Eboni G Price-Haywood1,2,3, Wanda Robinson1,2, Jewel Harden-Barrios1,3, Jeffrey Burton1,3, Todd Burstain1. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. 2. The University of Queensland, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA. 3. Center for Applied Health Services Research, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Opioid prescription drug abuse is a major public health concern. Healthcare provider prescribing patterns, especially among non-pain management specialists, are a major factor. Practice guidelines recommend what to do for safe opioid prescribing but do not provide guidance on how to implement best practices. METHODS: We describe the implementation of electronic medical record clinical decision support (EMR CDS) for opioid management of chronic noncancer pain in an integrated delivery system. This prospective cohort study will examine relationships between primary care physician compliance with EMR CDS-guided care (vs usual care), delivery of guideline-concordant care, and changes in the morphine equivalent of prescribed opioids. We report baseline characteristics of patients receiving chronic opioid therapy and organizational prescribing trends. RESULTS: Between August and October 2016, we identified 2,759 primary care patients who received chronic opioid therapy. Of these patients, approximately 71% had chronic noncancer pain, and 62% had diagnoses of depression/anxiety. Six of 36 primary care clinics each had >100 patients receiving chronic opioid therapy. When the EMR CDS launched in October 2017, we identified 54,200 patients who had received opioid therapy for at least 14 days from various specialty and primary care providers during the prior 24 months. Of these patients, 36% had a benzodiazepine coprescription, and 13% had substance abuse diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Health system research that examines workflow-focused strategies to improve physician knowledge and skills for safely managing opioid therapy is needed. If EMR CDS proves to be effective in increasing adherence to practice guidelines, this EMR strategy can potentially be replicated and scaled up nationwide to improve population health management.
BACKGROUND: Opioid prescription drug abuse is a major public health concern. Healthcare provider prescribing patterns, especially among non-pain management specialists, are a major factor. Practice guidelines recommend what to do for safe opioid prescribing but do not provide guidance on how to implement best practices. METHODS: We describe the implementation of electronic medical record clinical decision support (EMR CDS) for opioid management of chronic noncancer pain in an integrated delivery system. This prospective cohort study will examine relationships between primary care physician compliance with EMR CDS-guided care (vs usual care), delivery of guideline-concordant care, and changes in the morphine equivalent of prescribed opioids. We report baseline characteristics of patients receiving chronic opioid therapy and organizational prescribing trends. RESULTS: Between August and October 2016, we identified 2,759 primary care patients who received chronic opioid therapy. Of these patients, approximately 71% had chronic noncancer pain, and 62% had diagnoses of depression/anxiety. Six of 36 primary care clinics each had >100 patients receiving chronic opioid therapy. When the EMR CDS launched in October 2017, we identified 54,200 patients who had received opioid therapy for at least 14 days from various specialty and primary care providers during the prior 24 months. Of these patients, 36% had a benzodiazepine coprescription, and 13% had substance abuse diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Health system research that examines workflow-focused strategies to improve physician knowledge and skills for safely managing opioid therapy is needed. If EMR CDS proves to be effective in increasing adherence to practice guidelines, this EMR strategy can potentially be replicated and scaled up nationwide to improve population health management.
Entities:
Keywords:
Analgesics–opioid; chronic pain; decision support system–clinical; electronic medical records; primary health care
Authors: Alicia Grattan; Mark D Sullivan; Kathleen W Saunders; Cynthia I Campbell; Michael R Von Korff Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Matthew Daubresse; Hsien-Yen Chang; Yuping Yu; Shilpa Viswanathan; Nilay D Shah; Randall S Stafford; Stefan P Kruszewski; G Caleb Alexander Journal: Med Care Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Salahadin Abdi; Sairam Atluri; Carl C Balog; Ramsin M Benyamin; Mark V Boswell; Keith R Brown; Brian M Bruel; David A Bryce; Patricia A Burks; Allen W Burton; Aaron K Calodney; David L Caraway; Kimberly A Cash; Paul J Christo; Kim S Damron; Sukdeb Datta; Timothy R Deer; Sudhir Diwan; Ike Eriator; Frank J E Falco; Bert Fellows; Stephanie Geffert; Christopher G Gharibo; Scott E Glaser; Jay S Grider; Haroon Hameed; Mariam Hameed; Hans Hansen; Michael E Harned; Salim M Hayek; Standiford Helm; Joshua A Hirsch; Jeffrey W Janata; Alan D Kaye; Adam M Kaye; David S Kloth; Dhanalakshmi Koyyalagunta; Marion Lee; Yogesh Malla; Kavita N Manchikanti; Carla D McManus; Vidyasagar Pampati; Allan T Parr; Ramarao Pasupuleti; Vikram B Patel; Nalini Sehgal; Sanford M Silverman; Vijay Singh; Howard S Smith; Lee T Snook; Daneshvari R Solanki; Deborah H Tracy; Ricardo Vallejo; Bradley W Wargo Journal: Pain Physician Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Miguel A Ruiz; Enric Zamorano; Javier García-Campayo; Antonio Pardo; Olga Freire; Javier Rejas Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2010-08-09 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Leif I Solberg; Stephanie A Hooker; Rebecca C Rossom; Anna Bergdall; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2021 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Eboni G Price-Haywood; Jeffrey Burton; Todd Burstain; Jewel Harden-Barrios; John Lefante; Lizheng Shi; Robert N Jamison; Alessandra Bazzano; Lydia Bazzano Journal: Value Health Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 5.725