| Literature DB >> 29568479 |
Yui Uchida1, Masahiro Uesaka1, Takayoshi Yamamoto1, Hiroyuki Takeda1,2, Naoki Irie1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the general trends in developmental changes during animal evolution, which are often associated with morphological diversification, has long been a central issue in evolutionary developmental biology. Recent comparative transcriptomic studies revealed that gene expression profiles of mid-embryonic period tend to be more evolutionarily conserved than those in earlier or later periods. While the hourglass-like divergence of developmental processes has been demonstrated in a variety of animal groups such as vertebrates, arthropods, and nematodes, the exact mechanism leading to this mid-embryonic conservation remains to be clarified. One possibility is that the mid-embryonic period (pharyngula period in vertebrates) is highly prone to embryonic lethality, and the resulting negative selections lead to evolutionary conservation of this phase. Here, we tested this "mid-embryonic lethality hypothesis" by measuring the rate of lethal phenotypes of three different species of vertebrate embryos subjected to two kinds of perturbations: transient perturbations and genetic mutations.Entities:
Keywords: Developmental conservation; Hourglass model; Lethality; Pharyngula period; Phylotypic period
Year: 2018 PMID: 29568479 PMCID: PMC5855935 DOI: 10.1186/s13227-018-0095-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evodevo ISSN: 2041-9139 Impact factor: 2.250
Concentrations of inhibitors and temperatures used in heat shock experiments
| Heat shock (°C) | TSA | 17-AAG (µM) | α-Amanitin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zebrafish | 39 | 500 nM | 25 | 75 µg/ml |
| African clawed frog | 32 | 1 µM | 50 | |
| Chicken | 45 | 100 µM |
Developmental stages at which perturbations were initiated
| Earliest | ← | → | Latest | Evaluation of rate of lethal phenotypes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zebrafish | Sphere | 30%-epiboly | 24 hpf | 48 hpf | hatch |
| African clawed frog | st. 8 | st. 11 | st. 28 | st. 40 | st. 45 |
| Chicken | HH5 | HH16 | HH20 | HH25 |
The pharyngula periods of zebrafish, African clawed frog, and chicken are 24 hpf (hours post-fertilization), st. 28 (stage 28), and HH16 (Hamburger Hamilton stage 16), respectively
Fig. 1Pharyngula stages did not show the highest rate of lethal phenotypes following transient perturbations. a Representative embryos that showed malformation or lethal phenotype. (I–IV) Zebrafish embryos with (I) curled trunk, (II) bent trunk axis, (III) pericardial edema, and (IV) shortened trunk. (V–VIII) African clawed frog embryos with (V) curled trunk and small eyes, (VI) severely bent trunk, (VII) edema and abnormal head, and (VIII) bent trunk axis. (IX, X) Chicken embryos with (IX) abnormal head and growth arrest, and (X) small eyes. Scale bars represent 1 mm (I–VIII) and 5 mm (IX, X). b–d Rate of lethal phenotypes rate after transient perturbation in b zebrafish, c African clawed frog, and d chicken. Phenotype evaluation was performed at hatch period in zebrafish, st. 45 in African clawed frog, and HH25 in chicken. Blst blastula, Gst gastrula, Pha pharyngula, Lat late embryo, ctrl untreated control group. Data are displayed as means, and error bars denote SD. Only significant differences between each treated group and the control group are shown. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (Tukey–Kramer method)
Fig. 2Survival rate after UV irradiation decreased in the gastrula period, but not the pharyngula period. Kaplan–Meier survival curves of a zebrafish and b African clawed frog embryos after UV irradiation at the MZT period. Note that the horizontal axis shows successive developmental stages rather than actual time length. For zebrafish, developmental stages described by Kimmel et al. [35] were numbered sequentially from 1 to 35. Images of the developmental stages are shown below, with the numbers on the line corresponding to those in the survival curve x axis. Blue arrowheads, most conserved developmental periods in previous reports [18, 20]; black line, control; red line, UV-irradiated embryos; shaded area, 95% CI (confidence interval); vertical dotted line, UV irradiation. Numbers of embryos used in this analysis: zebrafish control group, n = 72; zebrafish treated group, n = 216; African clawed frog control group, n = 72; and African clawed frog treated group, n = 108