Literature DB >> 29564242

Analysis of a poultry slaughter process: Influence of process stages on the microbiological contamination of broiler carcasses.

Denise Althaus1, Claudio Zweifel1, Roger Stephan1.   

Abstract

In a large-scale Swiss poultry abattoir, a microbiological process analysis of broiler carcasses was performed. At each selected process stage (scalding, plucking, evisceration, washing, and chilling), 90 carcasses from 30 flocks were sampled and examined for Campylobacter, Salmonella, Escherichia coli, Enterobacteriaceae, and extended-spectrum b-lactamases-producing Enterobacteriaceae. With regard to Campylobacter counts on carcasses, plucking tended to slightly increase the results (on average by 0.4 log CFU/g), whereas mean counts from plucked and chilled carcasses were comparable (3.1 log CFU/g after plucking, 3.0 log CFU/g in the chiller). The Campylobacter results of chilled carcasses are thereby likely to comply with the newly defined requirements of the European Union (process hygiene criterion for Campylobacter). With regard to Escherichia coli and Enterobacteriaceae counts on carcasses, plucking clearly reduced the results (on average by 0.8 and 0.9 log CFU/g), whereas mean counts from plucked and chilled carcasses were comparable (3.4 and 3.5 log CFU/g after plucking, 3.4 log CFU/g in the chiller). In contrast, Salmonella spp. were not detected on broiler carcasses and extended-spectrum b-lactamases- producing Enterobacteriaceae only rarely (1.8%). Such abattoir-specific data are of central importance for assessment of slaughter process performance and if necessary for the implementation of effective measures in the slaughter process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Broiler carcasses; Campylobacter; Enterobacteriaceae.; Escherichia coli; Slaughter process

Year:  2017        PMID: 29564242      PMCID: PMC5850064          DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2017.7097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital J Food Saf        ISSN: 2239-7132


Introduction

The slaughter of poultry in large-scale slaughterhouses is a rapid and highly automated process. Despite technological advancements, there are still considerable opportunities for contamination and spread of bacteria during slaughter. To ensure food safety, strict adherence to good practices of slaughter hygiene, along with risk-based preventive measures (HACCP approach), is of central importance. For assessment of slaughter process performance, a process analysis including the identification of operations increasing or decreasing the microbiological contamination of carcasses is required (Brown et al., 2000; Milios et al., 2014; Zweifel et al., 2014). With regard to slaughtered broilers, such examinations will soon include also Campylobacter, which is the leading cause of acute bacterial gastroenteritis in humans (EFSA/ECDC, 2016). Handling and consumption of poultry are thereby considered major sources for human illnesses (Boysen et al., 2014; EFSA, 2010a). Various risk assessments indicate that reductions of Campylobacter counts on carcasses might cause a significant reduction in associated human cases (EFSA, 2011; Nauta et al., 2009; Rosenquist et al., 2003). Moreover, certain poultry slaughterhouses are more successful than others in containing the Campylobacter contamination of carcasses (EFSA, 2010b; Habib et al., 2012a). With the required monitoring of Salmonella and the planned introduction of Campylobacter as process hygiene criteria for slaughtered broilers in the European Union (EU), microbiological data are also required for the implementation of adequate measures in the slaughter process. The present study was performed in a large-scale poultry abattoir and the aim was to investigate the effects of selected slaughter operations on the microbiological contamination of broiler carcasses (selected foodborne pathogens and indicator bacteria).

Materials and Methods

Abattoir and slaughter process

This study was based on investigations carried out during May to June 2017 in a large-scale Swiss poultry abattoir. Most processing steps were automated. First, broilers were stunned using CO2, manually shackled, and exsanguinated. Broilers were then scalded (immersion) and plucked. Scalding comprised two scalding tanks (tank 1: on average 52.4°C, 120 s; tank 2: on average 52.5°C, 75 s) and plucking consisted of two segments. After transfer to the evisceration line, intestines were drawn out of the body’s cavity (vent cutter, opener, eviscerator), the neck was removed, and washing steps with cold potable water removed visible dirt. Finally, carcasses were chilled.

Sampling

Broiler carcasses were sampled at five slaughter process stages: after scalding, after plucking, after evisceration, after washing, and in the chiller. At each stage, 90 carcasses from 30 flocks were sampled during 10 sampling days. Each carcass sample consisted of pooled neck and breast skin. In addition, 30 scalding water samples (15 per scalding tank) were collected during five sampling days.

