BACKGROUND: Hydrodilatation (HD) has been shown to improve pain and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC). There is no consensus concerning how HD should be performed or what volume should be injected. It has distinct advantages compared to surgery; however, it is a painful procedure and is often poorly tolerated. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients referred for HD over a 2.5-year period aiming to assess whether volume injected influences outcome. RESULTS: There were 107 patients treated with HD; of these, 76 (43 female, 32 male) had full data for analysis. The majority were classified as primary AC (n = 57) with an average age of 55.5 years. The mean improvement in Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was 12.1, with females (13.9) and post-traumatic cases of AC (14.1) demonstrating the best outcome. No complications were observed during the HD process. There was a negative correlation observed between volume injected and OSS improvement. Only two patients experienced a poor outcome and required further treatment with manipulation +/- arthroscopic arthrolysis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study supports the use of HD as a first line treatment for AC regardless of the underlying cause, and also demonstrates that the volume injected does appear to influence the outcome.
BACKGROUND: Hydrodilatation (HD) has been shown to improve pain and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC). There is no consensus concerning how HD should be performed or what volume should be injected. It has distinct advantages compared to surgery; however, it is a painful procedure and is often poorly tolerated. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients referred for HD over a 2.5-year period aiming to assess whether volume injected influences outcome. RESULTS: There were 107 patients treated with HD; of these, 76 (43 female, 32 male) had full data for analysis. The majority were classified as primary AC (n = 57) with an average age of 55.5 years. The mean improvement in Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was 12.1, with females (13.9) and post-traumatic cases of AC (14.1) demonstrating the best outcome. No complications were observed during the HD process. There was a negative correlation observed between volume injected and OSS improvement. Only two patients experienced a poor outcome and required further treatment with manipulation +/- arthroscopic arthrolysis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study supports the use of HD as a first line treatment for AC regardless of the underlying cause, and also demonstrates that the volume injected does appear to influence the outcome.
Authors: E Maund; D Craig; S Suekarran; Ar Neilson; K Wright; S Brealey; L Dennis; L Goodchild; N Hanchard; A Rangan; G Richardson; J Robertson; C McDaid Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2012 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Derk A van Kampen; W Jaap Willems; Loes W A H van Beers; Rene M Castelein; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Caroline B Terwee Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 2.359