Literature DB >> 29560733

Novel [(3-indolylmethylene)hydrazono]indolin-2-ones as apoptotic anti-proliferative agents: design, synthesis and in vitro biological evaluation.

Wagdy M Eldehna1, Mahmoud F Abo-Ashour2, Hany S Ibrahim2, Ghada H Al-Ansary3, Hazem A Ghabbour4,5, Mahmoud M Elaasser6, Hanaa Y A Ahmed6, Nesreen A Safwat6.   

Abstract

On account of their significance as apoptosis inducing agents, merging indole and 3-hydrazinoindolin-2-one scaffolds is a logic tactic for designing pro-apoptotic agents. Consequently, 27 hybrids (6a-r, 9a-f and 11a-c) were synthesised and evaluated for their cytotoxicity against MCF-7, HepG-2 and HCT-116 cancer cell lines. SAR studies unravelled that N-propylindole derivatives were the most active compounds such as 6n (MCF-7; IC50=1.04 µM), which displayed a significant decrease of cell population in the G2/M phase and significant increase in the early and late apoptosis by 19-folds in Annexin-V-FTIC assay. Also, 6n increased the expression of caspase-3, caspase-9, cytochrome C and Bax and decreased the expression of Bcl-2. Moreover, compounds 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q generated ROS by significant increase in the level of SOD and depletion of the levels of CAT and GSH-Px in MCF-7.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Indole; anticancer; apoptosis; oxidative stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29560733      PMCID: PMC6010103          DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2017.1421181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem        ISSN: 1475-6366            Impact factor:   5.051


Introduction

Apoptosis, programmed cell death, is considered as an essential mechanism by the body to get rid of unwanted cells. Therefore, triggering apoptosis in cancer cells will lead to automatic death and increase the relief from cancer proliferation. Thoroughly understanding the mechanism of apoptosis reveals that it is affected by the expression of caspases, Bcl-2 family proteins, including either anti-apoptotic or pro-apoptotic members. Induction of apoptosis is considered as one of the most successful strategies to target cancer. Indole is a well-known interesting scaffold to generate anticancer agents through induction of apoptosis. Indole-3-carbinol (I3C) (Figure 1), a naturally occurring compound found in family Cruciferae, displayed a remarkable activity against different types of cancer cells including breast, colon, leukaemia and prostate. This activity was justified by its ability to induce apoptosis through arresting G1/S phase of cell cycle,. Interestingly, under acidic conditions, indole-3-carbinol is dimerised into 3,3′-diindolylmethane (DIM) which exhibited superior activity as apoptosis inducing agent over indole-3-carbinol,. Moreover, Phemindole (Figure 1) overcame the poor bioavailability of DIM and illustrated apoptotic activity against triple negative breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) through reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediated mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis. Modifications for both I3C and DIM took place to get more active compounds. For example, OSU-A9, N-substituted derivative of I3C, was 100 times more potent than the parent compound (the range of IC50 of OSU-A9 against MDA-MB-231, MCF-7 and SKBR3 is 1.2–1.8 µM and IC50 of IC3 = 200 µM) with more acid stability against both breast and prostate cancer cells (Figure 1),. In addition, 1,1-Bis(3'-indolyl)-1-(p-hydroxyphenyl)methane (I), a derivative of Phemindole, was found to promote apoptosis in both pancreatic and colon cancer cells in vivo as well as in vitro,.
Figure 1.

Reported indole derivatives with apoptotic activity.

Reported indole derivatives with apoptotic activity. On the other hand, several 3-hydrazinoindolin-2-one derivatives proved their anticancer activity through induction of apoptosis in various cancer cells. For instance, compounds IIa–c (Figure 2) showed cytotoxic activity against HepG2 cancer cells with IC50 range (1.0–2.4 µM). The apoptosis in HepG2 cells by compounds IIa–c was investigated through increasing the expression of Bax, a pro-apoptotic protein, and decreasing the expression of Bcl-2, an anti-apototic protein, accompanied by high levels of caspase-3. Moreover, compound III, a water-soluble oxindole derivative (Figure 2), possessed EC50 = 0.14 µM against human colorectal cells; HCT-116. It had an inhibitory activity against tubulin polymerisation (IC50 = 0.19 µM) through induction of apoptosis. Furthermore, compound IV had the ability to activate caspase 3/7 and promote apoptosis in Panc1 cells. The use of 3-hydrazinoindolin-2-one as apoptosis inducer was augmented by designing bis-isatin hydrazones connected with linker as in compound V (Figure 2). It showed cytotoxic activity against two cancer cell lines, namely MCF-7 and HCT-116 with an IC50 of 1.84 µM and 3.31 µM, respectively. The pro-apoptotic activity of this compound was assured by cell cycle disruption and Annexin-V FTIC analysis.
Figure 2.

Reported 3-hydrazinoindolin-2-one derivatives (II–V) with apoptotic activity.

Reported 3-hydrazinoindolin-2-one derivatives (II–V) with apoptotic activity. Inspired by these findings and as a part of our ongoing efforts towards developing novel and potent anticancer agents based on the indoline-2-one moiety, we herein report the design and synthesis of new three different sets of indole-indolin-2-one hybrids 6a–r, 9a–f and 11a–c (Figure 3), with the prime goal of developing potent anticancer agents with potential pro-apoptotic activity. First, methylenehydrazono (HC=N–N=) linker was selected to conjugate the indole and indolin-2-one moieties. Then, three strategies were applied to develop the three hybrids series. For the first series 6a–r, indole-3-carboxaldehyde or a variety of N-alkylated indole derivatives (N-methyl, N-propyl or N-benzyl) was conjugated with 5-/7-substituted indolin-2-one moieties. In the second series 9a–f, indole-3-carboxaldehyde was hybridised with a variety of N-alkylated indolin-2-one derivatives (N-methyl, N-propyl or N-benzyl). Regarding the third series, it was designed so as to maintain the pharmacophoric N-propyl-indole moiety while exploring the chemical variation at the N-position of the indolin-2-one moiety, in an attempt to optimise the obtained cytotoxicity results from the first and the second series and to carry out further elaboration of the indole-indolin-2-one hybrid scaffolds to explore a valuable SAR.
Figure 3.

The designed compounds (6a–r, 9a–f and 11a–c) as apoptosis-inducing agents.

The designed compounds (6a–r, 9a–f and 11a–c) as apoptosis-inducing agents. All compounds will be subjected to cytotoxic activity. According to the results, the most active hybrid will be further investigated regarding its effects on cell cycle progression and potential apoptotic effect in the MCF-7 cells, to acquire perception of the mechanism of the anti-proliferative activity of the synthesised hybrids. As inhibition of apoptotic markers (as Bcl-2, Bax, Caspase 3 and 9 and cytochrome C) leads to the accumulation of ROS and results in oxidative stress, some oxidative stress parameters will be taken into consideration in our biological study.

Materials and methods

Chemistry

Melting points were measured with a Stuart melting point apparatus and were uncorrected. Infrared (IR) Spectra were recorded as KBr disks using Schimadzu FT-IR 8400S spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Mass spectral data are given by GCMS-QP1000 EX spectrometer at 70 eV. NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury NMR spectrometer. 1H spectrum was run at 400 MHz and 13C spectrum was run at 100 MHz in deuterated dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO-d). Chemical shifts are expressed in values (ppm) using the solvent peak as internal standard. All coupling constant (J) values are given in Hertz. The abbreviations used are as follows: s, singlet; d, doublet; m, multiplet. Elemental analyses were carried out at the Regional Center for Microbiology and Biotechnology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. Analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel plates containing UV indicator was employed routinely to follow the course of reactions and to check the purity of products.

Synthesis of 1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde

Compound 2 was prepared according to the literature procedure.

Synthesis of 3-hydrazonoindolin-2-ones 4a–f

To a stirred solution of isatins 3a–f (5 mmol) in methyl alcohol (10 ml), 99% hydrazine hydrate (1.25 ml, 25 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 1 h, and then the formed precipitate was filtered off, washed with cold methanol, dried and recrystallised from glacial acetic acid to furnish hydrazones 4a–f.

Synthesis of N-substituted-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde derivatives 5a–c

Compounds 5a–c were prepared according to the literature procedure.

General procedure for the synthesis of target compounds 6a–r

A mixture of 3-hydrazonoindolin-2-ones 4a–f (1 mmol) and 1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde 2 or the appropriate N-substituted-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde 5a–c (1 mmol), was refluxed in absolute ethyl alcohol in the presence of a catalytic amount of glacial acetic acid for 3 h, and then cooled to room temperature. The solid formed was collected by filtration, dried and crystallised from dioxane to produce compounds 6a–r, respectively.

3-(((1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (6a)

Yield 80%, m.p. 262–263 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3409 (NH), 1697 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 6.89 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.05 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.27–7.38 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.53–7.55 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.21 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.28–8.30 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.37 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 8.94 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.74 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable), 12.14 (s, 1H, NH indole, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 111.04, 112.66, 113.13, 117.60, 121.70, 122.36, 122.47, 123.89, 124.96, 128.11, 133.16, 136.84, 138.03, 144.70, 149.58, 162.28, 165.82 (C=O); MS m/z [%]: 288 [M+, 31.53] 116 [100]; Anal. calcd. For C17H12N4O: C, 70.82; H, 4.20; N, 19.43; Found C, 71.04; H, 4.27; N, 19.70.