Microbiological examinations

Samples were analyzed qualitatively for Salmonella spp. and quantitatively for Campylobacter spp., Escherichia (E.) coli, Enterobacteriaceae, and extended-spectrum b-lactamases (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The qualitative examination for Salmonella spp. was done in accordance with ISO 6579:2007-10 with a modification. Briefly, a subset of each carcass sample (10 g) or of each scalding water sample (10 mL) was enriched (24 h, 37°C) at a 1:10 ratio in buffered peptone water (Oxoid, Pratteln, CH). From the first enrichment, 0.1 mL were incubated (24 h, 41.5°C) in 10 mL of Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth (Oxoid). The enriched samples were subcultured (24 h, 37°C) on xylose-lysine-desoxycholate (XLD) agar (Bio-Rad, Reinach, CH) and mannitol lysine crystal violet brilliant green (MLCB) agar (Oxoid). For the quantitative examinations, a subset of each carcass sample (10 g) was homogenized at a 1:10 ratio in 0.85% saline solution and analyzed using a spiral plater (Eddy Jet, IUL, Barcelona, E). Scalding water samples were quantitatively analyzed by spreading 0.1 mL. The following agars and conditions were used for the quantitative examinations: CampyFood agar (bioMerieux, Geneva, CH; 48 h, 41.5°C, microaerophilic conditions), Rapid E. coli 2TM agar (Bio- Rad; 24 h, 37°C), violet red bile glucose (VRBG) agar (Becton Dickinson, Allschwil, CH; 48 h, 30°C, anaerobic conditions), and chromogenic Brilliance ESBL agar (Oxoid; 24 h, 37°C).

Data analysis

Colony counts of quantitatively analyzed samples were expressed as log CFU/g or log CFU/mL. The detection limit was 200 CFU/g (2.3 log CFU/g) for carcass samples and 10 CFU/mL (1.0 log CFU/mL) for scalding water samples. Quantitative analysis was based on counts above the detection limit and results were compared by reference to mean log values. Mean log values differing by <0.5 log units were regarded as similar for practical purposes. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP 13.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The level of significance was set at α=0.05. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD test were used to analyze differences in counts between sequential process stages and scalding segments.

Results and Discussion

Microbiological slaughter process analysis: Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp.

While Salmonella spp. were not detected (after enrichment) in any of the 450 samples from broiler carcasses, 131 (29%) of all carcasses showed Campylobacter counts above the detection limit. At the different process stages, the proportion Campylobacter-positive carcasses ranged from 11 to 42% (Table 1). Because consumer risks seem mainly associated with highly contaminated products, the distribution of Campylobacter counts at different ranges is of importance. The distribution of counts at different ranges is shown in Table 1. Over all process stages, 50% of the Campylobacter-positive carcasses showed counts <3.0 log CFU/g and 42% between 3.0 and 4.0 log CFU/g. After scalding, Campylobacter counts averaged out at 2.7 log CFU/g (Table 1, Figure 1). Plucking tended to increase and washing to reduce the counts (on average by 0.4 log CFU/g), whereas results remained mainly constant by evisceration and chilling. The resulting mean count of chilled carcasses was 3.0 log CFU/g. With regard to Campylobacter and poultry slaughter, the available literature often showed common trends: reductions by scalding, rather increases by plucking, no changes or increases by evisceration, and reductions by washing and chilling (Berghaus et al., 2013; Duffy et al., 2014; Guerin et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2017; Pacholewicz et al., 2015b; Rosenquist et al., 2006; Seliwiorstow et al., 2015). However, direct comparisons are often hampered because the effect of a certain process stage on Campylobacter strongly depends on the respective conditions (e.g. temperature and time conditions used for scalding, varying washing steps, differing chilling methods).
Table 1.

Campylobacter, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacteriaceae results from broiler carcasses at selected stages of slaughter (n=90 at each process stage, sampling comprised 10 sampling days and a total of 30 broiler flocks).

