial phase similarity and percent change from prestimulus baseline. Group differences in poststimulus low-frequency activity and 40 Hz steady-state response were evaluated. Several EEG sensor analysis strategies were also examined. Poststimulus low-frequency group differences were observed across all methods. Given an age-related decrease in left STG 40 Hz steady-state activity in HC (HC > SZ), 40 Hz steady-state group differences were evident only in younger participants' source measures. Findings thus indicated that optimal data collection and analysis methods depend on the auditory encoding measure of interest. In addition, whereas results indicated that HC and SZ auditory encoding low-frequency group differences are generally comparable across modality and analysis strategy (and thus not dependent on obtaining construct-valid measures of left and right auditory cortex activity), 40 Hz steady-state group-difference findings are much more dependent on analysis strategy, with 40 Hz steady-state source-space findings providing the best group differentiation.
© 2018 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory encoding; electroencephalography; magnetoencephalography; schizophrenia; superior temporal gyrus

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29570815      PMCID: PMC6105408          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  78 in total

Review 1.  Misunderstanding analysis of covariance.

Authors:  G A Miller; J P Chapman
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2001-02

2.  Gamma band oscillations reveal neural network cortical coherence dysfunction in schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Gregory A Light; Jung Lung Hsu; Ming H Hsieh; Katrin Meyer-Gomes; Joyce Sprock; Neal R Swerdlow; David L Braff
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Models of brain sources.

Authors:  M Scherg; J S Ebersole
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Cognitive abilities and 50- and 100-msec paired-click processes in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ashley K Smith; J Christopher Edgar; Mingxiong Huang; Brett Y Lu; Robert J Thoma; Faith M Hanlon; Greg McHaffie; Aaron P Jones; Rodrigo D Paz; Gregory A Miller; José M Cañive
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Superior temporal gyrus spectral abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Authors:  J Christopher Edgar; Faith M Hanlon; Ming-Xiong Huang; Michael P Weisend; Robert J Thoma; Bruce Carpenter; Karsten Hoechstetter; José M Cañive; Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Translating Adult Electrophysiology Findings to Younger Patient Populations: Difficulty Measuring 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses in Typically Developing Children and Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  J Christopher Edgar; Charles L Fisk; Song Liu; Juhi Pandey; John D Herrington; Robert T Schultz; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  One set of sounds, two tonotopic maps: exploring auditory cortex with amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  N Weisz; A Keil; C Wienbruch; S Hoffmeister; T Elbert
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Cortical source estimates of gamma band amplitude and phase are different in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Peter Teale; Dan Collins; Keeran Maharajh; Donald C Rojas; Eugene Kronberg; Martin Reite
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Response in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanna Thuné; Marc Recasens; Peter J Uhlhaas
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 21.596

10.  Baseline gamma power during auditory steady-state stimulation in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Kevin M Spencer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

1.  Associations and Heritability of Auditory Encoding, Gray Matter, and Attention in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Yu-Han Chen; Breannan Howell; J Christopher Edgar; Mingxiong Huang; Peter Kochunov; Michael A Hunter; Cassandra Wootton; Brett Y Lu; Juan Bustillo; Joseph R Sadek; Gregory A Miller; José M Cañive
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 2.  Magnetoencephalography for Schizophrenia.

Authors:  J Christopher Edgar; Anika Guha; Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  Cortical volume and 40-Hz auditory-steady-state responses in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls.

Authors:  Sungkean Kim; Seon-Kyeong Jang; Do-Won Kim; Miseon Shim; Yong-Wook Kim; Chang-Hwan Im; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.881

4.  Maturation of Auditory Cortex Neural Activity in Children and Implications for Auditory Clinical Markers in Diagnosis.

Authors:  J Christopher Edgar; Lisa Blaskey; Heather L Green; Kimberly Konka; Guannan Shen; Marissa A Dipiero; Jeffrey I Berman; Luke Bloy; Song Liu; Emma McBride; Matt Ku; Emily S Kuschner; Megan Airey; Mina Kim; Rose E Franzen; Gregory A Miller; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.157

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.