3-(((1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)-5-chloroindolin-2-one (6b)

Yield 75%, m.p. > 300 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3427 (NH), 1703 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 6.90 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.26–7.33 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.41 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz), 7.55 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 8.26–8.29 (m, 2H, –CH=N– and Ar-H), 8.50 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 2.4 Hz), 9.00 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.87 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable), 12.23 (s, 1H, NH indole, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 111.17, 112.76, 113.37, 117.99, 121.60, 122.35, 124.15, 124.82, 126.66, 127.31, 132.18, 138.10, 138.17, 144.32, 148.07, 164.08, 164.15 (C=O); Anal. calcd. For C17H11ClN4O: C, 63.26; H, 3.44, N, 17.36; Found C, 63.43; H, 3.49; N, 17.61.

3-(((1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)-5-bromoindolin-2-one (6c)

Yield 75%, m.p. > 300 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3381 (NH), 1695 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 6.87 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.30–7.55 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 8.25–8.28 (m, 2H, –CH=N– and Ar-H), 8.68 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 9.00 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.88 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable), 12.24 (s, 1H, NH indole, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 112.82, 112.95, 113.34, 113.71, 119.25, 121.67, 122.34, 124.13, 124.81, 130.47, 135.09, 137.99, 138.15, 143.59, 148.78, 163.88, 165.47 (C=O); MS m/z [%]: 369 [(M + 2)+, 1.21], 367 [M+, 1.66], 116 [100]; Anal. calcd. For C17H11BrN4O: C, 55.61; H, 3.02; N, 15.26; Found C, 55.89; H, 2.98; N, 15.44.

3-(((1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)-5-methoxyindolin-2-one (6d)

Yield 83%, m.p. 291–293 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3395 (NH), 1711 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 3.78 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.80 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 6.95 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz), 7.19 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.27 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.53 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.08 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 2.8 Hz), 8.21 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.35 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.95 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.53 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable), 12.16 (s, 1H, NH indole, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 55.98 (OCH3), 111.76, 112.76, 112.77, 113.23, 117.92, 119.83, 121.86, 122.06, 124.02, 124.91, 137.23, 138.09, 138.50, 150.07, 155.07, 162.78, 166.01 (C=O); MS m/z [%]: 318 [M+, 1.32]; Anal. calcd. For C18H14N4O2: C, 67.92; H, 4.43; N, 17.60; Found C, 68.17; H, 4.52; N, 17.89.

3-(((1-Methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (6e)

Yield 78%, m.p. 255–257 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3386 (NH), 1701 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 3.90 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.88 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.04 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.33–7.38 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.60–7.62 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.21 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.27–8.29 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.36 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 8.92 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.73 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable), 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 33.77 (CH3), 111.05, 111.59 (2C), 117.63, 121.77, 122.49, 122.68, 123.94, 125.49, 128.16, 133.17, 138.63, 139.85, 144.74, 149.58, 161.76, 165.83 (C=O); Anal. calcd. For C18H14N4O: C, 71.51; H, 4.67; N, 18.53; Found C, 71.68; H, 4.52; N, 18.81.

5-Chloro-3-(((1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (6f)

Yield 80%, m.p. 285–287 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3414 (NH), 1708 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 3.92 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.88 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.31–7.54 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 8.23–8.28 (m, 2H, -CH=N- and Ar-H), 8.63 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.99 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.73 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 33.87 (CH3), 111.68, 111.86, 112.51, 118.75, 121.70, 122.65, 124.19, 125.31, 126.08, 127.59, 132.40, 138.79, 140.96, 143.29, 148.78, 163.23, 165.58 (C=O); Anal. calcd. For C18H13ClN4O: C, 64.20; H, 3.89; N, 16.64; Found C, 64.43; H, 3.93; N, 16.87.

5-Bromo-3-(((Z)-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (6g)

Yield 77%, m.p. 295–297 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3390 (NH), 1695 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 3.91 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.86 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.33–7.38 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.54 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.63 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.2 Hz), 8.24–8.29 (m, 2H, -CH=N- and Ar-H), 8.66 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.97 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.87 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 33.84 (N-CH3), 111.71, 111.79, 112.92, 113.69, 119.22, 121.75, 122.64, 124.16, 125.23, 130.43, 135.06, 138.75, 141.07, 143.56, 148.70, 163.38, 165.45 (C=O); Anal. calcd. For C18H13BrN4O: C, 56.71; H, 3.44, N, 14.70; Found C, 57.02; H, 3.48; N, 14.96.

5-Methoxy-3-(((1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (6h)

Yield 82%, m.p. 281–283 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3427 (NH), 1705 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 3.79 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.92 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.79 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 6.93 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0, 2.4 Hz), 7.21 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.32 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.55 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.06 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 2.4 Hz), 8.19 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.34 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.96 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.49 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 33.74 (N-CH3), 55.92 (OCH3), 111.64 (2 C), 111.71, 112.68, 117.87, 119.77, 121.94, 122.43, 124.01, 125.29, 138.46, 138.65, 140.35, 149.99, 155.02, 162.30, 165.97 (C=O); MS m/z [%]: 332 [M+, 67.77], 289 [100]; Anal. calcd. For C19H16N4O2: C, 68.66; H, 4.85, N, 16.86; Found C, 68.91; H, 4.92; N, 17.09.

3-(((1-Propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (6i)

Yield 75%, m.p. 118–120 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3415 (NH), 1698 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.85 (t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.81 (sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.24 (t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 6.88 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.04 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.33–7.38 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.66–7.68 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.26 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.28–8.30 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.36 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 8.92 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.73 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.53 (–CH2–CH2–H3), 23.28 (–CH2–H2–CH3), 48.26 (–H2–CH2–CH3), 111.05, 111.70, 111.74, 117.64, 121.93, 122.49, 122.62, 123.92, 125.56, 128.15, 133.18, 138.01, 139.08, 144.70, 149.61, 161.80, 165.83 (C=O); Anal. calcd. For C20H18N4O: C, 72.71; H, 5.49, N, 16.96; Found C, 72.88; H, 5.56; N, 17.24.

5-Chloro-3-(((1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (6j)

Yield 80%, m.p. 141–142 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3406 (NH), 1712 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.85, 1.02 (2t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.80, 3.40 (2sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.25, 4.31 (2t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 6.83, 6.90 (2d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.14, 7.41 (2dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz), 7.29–7.38 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.60, 7.69 (2d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.29, 8.30 (2 s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.48 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 2.4 Hz), 8.97, 8.99 (2 s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.78, 10.87 (2 s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.45, 11.51 (–CH2–CH2–H3), 23.15, 23.24 (–CH2–H2–CH3), 48.28, 48.33 (–H2–CH2–CH3), 111.82, 111.84, 111.95, 112.49, 117.40, 117.52, 118.74, 121.51, 121.64, 121.89, 122.58, 122.85, 123.91, 124.15, 124.53, 125.15, 125.40, 125.51, 126.10, 126.80, 127.60, 132.38, 137.52, 137.62, 138.15, 140.11, 143.27, 148.84, 163.08, 163.22, 165.60, 184.89; MS m/z [%]: 366 [(M + 2)+, 24.47], 364 [M+, 69.06], 143 [100]; Anal. calcd. For C20H17ClN4O: C, 65.84; H, 4.70; N, 15.36; Found C, 66.09; H, 4.74; N, 15.53.

5-Bromo-3-(((1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (6k)

Yield 83%, m.p. 126–128 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3381 (NH), 1697 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.88 (t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.84 (sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.27 (t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 6.86 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.31–7.36 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.54 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.69 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.29–8.31 (m, 2H, -CH=N- and Ar-H), 8.66 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.97 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.87 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.05 (–CH2–CH2–H3), 23.22 (–CH2–H2–CH3), 48.32 (–H2–CH2–CH3), 111.82, 111.90, 112.98, 113.69, 119.22, 121.89, 122.61, 124.17, 125.32, 130.42, 135.12, 138.15, 140.32, 143.59, 148.77, 163.41, 165.44 (C=O); Anal. calcd. For C20H17BrN4O: C, 58.69; H, 4.19; N, 13.69; Found C, 58.95; H, 4.26; N, 14.02.

5-Methoxy-3-(((1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (6l)

Yield 80%, m.p. 122–124 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3361 (NH), 1696 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.86 (t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.81 (sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.78 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.24 (t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 6.81 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 6.94 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.22 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.35 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.55 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.09 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.22 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.33 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.97 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.81 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.51 (–CH2–CH2–H3), 23.25 (–CH2–H2–CH3), 48.27 (–H2–CH2–CH3), 55.96 (OCH3), 111.76, 111.80 (2C), 112.74, 117.90, 119.83, 122.11, 122.32, 124.03, 125.43, 138.06, 138.51, 139.53, 150.07, 155.07, 162.32, 166.00; Anal. calcd. For C21H20N4O2: C, 69.98; H, 5.59; N, 15.55; Found C, 76.21; H, 5.66; N, 15.80.