MicroorganismsProcess stageResults ≥ detection limitCountsaNumber (%) of carcasses with counts ≥detection limit at different ranges (log CFU/g)b
Carcasses, %Flocks, %χSD<3.03.0-4.04.0-5.0>5.0
CampylobacterAfter scalding11.126.72.690.398 (80.0)2 (20.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
After plucking42.253.33.130.6317 (44.7)18 (47.4)3 (7.9)0 (0.0)
After evisceration41.150.03.200.6814 (37.8)17 (45.9)6 (16.2)0 (0.0)
After washing23.340.02.770.4513 (61.9)8 (38.1)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
In the chiller27.836.72.990.613 (52.0)10 (40.0)2 (8.0)0 (0.0)
E. coliAfter scalding94.41004.161.0812 (14.1)21 (24.7)35 (41.2)17 (20.0)
After plucking92.21003.370.8831 (37.3)33 (39.8)12 (14.5)7 (8.4)
After evisceration96.71003.750.7311 (12.6)42 (48.3)28 (32.2)6 (6.9)
After washing91.11003.340.7429 (35.4)37 (45.1)14 (17.1)2 (2.4)
In the chiller82.296.73.410.7522 (29.7)38 (51.4)12 (16.2)2 (2.7)
EnterobacteriaceaeAfter scalding90.096.74.421.016 (7.4)19 (23.5)36 (44.4)20 (24.7)
After plucking93.396.73.520.8622 (26.2)38 (45.2)18 (21.4)6 (7.1)
After evisceration97.81003.830.698 (9.1)43 (48.9)31 (35.2)6 (6.8)
After washing94.41003.340.7629 (34.1)38 (44.7)15 (17.6)3 (3.5)
In the chiller87.81003.390.7422 (27.8)41 (51.9)14 (17.7)2 (2.5)

aχ and SD, mean log CFU/g and standard deviation of results ≥detection limit (2.3 log CFU/g).

bCampylobacter: 131 carcasses with ≥2.3 log CFU/g, E. coli: 411 carcasses with ≥2.3 log CFU/g, Enterobacteriaceae: 417 carcasses with ≥2.3 log CFU/g.

Furthermore, microbiological criteria for Campylobacter spp. on slaughtered broilers have been recently investigated (Comin et al., 2014; EFSA, 2011; Lee et al., 2015; Nauta et al., 2012). With a new amendment of Reg. (EC) No. 2073/2005 (EC, 2005), the EU plans to implement a quantitative process hygiene criterion for Campylobacter on broiler carcasses after chilling. The amendment lays down requirements in view of sampling, sampling plans, sample processing, microbiological examinations, evaluation of results, and corrective actions (Table 2). Campylobacter results are thereby rated as satisfactory if not more than 20 (40%) of 50 samples (one sample consists of three neck skin samples from one flock) from 10 consecutive samplings show counts >1000 CFU/g (n=50, c=20). Thereby, it must be considered that i) countries with more favorable Campylobacter contamination levels may apply stricter c values and ii) c values will be reduced 2020 (c=15) and 2025 (c=10). Although the design of the present study does not fully correspond with the EU requirements, the results of the chilled carcasses were evaluated on the basis of the defined EU limits. Of the 90 chilled broiler carcasses (Table 1), only 12 (13%) showed Campylobacter counts ≥1000 CFU/g and only nine (10%) of them exceeded 1000 CFU/g. Looking at sets of consecutive 50 samples (moving window: samples 1-50, 6-55, etc.), in each case only five (10%) exceeded 1000 CFU/g. Thus, the Campylobacter results of chilled carcasses likely comply with the EU limits. First experiences with a newly implemented Campylobacter performance target using to a certain degree a similar approach have recently been reported from New Zealand (Lee et al., 2015).
Table 2.

Planned process hygiene criterion for Campylobacter on broiler carcasses after chilling in the European Union (amendment to Reg. [EC] No. 2073/2005).

MicroorganismsSampling planaLimitsAction in case of unsatisfactory results
nc
Carcasses of broilers (after chilling)Campylobacterb5020c1000 CFU/gImprovements in slaughter hygiene, review of process controls, origin of animals and of the biosecurity measures in the farms of origin

an = No. of samples from 10 consecutive sampling sessions, c = No. of samples with Campylobacter counts >1000 CFU/g.

bSatisfactory, if a maximum of c/n samples show values >1000 CFU/g; unsatisfactory, if more than c/n samples show values >1000 CFU/g.

cFrom 1.1.2020: c = 15, from 1.1.2025: c = 10.

Microbiological slaughter process analysis: Escherichia coli and Enterobacteriaceae

E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae were used as indicator of fecal contamination on broiler carcasses. Of the 450 carcasses, 91% and 93% showed counts above the detection limit for E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae, respectively. The distribution of counts at different ranges is shown in Table 1. During the slaughter process, trends and counts were comparable for E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae (Figure 1). Enterobacteriaceae were therefore mainly E. coli. After scalding, E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae counts averaged out at 4.2 and 4.4 log CFU/g, respectively (Table 1, Figure 1). Plucking reduced the counts (on average by 0.8 and 0.9 log CFU/g; P<0.05), probably due to physical removal. Pacholewicz et al. (2015b) recently also reported reductions by plucking, whereas an earlier study described an opposite effect (Berrang and Dickens, 2000). In the present study, evisceration slightly increased the counts (on average by 0.4 and 0.3 log CFU/g; P<0.05 for E. coli), whereas washing tended to reduce the counts (on average by 0.4 and 0.5 log CFU/g; P<0.05). Thus, as described previously (Berrang and Dickens, 2000; Pacholewicz et al., 2015b), evisceration operations were performed without extensive additional fecal contamination. By washing with cold water probably rather redistributions than real reductions were achieved (Loretz et al., 2010). Using air chilling with an usually limited microbial effect (James et al., 2006), results remained mainly constant and resulting mean E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae counts of chilled carcasses were 3.4 log CFU/g.

