Jia Yu1,2, Xue-Wei Wang2, Shi-Liang Liu2, Shan Shen2,3, Li-Wei Zhou4,5. 1. School of life Science, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, Liaoning, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China. 4. School of life Science, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, Liaoning, China. liwei_zhou1982@im.ac.cn. 5. State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. liwei_zhou1982@im.ac.cn.
Abstract
Resinicium, belonging to Hymenochaetales, Agaricomycetes, is a worldwide genus of corticioid wood-inhabiting fungi. To improve the knowledge of species diversity within the Hymenochaetales, two dozen specimens from Asia-Pacific preliminarily identified to be members of Resinicium sensu lato were carefully studied from morphological and phylogenetic perspectives. From these specimens, a new monotypic genus Skvortzoviella, and five new species, viz. Resinicium austroasianum, R. lateastrocystidium, Skvortzovia dabieshanensis, S. qilianensis and Skvortzoviella lenis are described; moreover, a new basal lineage of Resinicium represented by a Vietnam specimen and three Chinese specimens of S. pinicola are identified. The six newly proposed taxa are morphologically compared with related genera and species, while the family positions of Resinicium, Skvortzovia, and Skvortzoviella within the Hymenochaetales are still ambiguous. In addition, the ancestral geographic origin of Resinicium, even though inconclusive, is now thought to be Asia-Pacific instead of tropical America as previously assumed.
Resinicium, belonging to Hymenochaetales, Agaricomycetes, is a worldwide genus of corticioid wood-inhabiting fungi. To improve the knowledge of species diversity within the Hymenochaetales, two dozen specimens from Asia-Pacific preliminarily identified to be members of Resinicium sensu lato were carefully studied from morphological and phylogenetic perspectives. From these specimens, a new monotypic genus Skvortzoviella, and five new species, viz. Resinicium austroasianum, R. lateastrocystidium, Skvortzovia dabieshanensis, S. qilianensis and Skvortzoviella lenis are described; moreover, a new basal lineage of Resinicium represented by a Vietnam specimen and three Chinese specimens of S. pinicola are identified. The six newly proposed taxa are morphologically compared with related genera and species, while the family positions of Resinicium, Skvortzovia, and Skvortzoviella within the Hymenochaetales are still ambiguous. In addition, the ancestral geographic origin of Resinicium, even though inconclusive, is now thought to be Asia-Pacific instead of tropical America as previously assumed.
Resinicium, a worldwide genus of corticioid wood-inhabiting fungi, was erected for Hydnum bicolor and Corticium furfuraceum with the former as the generic type (Parmasto 1968). Although this genus is treated as a member of Rickenellaceae within Hymenochaetales (He et al. 2019; Olariaga et al. 2020), the corresponding phylogenetic analysis did not have a comprehensive sampling throughout this order (Olariaga et al. 2020). Due to the ambiguous circumscription of families within Hymenochaetales, the taxonomic position of Resinicium at the family level was not fully clarified from the phylogenetic perspective.A total of 22 species have been assigned to Resinicium at some stage (Index Fungorum: http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp). However, phylogenetic analyses have indicated that Resinicium is not a monophyletic genus (Larsson et al. 2006; Nakasone 2007). Within Hymenochaetales, R. aculeatum, R. bicolor, R. confertum, R. friabile, R. grandisporum, R. monticola, R. mutabile, R. rimulosum, R. saccharicola, and R. tenue were accepted to be members of Resinicium sensu stricto, whereas R. furfuraceum, R. furfurellum, R. meridionale and R. pinicola were included in the clade of Resinicium sensu lato and now are put in Skvortzovia (Larsson et al. 2006; Nakasone 2007; Telleria et al. 2008; Gruhn et al. 2017; Gruhn and Hallenberg 2018). Skvortzovia was originally erected as a monotypic genus for Odontia furfurella (Hjortstam and Bononi 1987). Besides the above-mentioned four species, Phlebia georgica was also combined into Skvortzovia, bringing the number of species in that genus to five (Gruhn and Hallenberg 2018).Morphologically, Resinicium is characterized by resupinate, thin, soft basidiomes with smooth to odontioid hymenia, a monomitic hyphal system mainly with clamp connections or with simple septa in few species, the presence of astrocystidia, and thin-walled, smooth, ellipsoid to cylindrical basidiospores. Skvortzovia is quite similar to Resinicium but differs in the absence of astrocystidia.In this study, we focus on Resinicium sensu lato. represented by specimens from the Asia-Pacific region including China, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Australia. Two new species are described in each of Resinicium and Skvortzovia, while a new monotypic genus typified by a new species without a confirmed position at the family level is introduced.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Morphological examination
The studied specimens are deposited at the Fungarium, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (HMAS), Beijing, China. The specimens were observed with Leica M125 (Wetzlar, Germany) and Nikon SMZ 1500 (Tokyo, Japan) stereomicroscopes and an Olympus BX 43 light microscope (Tokyo, Japan) at magnifications up to 1000×. Special color terms follow Petersen (1996). Microscopic procedures followed Wang et al. (2020). Specimen sections were mounted in Cotton Blue (CB), Melzer’s reagent (IKI), and 5% potassium hydroxide (KOH). All measurements were made from materials in CB. When presenting the variation of basidiospore sizes, 5% of the measurements were excluded from each end of the range and are given in parentheses. Drawings were made with the aid of a drawing tube. The following abbreviations are used in the descriptions: L = mean basidiospore length (arithmetic average of all measured basidiospores), W = mean basidiospore width (arithmetic average of all measured basidiospores), Q = variation in the L/W ratios between the studied specimens, and (a/b) = number of basidiospores (a) measured from given number (b) of specimens.
