| Literature DB >> 29561872 |
Zengrong Zhang1,2, Huarui Du1, Lijun Bai3, Chaowu Yang1, Qingyun Li1, Xiaocheng Li1, Mohan Qiu1, Chunlin Yu2, Zongrong Jiang4, Xiaoyu Jiang1, Lan Liu1, Chenming Hu1, Bo Xia1, Xia Xiong1, Xiaoyan Song1, Xiaosong Jiang1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tibetan chickens living at high altitudes show specific adaptations to high-altitude conditions, but the epigenetic modifications associated with these adaptations have not been characterized.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29561872 PMCID: PMC5862445 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Statistics of data generation.
| Sample | Library | Insert Size (bp) | Conversion rate (%) | Read length (bp) | Clean Reads | Clean data (Gbp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | ZANxgdHACDEAAPEMI-1 | 325 | 99.7 | 90 | 151,345,614 | 13.6 |
| T2 | ZANxgdHACDEBAPEMI-3 | 360 | 99.7 | 90 | 165,745,108 | 14.9 |
| T3 | ZANxgdHACDECAPEMI-7 | 340 | 99.7 | 90 | 141,554,972 | 12.7 |
Read alignment.
| Sample | Raw reads (M) | Raw data (Gb) | Mapped reads (M) | Average map rate (%) | Whole genome average coverage depth (X) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 151 | 13.6 | 114 | 75.5 | 9 |
| T2 | 166 | 14.9 | 121 | 72.9 | 10 |
| T3 | 141 | 12.7 | 112 | 79.4 | 9 |
Average methylation levels for C, CG, CHG, and CHH.
| Pattern | C | CG | CHG | CHH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methylation level (%) | 3.92 | 51.22 | 0.4 | 0.45 |
Fig 1Global DNA methylation profile of the Tibetan chicken.
(A) proportion of each mC type in whole genome, and the sum of proportion of three mC types is equal 100% (the symbol “%” was abridged) (B) Distribution of methylation levels for CG, CHG, and CHH. The y-axis indicates the fraction of all mCs while the x-axis represents methylation level of methyl cytosine. (C) Methyl cytosine density distribution throughout chromosome 1. Blue dots indicate methyl cytosine density in 10-kb windows throughout the chromosome. Smooth lines represent the mC density.
Fig 2CG and non-CG proximal sequence features.
Logo plots of the sequences proximal to sites of CG, CHG, and CHH DNA methylation in each sequence context.
Fig 3Average methylation level in different gene regions.
Each dot denotes the mean methylation level per bin, and the respective lines denote the 5-bin moving average.
Fig 4Distinguishing between methylated and unmethylated genes.
(A) Number of methylated genes and unmethylated genes. (B) GO enrichment analysis for upstream methylated genes and gene body methylated genes. The x-axis indicates GO items, the left y-axis indicates the proportion of genes involved, and the right y-axis indicates the exact number of genes.
Fig 5Pathway assignment based on KEGG.
(A) Pathway analysis of gene body methylated genes. (B) Pathway analysis of gene body unmethylated genes. (C) Pathway analysis of upstream methylated genes. (D) Pathway analysis of upstream unmethylated genes.
Fig 6Relationship between DNA methylation and gene expression level in the Tibetan chicken.
All genes were divided into ten groups according to their expression levels, from the lowest 10% and to the highest 10%. Each point represents the mean expression level and the relative methylation level. (A) Relationship between promoter DNA methylation and gene expression level. (B) Relationship between gene body DNA methylation and gene expression level.