| Literature DB >> 29567963 |
Thomas Wieloch1, Ina Ehlers2, Jun Yu3, David Frank4, Michael Grabner5, Arthur Gessler6,7, Jürgen Schleucher8.
Abstract
Measurements of carbon isotope contents of plant organic matter provide important information in diverse fields such as plant breeding, ecophysiology, biogeochemistry and paleoclimatology. They are currently based on 13C/12C ratios of specific, whole metabolites, but we show here that intramolecular ratios provide higher resolution information. In the glucose units of tree-ring cellulose of 12 tree species, we detected large differences in 13C/12C ratios (>10‰) among carbon atoms, which provide isotopically distinct inputs to major global C pools, including wood and soil organic matter. Thus, considering position-specific differences can improve characterisation of soil-to-atmosphere carbon fluxes and soil metabolism. In a Pinus nigra tree-ring archive formed from 1961 to 1995, we found novel 13C signals, and show that intramolecular analysis enables more comprehensive and precise signal extraction from tree rings, and thus higher resolution reconstruction of plants' responses to climate change. Moreover, we propose an ecophysiological mechanism for the introduction of a 13C signal, which links an environmental shift to the triggered metabolic shift and its intramolecular 13C signature. In conclusion, intramolecular 13C analyses can provide valuable new information about long-term metabolic dynamics for numerous applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29567963 PMCID: PMC5864875 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23422-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Intramolecular 13C distributions and effects of growing season air vapour pressure deficit (VPD) on 13C discrimination. Data were acquired for tree-ring glucose of Pinus nigra laid down from 1961 to 1995 at a site in the Vienna basin. (a) Intramolecular 13C distributions (means over 31 years) expressed in terms of intramolecular 13C discrimination. Solid line, observed distribution (Δi); dashed line, TPC-free distribution (Δi′); dotted line, hypothetical distribution without positional 13C effects. Insert: Glucose unit of cellulose showing intramolecular locations of carbon positions, i. (b,c) Effects of VPD on whole-molecule 13C discrimination, Δ and on positional 13C discrimination at C-1 and C-4; Δ1′ and Δ4′, respectively. Linear regression demonstrates highly significant negative relationships between VPD and both Δ and Δ1′, and no detectable relationship between VPD and Δ4′ (ordinary least squares regressions, n = 31, Δ = −0.011VPD + 20.0, r = −0.72, p = 5.4*10−6; Δ1′ = −0.023VPD + 29.1, r = −0.68, p = 3*10−5; Δ4′ = 0.002VPD + 12.9, r = 0.09, p = 0.64).
Figure 2Common variability among and components of variance in time-series of 13C discrimination. Data were acquired for tree-ring glucose of Pinus nigra laid down from 1961 to 1995 at a site in the Vienna basin. (a) Dendrogram showing clustering of time series of the TPC-free intramolecular 13C discrimination, Δi′. Asterisks denote the significance of correlation between Δi′ forming a cluster (*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 10−2; ***p ≤ 10−3, n = 31). (b) De-convolution of the explainable component of variance in Δ, and Δi′ into an explained and an unexplained component of variance according to previous authors[21]. Explainable variance denotes the total variance minus estimated error variance. Explained variance denotes the component of variance accounted for by growing season air vapour pressure deficit. Unexplained varaince denotes the component of variance not accounted for by independent variables.
Correlation coefficients and significance levels (*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 10−2; ***p ≤ 10−3; ****p ≤ 10−4) obtained from the Δi cross-correlation analysis (n = 31).
| Δ1 | Δ2 | Δ3 | Δ4 | Δ5 | Δ6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δ1 | 1 | |||||
| Δ2 | 0.60*** | 1 | ||||
| Δ3 | 0.31 | 0.52** | 1 | |||
| Δ4 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| 1 | ||
| Δ5 | 0.37* |
| 0.24 | 0.39* | 1 | |
| Δ6 |
| 0.48** | 0.31 | 0.11 | 0.69**** | 1 |
Correlation coefficients and significance levels (*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 10−2; ***p ≤ 10−3) obtained from the Δi′ cross-correlation analysis (n = 31).
| Δ1′ | Δ2′ | Δ3′ | Δ4′ | Δ5′ | Δ6′ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δ1′ | 1 | |||||
| Δ2′ | 0.54** | 1 | ||||
| Δ3′ | 0.31 | 0.48** | 1 | |||
| Δ4′ | −0.12 | 0.10 |
| 1 | ||
| Δ5′ | 0.11 |
| 0.03 | 0.32 | 1 | |
| Δ6′ |
| 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.06 | 0.61*** | 1 |