| Literature DB >> 29559823 |
Li-Wei Zhou1, Xue-Wei Wang1,2, Josef Vlasák3, Guang-Juan Ren4.
Abstract
The family Nigrofomitaceae has been considered to be a member of Polyporales and a synonym of Polyporaceae for a long time. However, no molecular evidence supports this taxonomic opinion. For the first time, Nigrofomitaceae is included in a phylogenetic analysis, which shows that this family is separated from Polyporales and nested within Hymenochaetales as a distinct lineage from four well-known families, viz. Hymenochaetaceae, Neoantrodiellaceae, Oxyporaceae and Schizoporaceae. Therefore, Nigrofomitaceae is treated as the fifth family of Hymenochaetales. Nigrofomes melanoporus, the type species of Nigrofomitaceae, was considered to have a pantropical distribution. However, from both morphological and phylogenetic perspectives, the Chinese specimens labelled as N. melanoporus are found not to be conspecific with the specimens of N. melanoporus from Costa Rica, close to the type locality in Cuba. These Chinese specimens are thus described as a new species Nigrofomes sinomelanoporus. The species diversity of Nigrofomes in pantropical region is discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Polyporales; pantropical distribution; taxonomy; wood-inhabiting fungus
Year: 2018 PMID: 29559823 PMCID: PMC5804300 DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.29.21250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MycoKeys ISSN: 1314-4049 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1.Phylogenetic position of inferred from the nLSU dataset. The topology is generated from the maximum likelihood analysis along with bootstrap values (above 50%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (above 0.8), respectively, calculated from the maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses at the nodes. Newly sequenced specimens are in boldface.
Figure 2.Phylogenetic relationship between the species of inferred from the ITS dataset. The topology is generated from the maximum likelihood analysis along with bootstrap values (above 50%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (above 0.8), respectively, calculated from the maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses at the nodes. Newly sequenced specimens are in boldface.
Figure 3.Basidiocarps of (Dai 16286). a Pileal surface b Pore surface c A vertical section. Scale bars: 1 cm.
Figure 4.Microscopic structure of (drawn from the holotype). a Basidiospores b Basidia and basidioles c Hyphae from trama d Hyphae from context. Scale bar: 10 µm.
Figure 5.A basidiocarp of in situ (Vlasák 1704/39). Scale bar: 2 cm.