| Literature DB >> 29567254 |
Xiao-Yu Wang1, Xuan Ding2, Yong-Fang Yuan3, Le-Yi Zheng1, Yan Cao1, Zhen-Yu Zhu1, Guo-Qing Zhang4, Yi-Feng Chai1, Xiao-Fei Chen1, Zhan-Ying Hong1.
Abstract
Rhizoma corydalis and Radix Angelicae Dahurica (Yuanhu-Baizhi) herbal medicine pair has been used for thousands of years and has been reported to be potentially active in recent cancer therapy. But the exact active components or fractions remain unclear. In this study, a new comprehensive two-dimensional (2D) 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES)-decorated MCF7-cell membrane chromatography (CMC)/capcell-C18 column/time-of-flight mass spectrometry system was established for screening potential active components and clarifying the active fraction of Yuanhu-Baizhi pair. APTES was modified on the surface of silica, which can provide an amino group to covalently link cell membrane fragments with the help of glutaraldehyde in order to improve the stability and column life span of the MCF7 CMC column. The comprehensive 2D MCF7-CMC system showed good separation and identification abilities. Our screen results showed that the retention components are mainly from the alkaloids in Yuanhu (12 compounds) and the coumarins (10 compounds) in Baizhi, revealing the active fractions of Yuanhu-Baizhi herbal medicine pair. Oxoglaucine, protopine, berberine, osthole, isopimpinellin and palmitic acid were selected as typical components to test the effects on cell proliferation and their IC50 were calculated as 38.17 μM, 29.45 μM, 45.42 μM, 132.7 μM, 156.8 μM and 90.5 μM respectively. Cell apoptosis assay showed that the drug efficacy was obtained mainly through inducing cell apoptosis. Furthermore, a synergistic assay results demonstrated that oxoglaucine (representative of alkaloids from Yuanhu) and isopimpinellin (representative of coumarins from Baizhi) showed significant synergistic efficacy with GFT, indicating that these components may act on other membrane receptors. The proposed 2D CMC system could also be equipped with other cells for further applications. Besides, the follow-up in-vitro experimental strategy using cell proliferation assay, cell apoptosis assay and synergistic assay proved to be a practical way to confirm the active fractions of herbal medicine.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-breast-cancer components; Cell membrane chromatography; Comprehensive two-dimensional chromatography; Herbal medicine; Rhizoma corydalis and Radix Angelicae Dahurica
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29567254 PMCID: PMC9322241 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2017.11.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Drug Anal Impact factor: 6.157
Fig. 1Scheme of APTES-decorated silica gel synthesis and its reaction with cell membranes.
Fig. 2Block scheme of 2D APTES-decorated MCF7-CMC/Capcell-C18 column/TOFMS system. (A) Position 1 and (B) position 2.
Fig. 3Selectivity evaluation of the 2D APTES-decorated MCF7-CMC system (DXM as a negative control ligand and GFT as a positive ligand).
Fig. 4Typical 2D chromatography plots of (A) Yuanhu extract (information of components 1–15 were listed in Table 1), (B) Baizhi extract (information of components 1–18 were listed in Table 2), (C) mixed standard solutions (berberine, oxoglaucine and protopine) from Yuanhu and (D) mixed standard solutions (osthole, isopimpinellin and palmitic acid) from Baizhi retaining results of 2D MCF7-CMC system.
Components of Yuanhu on 2D APTES-decorated MCF7/CMC system identified by TOFMS.
| Peak number | Identification | tR (CMC, min) | tR (C18, min) | Abundance match (%) | Formula | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Expected | Detected | Error (ppm) | ||||||
| 1 | Noroxyhydrastinine | 0–2.5 | 12.8 | 192.0655 ([M + H]+) | 192.0654 ([M + H]+) | −0.5 | 99.14 | C10H9NO3 |
| 2 | Dehydroglaucine | 2.5–30 | 12.2 | 352.1543 ([M + H]+) | 352.1542 ([M + H]+) | −0.3 | 99.64 | C21H21NO4 |
| 3 | Dehydrocorydaline | 5–30 | 12.1 | 367.1778 ([M + H]+) | 367.1739 ([M + H]+) | −10.6 | 92.29 | C22H24NO4 |
| 4 | Berberine | 1–30 | 11.8 | 337.1309 ([M + H]+) | 337.1297 ([M + H]+) | −3.6 | 99.63 | C20H18NO4 |
| 5 | Tetrahydroprotopapaverine | 1–27.5 | 11.5 | 330.1700 ([M + H]+) | 330.1707 ([M + H]+) | 2.1 | 91.51 | C19H23NO4 |
| 6 | 1–22.5 | 11.2 | 370.2013 ([M + H]+) | 370.2014 ([M + H]+) | 0.3 | 99.88 | C22H27NO4 | |
| 7 | Oxoglaucine | 1–30 | 10.7 | 352.1179 ([M + H]+) | 352.1184 ([M + H]+) | 1.4 | 91.79 | C20H17NO5 |
| 8 | Tetrahydrocorysamine | 1–30 | 10.2 | 338.1388 ([M + H]+) | 338.1387 ([M + H]+) | −0.3 | 99.87 | C20H19NO4 |
| 9 | Stepharanine | 2.5–30 | 9.6 | 325.1309 ([M + H]+) | 325.1284 ([M + H]+) | −7.7 | 82.28 | C19H18NO4 |
| 10 | 2.5–30 | 9.2 | 324.1230 ([M + H]+) | 324.1232 ([M + H]+) | 0.6 | 99.85 | C19H17NO4 | |
| 11 | 2.5–22.5 | 8.9 | 356.1854 ([M + H]+) | 356.1856 ([M + H]+) | 0.6 | 99.59 | C21H25NO4 | |
| 12 | Protopine | 1–30 | 8.4 | 354.1336 ([M + H]+) | 354.1338 ([M + H]+) | 0.6 | 97.94 | C20H19NO5 |
| 13 | Tetrahydrocolumbamine | 1–17.5 | 7.4 | 342.1700 ([M + H]+) | 342.1699 ([M + H]+) | −0.3 | 99.68 | C20H23NO4 |
| 14 | Pontevedrine | 1–10 | 6.6 | 384.1442 ([M + H]+) | 384.1450 ([M + H]+) | 2.1 | 97.79 | C21H21NO6 |
| 15 | Scoulerine | 1–7.5 | 5.9 | 328.1543 ([M + H]+) | 328.1544 ([M + H]+) | 0.3 | 99.89 | C19H21NO4 |
Confirmed by authentic standard compounds.