Molecular sequencing
Crude DNA was extracted from dry specimens as templates for subsequent PCR amplification using CTAB rapid plant genome extraction kit-DN14 (Aidlab Biotechnologies, Beijing, China). The primer pairs ITS5/ITS4 (White et al. 1990; Gardes and Bruns 1993) and LR0R/LR7 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990) were selected for amplifying ITS and nLSU regions, respectively. The PCR procedures were as follows: for ITS region, initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 34 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, 57.2 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min; for nLSU region, initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 34 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 47.2 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1.5 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were sequenced with the same primers used in PCR amplification at the Beijing Genomics Institute, Beijing, China. All newly generated sequences are deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/; Table 1).
Table 1
Information of species used in phylogenetic analyses
Order
Species
Voucher
GenBank accession number
ITS
LSU
Auriculariales
Auricularia brasiliana
URM 85567
NR151845
NG057066
Hymenochaetales
Alloclavaria purpurea
T.Niskanen 01-053
MF319053
MF318894
Atheloderma mirabile
TAA 169235
DQ873592
DQ873592
Basidioradulum radula
AFTOL-ID 451
DQ234537
AY700184
Blasiphalia pseudogrisella
P.Hoijer 4539
MF319045
MF318896
Bridgeoporus sinensis
Cui 10,013
KY131832
KY131891
Coltricia perennis
Cui 10,319
KU360687
KU360653
Contumyces rosellus
Redhead 7501
U66452
U66452
Fasciodontia brasiliensis
MSK-F 7245a
MK575201
MK598734
Fibricium rude
CBS 339.66
MH858815
MH870454
Fomitiporia hartigii
Cui 9914
KY750527
MT319381
Globulicium hiemale
Hjm 19,007
DQ873595
DQ873595
Gyroflexus brevibasidiatus
Lutzoni 930,826-1
U66441
U66441
Hastodontia halonata
HHB-17058
MK575207
MK598738
Hymenochaete rubiginosa
He 1049
JQ716407
JQ279667
Hyphodontia alutaria
KHL 11889
DQ873603
DQ873603
Kneiffiella abieticola
KHL 12498
DQ873601
DQ873601
Leucophellinus hobsonii
Cui 6468
KT203288
KT203309
Loreleia marchantiae
Lutzoni 910826-1
U66432
U66432
Lyomyces griseliniaea
KHL 12971
DQ873651
DQ873651
Muscinupta laevis
JJ 020909
EU118621
EU118621
Neoantrodiella gypsea
Cui 10372
KT203290
MT319396
Nigrofomes melanoporus
Vlasak 1704-39
MF629835
MF629831
Odonticium romellii
KHL 1514b
DQ873639
DQ873639
Peniophorella praetermissa
KHL 13164
DQ873597
DQ873597
Phellinidium ferrugineofuscum
Cui 10042
KR350573
MT319388
Repetobasidium conicum
KHL 12338
DQ873647
DQ873647
Resinicium austroasianum
LWZ 20171014-3
MW414503
MW414449
LWZ 20180417-5
MW414504
MW414450
LWZ 20180417-28
MW414505
MW414451
LWZ 20180517-42
MW414506
MW414452
LWZ 20180518-2
MW414507
MW414453
R. bicolor
O.Miettinen 14049
MF319079
MF319009
FP-133575
DQ826533
HHB10731
DQ826534
JLL13731
DQ826535
FP-133695
DQ826536
HHB 10108
DQ826537
AFTOL-ID 810
DQ218310
O3
JQ765682
UC2022858
KP814209
TENN57741
AF518763
GEL2071
DQ340321
Z-3-4
FJ872065
R. confertum
FP-102863
DQ826538
R. friabile
FP-102983
DQ826545
DQ863690
CBS 126043
MH864058
MH875513
FP-102803
DQ826541
PR-1380
DQ826542
FP-150153
DQ826543
ECCO-146
DQ826544
MS77
KJ831948
R. grandisporum
GGGUY13-008
KY995325
GGGUY13-030
KY995326
GGGUY13-031
KY995327
GGMAR12-326
KY995329
R. lateastrocystidium
LWZ 20180414-13
MW414508
MW414454
LWZ 20180414-15
MW414509
MW414455
LWZ 20180416-10
MW414510
MW414456
R. monticola
FP-150360
DQ826552
DQ863697
FP-102832
DQ826550
FP-150061
DQ826551
FP-150355
DQ826553
FP-150407
DQ826554
FP-150332
DQ826555
R. mutabile
FP-102989
DQ826556
DQ863699
PR-1366
DQ826557
GGGUY12-087
KY995322
GGMAR15-174
KY995330
GGMAR15-175
KY995331
R. rimulosum
FP-150328
DQ826546
KUC20131022-12
KJ668464
R. saccharicola
FP-102754
DQ826547
DQ863691
FP-102841
DQ826548
FP-102843
DQ826549
GGGUY12-118
KY995323
GGGUY12-158
KY995324
GGMAR12-230
KY995328
R. tenue
FP-150354
DQ826539
FP-150251
DQ826540
R. sp.
026
KC785591
R. sp.
ASR-272
GU973812
R. sp.
ASR-290
GU973828
R. sp.
GSR1
FJ179463
R.sp.