5-Fluoro-3-(((1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (6m)

Yield 75%, m.p. 135–137 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3420 (NH), 1702 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.86 (t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.83 (sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.23 (t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 6.98–7.02 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.31–7.36 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.42 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0, 2.4 Hz), 7.59 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.27–8.30 (m, 2H, -CH=N- and Ar-H), 8.45 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 2.4 Hz), 8.96 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.83 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); MS m/z [%]: 348 [M+, 25.60], 143 [100]; 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.49 (–CH2–CH2–H3), 23.26 (–CH2–H2–CH3), 48.25 (–H2–CH2–CH3), 111.13, 111.41, 112.55, 113.96, 117.90, 119.08, 121.47, 122.35, 124.03, 125.52, 132.78, 136.62, 138.97, 143.07, 149.21, 161.83, 165.90; Anal. calcd. For C20H17FN4O: C, 68.95; H, 4.92; N, 16.08; Found C, 69.18; H, 4.97; N, 16.24.

7-Fluoro-3-(((1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (6n)

Yield 79%, m.p. 129–131 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3418 (NH), 1705 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.85 (t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.81 (sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.24 (t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.09–7.12 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.29–7.376 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.67–7.69 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.23–8.30 (m, 3H, –CH=N– and 2 Ar-H), 8.95 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 11.27 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.52 (–CH2–CH2–H3), 23.29 (–CH2–H2–CH3), 48.23 (–H2–CH2–CH3), 111.13, 111.41, 112.98, 116.87, 119.16, 121.23, 123.85, 125.48, 127.04, 131.23, 135.47, 138.56, 142.61, 147.08, 152.32, 162.72, 166.04; Anal. calcd. For C20H17FN4O: C, 68.95; H, 4.92; N, 16.08; Found C, 69.12; H, 4.87; N, 16.31.

3-(((1-Benzyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (6o)

Yield 75%, m.p. 261–263 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3422 (NH), 1697 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 5.55 (s, 2H, benzylic CH2), 6.88 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.04 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.27–7.38 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 7.61 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 6.8, 2.0 Hz), 8.30 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 6.8, 2.0 Hz), 8.34 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.39 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.94 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.74 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 50.21 (benzylic CH2), 110.41, 111.07, 112.04, 112.15, 117.53, 117.90, 121.80, 122.50, 122.75, 124.06, 127.48, 127.77, 128.16, 129.19, 133.26, 137.40, 137.88, 139.15, 144.77, 149.75, 161.51, 163.22, 165.77 (C=O); Anal. calcd. For C24H18N4O: C, 76.17; H, 4.79; N, 14.81; Found C, 76.29; H, 4.87; N, 14.04.

3-(((1-Benzyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)-5-chloroindolin-2-one (6p)

Yield 80%, m.p. 218–220 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3395 (NH), 1703 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 5.57 (s, 2H, benzylic CH2), 6.90 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.14 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz), 7.27–7.36 (m, 6H, Ar-H), 7.42 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz), 7.64–7.66 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.29–8.31 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.42 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.46 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 2.0 Hz), 8.99 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.88 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 49.61, 50.31, 111.19, 111.29, 111.85, 112.25, 112.30, 112.53, 117.41, 118.03, 118.70, 119.67, 120.19, 121.92, 122.47, 122.71, 123.71, 124.30, 124.54, 125.52, 125.57, 126.10, 126.13, 126.34, 126.38, 126.81, 127.59, 127.65, 127.71, 127.82, 128.27, 128.50, 129.00, 129.22, 132.48, 136.74, 137.27, 137.62, 138.05, 138.36, 138.42, 140.14, 143.35, 149.06, 163.02, 163.08, 163.19, 165.57; Anal. calcd. For C24H17ClN4O: C, 69.82; H, 4.15; N, 13.57; Found C, 70.01; H, 4.21; N, 13.74.

3-(((1-Benzyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)-5-bromoindolin-2-one (6q)

Yield 78%, m.p. 210–213 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3428 (NH), 1705 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 5.56 (s, 2H, benzylic CH2), 6.81 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.31–7.42 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 7.55 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.65 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 8.29–8.31 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.42 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.64 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 9.00 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.88 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); MS m/z [%]: 459 [(M + 2)+, 5.93], 457 [M+, 6.83], 116 [100]; 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 50.32, 112.36, 113.03, 113.82, 120.17, 121.99, 122.77, 124.33, 125.00, 125.36, 127.84, 128.30, 129.24, 129.61, 130.52, 135.23, 137.28, 138.01, 140.32, 143.71, 149.03, 162.94, 163.22, 165.46; Anal. calcd. For C24H17BrN4O: C, 63.03; H, 3.75; N, 12.25; Found C, 63.26; H, 3.78; N, 12.51.

3-(((1-Benzyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)-5-methoxyindolin-2-one (6r)

Yield 76%, m.p. 222–224 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3408 (NH), 1705 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 3.75 (s, 3H, OCH3), 5.55 (s, 2H, benzylic CH2), 6.80 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 6.95 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz), 7.24–7.34 (m, 7H, Ar-H), 7.63 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.03 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 2.8 Hz), 8.37–8.39 (m, 2H, –CH=N– and Ar-H), 8.95 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 10.54 (s, 1H, NH isatin, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 50.21 (benzylic CH2), 55.94 (–OCH3), 111.97, 112.12, 112.22, 112.73, 117.81, 119.92, 122.10, 122.46, 124.17, 125.55, 127.81 (2C), 128.24, 129.20 (2C), 137.36, 137.94, 138.54, 139.61, 150.21, 155.04, 162.12, 165.91 (C=O); Anal. calcd. For C25H20N4O2: C, 73.51; H, 4.94; N, 13.72; Found C, 73.84; H, 4.98; N, 13.96.

Synthesis of N-substituted-indoline-2,3-dione 7a–f

Compounds 7a–f were prepared according to the literature procedure,.

Synthesis of N-substituted-3-hydrazonoindolin-2-ones 8a–f

Following the same procedures descried above for the preparation of hydrazones 4a–f. Compounds 8a, e, f and 8c are previously reported.

5-Chloro-3-hydrazono-1-methylindolin-2-on (8b)

Yield 65%, m.p. 159–161 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3304 (NH2), 1698 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 3.12, 3.16 (2 s, 3H, N-CH3), 6.97, 7.01 (2d, 1H, H-7 isatin, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.21 (dd, 1H, H-6 isatin, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz), 7.31, 8.06 (2d, 1H, H-4 isatin, J = 2.4 Hz), 9.87, 10.57 (2d, 2H, NH2, D2O exchangeable, J = 14.4 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 25.69 (N-CH3), 26.13 (N-CH3), 109.87, 110.58, 117.13, 117.64, 122.31, 123.56, 124.61, 126.25, 126.44, 126.63, 126.67, 128.16, 138.94, 140.67, 161.09, 164.68 (C=O); Anal. calcd. For C9H8ClN3O: C, 51.57; H, 3.85; N, 20.05; Found C, 51.69; H, 3.87; N, 19.93.

5-Chloro-3-hydrazono-1-propylindolin-2-one (8d)

Yield 72%, m.p. 133–135 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3310 (NH2), 1703 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.80 (t, 3H, -CH2-CH2-C3, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.51 (sextet, 2H, -CH2-C2-CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.60 (t, 2H, -C2-CH2-CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.05 (d, 1H, H-7 isatin, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.18 (dd, 1H, H-6 isatin, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz), 7.32 (d, 1H, H-4 isatin, J = 2.0 Hz), 9.89, 10.61 (2d, 2H, NH2, D2O exchangeable, J = 14.4 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.55, 11.57 (–CH2–CH2–H3), 21.00, 21.09 (–CH2–H2–CH3), 40.65, 40.91 (–H2–CH2–CH3), 110.03, 110.74, 117.24, 117.74, 122.45, 123.66, 124.53, 126.12, 126.34, 126.52, 126.64, 128.11, 138.25, 140.01, 161.07 (C=O), 164.66 (C=O); Anal. calcd. For C11H12ClN3O: C, 55.59; H, 5.09; N, 17.68; Found C, 55.43; H, 5.14; N, 17.80.

General procedure for the synthesis of target compounds 9a–f

Following the same procedures descried above for the preparation of compounds 6a–r.

3-(((1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)-1-methylindolin-2-one (9a)

Yield 70%, m.p. 283–285 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3410 (NH), 1698 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 3.19 (s, 3H, N-CH3), 7.08 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.13 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.28–7.33 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.44 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.52–7.55 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.22 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.28–8.30 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.42 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.2 Hz), 8.97 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 12.17 (s, 1H, NH indole, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 26.41 (N-CH3), 109.68, 112.66, 113.15, 116.88, 121.70, 122.42, 123.00, 123.93, 124.95, 127.79, 133.07, 137.06, 138.04, 145.75, 148.89, 162.72, 164.41 (C=O); MS m/z [%]: 302 [M+, 20.95], 273 [100]; Anal. calcd. For C18H14N4O: C, 71.51; H, 4.67; N, 18.53; Found C, 71.67; H, 4.72; N, 18.79.

3-(((1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)-5-chloro-1-methylindolin-2-one (9b)

Yield 65%, m.p. > 300 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3387 (NH), 1697 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 3.19 (s, 3H, N-CH3), 7.11 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.26–7.33 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.51 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz), 7.55 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 8.27–8.28 (m, 2H, -CH=N- and Ar-H), 8.53 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 2.0 Hz), 9.01 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 12.25 (s, 1H, NH indole, D2O exchangeable); MS m/z [%]:438 [(M + 2)+, 8.1], 336 [M+, 21.32], 116 [100]; 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 26.63, 111.28, 112.85, 113.47, 118.68, 121.85, 122.43, 124.30, 124.91, 125.13, 127.44, 132.24, 138.26 (2C), 144.57, 147.93, 164.13, 164.15; Anal. calcd. For C18H13ClN4O: C, 64.20; H, 3.89; N, 16.64; Found C, 64.43; H, 3.94; N, 16.87.