Peak that was not completely flushed out by 1st-CMC column within 30 min.
Possible isomers that cannot be separated by 2nd-C18 column and TOFMS using m/z.
Components of Baizhi on 2D APTES-decorated MCF7/CMC system identified by TOFMS.
| Peak number | Identification | tR (CMC, min) | tR (C18, min) | Abundance match (%) | Formula | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Expected | Detected | Error (ppm) | ||||||
| 1 | Suberosin | 1–10 | 12.0 | 245.1172 ([M + H]+) | 245.1172 ([M + H]+) | 0.00 | 85.97 | C15H16O3 |
| 2 | Phellopterin | 17.5–30 | 11.5 | 301.1071 ([M + H]+) | 301.1072 ([M + H]+) | 0.33 | 99.88 | C17H16O5 |
| 3 | Dibutylphthalate | 2.5–30 | 11.0 | 279.1591 ([M + H]+) | 279.1592 ([M + H]+) | 0.36 | 99.90 | C16H22O4 |
| 4 | Xanthotoxol | 7.5–22.5 | 10.5 | 203.0339 ([M + H]+) | 203.0339 ([M + H]+) | 0.00 | 99.91 | C11H6O4 |
| 5 | Imperatorin | 7.5–20 | 10.1 | 271.0965 ([M + H]+) | 271.0966 ([M + H]+) | 0.37 | 99.91 | C16H14O4 |
| 6 | Dahuribirin B | 1–15 | 9.9 | 651.2072 ([M + H]+) | 651.2072 ([M + H]+) | 0.00 | 98.73 | C34H34O13 |
| 7 | Palmitic acid | 1–15 | 9.5 | 257.2475 ([M + H]+) | 257.2490 ([M + H]+) | 1.70 | 98.92 | C16H32O2 |
| 8 | Alloimperatorin | 2.5–12.5 | 8.8 | 287.0914 ([M + H]+) | 287.0915 ([M + H]+) | 0.35 | 99.89 | C16H14O5 |
| 9 | Xanthotoxin | 1–12.5 | 8.2 | 217.0495 ([M + H]+) | 217.0496 ([M + H]+) | 0.46 | 99.96 | C12H8O4 |
| 10 | Isopimpinellin | 2.5–10 | 7.6 | 247.0601 ([M + H]+) | 247.0602 ([M + H]+) | 0.40 | 99.94 | C13H10O5 |
| 11 | Psoralen | 1–7.5 | 7.3 | 187.0390 ([M + H]+) | 187.0392 ([M + H]+) | 1.07 | 99.92 | C11H6O3 |
| 12 | Marmesin | 1–2.5 | 6.1 | 247.0965 ([M + H]+) | 247.0963 ([M + H]+) | −0.81 | 99.60 | C14H14O4 |
| 13 | Marmesinin | 1–2.5 | 4.9 | 409.1493 ([M + H]+) | 409.1494 ([M + H]+) | 0.24 | 98.56 | C20H24O9 |
| 14 | Scopoletin | 5–20 | 4.8 | 193.0495 ([M + H]+) | 193.0495 ([M + H]+) | 0.00 | 96.71 | C10H8O4 |
| 15 | Scopolin | 1–5 | 3.9 | 355.1024 ([M + H]+) | 355.1028 ([M + H]+) | 1.13 | 99.10 | C16H18O9 |
| 16 | Umbelliferone | 1–2.5 | 3.4 | 163.0390 ([M + H]+) | 163.039 ([M + H]+) | 0.00 | 99.73 | C9H6O3 |
| 17 | Desmodimine | 7.5–22.5 | 2.3 | 238.1074 ([M + H]+) | 238.1074 ([M + H]+) | 0.00 | 94.99 | C12H15NO4 |
| 18 | Adenosine | 1–2.5 | 1.6 | 268.1040 ([M + H]+) | 268.1044 ([M + H]+) | 1.49 | 98.64 | C10H13N5O4 |
Confirmed by authentic standard compounds.
Peak that was not completely flushed out by 1st-CMC column within 30 min.
Possible isomers that cannot be separated by 2nd-C18 column and TOFMS using m/z.
Fig. 5(A) MCF-7 cell proliferation inhibitory effects of (A) oxoglaucine, protopine and berberine in Yuanhu; (B) osthole, isopimpinellin and palmitic acid in Baizhi; (C) positive control drug GFT. (D) IC50 comparison of GFT, oxoglaucine, protopine, berberine, osthole, isopimpinellin and palmitic acid. Statistical differences were estimated with Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant and **p < 0.01 was considered as dramatically significant vs. the negative control, n = 3).
Fig. 6(A) Combination inhibitory effects of (A) GFT and Yuanhu–Baizhi extract (YD); (B) GFT and oxoglaucine (Oxo); (C) GFT and isopimpinellin (Iso) towards MCF7 cells.