Literature DB >> 29565193

Unintended hysterotomy extension during caesarean delivery: risk factors and maternal morbidity.

Lauren E Giugale1, Sara Sakamoto1, Jonathan Yabes2, Shannon L Dunn3, Elizabeth E Krans1,3.   

Abstract

We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study to evaluate the risk factors and the maternal morbidity associated with unintended extensions of the hysterotomy during caesarean delivery. We evaluated 2707 women who underwent low-transverse caesarean deliveries in 2011 at an academic, tertiary-care hospital. Hysterotomy extensions were identified through operative reports. Of the 2707 caesarean deliveries, 392 (14.5%) had an unintended hysterotomy extension. On the multivariable regression modelling, neonatal weight (OR 1.42; 95%CI 1.17-1.73), the arrest of labour [first-stage arrest (2.42; 1.73-3.38); second-stage arrest (5.54; 3.88-7.90)] and a non-reassuring foetal status (1.65; 1.20-2.25) were significantly associated with hysterotomy extensions. Hysterotomy extensions were significantly associated with an increased morbidity including an estimated blood loss >1200 millilitres (2.06; 1.41-3.02), a decline in postoperative haemoglobin ≥3.7 g/dL (2.07; 1.35-3.17), an evaluation for lower urinary tract injury (5.58; 3.17-9.81), and a longer operative time (8.11; 6.33-9.88). Based on these results, we conclude that unintended hysterotomy extensions significantly increase the maternal morbidity of caesarean deliveries. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Maternal morbidity associated with caesarean delivery (CD) is significantly greater than that in vaginal delivery. Unintended extensions of the hysterotomy occur in approximately 4-8% of CDs and are more common after a prolonged second stage of labour. The morbidity associated with hysterotomy extensions has been incompletely evaluated. What do the results of this study add? We demonstrate a rate of hysterotomy extension in a general obstetric population of approximately 15%, which is higher than previously reported estimates, and represents a potential doubling of the rate of the unintended hysterotomy extensions in recent years. The most significant risk factor for a hysterotomy extension was a second-stage labour arrest with a fourfold increase in the frequency of extensions. A hysterotomy extension is a significant independent risk factor for an intraoperative haemorrhage, a drop in postoperative haemoglobin, an intraoperative evaluation for lower urinary tract injury, and longer CD operative times. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? A second-stage arrest is a strong independent risk factor for a hysterotomy extension. Recent re-evaluations of the labour curve that extend the second stage of labour will likely increase the frequency of CDs performed after a prolonged second stage. In these scenarios, obstetricians should be prepared for an unintended hysterotomy extension and for the possibility of a longer procedure with the increased risks of blood loss and the need for evaluation of the lower urinary tract.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section; caesarean delivery; extension; hysterotomy; morbidity; retrospective

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29565193      PMCID: PMC6151157          DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1446421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  17 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of techniques used to deliver a deeply impacted fetal head at full dilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y B Jeve; O B Navti; J C Konje
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Evaluation and Management of Women and Newborns With a Maternal Diagnosis of Chorioamnionitis: Summary of a Workshop.

Authors:  Rosemary D Higgins; George Saade; Richard A Polin; William A Grobman; Irina A Buhimschi; Kristi Watterberg; Robert M Silver; Tonse N K Raju
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Significance of accidental extensions in the lower uterine segment during cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Lesley de la Torre; Víctor Hugo González-Quintero; Kathleen Mayor-Lynn; Loren Smarkusky; M Camille Hoffman; Amanda Saab; Makbib Diro
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Effect of expansion technique of uterine incision on maternal blood loss in cesarean section.

Authors:  Leila Sekhavat; Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi; Parisa Mojiri
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Characteristics of normal labor.

Authors:  S J Kilpatrick; R K Laros
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor.

Authors:  S Katherine Laughon; Vincenzo Berghella; Uma M Reddy; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Zhaohui Lu; Matthew K Hoffman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor.

Authors:  Joyce F Sung; Kay I Daniels; Laura Brodzinsky; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Aaron B Caughey; Deirdre J Lyell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Unintended extension of the lower segment uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of sharp versus blunt techniques.

Authors:  Osman Asıcıoglu; Kemal Gungorduk; Berhan Besımoglu Asıcıoglu; Gokhan Yıldırım; Ozgu Celıkkol Gungorduk; Cemal Ark
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of 2 techniques.

Authors:  Antonella Cromi; Fabio Ghezzi; Edoardo Di Naro; Gabriele Siesto; Giuseppe Loverro; Pierfrancesco Bolis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Surgical Site Infection following Cesarean Delivery: Patient, Provider, and Procedure-Specific Risk Factors.

Authors:  Raj Shree; Seo Young Park; Richard H Beigi; Shannon L Dunn; Elizabeth E Krans
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.