3-(((1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)-1-propylindolin-2-one (9c)

Yield 64%, m.p. 274–275 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3438 (NH), 1704 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.87 (t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.59 (sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.68 (t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.12–7.15 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.28–7.33 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.42 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.52–7.55 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.23 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.28–8.30 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.43 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.2 Hz), 8.96 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 12.17 (s, 1H, NH indole, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.61 (–CH2–CH2–H3), 20.86 (–CH2–H2–CH3), 41.25 (–H2–CH2–CH3), 109.87, 112.68, 113.16, 116.93, 121.70, 122.43, 122.88, 123.94, 124.95, 127.97, 133.09, 137.08, 138.05, 145.13, 148.77, 162.66, 164.41 (C=O); MS m/z [%]: 330 [M+, 12.07], 273 [100]; Anal. calcd. For C20H18N4O: C, 72.71; H, 5.49; N, 16.96; Found C, 72.98; H, 5.53; N, 17.23.

3-(((1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)-5-chloro-1-propylindolin-2-one (9d)

Yield 75%, m.p. 295–297 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3415 (NH), 1702 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.86 (t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.57 (sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.68 (t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.18 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.26–7.34 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.50 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz), 7.56 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.27–8.29 (m, 2H, -CH=N- and Ar-H), 8.55 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 2.4 Hz), 9.02 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 12.26 (s, 1H, NH indole, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.61, 20.83, 41.47, 111.46, 112.82, 113.43, 118.12, 121.63, 122.40, 124.20, 124.87, 126.61, 126.93, 127.52, 132.25, 138.23, 143.76, 148.31, 164.07, 164.08; Anal. calcd. For C20H17ClN4O: C, 65.84; H, 4.70; N, 15.36; Found C, 66.01; H, 4.78; N, 15.49.

3-(((1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)-1-benzylindolin-2-one (9e)

Yield 70%, m.p. 243–245 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3419 (NH), 1702 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 4.98 (s, 2H, benzylic CH2), 6.99 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.11 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.24–7.39 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 7.54–7.56 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.23 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.28–8.30 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.45 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.2 Hz), 9.00 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 12.19 (s, 1H, NH indole, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 43.12 (benzylic CH2), 110.27, 112.71, 113.19, 117.10, 121.72, 122.48, 123.19, 123.97, 124.97, 127.69 (2C), 127.92, 127.98, 129.17 (2C), 132.97, 136.73, 137.29, 138.08, 144.69, 148.59, 162.94, 164.58 (C=O); MS m/z [%]: 378 [M+, 5.01] 91 [100]; Anal. calcd. For C24H18N4O: C, 76.17; H, 4.79; N, 14.81; Found C, 76.44; H, 4.85; N, 15.06.

3-(((1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)-1-benzyl-5-chloroindolin-2-one (9f)

Yield 73%, m.p. 264–266 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3380 (NH), 1698 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 4.98 (s, 2H, benzylic CH2), 7.01 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.24–7.34 (m, 7H, Ar-H), 7.44 (dd, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz), 7.56 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 8.28–8.29 (m, 2H, -CH=N- and Ar-H), 8.57 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 2.0 Hz), 9.05 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 12.28 (s, 1H, NH indole, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 43.24 (benzylic CH2), 111.73, 112.83, 113.42, 118.26, 121.61, 122.42, 124.21, 124.83, 126.93, 127.51 (2C), 127.66, 127.98, 129.19 (2C), 132.14, 136.43, 138.20, 138.34, 143.23, 147.79, 164.31, 164.32 (C=O); MS m/z [%]: 414 [(M + 2)+, 1.41], 412 [M+, 3.85], 91 [100]; Anal. calcd. For C24H17ClN4O: C, 69.82; H, 4.15; N, 13.57; Found C, 70.04; H, 4.18; N, 13.81

Synthesis of 3-(hydrazonomethyl)-1-propyl-1H-indole 10

To a stirred solution of 1-propyl-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde 5b (1.9 g, 10 mmol) in ethanol (15 ml), 99% hydrazine hydrate (2.5 ml, 50 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 2 h, and then the formed precipitate upon cooling was filtered off, washed with water, dried and recrystallised from methanol to afford hydrazone 10. Yield 68%, m.p. 127–129 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 3294 (NH2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.83 (t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.75 (sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 7.6 Hz), 4.13 (t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.17–7.27 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.54 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.92 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.33 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.85 (s, 1H, H-2 indole); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.56 (–CH2–CH2–H3), 23.40 (–CH2–H2–CH3), 47.86 (-H2-CH2-CH3), 110.90, 111.60, 121.18, 122.75, 123.10, 125.70, 134.89, 137.55, 155.08; Anal. calcd. For C12H15N3: C, 71.61; H, 7.51; N, 20.88; Found C, 71.82; H, 7.43; N, 20.72.

General procedure for the synthesis of target compounds 11a–c

Following the same procedures descried above for the preparation of compounds 6a–r.

1-Methyl-3-(((1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (11a)

Yield 70%, m.p. 124–126 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 1711 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.84 (t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 6.8 Hz), 1.80 (sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 6.8 Hz), 3.19 (s, 3H, N-CH3), 4.24 (t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 6.8 Hz), 7.08 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.12 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.32–7.36 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.44 (dt, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0, 1.0 Hz), 7.54 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.66–7.68 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.27–8.34 (m, 2H, -CH=N- and Ar-H), 8.40 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.2 Hz), 8.95 (s, 1H, H-2 indole); MS m/z [%]: 344 [M+, 29.71], 143 [100]; 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.52, 23.28, 26.43, 48.28, 109.69, 111.70, 111.77, 116.90, 121.94, 122.69, 123.01, 123.95, 125.58, 127.83, 133.09, 138.03, 139.27, 145.79, 148.92, 162.24, 164.43; Anal. calcd. For C21H20N4O: C, 73.23; H, 5.85; N, 16.27; Found C, 72.98; H, 5.94; N, 16.23.

1-Propyl-3-(((1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (11b)

Yield 58%, m.p. 96–98 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 1706 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.84 (t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 7.2 Hz), 0.88 (t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.61 (sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.83 (sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.72 (t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.20 (t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 6.91 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.15–7.19 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.37–7.52 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 8.25 (s, 1H, -CH=N-), 8.29–8.31 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.39 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 8.94 (s, 1H, H-2 indole); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.63, 11.65, 19.02, 20.68, 41.47, 41.66, 116.94, 117.97, 118.01, 119.38, 119.76, 123.22, 126.24, 127.31, 133.87, 137.40, 137.92, 143.26, 144.35, 146.45, 152.76, 153.09, 162.52; MS m/z [%]: 372 [M+, 24.94], 315 [81.21], 143 [100]; Anal. calcd. For C23H24N4O: C, 74.17; H, 6.49; N, 15.04; Found C, 74.38; H, 6.56; N, 15.29.

1-Benzyl-3-(((1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazono)indolin-2-one (11c)

Yield 65%, m.p. 143–145 °C; IR (KBr, ν cm−1): 1710 (C=O); 1H NMR (DMSO-d) δ (ppm): 0.86 (t, 3H, –CH2–CH2–C3, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.82 (sextet, 2H, –CH2–C2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.25 (t, 2H, –C2–CH2–CH3, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.98 (s, 2H, benzylic CH2), 6.99 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.11 (t, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.24–7.39 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 7.67–7.69 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 8.29–8.31 (m, 2H, -CH=N- and Ar-H), 8.44 (d, 1H, Ar-H, J = 7.2 Hz), 8.98 (s, 1H, H-2 indole); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 11.54, 26.72, 43.17, 48.32, 112.65, 114.00, 114.97, 117.33, 118.01, 118.43, 119.41, 119.72, 123.16, 124.65, 127.31, 129.19, 135.95, 136.65, 137.39, 138.52, 143.26, 144.70, 147.38, 152.74, 153.07, 162.43, 164.61; MS m/z [%]: 420 [M+, 8.91], 91 [100]; Anal. calcd. For C27H24N4O: C, 77.12; H, 5.75; N, 13.32; Found C, 77.40; H, 5.79; N, 13.48.

Biological evaluation

Assessment of in vitro cytotoxic activity

HepG-2, HCT-116 and MCF-7 cancer cell lines were obtained from VACSERA Tissue Culture Unit. The cells were propagated in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum, 1% L-glutamine, HEPES buffer and 50 µg/ml gentamycin. All cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 and were subcultured two times a week. Cytotoxicity was determined following a reported procedure. The relation between surviving cells and drug concentration is plotted to get the survival curve of each tumour cell line after treatment with the specified compound. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was estimated from graphic plots of the dose response curve for each conc. using Graphpad Prism software (San Diego, CA). The data presented are the mean of at least three separate experiments.

In vitro anti-proliferative activity by NCI-USA

The anticancer assays were performed in accordance with the protocol of the Drug Evaluation Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD. A 48 h drug exposure protocol was used and sulphorhodamine B (SRB) protein assay was applied to estimate the cell viability and growth, as reported earlier,.

DNA-flow cytometry analysis

To determine the effect of compound 6n on the cell cycle distribution MCF-7 cell line; cell cycle analysis was performed using the CycleTEST™ PLUS DNA Reagent Kit (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA). Control cells with known DNA content (PBMCs) were used as a reference point for determining the DI (DNA Index) for the test samples. The cells were stained with propodium iodide stain following the procedure provided by the kit and then run on the DNA cytometer. Cell-cycle distribution was calculated using CELLQUEST software (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA).

