Literature DB >> 29563198

Assessment of 30/20-Microgram Disk Content versus MIC Results for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Helio S Sader1, Paul R Rhomberg2, Michael D Huband2, Ian A Critchley3, Gregory G Stone4, Robert K Flamm2, Ronald N Jones2.   

Abstract

We evaluated the correlation between MIC and disk diffusion inhibition zones when testing ceftazidime-avibactam, using the 30/20-μg disk and the disk diffusion and MIC breakpoints established by the U.S. FDA and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Organisms used included 2 groups of Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 2 groups of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates; 1 group of each consisted of randomly selected isolates and the second group consisted of a challenge group from thousands of surveillance isolates with an increased proportion of organisms displaying ceftazidime-avibactam MIC values close to the breakpoints. Broth microdilution, disk diffusion tests, and data analysis were performed according to reference standardized methods. Ceftazidime-avibactam breakpoints of ≤8/4 (susceptible) and ≥16/4 μg/ml (resistant) for MIC and ≥21/≤20 mm for disk diffusion, as established by the U.S. FDA and the CLSI, were applied for Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam MIC and disk zone (30/20-μg disk) correlation were acceptable when testing Enterobacteriaceae (overall, very major [VM] and major [Ma] error rates of 0.4% and 0.0%, respectively) and nearly so when testing P. aeruginosa (2.3% VM and 2.9% Ma errors). In summary, disk diffusion and broth microdilution testing results demonstrated good categorical agreement for ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa, using 30/20-μg disks.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  broth microdilution; disk diffusion; error rate-bounded method

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29563198      PMCID: PMC5971542          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01960-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

Review 1.  Setting and revising antibacterial susceptibility breakpoints.

Authors:  John Turnidge; David L Paterson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Determination of disk diffusion susceptibility testing interpretive criteria using model-based analysis: development and implementation.

Authors:  Glen DePalma; John Turnidge; Bruce A Craig
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Antimicrobial Susceptibility Results from Four Years (2012 to 2015) of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring Program in the United States.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; Michael D Huband; Mariana Castanheira; Robert K Flamm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Molecular β-Lactamase Characterization of Aerobic Gram-Negative Pathogens Recovered from Patients Enrolled in the Ceftazidime-Avibactam Phase 3 Trials for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections, with Efficacies Analyzed against Susceptible and Resistant Subsets.

Authors:  Rodrigo E Mendes; Mariana Castanheira; Leah N Woosley; Gregory G Stone; Patricia A Bradford; Robert K Flamm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Emerging Resistance, New Antimicrobial Agents  …  but No Tests! The Challenge of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in the Current US Regulatory Landscape.

Authors:  R M Humphries; J A Hindler
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Susceptibility tests of anaerobic bacteria: statistical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  C M Metzler; R M DeHaan
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Tested against Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from U.S. Medical Centers, 2013 to 2016.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; Mariana Castanheira; Dee Shortridge; Rodrigo E Mendes; Robert K Flamm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Ceftazidime-avibactam: a novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Christopher D Lawson; Heather Adam; Frank Schweizer; Sheryl Zelenitsky; Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; Andrew Denisuik; Ethan Rubinstein; Alfred S Gin; Daryl J Hoban; Joseph P Lynch; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Verification of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing Methods against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Ryan K Shields; Cornelius J Clancy; A William Pasculle; Ellen G Press; Ghady Haidar; Binghua Hao; Liang Chen; Barry N Kreiswirth; M Hong Nguyen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Phase I Study Assessing the Pharmacokinetic Profile, Safety, and Tolerability of a Single Dose of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  John S Bradley; Jon Armstrong; Antonio Arrieta; Raafat Bishai; Shampa Das; Shirley Delair; Timi Edeki; William C Holmes; Jianguo Li; Kathryn S Moffett; Deepa Mukundan; Norma Perez; José R Romero; David Speicher; Janice E Sullivan; Diansong Zhou
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

  10 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections.

Authors:  Yu-Xuan Ma; Chen-Yu Wang; Yuan-Yuan Li; Jing Li; Qian-Qian Wan; Ji-Hua Chen; Franklin R Tay; Li-Na Niu
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 16.806

2.  Correlation between Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Results when Testing Ceftazidime-Avibactam against a Challenge Collection of Enterobacterales Isolates: Results from a Multilaboratory Study.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; Paul R Rhomberg; Sukantha Chandrasekaran; Marisol Trejo; Kelley A Fedler; Linda D Boyken; Daniel J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam and Imipenem/Relebactam in Gram-Negative MDR Bacilli: Molecular Mechanisms and Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Paolo Gaibani; Tommaso Giani; Federica Bovo; Donatella Lombardo; Stefano Amadesi; Tiziana Lazzarotto; Marco Coppi; Gian Maria Rossolini; Simone Ambretti
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Evaluation of the EUCAST Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for Enterobacterales-Containing Blood Cultures in China.

Authors:  Yuzhang Shan; Bijie Hu; Wei Guo; Beili Wang; Chunmei Zhou; Shenlei Huang; Na Li
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the Etest and disk diffusion method for detection of the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Feifei Zhang; Zhanwei Wang; Hongbin Chen; Xiaojuan Wang; Yawei Zhang; Shuguang Li; Hui Wang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Assessment of Ceftazidime-Avibactam 30/20-μg Disk, Etest versus Broth Microdilution Results When Tested against Enterobacterales Clinical Isolates.

Authors:  Renru Han; Xuelin Yang; Yang Yang; Yan Guo; Dandan Yin; Li Ding; Shi Wu; Demei Zhu; Fupin Hu
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-01-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.