Yi Liu1, Yong Wang. 1. University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of proanthocyanidins (PA) and photoinitiator type on the degree of conversion (DC) and polymerization rate (PR) of a model dental adhesive. METHODS: Three types of photo-initiation systems were introduced into the Bis-GMA/HEMA co-monomer mixture, resulting in four resin formulations including CQ/A (0.5wt% CQ and EDMAB), CQ/A/I-1 (0.5wt% CQ, EDMAB and DPIHP), CQ/A/I-2 (1.0wt% CQ, EDMAB and DPIHP), and TPO (2.1wt% TPO). For each resin formulation, adhesives containing 0%, 2.5%, 5% and 10% of PA with respect to the weight of resin were produced after mixing the resin with various amount of PA/ethanol solution. When light-cured, the RP and DC of each adhesive was determined using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. RESULTS: Across and within the initiator groups, the DC followed the general trend of CQ/A<CQ/A/I-1<CQ/A/I-2<TPO and 0-PA>2.5-PA>5-PA>10-PA, respectively. The change of PR with respect to photo-initiation systems and PA content was in a similar but less pronounced pattern. CONCLUSION: PA hampered the polymerization of all adhesives regardless of photoinitiators used. The initiator formulations CQ/A/I-2 and TPO are better fit for PA-containing adhesives, both leading to >65% DC in the presence of 5% PA. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The inclusion of PA in dental adhesives has been limited by its interference with the light-curing of adhesive resins. This study found photo-initiation formulations that could maintain a satisfactory degree of monomer conversion while a significant amount of PA is incorporated.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of proanthocyanidins (PA) and photoinitiator type on the degree of conversion (DC) and polymerization rate (PR) of a model dental adhesive. METHODS: Three types of photo-initiation systems were introduced into the Bis-GMA/HEMA co-monomer mixture, resulting in four resin formulations including CQ/A (0.5wt% CQ and EDMAB), CQ/A/I-1 (0.5wt% CQ, EDMAB and DPIHP), CQ/A/I-2 (1.0wt% CQ, EDMAB and DPIHP), and TPO (2.1wt% TPO). For each resin formulation, adhesives containing 0%, 2.5%, 5% and 10% of PA with respect to the weight of resin were produced after mixing the resin with various amount of PA/ethanol solution. When light-cured, the RP and DC of each adhesive was determined using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. RESULTS: Across and within the initiator groups, the DC followed the general trend of CQ/A<CQ/A/I-1<CQ/A/I-2<TPO and 0-PA>2.5-PA>5-PA>10-PA, respectively. The change of PR with respect to photo-initiation systems and PA content was in a similar but less pronounced pattern. CONCLUSION: PA hampered the polymerization of all adhesives regardless of photoinitiators used. The initiator formulations CQ/A/I-2 and TPO are better fit for PA-containing adhesives, both leading to >65% DC in the presence of 5% PA. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The inclusion of PA in dental adhesives has been limited by its interference with the light-curing of adhesive resins. This study found photo-initiation formulations that could maintain a satisfactory degree of monomer conversion while a significant amount of PA is incorporated.
Authors: J De Munck; K Van Landuyt; M Peumans; A Poitevin; P Lambrechts; M Braem; B Van Meerbeek Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 6.116