| Literature DB >> 29568810 |
David Julian McClements1, Glen DeLoid2, Georgios Pyrgiotakis2, Jo Anne Shatkin3, Hang Xiao1, Philip Demokritou2.
Abstract
Many foods contain appreciable levels of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) (diameter < 100 nm) that may be either intentionally or unintentionally added. These ENMs vary considerably in their compositions, dimensions, morphologies, physicochemical properties, and biological responses. From a toxicological point of view, it is often convenient to classify ingested ENMs (iENMs) as being either inorganic (such as TiO2, SiO2, Fe2O3, or Ag) or organic (such as lipid, protein, or carbohydrate), since the former tend to be indigestible and the latter are generally digestible. At present there is a relatively poor understanding of how different types of iENMs behave within the human gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and how the food matrix and biopolymers transform their physico-chemical properties and influence their gastrointestinal fate. This lack of knowledge confounds an understanding of their potential harmful effects on human health. The purpose of this article is to review our current understanding of the GIT fate of iENMs, and to highlight gaps where further research is urgently needed in assessing potential risks and toxicological implications of iENMs. In particular, a strong emphasis is given to the development of standardized screening methods that can be used to rapidly and accurately assess the toxicological properties of iENMs.Entities:
Keywords: engineered nanomaterials; food matrix effects; food nanotechnology; gastrointestinal tract; in vitro models; nanotoxicology
Year: 2016 PMID: 29568810 PMCID: PMC5860850 DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2016.10.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: NanoImpact ISSN: 2452-0748