OBJECTIVE: Abnormal 50- and 100-msec event-related brain activity derived from paired-click procedures are well established in schizophrenia. There is little agreement on whether group differences in the ratio score, i.e., the ratio of EEG amplitude after the second stimulus (S2) to the amplitude after the first stimulus (S1), reflect an encoding or gating abnormality. In addition, the functional implications remain unclear. In the present study, EEG and magnetoencephalography (MEG) were used to examine paired-click measures and cognitive correlates of paired-click activity. METHOD: EEG and whole-cortex MEG data were acquired during the standard paired-click paradigm in 73 comparison subjects and 79 schizophrenia patients. Paired-click ratio scores were obtained at 50 msec (P50 evoked potential at Cz, M50 at left and right superior temporal gyrus [STG]) and 100 msec (N100 at Cz, M100 at left and right STG). A cognitive battery assessing attention, working memory, and long-delay memory was administered. IQ was also estimated. RESULTS: Groups differed on ratio score and amplitude of S1 response. Ratio scores at 50 msec and 100 msec and S1 amplitude predicted variance in attention (primarily S1 amplitude), working memory, and long-delay memory. The attention findings remained after removal of variance associated with IQ. CONCLUSIONS: Associations between paired-click measures and cognitive performance in patients support 50-msec and 100-msec ratio and amplitude scores as clinically significant biomarkers of schizophrenia. In general, cognitive performance was better predicted by the ability to encode auditory information than the ability to filter redundant information.
OBJECTIVE: Abnormal 50- and 100-msec event-related brain activity derived from paired-click procedures are well established in schizophrenia. There is little agreement on whether group differences in the ratio score, i.e., the ratio of EEG amplitude after the second stimulus (S2) to the amplitude after the first stimulus (S1), reflect an encoding or gating abnormality. In addition, the functional implications remain unclear. In the present study, EEG and magnetoencephalography (MEG) were used to examine paired-click measures and cognitive correlates of paired-click activity. METHOD: EEG and whole-cortex MEG data were acquired during the standard paired-click paradigm in 73 comparison subjects and 79 schizophreniapatients. Paired-click ratio scores were obtained at 50 msec (P50 evoked potential at Cz, M50 at left and right superior temporal gyrus [STG]) and 100 msec (N100 at Cz, M100 at left and right STG). A cognitive battery assessing attention, working memory, and long-delay memory was administered. IQ was also estimated. RESULTS: Groups differed on ratio score and amplitude of S1 response. Ratio scores at 50 msec and 100 msec and S1 amplitude predicted variance in attention (primarily S1 amplitude), working memory, and long-delay memory. The attention findings remained after removal of variance associated with IQ. CONCLUSIONS: Associations between paired-click measures and cognitive performance in patients support 50-msec and 100-msec ratio and amplitude scores as clinically significant biomarkers of schizophrenia. In general, cognitive performance was better predicted by the ability to encode auditory information than the ability to filter redundant information.
Authors: Faith M Hanlon; Gregory A Miller; Robert J Thoma; Jessica Irwin; Aaron Jones; Sandra N Moses; Mingxiong Huang; Michael P Weisend; Kim M Paulson; J Christopher Edgar; Lawrence E Adler; Jose M Cañive Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Brett Y Lu; J Christopher Edgar; Aaron P Jones; Ashley K Smith; Ming-Xiong Huang; Gregory A Miller; Jose M Cañive Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Julie V Patterson; William P Hetrick; Nash N Boutros; Yi Jin; Curt Sandman; Hal Stern; Steven Potkin; William E Bunney Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2008-01-09 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Jason K Johannesen; Paul D Kieffaber; Brian F O'Donnell; Anantha Shekhar; Jovier D Evans; William P Hetrick Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: J Christopher Edgar; Faith M Hanlon; Ming-Xiong Huang; Michael P Weisend; Robert J Thoma; Bruce Carpenter; Karsten Hoechstetter; José M Cañive; Gregory A Miller Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Bruce I Turetsky; Tiffany A Greenwood; Ann Olincy; Allen D Radant; David L Braff; Kristin S Cadenhead; Dorcas J Dobie; Robert Freedman; Michael F Green; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Gregory A Light; James Mintz; Keith H Nuechterlein; Nicholas J Schork; Larry J Seidman; Larry J Siever; Jeremy M Silverman; William S Stone; Neal R Swerdlow; Debby W Tsuang; Ming T Tsuang; Monica E Calkins Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Nash N Boutros; Anke Brockhaus-Dumke; Klevest Gjini; Andrei Vedeniapin; Mohamad Elfakhani; Scott Burroughs; Matcheri Keshavan Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Mei Hua Hall; Katja Schulze; Frühling Rijsdijk; Marco Picchioni; Ulrich Ettinger; Elvira Bramon; Robert Freedman; Robin M Murray; Pak Sham Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2006-07-07 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Yu-Han Chen; Breannan Howell; J Christopher Edgar; Mingxiong Huang; Peter Kochunov; Michael A Hunter; Cassandra Wootton; Brett Y Lu; Juan Bustillo; Joseph R Sadek; Gregory A Miller; José M Cañive Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Holly K Hamilton; Terrance J Williams; Joseph Ventura; Leland J Jasperse; Emily M Owens; Gregory A Miller; Kenneth L Subotnik; Keith H Nuechterlein; Cindy M Yee Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Andrew R Mayer; David Ruhl; Flannery Merideth; Josef Ling; Faith M Hanlon; Juan Bustillo; Jose Cañive Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: J Christopher Edgar; Michael A Hunter; Mingxiong Huang; Ashley K Smith; Yuhan Chen; Joseph Sadek; Brett Y Lu; Gregory A Miller; José M Cañive Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Robert E Featherstone; Valerie M Tatard-Leitman; Jimmy D Suh; Robert Lin; Irwin Lucki; Steven J Siegel Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Yu-Han Chen; Joni Saby; Emily Kuschner; William Gaetz; J Christopher Edgar; Timothy P L Roberts Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 6.556