Santi Di Pietro1, Francesco Falaschi2, Alice Bruno3, Tiziano Perrone4, Valeria Musella5, Stefano Perlini3. 1. Clinica Medica 2, Department of Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine Fellowship Program, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. santi.dipietro01@universitadipavia.it. 2. Clinica Medica 2, Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. 3. Clinica Medica 2, Department of Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine Fellowship Program, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. 4. Clinica Medica 1, Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. 5. Clinical Epidemiology and Biometric Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The sonographic evaluation of inferior vena cava diameters and its collapsibility-that is also defined as the caval index-has become a popular way to easily obtain a noninvasive estimate of central venous pressure. This is generally considered an easy sonographic task to perform, and according to the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Guidelines 25 repetitions of this procedure should be sufficient to reach proficiency. However, little is known about the learning process for this sonographic technique. Therefore, we designed this study to investigate the learning curve of inferior vena cava evaluation. METHODS: We enrolled a sample of ten ultrasound-naïve medical students who received a preliminary training provided by two Junior Emergency Medicine Residents. Following training, each student performed the sonographic task on 25 different patients who were hospitalized in the internal medicine ward. The students' performance was compared with the results obtained by a consultant in internal medicine with extensive experience in point-of-care ultrasound, who repeated the procedure on the same patients (gold standard). In detail, we evaluated the time to complete the task, the quality of the obtained images, and the ability to visually estimate and measure the caval index. RESULTS: Although most students (9/10) reached the pre-defined level of competence, their overall performance was inferior to the one achieved by the gold standard, with little improvement over time. However, repetition was associated with progressive shortening of the time needed to achieve readable images. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings suggest that, although allowing to obtain a pre-defined competence, 25 repetitions are not enough to reach a good level of proficiency for this technique, that needs a longer training to be achieved.
PURPOSE: The sonographic evaluation of inferior vena cava diameters and its collapsibility-that is also defined as the caval index-has become a popular way to easily obtain a noninvasive estimate of central venous pressure. This is generally considered an easy sonographic task to perform, and according to the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Guidelines 25 repetitions of this procedure should be sufficient to reach proficiency. However, little is known about the learning process for this sonographic technique. Therefore, we designed this study to investigate the learning curve of inferior vena cava evaluation. METHODS: We enrolled a sample of ten ultrasound-naïve medical students who received a preliminary training provided by two Junior Emergency Medicine Residents. Following training, each student performed the sonographic task on 25 different patients who were hospitalized in the internal medicine ward. The students' performance was compared with the results obtained by a consultant in internal medicine with extensive experience in point-of-care ultrasound, who repeated the procedure on the same patients (gold standard). In detail, we evaluated the time to complete the task, the quality of the obtained images, and the ability to visually estimate and measure the caval index. RESULTS: Although most students (9/10) reached the pre-defined level of competence, their overall performance was inferior to the one achieved by the gold standard, with little improvement over time. However, repetition was associated with progressive shortening of the time needed to achieve readable images. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings suggest that, although allowing to obtain a pre-defined competence, 25 repetitions are not enough to reach a good level of proficiency for this technique, that needs a longer training to be achieved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Caval index; Inferior vena cava; Learning curve; Point of care ultrasound; Ultrasound for undergraduates
Authors: Richard A Hoppmann; Victor V Rao; Mary Beth Poston; Duncan B Howe; Patrick S Hunt; Stanley D Fowler; Lance E Paulman; James R Wells; Nancy A Richeson; Paul V Catalana; Lynn K Thomas; L Britt Wilson; Thomas Cook; Shaun Riffle; Francis H Neuffer; James B McCallum; Brian D Keisler; Rachel S Brown; Anthony R Gregg; Kerry M Sims; Caroline K Powell; Matthew D Garber; James E Morrison; William B Owens; Kevin A Carnevale; William R Jennings; Sarah Fletcher Journal: Crit Ultrasound J Date: 2011-02-01
Authors: J Matthew Fields; Paul A Lee; Katherine Y Jenq; Dustin G Mark; Nova L Panebianco; Anthony J Dean Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: A W Kirkpatrick; M Sirois; K B Laupland; D Liu; K Rowan; C G Ball; S M Hameed; R Brown; R Simons; S A Dulchavsky; D R Hamiilton; S Nicolaou Journal: J Trauma Date: 2004-08
Authors: Kenton L Anderson; Katherine Y Jenq; J Matthew Fields; Nova L Panebianco; Anthony J Dean Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Nathan M Finnerty; Ashish R Panchal; Creagh Boulger; Amar Vira; Jason J Bischof; Christopher Amick; David P Way; David P Bahner Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2017-02-24