| Literature DB >> 29563868 |
Jeffery M Reddan1, David J White1, Helen Macpherson2, Andrew Scholey1, Andrew Pipingas1.
Abstract
Modifying nutritional intake through supplementation may be efficacious for altering the trajectory of cerebral structural decline evident with increasing age. To date, there have been a number of clinical trials in older adults whereby chronic supplementation with B vitamins, omega-3 fatty acids, or resveratrol, has been observed to either slow the rate of decline or repair cerebral tissue. There is also some evidence from animal studies indicating that supplementation with glycerophospholipids (GPL) may benefit cerebral structure, though these effects have not yet been investigated in adult humans. Despite this paucity of research, there are a number of factors predicting poorer cerebral structure in older humans, which GPL supplementation appears to beneficially modify or protect against. These include elevated concentrations of homocysteine, unbalanced activity of reactive oxygen species both increasing the risk of oxidative stress, increased concentrations of pro-inflammatory messengers, as well as poorer cardio- and cerebrovascular function. As such, it is hypothesized that GPL supplementation will support cerebral structure in older adults. These cerebral effects may influence cognitive function. The current review aims to provide a theoretical basis for future clinical trials investigating the effects of GPL supplementation on cerebral structural integrity in older adults.Entities:
Keywords: cerebral structure; glycerophospholipid; intervention; older adults; supplementation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29563868 PMCID: PMC5845902 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
GPL supplementation and cognitive function in older adults with subjective memory complaints (trials listed in reverse chronological order) and by subject type.
| More et al., | R, DB, PC, PG | SMC | 72 | 60–80 | SB-PS (300 mg/d) + PA (240 mg/d) | 3 mo | No treatment effects on WMS performance when comparing baseline low performers. Significant differences in WMS performance between groups favoring treatment in baseline higher performers |
| Vakhapova et al., | OLE | SMC | 122 | 72.4 ± 8.3 (naïve); 72.1 ± 7.9 (continuers) | 100 mg PS/d (as well as 26 mg DHA + EPA) | 15 w | Significantly improved sustained attention and memory recognition performance in the PS-DHA naïve participants (who did not receive PS in the earlier clinical trial) |
| Richter et al., | OL | SMC | 26 | 50–90 (74.6 ± 1.7) | 300 mg/d SB-PS | 12 w | Significantly improved memory performance, executive functioning and mental flexibility |
| Kato-Kataoka et al., | R, DB, PC, PG | SMC | 73 | T: 59.6 ± 1.0 (high dose)T: 59.1 ± 1.1 (low dose)P: 59.6 ± 1.1 | 100mg/d SB-PS or 300 mg/d SB-PS | 6 mo | Memory performance significantly increased from baseline for all groups. Improved performance on HDS-R test in high dose treatment participants who has poor performance at baseline vs. placebo. Improved delayed verbal memory recall in participant receiving high or low dose treatments vs. placebo |
| Richter et al., | OL | SMC | 8 | 69.3 ± 3.2 | 300 mg PS/d (as well as 37.5 mg DHA + EPA) | 6 w | Significantly improved delayed verbal recall following treatment |
| Vakhapova et al., | R, DB, PC, PG | SMC | 157 | T: 72.9 ± 8.20P: 73.01 ± 8.28 | 300 mg/d PS (as well as 79 mg DHA + EPA) | 15 w | Significantly improved immediate verbal recall. A trend toward reduced time for completing RCF was observed but failed to reach significance ( |
| Jorissen et al., | R, DB, PC, PG | AAMI | 120 | T: 65.8 ± 1.1 (high dose)T: 65.3 ± 0.9 (low dose)P: 64.6 ± 0.9 | 300 mg/d SB-PS; 600 mg/d SB-PS | 12 w (+3 w placebo washout) | No treatment effects were observed for any measure of cognitive function after treatment or washout |
Design—R, Randomized; DB, Double Blind; PC, Placebo Controlled; PG, Parallel Groups; OL, Open Label; OLE, Open Label Extension; Subjects-SMC, Subjective Memory Complainers; AAMI, Age-Associated Memory Impairment; Age—T, Treatment Group; P, Placebo Group; Treatment—SB, Soybean; PB, Plant Based; BC, Bovine Cortex; PS, Phosphatidylserine; PA, Phosphatidic Acid; DHA, Docosahexaenoic Acid; EPA, Eicosapentaenoic Acid; Time—d, Day; w, Weeks; mo, Months; Outcomes—WMS, Weschler Memory Scale; HDS-R, Hasegawa's Dementia Scare Revised; RCF, Rey Complex Figure.
