Literature DB >> 29563763

Further Demonstrations of Individual Preference among Mand Modalities during Functional Communication Training.

Joel E Ringdahl1, Wendy K Berg2, David P Wacker2, Stephen Ryan2, Anna Ryan2, Kayla Crook1, Maggie Molony1.   

Abstract

Previous research related to functional communication training has demonstrated its effectiveness across various communication modalities. Additionally, at least one study has demonstrated that, while the intervention can be effective across various communication modalities, individual participants demonstrate a preference among available communication modalities (indicated by response allocation under a concurrent schedules arrangement). The current study evaluated preference among concurrently available communication modalities for 18 individuals with developmental disabilities, including autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. Results of the study indicated that each of the individuals demonstrated a preference between communicative response modalities, though preference was not always immediately ascertained. The results are discussed within the context of implications for design and implementation of functional communication training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication deficits; Developmental disabilities; Functional communication training; Response preference

Year:  2016        PMID: 29563763      PMCID: PMC5858729          DOI: 10.1007/s10882-016-9518-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dev Phys Disabil        ISSN: 1056-263X


  13 in total

1.  Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages.

Authors:  Lisa Winborn; David P Wacker; David M Richman; Jennifer Asmus; Deb Geier
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  Reinforcement schedule thinning following functional communication training: review and recommendations.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian; Eric W Boelter; David P Jarmolowicz
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2011

3.  Functional communication training: a review and practical guide.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Tiger; Gregory P Hanley; Jennifer Bruzek
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2008

4.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

5.  The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors.

Authors:  R H Horner; H M Day
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1991

6.  Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  H S Roane; T R Vollmer; J E Ringdahl; B A Marcus
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

7.  Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages.

Authors:  G P Hanley; C C Piazza; W W Fisher; S A Contrucci; K A Maglieri
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

8.  Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.

Authors:  B A Iwata; M F Dorsey; K J Slifer; K E Bauman; G S Richman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

9.  On the effectiveness of and preference for punishment and extinction components of function-based interventions.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Cathleen C Piazza; Wayne W Fisher; Kristen A Maglieri
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

10.  Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training.

Authors:  E G Carr; V M Durand
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of response preference on resistance to change.

Authors:  Joel E Ringdahl; Wendy K Berg; David P Wacker; Kayla Crook; Maggie A Molony; Kristina K Vargo; Jodi E Neurnberger; Karla Zabala; Christopher J Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.