Microbiological slaughter process analysis: extended-spectrum β-lactamases-producing Enterobacteriaceae

With regard to antibiotic resistance, ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae are currently of special concern (Seiffert et al., 2013). With regard to foods of animal origin, in particular healthy chickens as carriers and contaminated poultry products are currently in the focus (Abgottspon et al., 2014; Geser et al., 2012). A high prevalence of 63% (flock level) was recently reported by examining chicken fecal samples collected at slaughter with an enrichment step (Geser et al., 2012). In the present study, ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CTX- 1 producing Escherichia coli and CTX-1 producing Escherichia fergusonii) were found quantitatively on only eight (1.8%) broiler carcasses (seven from one sampling day and six from the same flock) and counts ranged from 2.3 to 3.9 log CFU/g. None of the final chilled carcasses tested positive. In contrast, Pacholewicz et al. (2015a) could recently enumerate ESBL-producing E. coli in 82% of 620 samples collected trough processing in two broiler slaughterhouses in Germany and the Netherlands.

Scalding water

In the examined poultry abattoir, a twosegment scalding system was used. Such systems are intended to expose the carcasses to less and less contaminated scalding water (Cason et al., 2000; Hinton et al., 2004). In accordance, Campylobacter, E. coli, and Enterobacteriaceae counts were lower (P<0.05) in the second scalding tank than in the first scalding tank. Differences of mean Campylobacter, E. coli, and Enterobacteriaceae counts thereby accounted for 1.0, 1.0, and 0.8 log CFU/mL, respectively (Table 3). To assess the effect of scalding and the respective parameters (in particular exposition temperature and time), further investigations including carcasses before and after scalding are required. Furthermore, one scalding water sample was positive for Salmonella spp. and one for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The Salmonella isolate was identified as Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica 4,12:i:–
Table 3.

Campylobacter, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacteriaceae results from scalding water samples (n=30).

Scalding tankaCampylobacterbE. coliEnterobacteriaceae
n posχSDn posχSDn posχSD
No. 1 (n = 15)72.460.94154.110.69154.020.47
No. 2 (n = 15)101.470.57153.070.58153.180.52

aTank 1: on average 52.4°C, 120 s, tank 2: on average 52.5°C, 75 s.

bn pos, No. of samples with results ≥ detection limit (1.0 log CFU/mL); χ and SD, mean log CFU/mL and standard deviation of results ≥ detection limit.

Conclusions

A quantitative microbiological process analysis of broiler carcasses was performed at selected stages (scalding, plucking, evisceration, washing, chilling) in a large-scale poultry abattoir. Campylobacter spp. were found at the different stages on 11% (after scalding) to 42% (after plucking) of the carcasses. With regard to Campylobacter counts on carcasses, plucking tended to slightly increase the results (on average by 0.4 log CFU/g). Commonly minor changes occurred at the following stages and mean counts from plucked and chilled carcasses were similar (about 3.0 log CFU/g). Although not directly comparable, Campylobacter results of chilled carcasses are likely to comply with the newly defined EU requirements (process hygiene criterion for Campylobacter). E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae were found in remarkable frequencies and counts in the poultry slaughter process. With regard to E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae counts on carcasses, plucking clearly reduced the results (on average almost by one order of magnitude). Some process stage-specific changes were evident in the following, but mean E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae counts from plucked and chilled carcasses were similar (about 3.4 log CFU/g). On the other hand, Salmonella spp. and ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae were not or only rarely detected on the broiler carcasses. Such abattoir- specific microbiological data from carcasses form the basis for assessment of slaughter process performance, are of central importance for the implementation of HACCP-based systems, and allow if necessary (e.g. non-compliance with process hygiene criteria) to take targeted measures at selected slaughter process stages.
  18 in total

1.  Campylobacter contamination in broiler carcasses and correlation with slaughterhouses operational hygiene inspection.

