Victor Sarli Issa1. 1. Instituto do Coração (InCor) do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; Hospital do Coração (HCor), São Paulo, SP - Brazil.
The presence of diffuse fibrosis in the myocardial tissue is a characteristic of Chagas
heart disease.[1] The mechanisms proposed
to explain such fibrosis areas vary and include direct injury by Trypanosoma
cruzi to the cardiac tissue, as well as tissue ischemia due to
microcirculation changes and microvascular thrombosis mediated by inflammatory[2] and immune[3] processes. The myocardial fibrosis not only reveals
important aspects of the pathophysiology of the disease, but has a clinical
significance,[4] because its
progression can lead to injury to the heart conduction system, contributing to generate
arrhythmia, as well as systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction, in addition to
favoring the appearance of thromboembolic phenomena from the hypokinetic or akinetic
areas.This issue of the Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia presents the
results of a study jointly conducted by three different centers in the city of Salvador,
Bahia state, about the clinical significance of the fibrosis found in patients with
Chagas disease, in both the indeterminate and heart disease (with and without left
ventricular dysfunction) stages. The search for fibrosis was performed by use of late
enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The authors have reported late
enhancement compatible with fibrosis in 41% of the patients with the indeterminate form,
a figure similar to that found in patients with heart disease without ventricular
dysfunction. In addition, it is worth noting the similar findings in the other groups
regarding the clinical characteristics and the levels of type B natriuretic peptide,
troponin, interleukins 2, 4, 6 and 10, tumor necrosis factor alpha and gamma
interferon.[5]Previous studies have identified myocardial fibrosis in patients with Chagas disease and
correlated its intensity with the severity of ventricular dysfunction and symptoms. A
study of 51 patients with Chagas disease using late enhancement technique has identified
images compatible with myocardial fibrosis in 20% of the 15 patients with the
indeterminate form.[6] Similar results
have been found by using other imaging techniques: a study of 40 patients with the
indeterminate form of Chagas disease, using echocardiography and single photon emission
computed tomography (gated-SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging, has
detected some changes in perfusion and myocardial motion in 25% of the individuals,
including perfusion defects, reduced ejection fraction and intraventricular
dyssynchrony.[7]The finding by Rabelo et al.[5] of similar
phenotypes in patients with the indeterminate form and those with heart disease (and
normal left ventricular function) draws attention to the discussion on the meaning of
the indeterminate form definition. This concept has been applied to patients with
positive serology for Trypanosoma cruzi and neither gastrointestinal
disease nor myocardial injury identified on clinical assessment, chest X-rays and
electrocardiogram. However, the value of that definition has been questioned based on
the current methods to assess cardiac function and morphology. One way to estimate the
value of those findings is to assess the long-term outcome of patients.[8] A study from 2001 of 160 patients with
the indeterminate form, followed up for 98 months, and based on clinical,
electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings (two-dimensional and M mode) has
reported stable ejection fraction during follow-up despite the appearance of
electrocardiographic changes.[9] A study
with a 10-year follow-up of blood donors with positive serology for Trypanosoma
cruzi has estimated the incidence of the progression to heart disease in
1.85 per 100 individuals-year, with heart disease diagnosis based on
electrocardiographic and two-dimensional echocardiographic changes.[10] However, studies assessing the
long-term follow-up of patients with the indeterminate form of Chagas disease by using
the currently available techniques for analysis of myocardial function and morphology
and mortality data still lack.Finally, despite the progression over the last decades of the methods to identify the
patients at higher risk or with subclinical morphological changes, the likelihood of the
patients' prognostic improvement still faces the limitations of therapy, especially
considering the negative results of the etiological treatment of Chagas disease's
chronic forms.[11] Those and other
difficulties that persist in the management of patients with Chagas disease are a
constant challenge for the doctors and researchers who cope with such a severe
condition.
Authors: Amilcar O Mocelin; Victor S Issa; Fernando Bacal; Guilherme V Guimarães; Edecio Cunha; Edimar A Bocchi Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Carlos E Rochitte; Paulo F Oliveira; Joalbo M Andrade; Bárbara M Ianni; José R Parga; Luiz F Avila; Roberto Kalil-Filho; Charles Mady; José C Meneghetti; João A C Lima; José A F Ramires Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-09-23 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Carlos A Morillo; Jose Antonio Marin-Neto; Alvaro Avezum; Sergio Sosa-Estani; Anis Rassi; Fernando Rosas; Erick Villena; Roberto Quiroz; Rina Bonilla; Constança Britto; Felipe Guhl; Elsa Velazquez; Laura Bonilla; Brandi Meeks; Purnima Rao-Melacini; Janice Pogue; Antonio Mattos; Janis Lazdins; Anis Rassi; Stuart J Connolly; Salim Yusuf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ester C Sabino; Antonio L Ribeiro; Vera M C Salemi; Claudia Di Lorenzo Oliveira; Andre P Antunes; Marcia M Menezes; Barbara M Ianni; Luciano Nastari; Fabio Fernandes; Giuseppina M Patavino; Vandana Sachdev; Ligia Capuani; Cesar de Almeida-Neto; Danielle M Carrick; David Wright; Katherine Kavounis; Thelma T Goncalez; Anna Barbara Carneiro-Proietti; Brian Custer; Michael P Busch; Edward L Murphy Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: R Espinosa; H A Carrasco; F Belandria; A M Fuenmayor; C Molina; R González; O Martínez Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 1985-05 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Amalia Peix; Raymid García; Jesús Sánchez; Lázaro O Cabrera; Kenia Padrón; Oscar Vedia; Hugo V Choque; Jorge Fraga; Juan Bandera; Alberto Hernández-Cañero Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Savio Cardoso; Clerio Francisco de Azevedo Filho; Fábio Fernandes; Barbara Ianni; Jorge Andion Torreão; Mateus Diniz Marques; Luiz Francisco Rodrigues de Ávila; Raul Santos Filho; Charles Mady; Roberto Kalil-Filho; José Antônio Franchine Ramires; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Carlos E Rochitte Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: María Elena Tello-Cajiao; Olga Lucia Agudelo; Marcela Quintero; Laura Cardenas; Fernando Rosso Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Ricardo Wesley Alberca; Tatiana Mina Yendo; Yasmim Álefe Leuzzi Ramos; Iara Grigoletto Fernandes; Luana de Mendonça Oliveira; Franciane Mouradian Emidio Teixeira; Danielle Rosa Beserra; Emily Araujo de Oliveira; Sarah Cristina Gozzi-Silva; Milena Mary de Souza Andrade; Anna Cláudia Calvielli Castelo Branco; Anna Julia Pietrobon; Nátalli Zanete Pereira; Cyro Alves de Brito; Raquel Leão Orfali; Valéria Aoki; Alberto José da Silva Duarte; Gil Benard; Maria Notomi Sato Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 3.707