| Literature DB >> 29563920 |
Jennifer N Mahley1, Jarmila Pittermann1, Nick Rowe2, Alex Baer3, James E Watkins4, Eric Schuettpelz5, James K Wheeler1, Klaus Mehltreter6, Michael Windham7, Weston Testo8, James Beck9.
Abstract
Herbaceous plants rely on a combination of turgor, ground tissues and geometry for mechanical support of leaves and stems. Unlike most angiosperms however, ferns employ a sub-dermal layer of fibers, known as a hypodermal sterome, for support of their leaves. The sterome is nearly ubiquitous in ferns, but nothing is known about its role in leaf biomechanics. The goal of this research was to characterize sterome attributes in ferns that experience a broad range of mechanical stresses, as imposed by their aquatic, xeric, epiphytic, and terrestrial niches. Members of the Pteridaceae meet this criteria well. The anatomical and functional morphometrics along with published values of tissue moduli were used to model petiole flexural rigidity and susceptibility to buckling in 20 species of the Pteridaceae. Strong allometric relationships were observed between sterome thickness and leaf size, with the sterome contributing over 97% to petiole flexural rigidity. Surprisingly, the small-statured cheilanthoid ferns allocated the highest fraction of their petiole to the sterome, while large leaves exploited aspects of geometry (second moment of area) to achieve bending resistance. This pattern also revealed an economy of function in which increasing sterome thickness was associated with decreasing fiber cell reinforcement, and fiber wall fraction. Lastly, strong petioles were associated with durable leaves, as approximated by specific leaf area. This study reveals meaningful patterns in fern leaf biomechanics that align with species leaf size, sterome attributes and life-history strategy.Entities:
Keywords: flexural rigidity; ground tissue; modulus of elasticity; sclerenchyma; second moment of area
Year: 2018 PMID: 29563920 PMCID: PMC5850050 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Photos and micrographs of selected Pteridaceae ferns, their petioles and steromes. These species were chosen on account of their diverse habitats, interesting stele arrangements, wide range of leaf sizes and variable steromes, if present. (A–C) Polytaenium citrifolium, an epiphyte without a sterome; (D–F) Bommeria hispida, a short, desert-dwelling species with a thin sterome composed of thick-walled fibers; (G–H) Pityrogramma ebenea, a tropical species with an average sterome but a pronounced adaxial groove in the petiole; (I–K) Pteris livida, a 2 m tall tropical upland species with relatively large yet poorly reinforced sterome fibers. Informed permission to include student in (I) was granted by written consent.
Figure 2A phylogeny of the selected Pteridaceae ferns examined in this study, with leaf areas mapped onto the branches. The colors of species' name indicate their native habitats. A bootstrap value is associated with each node.
List of species studied, the clade to which they belong within the Pteridaceae, habitat, and their name abbreviation.
| Ceratopteroid | Upright terrestrial | Mexico/mangrove forest | Au | |
| Ceratopteroid | Aquatic | Costa Rica/river bank | Ct | |
| Pteridoid | Upright Terrestrial | Costa Rica/paramo sheltered habitat | Ja | |
| Pteridoid | Upright Terrestrial | Costa Rica/paramo sheltered | Js | |
| Pteridoid | Scandent Terrestrial | Costa Rica/disturbed cloud forest | Jf | |
| Pteridoid | Upright-Angled Terrestrial | Costa Rica/disturbed cloud forest | Pe | |
| Pteridoid | Upright Terrestrial | Costa Rica/cloud forest understory | Pl | |
| Pteridoid | Upright Terrestrial | Costa Rica/cloud forest understory | Po | |
| Pteridoid | Upright Terrestrial | Costa Rica/tropical rainforest understory | Pp | |
| Adiantoid | Upright Terrestrial | Costa Rica/tropical rainforest understory | Al | |
| Adiantoid | Tree-trunk Epiphyte | Costa Rica/tropical rainforest understory | Pc | |
| Cheilanthoid | Upright Terrestrial | Arizona/xeric montane habitat | Bh | |
| Cheilanthoid | Upright Terrestrial | Costa Rica/paramo exposed habitat | Ga | |
| Cheilanthoid | Upright Terrestrial | Costa Rica/paramo exposed habitat | Gm | |
| Cheilanthoid | Upright Terrestrial | Costa Rica/tropical rainforest understory | Hp | |
| Cheilanthoid | Upright Terrestrial | Arizona/sandstone canyons | Ns | |
| Cheilanthoid | Upright Terrestrial | Arizona/sandstone canyons | Mg | |
| Cheilanthoid | Upright Terrestrial | Arizona/xeric montane habitat | Ml | |
| Cheilanthoid | Upright Terrestrial | Arizona/xeric montane habitat | Mw | |
| Cheilanthoid | Upright Terrestrial | Arizona/xeric montane habitat | Pt | |
| Outgroup: Dennstaedtiaceae | Upright Terrestrial | Costa Rica/tropical rainforest understory | Dc |
Figure 3A schematic of a petiole cross section, indicating how sterome thickness (a), fiber lumen area (b), wall thickness (c) and cell distance to cuticle (d) were measured.
