| Literature DB >> 29561754 |
Yang Wei1, Yu-Han Chang2,3,4, Chung-Jui Liu5, Ren-Jei Chung6.
Abstract
The susceptibility of guided bone regeneration (GBR) material to infection by pathogens at wound sites during bone healing has often been overlooked. The objective of this study was the synthesis and characterization of a potential material for antibacterial GBR application. In the current study, the mechanical stEntities:
Keywords: composite hydrogel; drug delivery GBR; nature cross-linking agent
Year: 2018 PMID: 29561754 PMCID: PMC6030783 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10020037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Polymeric composites made in this study.
| Polymer | Components | Abbreviation |
|---|---|---|
| A | Oxidized hyaluronic acid | (oxi-HA) |
| B | A + Collagen | CH |
| C | B + β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) | CHT |
| D | B + β-TCP + OPCs | CHTP |
Components of MG-63 cell culture medium.
| Name | Concentrations in g/L or mL/L |
|---|---|
| Minimum essential medium (MEM) | 9.3918 g |
| Non-essential amino acid (NEAA) | 10 mL |
| Sodium pyruvate (SP) | 10 mL |
| L-glutamine (L-G) | 10 mL |
| Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) | 10 mL |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 1.5 g |
| Heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum | 100 mL |
Figure 1(A) Chemical schematic of hyaluronic acid oxidation oxidized by sodium periodate; the newly formed aldehyde group is expressed in red color [37]; (B) FTIR Spectra of hyaluronic acid (red) and oxidized hyaluronic acid (blue); and (C) collagen (Col) and oxi-HA/collagen (CH) at different weight ratios (w/w).
Figure 2SEM morphology (scale bar = 500 μm) of (A) lyophilized collagen and oxi-HA/collagen hydrogel (CH) at different concentrations (w/w) after brief fixation and serial dehydration; with the connective pores clearly shown in (B) CH-10%; (C) CH-20%; (D) CH-30%; (E) CH-35% and (F) CH-40%.
Figure 3Crosslinking index of CH hydrogels made from oxidized HA/collagen at different concentrations (w/w). Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate measurements.
Figure 4Swelling ratio (%) (data collected at soaking time of 120 min) (left y-axis) and compression modulus (E) (right y-axis) of CHT with different β-TCP content. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate measurements. * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05). ** represents no significant difference (p > 0.05).
Figure 5Effect of the amount of β-TCP added on the degradation percentage of CHT composite materials. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate measurements.
Figure 6Degradation test results of CHTP. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate measurements.
Figure 7(A) Swelling ratio (%) (data collected at soaking time of 120 min) (left y-axis) and compression modulus (E) (right y-axis) of CHT with and without OPCs added. CHTP-5% represents that 5% OPCs were applied to a CHT composite with 30% (w/w) of β-TCP added (CHT-30% or CHTP-0%); (B) Cell viability evaluated by MTT assay for CHTP composite material. Cell growth is expressed as the relative absorbance obtained over the control condition. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate measurements. * indicates significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 8Drug release profile for tetracycline-loaded CHTP composite material. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate measurements.