Annexin V-FITC apoptosis assay

Apoptotic cells were further analysed by Annexin V-FITC/DAPI assay (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI). Briefly, MCF-7 cells were cultured to a monolayer then treated with compound 6n at the IC50 concentration (1.04 µM) as described earlier. Cells were then harvested through trypsinisation, and rinsed twice in PBS followed by binding buffer. Moreover, cells were re-suspended in 100 lL of binding buffer with the addition of 1 lL of FITC-Annexin V (Becton Dickinson BD PharmingenTM, Heidelberg, Germany) followed by an incubation period of 30 min at 4 °C. Cells were then rinsed in binding buffer and re-suspended in 150 lL of binding buffer with the addition of 1 lL of DAPI (1 lg/lL in PBS) (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany). Cells were then analysed using the flow cytometer BD FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and the results were interpreted with FlowJo7.6.4 software (Tree Star, FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR)

RNA extraction, real-time PCR analysis and quantification of gene expression

The gene expression of caspase3, caspase8, caspase 9, Bax, Bcl-2 and cytochrome-C was assessed by total mRNA extraction from cells using RNeasy Mini Kit®, Up to 1 × 107 cells, depending on the cell line, are disrupted in Buffer RLT and homogenised & disrupted, Ethanol is then added to the lysate, creating conditions that promote selective binding of RNA to the RNeasy membrane. The sample is then applied to the RNeasy Mini spin column. Total RNA binds to the membrane, contaminants are efficiently was headway, and high-quality RNA is eluted in RNase-free water. Primer sequences for each gene were as follows: caspase-3 forward primer 5′-TGCATACTCCACAGCACCTGGTTA-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CATGGCACAAAGCGACTGGATGAA-3′; Caspase-8 forward primer 5′-TTTCACTGTGTTAGCCAGGGTGGTA-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CCTGTAATCCCAGCACTTTGGGAG-3′; Caspase-9 forward primer 5′-TCAGTGACGTCTGTGTTCAGGAGA-3′ and reverse primer 5′-TTGTTGATGATGAGGCAG TAGCCG-3′; Bcl-2 forward primer 5′-ATGACCAGACACTGACCATCCACT-3′ and reverse primer 5′-ATGTAGTGGTTCTCCTGGTGGCAA-3; Bax forward primer 5′-TCTACTTTGCCAGCAAACTGGTGC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-TGTCCAGCCCATGATGGTTCTGAT-3′; Cytochrome-C forward primer 5′-AGCTGGAGACGTTGAGAAGG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-ATCTTCGTGCCAGGGATGTA-3′; GAPDH was used as reference housekeeping gene with forward primer 5′-TTCCAGGACCAAGATCCCTCCAAA-3′ and reverse primer 5′-ATGGTGGTGAAGACACCAGTGAAC-3′.

DPPH-free radical scavenging activities

The samples were tested for the antioxidant activity by measuring their radical scavenging ability that was assessed by the stable 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl free radical (DPPH; purchased from Sigma; St. Louis, MO) scavenging method as modified by ElSheikh et al.. In details, 150 µl (DMSO solution; 1000 µg/ml final concentration) of each sample (or ascorbic acid as a reference antioxidant) was added to 850 µl pure methanol and 10 two-fold dilutions were made from this stock solution to give good dose-response curve then 2 ml of freshly prepared 0.13 mM DPPH solution in methanol was added to each tube. For control sample, 850 µl methanol and 150 µl dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) were added to 2 ml DPPH solution The sample solutions were vigorously shaken on a vortex for 1 min. and then the absorbance was measured at 516 nm in a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Spectronic Spectrometer, Milton Roy Ltd, Ivyland, PA) after 30 min. The radical scavenging ability (RSA) was calculated according to the following equation: where Ac is the absorbance of control DPPH sample without antioxidant; As is the absorbance of tested sample after 30 min. The concentration required for 50% radical scavenging ability (IC50) was calculated from the graphic plots.

Oxidative stress parameters

Total protein assay in MCF-7 cells

The total proteins were assayed in treated and non-treated MCF-7 cells according to Lowry et al.. Briefly, a solution containing 0.01% cupric sulphate, 0.01% NaK Tartarate, 2% sodium carbonate and 0.1 N sodium hydroxide was added to each sample and to each tube containing BSA and water (for the standard curve of the assay). Samples were vortexed and then allowed to incubate for 10 min at RT. Then, Folin–Ciocalten phenol reagent was added to each reaction tube to a final concentration of 0.1 N. Samples were vortexed and then allowed to incubate for 30 min at RT. The absorbance of each sample tube was then read at 500 nm. A standard curve was constructed and each sample protein concentration was then calculated by interpolating within the range of values provided by the standard curve. All Lowry protein assay reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity

SOD activity was done according to Kakkar et al.. SOD assay is based on the spectrophotometric assessment of the inhibition of nitro blue tetrazolium-NADH and phenazine methosulphate (PMS)-mediated formazan formation. Absorbance was measured at 560 nm. About 50% inhibition of formazan formation under the assay condition in 1 min is taken as one unit of enzyme activity/minute.

Catalase (CAT)activity

CAT was assayed spectrophotometrically using the method of Aebi et al.. Assay is based on the principle of measurement of decomposition of H2O2 by CAT measured at 240 nm.

Glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx) activity

The method of Paglia and Valentine was used to measure GPx activity. Cell pellets were homogenised in stock buffer containing 55 mM potassium phosphate, 1 mM sodium azide and 1 mM EDTA. GPx activity was measured by adding 0.25 mM H2O2 in the presence of 1 mM GSH, 1 EU/ml glutathione reductase (GR) and 0.2 mM NADPH and measuring the change in absorbance at 340 nm for 5 min. GSH is oxidised by H2O2 to GSSG which is recycled by GR in presence of NADPH. Data were normalised per mg protein as determined by the Lowry protein assay.

Malondialdehyde (MDA) assay

MDA is the last marker of the lipid peroxidation pathway. This assay is according to the repercussion of MDA with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) that forms the MDATBA adduct that can be quantified calorimetrically. Briefly, cells were collected by centrifugation and sonicated in ice-cold potassium chloride (1.15%) and centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm. The resulting supernatant (1 ml) was added to 2 ml of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reagent (15% TCA, 0.7% TBA and 0.25 N HCl) and heated at 100 °C for 15 min in a boiling bath. The sample was then placed in cold and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 10 min. Absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 535 nm.

Carbonyl protein content assay

Protein carbonyl (PC) is the marker of protein oxidation. The carbonyl was identified by measuring the PC residues using dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH). Absorbance of the samples was measured at 370 nm.

Results and discussion

The proposed synthetic routes to prepare the target compounds are shown in Schemes 1–3. The synthesis of the N-substituted-indole-3-carbaldehyde derivatives 5a–c was accomplished through formylation of 1H-indole 1 with phosphorus oxychloride and DMF to give 1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde 2, then alkylation of the latter by methyl/propyl/benzyl bromide in DMF in the presence of potassium carbonate. While, refluxing isatins 3a–d with hydrazine hydrate in methanol afforded the 3-hydrazonoindolin-2-ones 4a–d. The first series of the target compounds 6a–r was obtained in good yields (75–83%) through condensation of hydrazones 4a–d with 1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde 2 or N-substituted-indole-3-carbaldehydes 5a–c in absolute ethyl alcohol in the presence of a catalytic amount of glacial acetic acid (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.

Synthesis of target compounds 6a–r; Reagents and conditions: (i) dry DMF/POCl3/NaOH/H2O/2 h, (ii) alkyl (or benzyl) bromide/THF/NaH, r.t. 12 h, (iii) CH3OH/NH2NH2.H2O/reflux 1 h, (iv) EtOH/AcOH (catalytic)/reflux 3 h and (v) Hydrazones 4a–d/EtOH/AcOH (catalytic)/reflux 3 h.

Synthesis of target compounds 6a–r; Reagents and conditions: (i) dry DMF/POCl3/NaOH/H2O/2 h, (ii) alkyl (or benzyl) bromide/THF/NaH, r.t. 12 h, (iii) CH3OH/NH2NH2.H2O/reflux 1 h, (iv) EtOH/AcOH (catalytic)/reflux 3 h and (v) Hydrazones 4a–d/EtOH/AcOH (catalytic)/reflux 3 h. We next synthesised another series of hybrids (9a–f) to assess the impact of N-alkylation of the isatin moiety. Reaction of isatins 3a,b with methyl/propyl/benzyl bromide were carried out in a refluxing dry acetonitrile in the presence of potassium carbonate to furnish N-alkylated isatins 7a–f, respectively, which subsequently condensed with hydrazine hydrate in methanol to afford the hydrazones 8a–f. The target compounds 9a–f were obtained (64–75% yields) by reacting the hydrazone intermediates 8a–f with H-indole-3-carbaldehyde 2 in a refluxing ethanol in the presence of a catalytic amount of glacial acetic acid (Scheme 2). Trials to increase the yield, by using only glacial acetic acid as a solvent, failed as it is reported that it will give another product.
Scheme 2.

Synthesis of target compounds 9a–f; Reagents and conditions: (i) methyl, propyl or benzyl bromide, dry acetonitrile, K2CO3, reflux 3 h, (ii) CH3OH/NH2NH2.H2O/reflux 1 h and (iii) EtOH/AcOH (catalytic)/reflux 3 h.