Regression coefficients, scaling exponents and model fits for numerous trait relationships analyzed using standardized reduced major axis regression models (y = ax, where a is the proportionality coefficient related to the elevation (y-intercept) of the fit, and b is the slope on the log-transformed plot; Warton et al., 2012) and phylogenetically independent contrasts (PIC; Paradis et al., 2004).
| 0.756 | 6.34E-07 | 1.0445 | 2.12 | 0.565 | 5.12E-05 | |
| 0.883 | 2.69E-010 | 2.189 | 1.193 | 0.873 | 3.55E-10 | |
| 0.704 | 2.03E-06 | 2.252 | 5.604 | 0.957 | 1.13E-14 | |
| 0.822 | 8.87E-008 | 0.672 | 3.889 | 0.548 | 7.55E-05 | |
| 0.643 | 3.60E-05 | 1.534 | −3.856 | 0.2838 | 0.0076 | |
| 0.77 | 8.02E-07 | 3.233 | −8.804 | 0.3 | 0.0061 | |
| 0.613 | 7.40E-05 | 3.243 | −7.115 | 0.447 | 5.48E-04 | |
| 0.794 | 3.09E-007 | −0.952 | 5.944 | ns | ns | |
| 0.706 | 6.67E-006 | 0.683 | −0.493 | 0.701 | 1.34E-06 | |
| 0.63 | 5.05E-05 | −4.29 | 1.49 | ns | ns | |
| 0.44 | 2.20E-16 | −0.627 | 1.96 | – | – | |
| 0.998 | 2.22E-16 | 0.894 | 0.383 | 0.99 | 2.20E-16 | |
| 0.659 | 1.41E-05 | 1.383 | −0.747 | 0.526 | 1.79E-04 | |
| 0.77 | 8.02E-07 | 3.233 | −8.804 | 0.241 | 0.0163 | |
| 0.858 | 4.68E-09 | 0.583 | −2.077 | 0.307 | 6.60E-03 | |
| 0.824 | 7.99E-08 | 3.505 | 0.012 | 0.1369 | 0.0587 | |
| 0.738 | 1.24E-06 | 1.844 | 2.103 | 0.265 | 0.012 |
D.
Figure 4Log-log plots of stipe diameter in relation to leaf length (A), leaf area (B), and leaf mass (C). Table 2 provides the scaling and correlation coefficients.
Figure 5Log-log plots of petiole diameter vs. sterome thickness (A) and the percentage of sclerenchyma per petiole cross-section (B; no relationship).
Figure 6Log-log plots of relationships between sterome thickness and wall thickness:lumen diameter (A; t/D), sterome cell lumen diameter (B), and sterome wall thickness (C).
Figure 7A log-log plot of the distance of individual sterome fibers from the petiole cuticle in relation to their degree of reinforcement (t/D).
Figure 8A log-log plot of sterome thickness vs. the fiber wall fraction of the sterome.
Figure 9The percentage of sclerenchyma and parenchyma tissue occupying a cross-section of species' petioles in relation to each tissue's contribution to the second moment of area. The inset shows the relationship between petiole diameter and the second moment of area.
Figure 10Components of petiole mechanical properties in relation to species leaf area. (A) Log-log plot of flexural rigidity vs. leaf area; (B) Log-log plot of the second moment of area in relation to species leaf area; (C) The petiole composite modulus of elasticity vs. leaf area (no relationship).
Figure 11Log-log plot of measured petiole length in relation to the predicted maximum petiole length (A). The relationship between the safety factor from buckling and leaf investment, that is specific leaf area, is shown in (B).