| Literature DB >> 31906609 |
Shin Oe1, Yu Yamato1, Tomohiko Hasegawa2, Go Yoshida2, Sho Kobayashi3, Tatsuya Yasuda2, Tomohiro Banno2, Hideyuki Arima2, Yuki Mihara2, Hiroki Ushirozako2, Tomohiro Yamada2, Koichiro Ide2, Yuh Watanabe2, Haruo Niwa4, Yukihiro Matsuyama2.
Abstract
STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores; Patients reported outcome; Spinal sagittal alignment; Sporting activity
Year: 2020 PMID: 31906609 PMCID: PMC7280917 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2019.0212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Spine J ISSN: 1976-1902
Fig. 1.(A, B) Evaluated radiographic parameters. SS, sacral slope; PT, pelvic tilt; LL, lumbar lordosis (L1–S1); TK, thoracic kyphosis (T5–T12); TS, T1 slope; CL, cervical lordosis (C2–C7); (7) SVA, sagittal vertical axis; TPA, T1 pelvic angle.
Fig. 2.Flowchart of volunteer recruitment. A total of 397 were excluded, and 170 males and 303 females were recruited.
Demographic data among volunteers
| Characteristic | Male | Female | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sports activity (-) | Sports activity (+) | Sports activity (-) | Sports activity (+) | |||
| No. of patients | 101 | 69 | 178 | 125 | ||
| Age (yr) | 74.9±7.4 | 74.6±8.0 | 0.789 | 73.6±8.1 | 73.9±8.5 | 0.783 |
| Height (cm) | 162.0±6.9 | 161.6±7.9 | 0.714 | 148.5±6.7 | 149.7±5.9 | 0.108 |
| Weight (kg) | 59.6±9.3 | 61.3±7.6 | 0.214 | 48.9±7.6 | 50.6±7.4 | 0.055 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.7±3.1 | 23.5±2.3 | 0.079 | 22.1±3.3 | 22.6±3.1 | 0.236 |
| Grip strength (kg) | 35.7±7.6 | 35.7±9.4 | 0.966 | 23.6±4.7 | 24.5±5.6 | 0.125 |
| Amount of muscle (kg) | 43.9±5.4 | 44.6±4.8 | 0.379 | 32.1±3.5 | 32.6±3.6 | 0.214 |
| Percent of body fat (%) | 20.3±5.4 | 21.4±5.6 | 0.184 | 28.3±7.0 | 29.2±6.8 | 0.247 |
| Base metabolism (kcal/day) | 1,196.0±155.7 | 1,221.2±171.4 | 0.372 | 966.5±114.6 | 983.7±112.3 | 0.202 |
| Young adult mean value (%, at total femur) | 78.9±11.9 | 82.1±15.4 | 0.155 | 70.9±14.2 | 71.6±12.1 | 0.642 |
| No. of births | - | - | - | 2.4±0.9 | 2.5±0.9 | 0.349 |
| HADS-anxiety | 4.2±3.1 | 4.5±2.9 | 0.523 | 6.1±3.2 | 5.1±3.7 | 0.024* |
| HADS-depression | 4.0±3.0 | 3.7±3.2 | 0.542 | 4.3±3.4 | 3.3±3.3 | 0.012 |
| HADS-total | 8.2±5.4 | 8.2±5.4 | 0.996 | 10.4±6.0 | 8.4±6.4 | 0.009 |
| EuroQol-5 dimension | 0.828±0.174 | 0.850±0.154 | 0.400 | 0.787±0.164 | 0.857±0.160 | 0.000 |
| Oswestry Disability Index (%) | 13.1±13.7 | 11.8±12.9 | 0.531 | 16.8±13.8 | 11.8±12.0 | 0.001 |
| Neck Disability Index (%) | 8.6±9.5 | 9.2±8.6 | 0.641 | 12.0±10.8 | 8.9±8.7 | 0.007 |
Values are presented as number or mean±standard deviation.
HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
p<0.05.
p<0.01.
p<0.001.
Radiographic parameters among volunteers
| Variable | Male | Female | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sports activity (-) | Sports activity (+ | Sports activity (-) | Sports activity (+) | |||
| No. of patients | 101 | 69 | 178 | 125 | ||
| Sacral slope | 29.2±10.4 | 31.3±9.2 | 0.176 | 26.7±11.6 | 28.5±10.5 | 0.175 |
| Pelvic tilt | 17.2±8.2 | 17.2±9.4 | 1.000 | 24.1±10.8 | 23.2±9.3 | 0.443 |
| PI | 46.4±9.9 | 48.4±9.6 | 0.172 | 50.8±11.1 | 51.7±10.3 | 0.493 |
| LL | 40.7±14.7 | 44.9±14.5 | 0.068 | 40.1±20.5 | 44.1±18.1 | 0.078 |
| PI-LL | 5.7±13.4 | 3.6±15.8 | 0.356 | 10.8±19.9 | 7.6±18.1 | 0.158 |
| Thoracic kyphosis | 30.3±10.8 | 30.1±11.7 | 0.906 | 32.9±14.5 | 32.6±16.3 | 0.869 |
| TS | 27.2±8.7 | 27.1±8.3 | 0.910 | 26.6±11.7 | 25.4±10.2 | 0.370 |
| CL | 17.4±12.2 | 21.6±11.7 | 0.044 | 25.4±15.5 | 23.9±14.7 | 0.389 |
| TS-CL | 9.8±12.1 | 5.9±12.3 | 0.040 | 1.1±12.1 | 1.5±12.7 | 0.802 |
| C2-7 SVA | 20.6±18.2 | 19.0±15.4 | 0.559 | 11.1±13.1 | 10.2±13.9 | 0.533 |
| C7 SVA | 23.5±50.8 | 18.5±54.7 | 0.544 | 28.4±61.9 | 14.0±49.5 | 0.025 |
| C2 SVA | 41.5±57.4 | 32.1±64.4 | 0.315 | 36.6±67.8 | 21.9±53.1 | 0.036 |
| T1 pelvic angle | 16.1±10.1 | 16.1±16.1 | 0.971 | 21.0±13.7 | 18.0±12.9 | 0.053 |
Values are presented as number or mean±standard deviation.
PI, pelvic incidence; LL, lumbar lordosis; TS, T1 slope; CL, cervical lordosis; SVA, sagittal vertical axis.
p<0.05.
Fig. 3.Details of the types and exercise intensity of sports undertaken by males. Exercise intensity was evaluated using MET. Mean exercise intensity was 4.0 METs. MET, metabolic equivalent.
Fig. 4.Details of the types and exercise intensity of sports undertaken by females. Exercise intensity was evaluated using MET. Mean exercise intensity was 3.8 METs. MET, metabolic equivalent.
Coefficient of correlation between HADS-T and health-related quality of life
| Variable | HADS-T in males ( | HADS-T in females ( |
|---|---|---|
| EuroQol-5 dimension | -0.436 (0.000) | -0.396 (0.000) |
| Oswestry Disability Index | 0.441 (0.000) | 0.431 (0.000) |
| Neck Disability Index | 0.517 (0.000) | 0.546 (0.000) |
HADS-T, total score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.