LWZ 20171015-31
MW414511
MW414457
Rickenella fibula
P.Salo 1882
MF319088
MF319027
Rigidoporus corticola
Dai 12632
KF111018
KF111020
Sidera lunata
JS 15063
DQ873593
DQ873593
Skvortzovia dabieshanensis
LWZ 20201012-22
MW414512
MW414458
LWZ 20201014-18
MW414513
MW414459
LWZ 20201017-55
MW414514
MW414460
S. furfuracea
KHL 11738
DQ873648
DQ873648
S. furfurella
KHL 10180
DQ873649
DQ873649
S. georgica
KHL 12019
DQ873645
DQ873645
S. pinicola
KHL 12224
DQ873637
DQ873637
LWZ 20180921-6
MW414515
MW414461
LWZ 20201011-18
MW414516
MW414462
LWZ 20201013-15
MW414517
MW414463
S. qilianensis
LWZ 20180904-16
MW414518
MW414464
LWZ 20180904-18
MW414519
MW414465
LWZ 20180904-20
MW414520
MW414466
Skvortzoviella lenis
LWZ 20180921-7
MW414521
MW414467
LWZ 20180921-17
MW414522
MW414468
LWZ 20180921-25
MW414523
MW414469
LWZ 20180921-32
MW414524
MW414470
LWZ 20180922-39
MW414525
MW414471
LWZ 20180922-61
MW414526
MW414472
Sphaerobasidium minutum
KHL 11714
DQ873652
DQ873653
Trichaptum abietinum
NH 12842
AF347104
AF347104
Tubulicrinis globisporus
KHL 12133
DQ873655
DQ873655
T. hirtellus
KHL 11717
DQ873657
DQ873657
Xylodon asperus
KG Nilsson 2004b
DQ873606
DQ873607
Polyporales
Abortiporus biennis
TFRI 274
EU232187
EU232277
Antrodiella semisupina
FCUG 960
EU232182
EU232266
Earliella scabrosa
PR1209
JN165009
JN164793
Fomitopsis betulina
Otto Miettinen 12388
JQ700297
JQ700297
Fragiliporia fragilis
Dai 13080
KJ734260
KJ734264
Dai 13559
KJ734261
KJ734265
Melanoporia nigra
X1735
KC543172
KC543172
Polyporus tuberaster
Wei 2577
AB474086
KX900131
Radulodon aneirinus
MUAF 888
EU340895
EU368503
The newly sequenced vouchers are in bold
Information of species used in phylogenetic analysesThe newly sequenced vouchers are in bold
Phylogenetic analyses
Besides the newly generated sequences, additional related sequences were also downloaded from GenBank (Table 1) for inclusion in the phylogenetic analyses. Firstly, the combined dataset of ITS and nLSU regions (1) was used to explore the phylogenetic positions of the newly studied specimens within Hymenochaetales. All vouchers of Hymenochaetales and Polyporales listed in Table 1, each with both ITS and nLSU sequences available, were included as ingroup taxa, while Auricularia cornea from Auriculariales was selected as an outgroup taxon (Hibbett et al. 2007). Due to previous phylogenetic studies focusing on Resinicium being mainly based solely on the ITS region, a voucher- and species-abundant ITS dataset of Resinicium (2), comprising all vouchers of Resinicium in Table 1, was used to further differentiate species identities within this genus. Finally, another combined dataset of ITS and nLSU regions (3) was used to perform a biogeographic analysis of Resinicium. All vouchers of Resinicium listed in Table 1, each with both ITS and nLSU sequences available, were included in this dataset. No outgroup taxa were selected for datasets 2 and 3.All datasets were aligned using MAFFT 7.110 (Katoh and Standley 2013) under the G-INS-i option (Katoh et al. 2005). Regarding the combined datasets of the ITS and nLSU regions, each region was aligned separately and then the alignments of the two regions were concatenated as a single alignment. The best-fit evolutionary models of alignments for phylogenetic analyses were estimated using jModelTest (Guindon and Gascuel 2003; Posada 2008) under Akaike information criterion.Regarding datasets 1 and 2, Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) methods were utilized for phylogenetic analyses. The ML method was conducted using raxmlGUI 1.2 (Silvestro and Michalak 2012; Stamatakis 2006) with calculation of bootstrap (BS) replicates under the auto FC option (Pattengale et al. 2010). The BI method was conducted using MrBayes 3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012). Two independent runs were employed, and each run had four chains and started from random trees. Trees were sampled every 1000th generation, and the first 25% of trees were removed, while the other 75% of trees were retained for constructing a 50% majority consensus tree and calculating Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPPs). Tracer 1.5 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/) was used to judge whether chains converged.A consensus tree for the alignment resulting from dataset 3 was generated by BI method using BEAST v1.10.4 (Suchard et al. 2018). Trees were sampled every 1000th generation from a total of 50 million generations and the first 10% of the sampled trees were removed as burn-in. Chain convergence recorded in the resulting log file was determined using Tracer 1.5. The consensus tree was used for biogeographic analysis using RASP 4.2 under the Bayesian Binary MCMC (BBM) analysis with default parameters (Yu et al. 2015, 2020). Six geographic origins, viz. Asia-Pacific, Europe, North America, South America, tropical America and Africa were set according to voucher information.
RESULTS
A total of 24 specimens preliminarily identified to Resinicium sensu lato were studied further. ITS and nLSU regions were newly generated from all these specimens (Table 1).The combined dataset of ITS and nLSU regions (1) from 78 collections generated a concatenated alignment of 2399 characters with GTR + I + G as the best-fit evolutionary model. The ML search stopped after 250 BS replicates. In BI, all chains converged after 50 million generations with an average standard deviation of split frequencies of 0.002644, which was indicated by all effective sample sizes (ESSs) above 13,600 and the potential scale reduction factors (PSRFs) close to 1.000. ML and BI methods generated similar topologies in main lineages, and thus only the topology generated by the ML method is presented along with BS values and BPPs above 50% and 0.8, respectively, at the nodes (Fig. 1). The phylogeny generated by this dataset well supported Hymenochaetales as an independent order (BS = 92%, BPP = 1). Within Hymenochaetales, the family rank was not resolved, whereas at the generic rank Resinicium was fully supported and Skvortzovia was strongly supported (BS = 98%, BPP = 1). In the genera Resinicium and Skvortzovia, three (one including a single specimen LWZ 20171015-31 from Vietnam) and two new lineages, respectively, emerged, and three studied specimens were grouped with Skvortzovia pinicola with full support. Moreover, an independent clade from other sampled genera and species composed of six newly studied specimens was also fully supported.