Synthesis of target compounds 9a–f; Reagents and conditions: (i) methyl, propyl or benzyl bromide, dry acetonitrile, K2CO3, reflux 3 h, (ii) CH3OH/NH2NH2.H2O/reflux 1 h and (iii) EtOH/AcOH (catalytic)/reflux 3 h. Synthesis of target compounds 11a–c; Reagents and conditions: (i) EtOH/NH2NH2.H2O/reflux 2 h and (ii) EtOH/AcOH (catalytic)/reflux 3 h. As a part of the SAR study, an additional series of derivatives (11a–c) was designed. To prepare such set of analogues (11a–c), the intermediate 10 was condensed with the appropriate N-substituted isatin 7a,c,e in ethanol to furnish the target compounds 11a–c, respectively, with 58–70% yields (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3.

Synthesis of target compounds 11a–c; Reagents and conditions: (i) EtOH/NH2NH2.H2O/reflux 2 h and (ii) EtOH/AcOH (catalytic)/reflux 3 h.

The structures of the all synthesised compounds were confirmed under the basis of spectral and elemental analyses which were in full agreement with the proposed structures.

In vitro anti-proliferative activity assay

Anti-proliferative activity towards MCF-7, HepG-2 and HCT-116 cell lines

Anti-proliferative activity of the synthesised compounds was proved by performing cytotoxic activity assay against three different cell lines (MCF-7, HepG-2 and HCT-116) as reported. The results showed various strength of activity as shown in Table 1. Scrutinising the results reveals that compounds 6 of the first series, which is characterised by free NH of the isatin group and diverse N-substituents of indole moiety, illustrated their activity with respect to the substituent on NH of indole moiety. For example, compounds 6a–h, with –NH and –N–CH3 on indole group, displayed no or weak cytotoxic activity against all three cell lines as they all possess IC50 values exceeding 24.55 µM. Grafting an N-propyl group on –NH of indole moiety yielded compounds with variant activity. For instance, compounds 6j and 6k with 5-Cl and 5-Br substituent on the isatin group exhibited moderate cytotoxic activity against the three cell lines ranging from 12.74 µM up to 25.87 µM. Exceptionally, compound 6i with N-propyl indole group and unsubstituted isatin moiety and compound 6n with N-propyl indole group and substituted 7-F isatin moiety, displayed significant cytotoxic activity against the three cell lines with IC50 values of 3.67 µM and 8.7 µM, respectively, against HCT-116 cell line and IC50 values of 13 µM and 3.97 µM, respectively, against HepG-2 cell line. Compounds 6i and 6n with the N-propyl indole group and unsubstituted indolin-2-one moiety or unsubstituted indolin-2-one moiety with the 7-F group, displayed strong cytotoxic activity against MCF-7 (IC50 = 3.58 µM and 1.04 µM) as shown in Table 1. Fortunately, introduction of benzyl group on indole moiety was fruitful in compound 6q (HCT-116; IC50 = 5.99 µM, HepG-2; IC50 = 3.81 µM). On the other hand, all other derivatives with different substitutions on indolin-2-one moiety possessed weak or no activity.
Table 1.

Antitumor activity of compounds 6a–u, 9a–f, and 11a–c against HCT-116, HepG2, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines.

 IC50 (µM)a
CompoundHCT-116HepG-2MCF-7
6a>100>100>100
6b>10094.62 ± 6.93>100
6c>10058.34 ± 2.38>100
6d95.46 ± 4.0852.95 ± 1.87>100
6e37.46 ± 1.2424.55 ± 0.4755.34 ± 2.72
6f>100>100>100
6g>100>100>100
6h>100>100>100
6i3.67 ± 1.7913.00 ± 0.673.58 ± 0.28
6j14.00 ± 1.0218.41 ± 1.0325.87 ± 1.88
6k25.42 ± 1.2212.74 ± 0.8314.38 ± 0.98
6l99.14 ± 4.5283.78 ± 3.41>100
6m95.59 ± 5.8883.74 ± 2.29>100
6n8.57 ± 0.523.97 ± 0.191.04 ± 0.08
6o80.50 ± 2.4857.00 ± 1.4494.00 ± 1.44
6p27.80 ± 0.9660.60 ± 2.9227.20 ± 1.58
6q5.99 ± 0.423.81 ± 0.137.67 ± 0.62
6r>100>100>100
9a>100>100>100
9b>100>100>100
9c>100>100>100
9d55.30 ± 1.7827.70 ± 1.0498.40 ± 5.74
9e>10091.60 ± 5.44>100
9f98.20 ± 4.44>100>100
11a70.13 ± 3.2055.25 ± 3.1839.42 ± 1.06
11b>100>100>100
11c>100>100>100
Dox.3.70 ± 0.263.56 ± 0.172.57 ± 0.18

IC50 values are the mean ± SE of three separate experiments.

Antitumor activity of compounds 6a–u, 9a–f, and 11a–c against HCT-116, HepG2, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines. IC50 values are the mean ± SE of three separate experiments. Unfortunately, changing the N-substitution from indole moiety to isatin moiety did not display any cytotoxic activity as in compounds 9a–f revealed by their high IC50 values as shown in Table 1. This gives insight that N-propyl substitution of the indole moiety is advantageous to anti-proliferative activity over substitution of the indolin-2-one group. Accordingly, a third series was designed (11a–c), sparing the N-propyl indole scaffold and substituting the indolin-2-one group with different substituents. Unfortunately, none of derivatives 11a–c proved to be a potent cytotoxic compound as they possess IC50 values on the three cell lines exceeding 27.7 µM.

NCI, USA anti-proliferative assay of 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q towards 60 cell lines

The structures of the active synthesised compounds were submitted to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Developmental Therapeutic Program (www.dtp.nci.nih.gov). Four compounds 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q were selected to be screened for their anticancer activity in vitro. The compounds were screened at one dose primary anticancer assay towards a panel of 60 cancer cell lines (concentration 10−5 M). The tumour cell lines were taken from nine different organs (blood, colon, lung, brain, skin, ovary, kidney, prostate and breast). The data reported as mean-graph of the percent growth of the treated cells, and presented as percentage growth inhibition (GI%) caused by the test compounds (Table 2).
Table 2.

Percentage growth inhibition (GI %) of in vitro subpanel tumour cell lines at 10 μM concentration for compounds 6i, 6j, 6n, and 6q.

 Compounda
Subpanel/cell line6i (NSC 795310)6j (NSC 795312)6n (NSC795322)6q (NSC795327)
Leukemia
 CCRF-CEM24316619
 HL-60(TB)39205616
 K-56229376533
 MOLT-426395233
 RPMI-8226252138
 SR35337620
Non-small cell lung cancer
 A549/ATCC2312
 EKVX633344
 HOP-6212
 HOP-92243228
 NCI-H226122620
 NCI-H2315
 NCI-H322M1516
 NCI-H4602648
 NCI-H52217142816
Colon cancer
 COLO 20512
 HCC-2998
 HCT-116122120
 HCT-152523
 HT291423
 KM122414
 SW-6201137
CNS cancer
 SF-2681813
 SF-295
 SF-53915
 SNB-19
 SNB-7535191715
 U251122216
Melanoma
 LOX IMVI172216
 MALME-3M
 M14122013
 MDA-MB-43511
 SK-MEL-2
 SK-MEL-28
 SK-MEL-5112012
 UACC-257181217
 UACC-6227252121
Ovarian cancer
 IGROV131503919
 OVCAR-32135
 OVCAR-433122116
 OVCAR-572
 OVCAR-8102117
 NCI/ADR-RES16
 SK-OV-31525
Renal cancer
 786-0
 A4981685
 ACHN2926
 RXF 393381842
 SN12C11171716
 TK-1018
 UO-3130473524
Prostate
 PC-313461225
 DU-14514
Breast cancer
 MCF727324617
 MDA-MB-23111291817
 HS 578T11291319
 BT-549
 T-47D29315010
 MDA-MB-468252123143
Mean growth, %89818185
Sensitive cell lines no.31443926

Only GI % higher than 10% are shown.

Percentage growth inhibition (GI %) of in vitro subpanel tumour cell lines at 10 μM concentration for compounds 6i, 6j, 6n, and 6q. Only GI % higher than 10% are shown. Close examination of the obtained results, GI% values in Table 2, suggested that compounds 6j and 6n (N-propyl-indole derivatives combined with substituted indolin-2-one) are the most active analogues in this assay, showing broad spectrum activity toward numerous cell lines that belong to different tumour subpanels. Both compounds 6j and 6n displayed mean inhibition =19%, and possessed anti-proliferative activity against 44 and 39 cell lines, respectively, representing all subpanels (GI; 11–76%). Compound 6n showed potent growth inhibitory effect over leukaemia CCRF-CEM, HL-60(TB), K-562, MOLT-4, SR and breast cancer MCF7, T-47D with inhibition percent of 66%, 56%, 65%, 52%, 76%, 46% and 50%, respectively. Whereas, compound 6j showed potent growth inhibitory effect over non-small cell lung cancer EKVX, ovarian cancer IGROV1, renal cancer UO-31 and prostate cancer PC-3 with inhibition percent of 63%, 50%, 47% and 46%, respectively. All the leukaemia (except RPMI-8226) and breast cancer (except BT-549) cell lines were sensitive to all the tested compounds 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q with GI% range of 16–76% and 11–50%, respectively. The susceptible cell lines to the tested compounds 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q with GI % ≥ 25 are presented in Figure 4. Only leukaemia K-562, MOLT-4 and renal UO-31 cell lines were susceptible to all the tested compounds, with GI % ≥ 25. While compound 6q showed potent growth inhibition against ovarian cancer OVCAR-5 and renal cancer A498 (GI % = 72 and 85, respectively), it exerted lethal activity over breast cancer MDA-MB-468 with GI % = 143.
Figure 4.

