| Literature DB >> 29561864 |
Gustavo Tejera1, Beneharo Rodríguez1, Carlos Armas2, Airam Rodríguez3.
Abstract
Insular wildlife is more prone to extinction than their mainland relatives. Thus, a basic understanding of non-natural mortality sources is the first step in the development of conservation management plans. The Canary Islands are an important tourist destination due to their unique climate and rich scenery and biodiversity. During the last few decades, there has been significant development of urban areas and busy road networks. However, there have been no studies describing the effects of road mortality on wildlife in this archipelago. We describe the temporal and spatial patterns of wildlife roadkill in Lanzarote (UNESCO Biosphere Reserve), using counts from cars for an entire annual cycle. A total of 666 roadkills were recorded (monthly average of 0.09 birds/km and 0.14 mammals/km) comprising at least 37 species including native birds and introduced mammals. Seasonal abundance, richness and diversity of roadkills showed a high peak during summer months for both mammals and birds. GLMs indicated that accidents (including birds and mammals) have a higher probability of occurrence close to houses and on roads with high speed limits. When analysed separately, mammal kills occurred in sectors with high speed limits, close to houses and in areas surrounded by exotic bushes, while bird roadkills appeared in road sectors with high speed limits, close to houses and low traffic volume. Our findings highlight that roads are a potential threat to native birds in the eastern Canary Islands. Detailed studies on the local population dynamics of highly affected species, such as the Houbara Bustard, Eurasian Stone Curlew, Barn Owl or Southern Shrike, are urgently needed to determine whether these levels of road mortality are sustainable.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29561864 PMCID: PMC5862401 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192731
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Location of Lanzarote Island and road network (in dark grey) studied during November 2010-October 2011.
Grey areas indicate the most important cities and towns. Black points on the road network indicate roadkill locations.
Percentage of population annually affected by roadkills on Lanzarote, Canary Islands, of some representative species.
Species were selected according to number of carcasses and mortality estimations. Population sizes (individuals) were taken from literature [57–59].
| Species | Population size | % of population affected using | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carcasses | Mortality | ||
| 160–200 | 3,0–3,8 | 83,8–117,5 | |
| 350–400 | 5,3–6,0 | 43,7–101,7 | |
| 1175–3116 | 0,5–1,3 | 26,8–71,1 | |
| 587–2772 | 0,3–1,4 | 16,1–76,0 | |
| 300–400 | 1,8–2,3 | 9,8–13,0 | |
| 485–3972 | 0,8–6,6 | 4,5–36,9 | |
| 3370–3870 | 0,3–0,3 | 1,6–1,8 | |
| 334–579 | 0,3–0,6 | 1,2–2,1 | |
Fig 2Seasonal variation of abundance (roadkills/km), diversity and richness of road casualties of wildlife on Lanzarote, Canary Islands, during November 2010 to October 2011.
Results of the generalized linear models built to evaluate the occurrence of roadkills on Lanzarote, Canary Islands.
Significant variables are in bold, i.e. 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) do not include zero.
| Model | Estimate | Std. Error | lower 95% CI | upper 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | -0.173 | 0.142 | -0.452 | 0.104 |
| Exotic shrubland | 0.251 | 0.165 | -0.072 | 0.575 |
| Urban | 0.044 | 0.174 | -0.298 | 0.386 |
| Traffic volume | -0.112 | 0.059 | -0.229 | 0.002 |
| Urban | 0.043 | 0.205 | -0.356 | 0.447 |
| Traffic volume | -0.051 | 0.064 | -0.179 | 0.072 |
| Exotic shrubland | 0.018 | 0.221 | -0.411 | 0.454 |
| Urban | 0.053 | 0.229 | -0.392 | 0.506 |
Results of the generalized linear models built to evaluate the factors affecting the abundance of wildlife (mammals and birds) roadkills on Lanzarote, Canary Islands.
Significant variables are in bold, i.e. 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) do not include zero.
| Model | Estimate | Std. Error | lower 95% CI | upper 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traffic volumen | -0.015 | 0.081 | -0.181 | 0.158 |
| % Secondary scrublands | 0.078 | 0.111 | -0.143 | 0.292 |
| % Urban | -0.181 | 0.120 | -0.419 | 0.049 |
| Speed limit | 0.203 | 0.100 | -0.006 | 0.414 |
| Traffic volumen | 0.006 | 0.091 | -0.180 | 0.198 |
| % Secondary scrublands | 0.239 | 0.131 | -0.012 | 0.486 |
| % Urban | 0.009 | 0.142 | -0.261 | 0.277 |
| (Intercept) | 0.025 | 0.102 | -0.176 | 0.225 |
| Traffic volume | -0.134 | 0.112 | -0.374 | 0.103 |
| % Secondary scrublands | -0.111 | 0.142 | -0.399 | 0.170 |
| % Urban | -0.196 | 0.151 | -0.501 | 0.102 |