GPL supplementation and cognitive function in older adults with dementia (trials listed in reverse chronological order) and by subject type.
| Zhang et al., | R, PC, PG | AD | 57 | T: 74.9 ± 18.2P: 75.3 ± 11.8 | 300 mg/d PS | 20 w | Significantly improved memory performance (vocabulary-picture matching) following treatment |
| More et al., | DB, R, PC, PG | AD | 96 | 50–90 (75.3) | 300 mg/d SB-PS + 240 mg/d PA | 2 mo | No further deterioration in ADL score following treatment, though further deterioration evident following placebo. Slight, though non-significant improvements in both groups, though there was a higher proportion of participants in the treatment group progressing from abnormal (≤23) to normal score range (>23) than placebo. |
| Heiss et al., | R, OL, PG | AD | 70 | 48–79 | CT + PS (400 mg/d); CT + P* (1,200 mg/d); CT; SS | 6 mo | Significantly improved orientation performance (on MMSE) after 8 and 16 weeks treatment for CT+ PS group relative to SS or CT, but not compared to CT + P*. No between group differences on MMSE at 6 months. Within group analysis indicates that no treatment effects were evident for SS or CT. CT+P* demonstrated increased orientation scores at 8 weeks and verbal fluency at 16 weeks. CT+PS demonstrated significantly higher MMSE at 8 and 16 weeks with a trend toward higher scores at 6 months. A similar trend was evident for orientation scores. Visuospatial performance also improved in the CT+PS group. |
| Heiss et al., | OL, R, PG | AD | 80 | Not Specified | CT + PS (400 mg/d); CT + P* (1,200 mg/d); CT; SS | 6 mo | Significantly improved MMSE score, as well as block span test (short term memory performance) only evident for CP+PS group |
| Amaducci, | R, DB, PC, PG | AD | 142 | T: 62.0 ± 7.4P: 62.2 ± 6.9 | 200 mg/d BC-PS | 3 mo | Significantly improved BDRS score following 3 months treatment. Significant improved BDRS score, relative to baseline, was evident 3 months post-treatment. |
| Yaguchi et al., | OL, PG | MCI, D | 67 | 59–93 (77.1 ± 0.8) | 300 mg/d POPhtCho | 6 mo | Treatment effects on mean MMSE score. Mean MMSE score was increased following treatment, with no change identified in control subjects. |
| Granata and Di Michele, | OL | D | 35 | 61–80 (70.94 ± 5.43) | 300 mg PS | 60 d | Significantly improved verbal and working memory performance |
| Puca et al., | OL | D | 27 | 55–80 (65.5 ± 8.6) | 300 mg PS | 60 d | Significantly improved verbal memory performance after 60 days. Some improvements in memory performance were maintained after 30 days no treatment. |
Design—R, Randomized; DB, Double Blind; PC, Placebo Controlled; PG, Parallel Groups; OL, Open Label; Subjects—MCI, Mild Cognitive Impairment; AD, Alzheimer's Dementia; D, Dementia; Time—d, Days; w, Weeks; mo, Months; Age—T, Treatment Group; P, Placebo Group; Treatment—SB, Soybean; BC, Bovine Cortex; PS, Phosphatidylserine; PA, Phosphatidic Acid; DLPhtCho, 1,2-dilynoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; POPhtCho, 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; CT, Cognitive Training; SS, Social Support; P.
Figure 1General biochemical structure of a glycerophospholipid.
Figure 2Biosynthesis pathways of phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, and phosphatidylserine in mammalian cells.
Figure 3Select pathways through which glycerophospholipid supplementation may benefit cerebral structure and cognitive function in older adults.
GPL supplementation and cognitive function in older adults with age-related “cognitive deterioration” (trials listed in reverse chronological order).
| Nagata et al., | OL, PG | CD | 310 | 59–95 (76 ± 1.2) | 100 mg/d DLPhtCho; 90 mg/d POPhtCho; Combined 50 mg/d DLPhtCho + 45 mg/d POPhtCho | 5 mo | MMSE scores were markedly increased following all treatments. MMSE score increase was significantly greater following dual supplementation compared to single supplementation. |
| Cenacchi et al., | R, DB, PC, PG | CD | 494 | T: 77.8 ± 5.6 | 300 mg/d BC-PS | 6 mo | Significantly improved verbal memory performance following 3 and 6 months treatment compared to placebo. |
| Allegro et al., | OL | CD | (30) | 72.4 ± 4.8 | 300 mg PS | 60 d | Significantly improved verbal and working memory performance over 60 day's treatment. Increased memory function compared to baseline 30 days post-treatment, though most scores reduced to below 60-day treatment scores. |
| Caffarra and Santamaria, | OL | CD | 30 | 69.2 ± 5.6 | 300 mg PS | 60 d | Significantly improved verbal memory (acquisition and recall), immediate semantic memory performance as well as attention/concentration. |
| Villardita et al., | R, DB, PC, PG | CD | 170 | 55–80 (65.7 ± 7.5) | 300 mg/d BC-PS | 90 d | Significantly improved attention/vigilance, verbal and working memory performance, as well as immediate and delayed semantic memory compared to placebo. |
Design—R, Randomized; DB, Double Blind; PC, Placebo Controlled; PG, Parallel Groups; OL, Open Label; Subjects—CD, Cognitive deterioration; Age—T, Treatment Group; P, Placebo Group; Treatment—BC, Bovine Cortex; DLPhtCho, 1,2-dilynoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; POPhtCho, 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; PS, Phosphatidylserine; Time—d, Days; mo, Months.