Fig. 1
Phylogenetic positions of the newly studied specimens of Resinicium sensu lato within the Hymenochaetales inferred from the combined dataset of ITS and nLSU regions. The topology generated by the maximum likelihood method is presented along with the bootstrap values and the Bayesian posterior probabilities above 50% and 0.8, respectively, at the nodes
Phylogenetic positions of the newly studied specimens of Resinicium sensu lato within the Hymenochaetales inferred from the combined dataset of ITS and nLSU regions. The topology generated by the maximum likelihood method is presented along with the bootstrap values and the Bayesian posterior probabilities above 50% and 0.8, respectively, at the nodesThe ITS dataset of Resinicium (2) from 58 collections generated an alignment of 645 characters with GTR + I + G as the best-fit evolutionary model. The ML search stopped after 300 BS replicates. In BI, after 10 million generations, all chains converged with an average standard deviation of split frequencies of 0.002680, which was indicated by all ESSs above 5500 and the PSRFs equal to 1.000. ML and BI methods generated similar topologies in main lineages. Therefore, the topology inferred from ML method was presented along with BS values and BPPs above 50% and 0.8, respectively, at the nodes (Fig. 2). The midpoint-rooted tree recovered nine known species of Resinicium, while the newly studied specimens formed three independent lineages (one including a single specimen LWZ 20171015-31 from Vietnam) as in the phylogeny inferred from dataset 1.
Fig. 2
Species identities of Resinicium differentiated by ITS-based phylogeny. The midpoint-rooted tree generated by the maximum likelihood method is presented along with the bootstrap values and the Bayesian posterior probabilities above 50% and 0.8, respectively, at the nodes
Species identities of Resinicium differentiated by ITS-based phylogeny. The midpoint-rooted tree generated by the maximum likelihood method is presented along with the bootstrap values and the Bayesian posterior probabilities above 50% and 0.8, respectively, at the nodesTaking both morphological characters and the phylogenies inferred from datasets 1 and 2 into consideration, two new species from each of Resinicium and Skvortzovia, and a new monotypic genus typified by a new species within Hymenochaetales are described below. The new lineage with a single specimen LWZ 20171015-31 from Vietnam in Resinicium is treated as R. sp. instead of being described as a new species until more collections that group with LWZ 20171015-31 are available and carefully studied.Dataset 3 from 15 collections generated a concatenated alignment of 1457 characters. The best-fit evolutionary model for this alignment was estimated as GTR + I + G. Chain convergence was indicated by all ESSs above 3500. The midpoint-rooted phylogeny successfully resolved the species relationships within Resinicium and the ancestral geographic origin of Resinicium was estimated to be Asia-Pacific (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Biogeography of Resinicium inferred from the combined dataset of ITS and nLSU regions. The midpoint-rooted consensus tree was generated by the Bayesian inference method using BEAST. As evaluated using RASP under the Bayesian Binary MCMC analysis, the geographic origin was indicated by a pie chart at each node of the tree. The geographic distribution represented by each color and letter in the pie charts and the illustration is indicated in the upper left of the tree
Biogeography of Resinicium inferred from the combined dataset of ITS and nLSU regions. The midpoint-rooted consensus tree was generated by the Bayesian inference method using BEAST. As evaluated using RASP under the Bayesian Binary MCMC analysis, the geographic origin was indicated by a pie chart at each node of the tree. The geographic distribution represented by each color and letter in the pie charts and the illustration is indicated in the upper left of the tree
TAXONOMY
Jia Yu, Xue W. Wang, S.L. Liu & L.W. Zhou, sp. nov. (Figs. 4–5)
Fig. 4
Basidiomes of Resinicium austroasianum. a, b LWZ 20180417-5 (holotype). c LWZ 20171014-3 (paratype). d LWZ 20180518-2 (paratype). Scale bars: a = 5 mm, b–d = 2 cm
Fig. 5
Microscopic structures of Resinicium austroasianum (drawn from holotype). a basidiospores. b basidia and basidioles. c astrocystidia. d leptocystidia. e apical part of a tooth. Scale bar = 10 μm
Basidiomes of Resinicium austroasianum. a, b LWZ 20180417-5 (holotype). c LWZ 20171014-3 (paratype). d LWZ 20180518-2 (paratype). Scale bars: a = 5 mm, b–d = 2 cmMicroscopic structures of Resinicium austroasianum (drawn from holotype). a basidiospores. b basidia and basidioles. c astrocystidia. d leptocystidia. e apical part of a tooth. Scale bar = 10 μmMycoBank: MB 840227.Etymology: austroasianum (Lat.), refers to South Asia.Diagnosis: Similar to R. monticola in the absence of halocystidia; however, R. monticola differs by its narrower basidiospores (2.8–3.2 μm in width) and rarely cracked basidiomes (Nakasone 2007).Type:
Malaysia: Selangor: Kota Damansara Community Forest Reserve, on fallen angiosperm branch, 17 Apr. 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180417-5 (HMAS– holotype).Description: Basidiomes annual, resupinate, closely adnate, widely effused, not easily separable, thin, crustose, white to cream when fresh, pale yellow to curry-yellow with age, usually cracked into polygons. Hymenophore grandinioid to odontoid, composed of small cylindrical aculei, usually with round apex, 5–6 per mm, 300–500 μm long. Subiculum not stratified, white, 50–100 μm thick. Margin gradually thinning out, white, occasionally with mycelial cords.Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections. Subiculum composed of crystal clusters and agglutinated hyphae; subicular hyphae hyaline, thin-walled, frequently branched, often collapsed and indistinct, sometimes with denuded spines, 2–3 μm diam. Subhymenial hyphae obscured from numerous crystal clusters, frequently branched, hyaline, compact and agglutinated, 1.5–2.5 μm diam. Astrocystidia extremely abundant in hymenium and subhymenium, often developing both terminally and laterally on hyphae, hyaline, thin-walled, 7–20 × 1–3 μm, 1–1.5 μm diam at base, at apex a stellate cluster of hyaline crystals, up to 4–6 μm diam. Hymenial leptocystidia numerous, cylindrical with obtuse apex, 10–30 × 2–3 μm, with a basal clamp. Basidia cylindrical, often with a median constriction, four sterigmata, 10–20 × 4–6 μm, tapering to 2–3 um diam with a clamp connection at base; basidioles similar in shape to basidia, but smaller. Basidiospores ellipsoid, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled, acyanophilous, non-amyloid, non-dextrinoid, (4.2–)4.5–5.1(− 5.3) × (3.2–)3.3–4.2(− 4.3) μm, L = 4.8 μm, W = 3.7 μm, Q = 1.25–1.28 (n = 90/3).Additional specimens examined:
Australia:
Queensland: Cairns: Cairns Botanic Gardens, on angiosperm stump, 17 May 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180517-42 (HMAS); Mount Whitfield Conservation Park, on fallen angiosperm branch, 18 May 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180518-2 (HMAS). – Malaysia:
Selangor: Kota Damansara Community Forest Reserve, on angiosperm stump, 17 Apr. 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180417-28 (HMAS). – Vietnam: Thac Mai Preservation Park, on fallen angiosperm branch, 14 Oct. 2017, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20171014-3 (HMAS).Jia Yu, Xue W. Wang, S.L. Liu & L.W. Zhou, sp. nov. (Figs. 6–7)
Fig. 6
Basidiomes of Resinicium lateastrocystidium. a, b LWZ 20180414-15 (holotype). c LWZ 20180414-13 (paratype). d LWZ 20180416-10 (paratype). Scale bars: a = 5 mm, b–d = 2 cm
Fig. 7
Microscopic structures of Resinicium lateastrocystidium (drawn from holotype). a basidiospores. b basidia and basidioles. c astrocystidia. d halocystidia. e apical part of a tooth. Scale bar = 10 μm
Basidiomes of Resinicium lateastrocystidium. a, b LWZ 20180414-15 (holotype). c LWZ 20180414-13 (paratype). d LWZ 20180416-10 (paratype). Scale bars: a = 5 mm, b–d = 2 cmMicroscopic structures of Resinicium lateastrocystidium (drawn from holotype). a basidiospores. b basidia and basidioles. c astrocystidia. d halocystidia. e apical part of a tooth. Scale bar = 10 μmMycoBank: MB 840229.Etymology: lateastrocystidium (Lat.), refers to the wide astrocystidia.Diagnosis: Characterized in the genus by the presence of halocystidia and wide astrocystidia (above 6 μm in diam).Type:
Malaysia:
Kuala Lumpur: KL Forest Eco park, on fallen angiosperm trunk, 14 Apr. 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180414-15 (HMAS – holotype).Description: Basidiomes annual, resupinate, closely adnate, widely effused, not easily separable, thin, farinaceous, cream to buff-yellow when fresh, straw-yellow to olivaceous buff with age, not cracked. Hymenophore grandinioid to odontoid, usually with small conical apex, 3–4 per mm, 300–500 μm long. Subiculum not stratified, straw-yellow to olivaceous buff, 100–200 μm thick. Margin gradually thinning out, white, occasionally with mycelia cords.Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections. Subiculum composed of mostly indistinct hyphae; subicular hyphae hyaline, thin-walled, moderately branched, often collapsed, 2–3 μm diam. Subhymenial hyphae frequently branched, hyaline, compact and agglutinated, 1.5–2.5 μm diam. Astrocystidia rare, scattered, often developing both terminally and laterally on hyphae, hyaline, thin-walled, 10–20 × 1.7–3 μm, 1.5–3 μm diam at base, at apex a stellate cluster of hyaline crystals, to 6–15 μm diam. Halocystidia hyaline, thin-walled, 15–30 × 4–10 μm, tapering to 2–3 μm diam at base, the outer layer inflates to a bladder, 10–20 μm diam, formed a capitate cystidium. Basidia cylindrical, often with a median constriction, four sterigmata, 13–20 × 5–6 μm, tapering to 2–4 um diam with a clamp connection at base; basidioles similar in shape to basidia, but smaller. Basidiospores ellipsoid, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled, acyanophilous, non-amyloid, non-dextrinoid, (3.9–)4.1–5 × (2.8–)2.9–3.9(− 4) μm, L = 4.5 μm, W = 3.3 μm, Q = 1.35–1.36 (n = 90/3).Additional specimens examined:
Malaysia:
Kuala Lumpur: KL Forest Eco park, on fallen angiosperm trunk, 14 Apr. 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180414-13 (HMAS); Selangor: Kota Damansara Community Forest Reserve, on fallen angiosperm branch, 16 Apr. 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180416-10 (HMAS).Notes: Resinicium lateastrocystidium resembles R. friabile, R. rimulosum and R. saccharicola in the presence of halocystidia and astrocystidia; however, astrocystidia in the latter three species are much narrower (1.5–3 μm in width in R. friabile, Nakasone 2007; 3–4 μm in width in R. rimulosum, Nakasone 2007; 1.5–2 μm in width in R. saccharicola, Nakasone 2000). In addition, these three species differ from R. lateastrocystidium by narrower or longer basidiospores (4.5–5 × 2.8–3 μm in R. friabile, Hjortstam and Melo 1997; 4–4.8 × 2.8–3 μm in R. rimulosum, Nakasone 2007; 5–6.1 × 3.3–4.2 μm in R. saccharicola, Nakasone 2000).Jia Yu, Xue W. Wang, S.L. Liu & L.W. Zhou, sp. nov. (Figs. 8–9)