Authors:  Ihab Habib; Dirk Berkvens; Lieven De Zutter; Katelijne Dierick; Xavier Van Huffel; Niko Speybroeck; Annemie H Geeraerd; Mieke Uyttendaele
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 5.516

2.  Characteristics of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from Swiss and imported poultry meat.

Authors:  H Abgottspon; R Stephan; C Bagutti; P Brodmann; H Hächler; K Zurfluh
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.077

3.  Campylobacter carcass contamination throughout the slaughter process of Campylobacter-positive broiler batches.

Authors:  Tomasz Seliwiorstow; Julie Baré; Inge Van Damme; Mieke Uyttendaele; Lieven De Zutter
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  Risk based microbiological criteria for Campylobacter in broiler meat in the European Union.

Authors:  Maarten J Nauta; Moez Sanaa; Arie H Havelaar
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 5.277

5.  Enumeration of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. in environmental farm samples and processing plant carcass rinses from commercial broiler chicken flocks.

Authors:  Roy D Berghaus; Stephan G Thayer; Bibiana F Law; Rita M Mild; Charles L Hofacre; Randall S Singer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Microbiological contamination of cattle carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two abattoirs.

Authors:  Claudio Zweifel; Michel Capek; Roger Stephan
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Quantitative effects of in-line operations on Campylobacter and Escherichia coli through two Australian broiler processing plants.

Authors:  Lesley L Duffy; Patrick J Blackall; Rowland N Cobbold; Narelle Fegan
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 5.277

8.  Reduction of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase- and AmpC-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli through processing in two broiler chicken slaughterhouses.

Authors:  Ewa Pacholewicz; Apostolos Liakopoulos; Arno Swart; Betty Gortemaker; Cindy Dierikx; Arie Havelaar; Heike Schmitt
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.277

9.  Occurrence and characteristics of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae in food producing animals, minced meat and raw milk.

Authors:  Nadine Geser; Roger Stephan; Herbert Hächler
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Source attribution of human campylobacteriosis in Denmark.

Authors:  L Boysen; H Rosenquist; J T Larsson; E M Nielsen; G Sørensen; S Nordentoft; T Hald
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.434

View more
  8 in total

1.  The prevalence of Campylobacter species in broiler flocks and their environment: assessing the efficiency of chitosan/zinc oxide nanocomposite for adopting control strategy.

Authors:  Asmaa Nady Mohammed; Sahar Abdel Aleem Abdel Aziz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Identification and differentiation of Campylobacter isolated from chicken meat using real-time polymerase chain reaction and high resolution melting analysis of hipO and glyA genes.

Authors:  Ika Kartika Syarifah; Hadri Latif; Chaerul Basri; Puji Rahayu
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-09-15

3.  Detection of Sutterella spp. in Broiler Liver and Breast.

Authors:  Sophia Derqaoui; Mohammed Oukessou; Kawtar Attrassi; Fatima Zahra Elftouhy; Saadia Nassik
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-30

4.  Prevalence and Characteristics of Campylobacter Throughout the Slaughter Process of Different Broiler Batches.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhang; Mengjun Tang; Qian Zhou; Jing Zhang; Xingxing Yang; Yushi Gao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Pilot Study on Poultry Meat from Antibiotic Free and Conventional Farms: Can Metagenomics Detect Any Difference?

Authors:  Alessandra De Cesare; Chiara Oliveri; Alex Lucchi; Federica Savini; Gerardo Manfreda; Claudia Sala
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-01-18

6.  Detection of microbial contamination in chicken meat from local markets in Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.

Authors:  Dhandy Koesoemo Wardhana; Ajeng Erika Prihastuti Haskito; Muhammad Thohawi Elziyad Purnama; Devi Ayu Safitri; Suwaibatul Annisa
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-12-20

7.  Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Salmonella Isolated from Broiler Farms at the Tolima Region-Colombia.

Authors:  Roy Rodríguez-Hernández; Johan F Bernal; Jimmy F Cifuentes; Luz Clemencia Fandiño; María P Herrera-Sánchez; Iang Rondón-Barragán; Noel Verjan Garcia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Role played by the environment in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through the food chain.

Authors:  Konstantinos Koutsoumanis; Ana Allende; Avelino Álvarez-Ordóñez; Declan Bolton; Sara Bover-Cid; Marianne Chemaly; Robert Davies; Alessandra De Cesare; Lieve Herman; Friederike Hilbert; Roland Lindqvist; Maarten Nauta; Giuseppe Ru; Marion Simmons; Panagiotis Skandamis; Elisabetta Suffredini; Héctor Argüello; Thomas Berendonk; Lina Maria Cavaco; William Gaze; Heike Schmitt; Ed Topp; Beatriz Guerra; Ernesto Liébana; Pietro Stella; Luisa Peixe
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-06-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.