Literature DB >> 26130023

The role of isohydric and anisohydric species in determining ecosystem-scale response to severe drought.

D T Roman1, K A Novick2, E R Brzostek3, D Dragoni4, F Rahman5, R P Phillips6.   

Abstract

Ongoing shifts in the species composition of Eastern US forests necessitate the development of frameworks to explore how species-specific water-use strategies influence ecosystem-scale carbon (C) cycling during drought. Here, we develop a diagnostic framework to classify plant drought-response strategies along a continuum of isohydric to anisohydric regulation of leaf water potential (Ψ(L)). The framework is applied to a 3-year record of weekly leaf-level gas exchange and Ψ measurements collected in the Morgan-Monroe State Forest (Indiana, USA), where continuous observations of the net ecosystem exchange of CO2 (NEE) have been ongoing since 1999. A severe drought that occurred in the middle of the study period reduced the absolute magnitude of NEE by 55%, though species-specific responses to drought conditions varied. Oak species were characterized by anisohydric regulation of Ψ(L) that promoted static gas exchange throughout the study period. In contrast, Ψ(L) of the other canopy dominant species was more isohydric, which limited gas exchange during the drought. Ecosystem-scale estimates of NEE and gross ecosystem productivity derived by upscaling the leaf-level data agreed well with tower-based observations, and highlight how the fraction of isohydric and anisohydric species in forests can mediate net ecosystem C balance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon flux; Eddy covariance; Net ecosystem exchange; Stomatal conductance; Water regulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26130023     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3380-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

1.  Processes preventing nocturnal equilibration between leaf and soil water potential in tropical savanna woody species.

Authors:  Sandra J Bucci; Fabian G Scholz; Guillermo Goldstein; Frederick C Meinzer; Jose A Hinojosa; William A Hoffmann; Augusto C Franco
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.196

2.  Fire history, related to climate and land use in three southern Appalachian landscapes in the eastern United States.

Authors:  William T Flatley; Charles W Lafon; Henri D Grissino-Mayer; Lisa B LaForest
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change.

Authors:  Paul A O'Gorman; Tapio Schneider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought?

Authors:  Nate McDowell; William T Pockman; Craig D Allen; David D Breshears; Neil Cobb; Thomas Kolb; Jennifer Plaut; John Sperry; Adam West; David G Williams; Enrico A Yepez
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Can forest management be used to sustain water-based ecosystem services in the face of climate change?

Authors:  Chelcy R Ford; Stephanie H Laseter; Wayne T Swank; James M Vose
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought.

Authors:  Brendan Choat; Steven Jansen; Tim J Brodribb; Hervé Cochard; Sylvain Delzon; Radika Bhaskar; Sandra J Bucci; Taylor S Feild; Sean M Gleason; Uwe G Hacke; Anna L Jacobsen; Frederic Lens; Hafiz Maherali; Jordi Martínez-Vilalta; Stefan Mayr; Maurizio Mencuccini; Patrick J Mitchell; Andrea Nardini; Jarmila Pittermann; R Brandon Pratt; John S Sperry; Mark Westoby; Ian J Wright; Amy E Zanne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Above- and belowground controls on water use by trees of different wood types in an eastern US deciduous forest.

Authors:  Frederick C Meinzer; David R Woodruff; David M Eissenstat; Henry S Lin; Thomas S Adams; Katherine A McCulloh
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.196

8.  Water-use strategies of six co-existing Mediterranean woody species during a summer drought.

Authors:  José L Quero; Frank J Sterck; Jordi Martínez-Vilalta; Rafael Villar
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Hydraulic safety margins and embolism reversal in stems and leaves: why are conifers and angiosperms so different?

Authors:  Daniel M Johnson; Katherine A McCulloh; David R Woodruff; Frederick C Meinzer
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.729

10.  Dynamics of leaf water relations components in co-occurring iso- and anisohydric conifer species.

Authors:  Frederick C Meinzer; David R Woodruff; Danielle E Marias; Katherine A McCulloh; Sanna Sevanto
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 7.228

View more
  12 in total

1.  Soil microbial communities buffer physiological responses to drought stress in three hardwood species.

Authors:  Steven A Kannenberg; Richard P Phillips
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Inter- and intraannual growth patterns of urban small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata mill.) at two public squares with contrasting microclimatic conditions.

Authors:  Astrid Moser; Mohammad A Rahman; Hans Pretzsch; Stephan Pauleit; Thomas Rötzer
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Ozone exposure-response relationships parametrized for sixteen tree species with varying sensitivity in the United States.

Authors:  E Henry Lee; Christian P Andersen; Peter A Beedlow; David T Tingey; Seiji Koike; Jean-Jacques Dubois; S Douglas Kaylor; Kristopher Novak; R Byron Rice; Howard S Neufeld; Jeffrey D Herrick
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.755

4.  Candidate regulators and target genes of drought stress in needles and roots of Norway spruce.

Authors:  Julia C Haas; Alexander Vergara; Alonso R Serrano; Sanatkumar Mishra; Vaughan Hurry; Nathaniel R Street
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.196

5.  Short-term favorable weather conditions are an important control of interannual variability in carbon and water fluxes.

Authors:  Jakob Zscheischler; Simone Fatichi; Sebastian Wolf; Peter D Blanken; Gil Bohrer; Kenneth Clark; Ankur R Desai; David Hollinger; Trevor Keenan; Kimberly A Novick; Sonia I Seneviratne
Journal:  J Geophys Res Biogeosci       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.822

6.  Intramolecular 13C analysis of tree rings provides multiple plant ecophysiology signals covering decades.

Authors:  Thomas Wieloch; Ina Ehlers; Jun Yu; David Frank; Michael Grabner; Arthur Gessler; Jürgen Schleucher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Accumulated Response of Deciduous Liquidambar formosana Hance and Evergreen Cyclobalanopsis glauca Thunb. Seedlings to Simulated Nitrogen Additions.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Zhang; Yamin Zhao; Xiaoyan Zhang; Sichen Tao; Xiong Fang; Xingwen Lin; Yonggang Chi; Lei Zhou; Chaofan Wu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Extreme Growth Increments Reveal Local and Regional Climatic Signals in Two Pinus pinaster Populations.

Authors:  Joana Vieira; Cristina Nabais; Filipe Campelo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Rainfall seasonality and drought performance shape the distribution of tropical tree species in Ghana.

Authors:  Lucy Amissah; Godefridus M J Mohren; Boateng Kyereh; Victor K Agyeman; Lourens Poorter
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  A Dynamic Model for Strategies and Dynamics of Plant Water-Potential Regulation Under Drought Conditions.

Authors:  Phillip Papastefanou; Christian S Zang; Thomas A M Pugh; Daijun Liu; Thorsten E E Grams; Thomas Hickler; Anja Rammig
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.