Fig. 8
Basidiomes of Skvortzovia dabieshanensis. a, b LWZ 20201012-22 (holotype). c LWZ 20201014-18 (paratype). d LWZ 20201017-55 (paratype). Scale bars: a = 5 mm, b–d = 2 cm
Fig. 9
Microscopic structures of Skvortzovia dabieshanensis (drawn from holotype). a basidiospores. b basidia and basidioles. c leptocystidia. d apical part of a tooth. Scale bar = 10 μm
Basidiomes of Skvortzovia dabieshanensis. a, b LWZ 20201012-22 (holotype). c LWZ 20201014-18 (paratype). d LWZ 20201017-55 (paratype). Scale bars: a = 5 mm, b–d = 2 cmMicroscopic structures of Skvortzovia dabieshanensis (drawn from holotype). a basidiospores. b basidia and basidioles. c leptocystidia. d apical part of a tooth. Scale bar = 10 μmMycoBank: MB 840228.Etymology: dabieshanensis (Lat.), refers to the Dabieshan Mountains.Diagnosis: Similar to Skvortzovia furfurella in the grey grandinioid basidiomes, capitate leptocystidia and lack of halocystidia, but S. furfurella differs by smaller allantoid basidiospores (3.5–4 × 0.8–1 μm, Gruhn and Hallenberg 2018).Type:
China:
Anhui: Jinzhai County: Dabieshan Mountains: Tiantangzhai National Nature Reserve, on fallen trunk of Pinus, 12 Oct. 2020, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20201012-22 (HMAS – holotype).Description: Basidiomes annual, resupinate, closely adnate, widely effused, not easily separable, thin, farinaceous, white to cream when fresh, ash-grey with age, not cracked. Hymenophore grandinioid, composed of small aculei, usually with round apex, 5–6 per mm, 200–300 μm long. Subiculum not stratified, white, 100–200 μm thick. Margin gradually thinning out, white, occasionally with mycelia cords.Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections. Subiculum composed of indistinct generative hyphae; subicular hyphae hyaline, thin-walled, frequently branched, interwoven, 2–3 μm diam. Subhymenial hyphae hyaline, thin-walled, frequently branched, compact and agglutinated, 1.5–2.5 μm diam. Hymenial leptocystidia capitate, hyaline, thin-walled, with a basal clamp connection, 15–30 × 2.5–4 μm. Basidia clavate four sterigmata, 10–20 × 3.5–5 μm, tapering to 2–4 um diam with a clamp connection at base; basidioles similar in shape to basidia, but smaller. Basidiospores cylindrical to allantoid, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, acyanophilous, non-amyloid, non-dextrinoid, (3.5–)3.8–4.7(− 4.9) × 1.8–2.4(− 2.6) μm, L = 4.2 μm, W = 2.1 μm, Q = 2.05–2.08 (n = 90/3).Additional specimen examined:
China:
Anhui: Yuexi County: Dabieshan Mountains: Yaoluoping National Nature Reserve, on fallen trunk of Pinus, 14 Oct. 2020, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20201014-18 (HMAS); Shucheng County: Dabieshan Mountains: Wanfoshan National Nature Reserve, on fallen angiosperm trunk, 17 Oct. 2020, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20201017-55 (HMAS).Notes: Skvortzovia pinicola has similar basidiospores in shape and size to S. dabieshanensis but differs by the presence of halocystidia in the apex of the aculei (Eriksson et al. 1981).Jia Yu, Xue W. Wang, S.L. Liu & L.W. Zhou, sp. nov. (Figs. 10–11)
Fig. 10
Basidiomes of Skvortzovia qilianensis. a b LWZ 20180904-16 (holotype). c LWZ 20180904-18 (paratype). d LWZ 20180904-20 (paratype). Scale bars: a = 5 mm, b–d = 2 cm
Fig. 11
Microscopic structures of Skvortzovia qilianensis (drawn from holotype). a basidioles. b leptocystidia. c apical part of a tooth. Scale bar = 10 μm
Basidiomes of Skvortzovia qilianensis. a b LWZ 20180904-16 (holotype). c LWZ 20180904-18 (paratype). d LWZ 20180904-20 (paratype). Scale bars: a = 5 mm, b–d = 2 cmMicroscopic structures of Skvortzovia qilianensis (drawn from holotype). a basidioles. b leptocystidia. c apical part of a tooth. Scale bar = 10 μmMycoBank: MB 840230.Etymology: qilianensis (Lat.), refers to the Qilian Mountains.Diagnosis: Characterized in the genus by the woody hard, buff-yellow to lemon-yellow and not cracked basidiomes, and odontioid hymenophores with relatively long aculei.Type:
China:
Gansu: Zhangye: Qilian Mountains National Park: Sidalong Forest Farm, on fallen branch of Picea, 4 Sep. 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180904-16 (HMAS – holotype).Description: Basidiomes annual, closely adnate, widely effused, not easily separable, thin, woody hard, cream to pale yellow when fresh, buff-yellow to lemon-yellow with age, not cracked. Hymenophore odontoid, composed of small, cylindrical aculei, aculei rather distant, 2–4 aculei per mm, 400–500 μm long, the higher ones slightly attenuate with a short fimbriate sterile apex. Subiculum not stratified, buff to honey-yellow, 100–200 μm thick. Margin gradually thinning out, white, abrupt with short aculei.Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections. Subiculum composed of indistinct generative hyphae; subicular hyphae hyaline, thin-walled, frequently branched, interwoven, 2–3 μm diam. Subhymenial hyphae hyaline, thin-walled, frequently branched, 1.5–2.5 μm diam. Hymenial leptocystidia tubular with obtuse apex, numerous, hyaline, thin-walled, with a basal clamp connection, 10–30 × 1.5–2.5 μm. Basidia not found; basidioles rare, clavate to cylindrical, 10–14 × 4.5–5.5 μm, tapering to 2–3 um diam with a clamp connection at base. Basidiospores not found.Additional specimens examined:
China:
Gansu: Zhangye: Qilian Mountains National Park: Sidalong Forest Farm, on fallen branch of Picea, 4 Sep. 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180904-20 (HMAS), LWZ 20180904-20 (HMAS).Notes: Basidiospores were not found in any of the three specimens of S. qilianensis studied. Traditionally, it is not a common practice to describe new species of wood-inhabiting fungi lacking basidiospores. However, if other morphological characters are taxonomically distinct, sometimes mycologists have ignored basidiospores and described the specimens as new species (Tchoumi et al. 2020).Jia Yu, Xue W. Wang, S.L. Liu & L.W. Zhou, gen. nov.MycoBank: MB 840231.Etymology: Skvortzoviella (Lat.), refers to the similarity to Skvortzovia.Diagnosis: Unique in Hymenochaetales being characterized by a combination of resupinate and cracked basidiomes, the smooth and light-colored hymenophore, a monomitic hyphal system, tubular leptocystidia with obtuse apex, and ellipsoid basidiospores.Type: Skvortzoviella lenis Jia Yu et al. 2021.Description: Basidiomes annual, closely adnate, widely effused, not easily separable, thin, membranous, rarely soft, usually with a few broad cracks or cracked extensively. Hymenophore smooth or irregular, cream to pale yellow. Margin gradually thinning out, white, filamentose.Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, hyaline, thin-walled, frequently branched. Hymenial leptocystidia tubular with obtuse apex, hyaline, thin-walled. Basidia cylindrical, often with a median constriction, four sterigmata. Basidiospores ellipsoid, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled, acyanophilous, non-amyloid, non-dextrinoid.Notes: Morphologically, Skvortzoviella is closely related to Skvortzovia; however, Skvortzovia also accommodates species with grandinioid to odontioid hymenophores in addition to those with smooth hymenophores (Eriksson et al. 1981; Gruhn and Hallenberg 2018).Jia Yu, Xue W. Wang, S.L. Liu & L.W. Zhou, sp. nov. (Figs. 12–13)
Fig. 12
Basidiomes of Skvortzoviella lenis. a, b LWZ 20180921-17 (holotype). c LWZ 20180921-32 (paratype). d LWZ 20180921-25 (paratype). e LWZ 20180922-39 (paratype). f LWZ 20180922-61 (paratype). Scale bars: a = 5 mm; b = 5 cm; c–f = 3 cm
Fig. 13
Microscopic structures of Skvortzoviella lenis (drawn from holotype). a basidiospores. b basidia and basidioles. c leptocystidia. d a section of hymenial and subhymenial layer. Scale bar = 10 μm
Basidiomes of Skvortzoviella lenis. a, b LWZ 20180921-17 (holotype). c LWZ 20180921-32 (paratype). d LWZ 20180921-25 (paratype). e LWZ 20180922-39 (paratype). f LWZ 20180922-61 (paratype). Scale bars: a = 5 mm; b = 5 cm; c–f = 3 cmMicroscopic structures of Skvortzoviella lenis (drawn from holotype). a basidiospores. b basidia and basidioles. c leptocystidia. d a section of hymenial and subhymenial layer. Scale bar = 10 μmMycoBank: MB 840232.Etymology: lenis (Lat.), refers to the smooth hymenium.Diagnosis: Similar to Skvortzovia georgica in the smooth hymenium, but S. georgica has slightly larger leptocystidia (30–32 × 4–5 μm) and allantoid basidiospores (Gruhn and Hallenberg 2018).Type:
China:
Yunnan: Baoshan: Gaoligong Mountains National Nature Reserve: Baihua Ridge, on angiosperm stump, 21 Sep. 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180921-17 (HMAS – holotype).Description: Basidiomes annual, closely adnate, widely effused, not easily separable, thin, membranous, rarely soft, usually with a few broad cracks or cracked extensively, 50–100 μm thick. Hymenophore smooth or irregular, white to cream when fresh, pale yellow to buff-yellow with age. Subiculum not stratified, white when fresh, light cream-coloured in dried material. Margin gradually thinning out, white, filamentose.Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections. Subiculum composed of indistinct generative hyphae; subicular hyphae hyaline, thin-walled, frequently branched, 2–2.5 μm diam. Subhymenial hyphae hyaline, frequently branched, compact and agglutinated, 1.5–2.0 μm diam. Hymenial leptocystidia tubular with obtuse apices, hyaline, thin-walled, with a basal clamp connection, 15–30 × 1.5–3 μm. Basidia cylindrical, often with a median constriction, four sterigmata, 12–20 × 4.7–6 μm, tapering to 2.5–3.5 μm diam with a clamp connection at base; basidioles similar in shape to basidia, but smaller. Basidiospores ellipsoid, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled, acyanophilous, non-amyloid, non-dextrinoid, 4.8–5.8(− 6.0) × (2.8–)2.9–3.5 μm, L = 5.1 μm, W = 3.1 μm, Q = 1.62–1.67 (n = 90/3).Additional specimens examined:
China:
Yunnan: Baoshan: Gaoligong Mountains National Nature Reserve: Baihua Ridge, on fallen angiosperm twig, 21 Sep. 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180921-7 (HMAS); loc. cit., on fallen angiosperm trunk, 21 Sep. 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180921-25 (HMAS); loc. cit., on fallen angiosperm twig, 21 Sep. 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180921-32 (HMAS); loc. cit., on fallen angiosperm branch, 22 Sep. 2018, Li-Wei Zhou, LWZ 20180922-39 (HMAS), LWZ 20180922-61 (HMAS).Notes: Skvortzovia furfuracea resembles Skvortzoviella lenis in the smooth to grandinioid hymenophore and ellipsoid basidiospores, but differs by the presence of halocystidia (Eriksson et al. 1981).
