Literature DB >> 29560524

EFO-LCI: A New Life Cycle Inventory Database of Forestry Operations in Europe.

Giuseppe Cardellini1,2, Tatiana Valada3, Claire Cornillier4, Estelle Vial4, Marian Dragoi5, Venceslas Goudiaby6, Volker Mues7, Bruno Lasserre8, Arkadiusz Gruchala9, Per Kristian Rørstad10, Mathias Neumann11, Miroslav Svoboda12, Risto Sirgmets13, Olli-Pekka Näsärö14, Frits Mohren6, Wouter M J Achten15, Liesbet Vranken3, Bart Muys16.   

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) has become a common methodology to analyze environmental impacts of forestry systems. Although LCA has been widely applied to forestry since the 90s, the LCAs are still often based on generic Life Cycle Inventory (LCI). With the purpose of improving LCA practices in the forestry sector, we developed a European Life Cycle Inventory of Forestry Operations (EFO-LCI) and analyzed the available information to check if within the European forestry sector national differences really exist. We classified the European forests on the basis of "Forest Units" (combinations of tree species and silvicultural practices). For each Forest Unit, we constructed the LCI of their forest management practices on the basis of a questionnaire filled out by national silvicultural experts. We analyzed the data reported to evaluate how they vary over Europe and how they affect LCA results and made freely available the inventory data collected for future use. The study shows important variability in rotation length, type of regeneration, amount and assortments of wood products harvested, and machinery used due to the differences in management practices. The existing variability on these activities sensibly affect LCA results of forestry practices and raw wood production. Although it is practically unfeasible to collect site-specific data for all the LCAs involving forest-based products, the use of less generic LCI data of forestry practice is desirable to improve the reliability of the studies. With the release of EFO-LCI we made a step toward the construction of regionalized LCI for the European forestry sector.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forest Unit; Forest management; Life cycle assessment; Silviculture; Wood

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29560524     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1024-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  8 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment.

Authors:  Göran Finnveden; Michael Z Hauschild; Tomas Ekvall; Jeroen Guinée; Reinout Heijungs; Stefanie Hellweg; Annette Koehler; David Pennington; Sangwon Suh
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Interactive notebooks: Sharing the code.

Authors:  Helen Shen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment.

Authors:  Stefanie Hellweg; Llorenç Milà i Canals
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  RESEARCH INTEGRITY. Liberating field science samples and data.

Authors:  Marcia McNutt; Kerstin Lehnert; Brooks Hanson; Brian A Nosek; Aaron M Ellison; John Leslie King
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture.

Authors:  B A Nosek; G Alter; G C Banks; D Borsboom; S D Bowman; S J Breckler; S Buck; C D Chambers; G Chin; G Christensen; M Contestabile; A Dafoe; E Eich; J Freese; R Glennerster; D Goroff; D P Green; B Hesse; M Humphreys; J Ishiyama; D Karlan; A Kraut; A Lupia; P Mabry; T A Madon; N Malhotra; E Mayo-Wilson; M McNutt; E Miguel; E Levy Paluck; U Simonsohn; C Soderberg; B A Spellman; J Turitto; G VandenBos; S Vazire; E J Wagenmakers; R Wilson; T Yarkoni
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science.

Authors:  Jelte M Wicherts; Rogier A Kievit; Marjan Bakker; Denny Borsboom
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science.

Authors:  Karthik Ram
Journal:  Source Code Biol Med       Date:  2013-02-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.