The most sensitive cell lines towards the target compounds 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q according to the GI %.

The most sensitive cell lines towards the target compounds 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q according to the GI %.

Cell-cycle analysis and apoptotic study

Compound 6n displayed a significant cytotoxic activity against MCF-7 cancer cell lines. Consequently, more biological studies were performed to explore its mechanistic study inside this cancer cell line. Cell-cycle analysis and apoptotic cell markers would be taken into consideration during this investigative study.

Cell-cycle analysis

Anti-proliferative agents abort cell growth by arresting its proliferation at certain well-known checkpoints. Upon treatment of cancer cells with anticancer agents, distinguish cells can be detected in various phases of cell cycle. Herein, MCF-7 cells were treated with compound 6n at its IC50 (1.04 µM). Analysing the obtained data, reveals that compound 6n produced a marked decrease of the cell population at G1 and S phases as compared to the control (55.3% and 27.56%, versus 64.82% and 26.85%, respectively). Whereas it caused significant decrease of cell population in the G2/M phase when compared with untreated control cells (17.13% versus 8.33%). These results prove that compound 6n exerts its cytotoxic effect in MCF-7 cells through arresting its proliferation in G2/M phase (Figure 5).
Figure 5.

Effect of compound 6n on the phases of cell cycle of MCF-7 cells.

Effect of compound 6n on the phases of cell cycle of MCF-7 cells.

Annexin-V FTIC apoptotic study

Annexin V-based flow cytometry analysis indicates either the cell death is achieved through programmed apoptosis or non-specific necrosis. Therefore, Annexin V-FTIC/DAPI dual staining assay (Figure 6) was carried out for compound 6n aiming to evaluate its apoptotic effect. In the current study, MCF-7 cells were treated with 6n.
Figure 6.

Effect of compound 6n on the percentage of Annexin V-FITC positive staining in MCF-7 cells versus control (1% DMSO).

Effect of compound 6n on the percentage of Annexin V-FITC positive staining in MCF-7 cells versus control (1% DMSO). Scrutinising the results of Annexin-V FTIC assay revealed that 6n exhibited a marked increase in the percent of Annexin V-FITC positive apoptotic cells including both the early and late apoptotic phases, from 1.14% to 21.74% which implies 19-folds increase as compared with the control (p < .001). Moreover, only 2.45% of the cells showed non-specific necrosis. These findings are in accordance with the previous apoptosis studies observations that propound undoubtedly that compound 6n exhibits pro-apoptotic potential which contributes to its anti-proliferative activity.

Activation of proteolytic caspase cascade

Activation of the cysteine aspartic proteases, known as caspases, comprises a pivotal role in the self-automated cell death; apoptosis. Consequently, the effect of compound 6n on caspase 3, the executioner caspase, was evaluated aiming to investigate its pro-apoptotic effect. Moreover, its effect on caspase 8 and caspase 9 activations was determined in order to specify either apoptosis was induced through the intrinsic or extrinsic pathway. Results revealed that compound 6n amazingly induced the level of active caspase 3 by 76-folds in comparison with control cells. Exploring its effects on both caspase 8 and caspase 9 revealed that it potentiated the level of the former by only 1.98-folds, whereas it produced marked increments of the latter by 928-folds. These results strongly suggest that compound 6n induced apoptosis in MCF-7 cell line through the intrinsic rather than the extrinsic pathway (Table 3).
Table 3.

Effect of compound 6n on the active caspases-3, -8 and -9 levels, and the expression levels of Bcl-2, Bax and cytochrome C, respectively, in MCF-7 cancer cells treated with the compound at its IC50 concentration.

CompoundCasp-3 IU/mlCasp-8 IU/mlCasp-9 IU/mlBax IU/mlBcl-2 IU/mlBax/Bcl-2 ratioCyt-C IU/ml
Control17333368246985178,2330.0055660
6n131,927***6690**228,320***374,152***165,783**2.256383,873***

Data are mean ± SD of three separate experiments.

Significantly different from control (1% DMSO) at p < .05.

Significantly different from control at p < .01.

Significantly different from control at p < .001.

Effect of compound 6n on the active caspases-3, -8 and -9 levels, and the expression levels of Bcl-2, Bax and cytochrome C, respectively, in MCF-7 cancer cells treated with the compound at its IC50 concentration. Data are mean ± SD of three separate experiments. Significantly different from control (1% DMSO) at p < .05. Significantly different from control at p < .01. Significantly different from control at p < .001.

Effects on mitochondrial apoptosis pathway (Bcl-2 family) proteins

Members of the Bcl-2 are chief regulators of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Among these, Bax and Bcl-2 precisely modulate this programmed process. Both proteins have opposing effects on apoptosis induction, where Bax possesses pro-apoptotic activity while Bcl-2 has anti-apoptotic effect,. Thus, the ratio between them is the determining factor for cell fate regulation. Accordingly, in the current study, MCF-7 cells were treated with the IC50 of compound 6n and its effect on the levels of both Bax and Bcl-2 were recorded in Table 3. Furthermore, the Bax/Bcl2 ratio was determined to give more profound insight of the pro-apoptotic activity of the molecule. As indicated by the results in Table 3, compound 6n amazingly boosted the Bax level 379.8-folds as compared with the control. Whereas it only downregulated the Bcl2 level by 1.07-folds. A rather decisive value is the Bax/Bcl2 ratio which gives insight to the overall pro-apoptotic effect of our compound. The calculated value for the Bax/Bcl2 ratio in comparison with that of the reference compound is increased by 407-folds. Conclusively, the ability of compound 6n to upregulate Bax level, downregulate Bcl2 level while significantly boosting the Bax/Bcl2 ratio proves undoubtedly compound 6n pro-apoptotic activity.

Cytochrome C activation

Mitochondrial cytochrome C is released into the cytosol as a result of Bax/Bcl2 increments. Accordingly, it potentiates a cascade of caspases that finally triggers the executioner caspase: caspase 3,. From the previous findings, compound 6n proved to induce apoptosis in MCF-7 cell line through activation of the intrinsic rather than the extrinsic pathway as witnessed by the significant augmentation of caspase 9 level compared to caspase 8 level increments. Thus, we measured the level of cytochrome C to further emphasise the adoption of the intrinsic pathway. MCF-7 cells were treated with the IC50 of compound 6n and the level of cytochrome C was determined as compared with the control. Results revealed that cytochrome C level increased by 581-folds (Table 3).

Apoptotic effect through generation of ROS

DPPH free radical scavenging activities

In the current study, the antioxidant potential of the synthesised compounds 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q was tested using one of the most common antioxidant assays; the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl free radical) radical scavenging assay, and were compared with standard antioxidant (ascorbic acid). DPPH is a stable free radical that has the potential to accept an electron producing a stable molecule. Compounds that have the ability to act as electron donors result in reduction of this DPPH radical revealing their antioxidant potential. The principle of the assay depends on measuring the absorbance of the odd electrons of DPPH at 516 nm. In the presence of free radical scavengers, the absorbance decreases proportional to the decrease of the DPPH radical concentration. IC50 values that produce 50% inhibition of the DPPH radical are given in Table 4.
Table 4.

Evaluation of antioxidant activity for compounds 6i, 6j, 6n, and 6q using DPPH radical scavenging activity.

CompoundIC50 (μg/ml)a
6i115.8 ± 6.4
6j43.9 ± 0.8
6n31.6 ± 0.8
6q48.1 ± 1.7
Ascorbic acid9.7 ± 0.5

IC50 values are the mean ± SE of three separate experiments.

Evaluation of antioxidant activity for compounds 6i, 6j, 6n, and 6q using DPPH radical scavenging activity. IC50 values are the mean ± SE of three separate experiments. The results reveal that all the tested compounds, 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q, exhibited much higher IC50 values compared with that of ascorbic acid (IC50 = 115.8 µg/ml, 43.9 µg/ml, 31.6 µg/ml and 48.1 µg/ml, versus 9.7 µg/ml, respectively). This confirms that they have low antioxidant potential which favours the induction of oxidative stress that triggers apoptosis in neoplastic cells.

Oxidative stress parameters

In the current study, we evaluated the activities of some free radical enzymes including SOD, CAT, GSHPx, lipid peroxide (LP) and PC in MCF-7 cells treated with our synthesised compounds (Table 5). Moreover, the level of total protein was evaluated as an indication of the cytotoxic effect of the tested compounds.
Table 5.

Oxidative stress markers and antioxidants in control and MCF-7 treated cells with compounds 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q.

 Compound
ROS6i6j6n6qControl
Total protein (μg/106 cells)59.1 ± 7.589.2 ± 10.454.6 ± 8.270.8 ± 6.4131.9 ± 11.7
Superoxide dismatase (SOD) (nMol/mg protein)137.8 ± 12.4104.6 ± 7.8145.2 ± 9.6114.5 ± 10.164.6 ± 2.8
Catalase (CAT) (U/mg protein)8.7 ± 2.922.6 ± 1.210.9 ± 4.118.4 ± 1.824.8 ± 3.4
Glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx) (mU/mg protein)4.9 ± 1.36.7 ± 1.54.6 ± 0.85.3 ± 1.18.9 ± 1.8
Malondialdehyde (MDA) (nMol/mg protein)1.75 ± 0.310.56 ± 0.181.68 ± 0.241.27 ± 0.150.42 ± 0.06
Protein carbonyl (PC) (mMol/mg protein)16.8 ± 2.48.4 ± 0.428.1 ± 3.712.3 ± 1.56.4 ± 0.2

Data are mean ± SD of three separate experiments.

Oxidative stress markers and antioxidants in control and MCF-7 treated cells with compounds 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q. Data are mean ± SD of three separate experiments. The results reveal that treatment of the MCF-7 cells with IC50 values of the compounds 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q elevated the level of SOD with concomitant depression of CAT and GSHPx as compared to the control cells. Additionally, the levels of ROS exemplified in LP were significantly elevated in comparison with the control cells. Moreover, the levels of PC were also elevated consequently (Table 5). These results can thoroughly prove that the cytotoxic effect of the tested compounds 6i, 6j, 6n and 6q is partially exerted by disrupting the balance between free radical or ROS production and the antioxidant system. This is achieved through elevation of ROS (LP) levels evidenced by the significant increase in the level of SOD which triggers the production of ROS that in turn mediates apoptosis. ROS catabolising enzymes as CAT and GSH-Px levels were shown to be depleted in MCF-7 cells treated with the synthesised compounds as compared with the control which guarantees the consequent accumulation of ROS that eventually affects tumour cell killing due to protein oxidation which converts the protein to PC derivatives. In accordance, the elevated PC levels imply the protein oxidative damage as it is a reliable marker for protein damage. These results are consistent with the postulation that these compounds endeavour their cytotoxic activity through ROS generation. In accordance with these findings, the level of protein in the treated cells was lower than that of the control due to the oxidative damage of the protein by ROS over generation.

Conclusion

Hybridisation technique between indole and 3-hydrazinoindolin-2-one was successful to produce apoptosis inducing agents. According to this technique, 27 compounds were designed and synthesised to be investigated for their cytotoxic activity against three cancer cell lines. Compound 6n showed the best activity with IC50 = 1.04 µM against MCF-7 cancer cell line. This compound displayed a broad-spectrum activity against different cancer cell lines in 60-cell line panel test by NCI-USA. Deep apoptotic study on this compound revealed that this compound would disrupt G2/M phase in cell cycle and increase % of early and late apoptosis by 19-folds more than control in Annexin V-FTIC. Compound 6n exhibited an ability to increase the expression of some enzymes that affect the apoptosis as caspase 3, caspase 9, cytochrome c, Bax and decrease the expression of Bcl-2. Compound 6n showed the ability to induce apoptosis by generation of ROS and this shown in a further biological study on oxidative stress markers as superoxide dismutase (SOD), CAT and GSHPx.
  42 in total

1.  Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular docking studies of novel 1-benzene acyl-2-(1-methylindol-3-yl)-benzimidazole derivatives as potential tubulin polymerization inhibitors.

Authors:  Yan-Ting Wang; Ya-Juan Qin; Na Yang; Ya-Liang Zhang; Chang-Hong Liu; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Novel 4/3-((4-oxo-5-(2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)thiazolidin-2-ylidene)amino) benzenesulfonamides: Synthesis, carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity, anticancer activity and molecular modelling studies.

Authors:  Wagdy M Eldehna; Mahmoud F Abo-Ashour; Alessio Nocentini; Paola Gratteri; Ibrahim H Eissa; Mohamed Fares; Omnia E Ismael; Hazem A Ghabbour; Mahmoud M Elaasser; Hatem A Abdel-Aziz; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 3.  Molecular targets and anticancer potential of indole-3-carbinol and its derivatives.

Authors:  Bharat B Aggarwal; Haruyo Ichikawa
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase.

Authors:  D E Paglia; W N Valentine
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1967-07

5.  Inactivation of the orphan nuclear receptor TR3/Nur77 inhibits pancreatic cancer cell and tumor growth.

Authors:  Syng-Ook Lee; Maen Abdelrahim; Kyungsil Yoon; Sudhakar Chintharlapalli; Sabitha Papineni; Kyounghyun Kim; Huamin Wang; Stephen Safe
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening.

Authors:  P Skehan; R Storeng; D Scudiero; A Monks; J McMahon; D Vistica; J T Warren; H Bokesch; S Kenney; M R Boyd
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-07-04       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  A potent indole-3-carbinol derived antitumor agent with pleiotropic effects on multiple signaling pathways in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Jing-Ru Weng; Chen-Hsun Tsai; Samuel K Kulp; Dasheng Wang; Chia-Hui Lin; Hsiao-Ching Yang; Yihui Ma; Aaron Sargeant; Chang-Fang Chiu; Ming-Hsui Tsai; Ching-Shih Chen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Cell death regulation by the Bcl-2 protein family in the mitochondria.

Authors:  Yoshihide Tsujimoto
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.384

9.  Synthesis and in vitro anti-proliferative activity of some novel isatins conjugated with quinazoline/phthalazine hydrazines against triple-negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells as apoptosis-inducing agents.

Authors:  Wagdy M Eldehna; Hadia Almahli; Ghada H Al-Ansary; Hazem A Ghabbour; Mohamed H Aly; Omnia E Ismael; Abdullah Al-Dhfyan; Hatem A Abdel-Aziz
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.051

10.  Discovery of substituted N'-(2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)benzohydrazides as new apoptosis inducers using a cell- and caspase-based HTS assay.

Authors:  Nilantha Sirisoma; Azra Pervin; John Drewe; Ben Tseng; Sui Xiong Cai
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.823

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Target-based anticancer indole derivatives and insight into structure‒activity relationship: A mechanistic review update (2018-2021).

Authors:  Ashima Dhiman; Rupam Sharma; Rajesh K Singh
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 14.903

2.  Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and In Silico Studies of Certain Oxindole-Indole Conjugates as Anticancer CDK Inhibitors.

Authors:  Tarfah Al-Warhi; Ahmed M El Kerdawy; Nada Aljaeed; Omnia E Ismael; Rezk R Ayyad; Wagdy M Eldehna; Hatem A Abdel-Aziz; Ghada H Al-Ansary
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Pyridine-Ureas as Potential Anticancer Agents: Synthesis and In Vitro Biological Evaluation.

Authors:  Mohamed El-Naggar; Hadia Almahli; Hany S Ibrahim; Wagdy M Eldehna; Hatem A Abdel-Aziz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Synthesis, Molecular Docking and β-Glucuronidase Inhibitory Potential of Indole Base Oxadiazole Derivatives.

Authors:  El Hassane Anouar; Moustapha Eid Moustapha; Muhammad Taha; Mohammed H Geesi; Zeinab R Farag; Fazal Rahim; Noor Barak Almandil; Rai Khalid Farooq; Muhammad Nawaz; Ashik Mosaddik
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Synthesis and in vitro anticancer activity of certain novel 1-(2-methyl-6-arylpyridin-3-yl)-3-phenylureas as apoptosis-inducing agents.

Authors:  Wagdy M Eldehna; Ghada S Hassan; Sara T Al-Rashood; Tarfah Al-Warhi; Ahmed E Altyar; Hamad M Alkahtani; Abdulrahman A Almehizia; Hatem A Abdel-Aziz
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.051

6.  Antiproliferative activity and possible mechanism of action of certain 5-methoxyindole tethered C-5 functionalized isatins.

Authors:  Maha S Almutairi; Eman S Hassan; Adam B Keeton; Gary A Piazza; Ali S Abdelhameed; Mohamed I Attia
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of New HDAC1 and HDAC2 Inhibitors Endowed with Ligustrazine as a Novel Cap Moiety.

Authors:  Mohammad M Al-Sanea; Lizaveta Gotina; Mamdouh Fa Mohamed; Della Grace Thomas Parambi; Hesham A M Gomaa; Bijo Mathew; Bahaa G M Youssif; Khalid Saad Alharbi; Zainab M Elsayed; Mohamed A Abdelgawad; Wagdy M Eldehna
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.162

8.  Novel oxindole/benzofuran hybrids as potential dual CDK2/GSK-3β inhibitors targeting breast cancer: design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and in silico studies.

Authors:  Wagdy M Eldehna; Sara T Al-Rashood; Tarfah Al-Warhi; Razan O Eskandrani; Amal Alharbi; Ahmed M El Kerdawy
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.051

9.  Novel Thiazolidinone/Thiazolo[3,2-a]Benzimidazolone-Isatin Conjugates as Apoptotic Anti-proliferative Agents Towards Breast Cancer: One-Pot Synthesis and In Vitro Biological Evaluation.

Authors:  Mohamed El-Naggar; Wagdy M Eldehna; Hadia Almahli; Amr Elgez; Mohamed Fares; Mahmoud M Elaasser; Hatem A Abdel-Aziz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Recent Advancements in the Development of Anti-Breast Cancer Synthetic Small Molecules.

Authors:  Eslam B Elkaeed; Hayam A Abd El Salam; Ahmed Sabt; Ghada H Al-Ansary; Wagdy M Eldehna
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.