DISCUSSION
Previous phylogenies have shown the intraspecific ITS variations in Resinicium, such as those in R. friabile, R. grandisporum, and R. saccharicola (Nakasone 2007; Gruhn et al. 2017). Similarly, the newly described R. austroasianum formed intraspecific clades (LWZ 20180517-42 and the other four specimens; Figs. 1–2). However, these clades are short-branched and no morphological differences could be found corresponding to these clades. Therefore, we treated these genetic distances as intraspecific but not interspecific variations.Resinicium was considered to originate in tropical America due to the high species diversity including basal lineages there (Nakasone 2007, Gruhn et al. 2017). However, the current study identifies two new species and more importantly a new basal lineage of Resinicium from tropical regions in the Asia-Pacific area (Figs. 1–2), which in part places doubt on the tropical American origin of this genus (Nakasone 2007, Gruhn et al. 2017). Moreover, the biogeographic analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS and nLSU regions also supported Asia-Pacific as the ancestral origin of Resinicium (Fig. 3). Comparing with the combined dataset (3), the ITS dataset of Resinicium (2) included more vouchers and species of Resinicium but failed to resolve species relationships with reliable statistical values in some lineages in biogeographic analysis (data not shown). Therefore, the current Asia-Pacific origin of Resinicium is not conclusive. A wider sampling around tropical regions in a multi-locus-based biogeographic analysis will clarify the geographic origin and evolution of Resinicium.Like previous studies (Zhou et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2019), the current combined dataset of ITS and nLSU (1) does not resolve the relationships among families within Hymenochaetales (Fig. 1). Therefore, the family positions of Resinicium, Skvortzovia, and Skvortzoviella are still ambiguous. To solve this issue, a comprehensive phylogenetic study on the whole order with the help of multi-loci and a wider sampling should be performed, which is beyond the scope of the current study. However, the current study provides new materials for further reconstructing the phylogenetic backbone of Hymenochaetales.
CONCLUSION
The current study revealed one new monotypic genus, Skvortzoviella, typified by the new species, S. lenis, and four other new species, viz. Resinicium austroasianum, R. lateastrocystidium, Skvortzovia dabieshanensis and S. qilianensis, from the Asia-Pacific region. Besides, a new basal lineage of Resinicium represented by one specimen LWZ 20171015–31 from Vietnam (Fig. 14), and three Chinese specimens of Skvortzovia pinicola (Fig. 15) are also identified. Phylogenetic analyses support the six new taxa and the new lineage of Resinicium as members of Hymenochaetales (Fig. 1) thereby adding to the knowledge of generic and species diversity within this order.
Fig. 14
Basidiomes of Resinicium sp. (LWZ 20171015-31) in situ. Scale bar = 2 cm
Fig. 15
Basidiomes of Skvortzovia pinicola in situ. a LWZ 20180921-6. b LWZ 20201011-18. Scale bars = 2 cm
Basidiomes of Resinicium sp. (LWZ 20171015-31) in situ. Scale bar = 2 cmBasidiomes of Skvortzovia pinicola in situ. a LWZ 20180921-6. b LWZ 20201011-18. Scale bars = 2 cm
Authors: Nicholas D Pattengale; Masoud Alipour; Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds; Bernard M E Moret; Alexandros Stamatakis Journal: J Comput Biol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.479
Authors: David S Hibbett; Manfred Binder; Joseph F Bischoff; Meredith Blackwell; Paul F Cannon; Ove E Eriksson; Sabine Huhndorf; Timothy James; Paul M Kirk; Robert Lücking; H Thorsten Lumbsch; François Lutzoni; P Brandon Matheny; David J McLaughlin; Martha J Powell; Scott Redhead; Conrad L Schoch; Joseph W Spatafora; Joost A Stalpers; Rytas Vilgalys; M Catherine Aime; André Aptroot; Robert Bauer; Dominik Begerow; Gerald L Benny; Lisa A Castlebury; Pedro W Crous; Yu-Cheng Dai; Walter Gams; David M Geiser; Gareth W Griffith; Cécile Gueidan; David L Hawksworth; Geir Hestmark; Kentaro Hosaka; Richard A Humber; Kevin D Hyde; Joseph E Ironside; Urmas Kõljalg; Cletus P Kurtzman; Karl-Henrik Larsson; Robert Lichtwardt; Joyce Longcore; