Literature DB >> 17826431

Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor.

Joyce F Sung1, Kay I Daniels, Laura Brodzinsky, Yasser Y El-Sayed, Aaron B Caughey, Deirdre J Lyell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that prolonged second stage of labor increases the incidence of unintentional hysterotomy extensions at cesarean delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort of term pregnant women who underwent primary cesarean delivery after failed second stage of labor at Stanford University was assessed for hysterotomy extensions and other maternal and neonatal morbidities. Groups included second stage length of 1-3 hours and >4 hours. Data were analyzed with the use of chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.
RESULTS: Of the 239 women who were studied, the second stage of labor lasted 1-3 hours in 82 patients and >4 hours in 157 patients. Prolonged second stage of labor was associated with unintentional hysterotomy extensions (40% vs 26%; P = .03), particularly to the cervix (29% vs 5%; P = .005), and with surgery that lasted >90 minutes (9% vs 1%; P = .01). The incidence of hysterotomy extensions was associated positively with the length of the second stage. Other maternal and neonatal morbidities were similar between groups.
CONCLUSION: Prolonged second stage of labor is associated with an increase in unintentional hysterotomy extensions at cesarean delivery and prolonged operative time. The future risk of hysterotomy extensions merits further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17826431     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Second stage caesarean section: evaluation of patwardhan technique.

Authors:  Pradip Kumar Saha; Richa Gulati; Poonam Goel; Rimpy Tandon; Anju Huria
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-01-12

2.  Unintended hysterotomy extension during caesarean delivery: risk factors and maternal morbidity.

Authors:  Lauren E Giugale; Sara Sakamoto; Jonathan Yabes; Shannon L Dunn; Elizabeth E Krans
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Risk factors associated with preterm birth after a prior term delivery.

Authors:  L F Wong; J Wilkes; K Korgenski; M W Varner; T A Manuck
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Does stage of labor at time of cesarean delivery affect risk of subsequent preterm birth?

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Mary D Sammel; Adi Hirshberg; Michal A Elovitz; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Evaluating the impact of a standardized induction protocol to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Katheryne L Downes; Rebecca F Hamm; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-10-24

6.  Predictors of labor abnormalities in university hospital: unmatched case control study.

Authors:  Wayu Abraham; Yifru Berhan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Diverse definitions of prolonged labour and its consequences with sometimes subsequent inappropriate treatment.

Authors:  Astrid Nystedt; Ingegerd Hildingsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Intrapartum Cervical Laceration and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Luchin F Wong; Jacob Wilkes; Kent Korgenski; Michael W Varner; Tracy A Manuck
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2016-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.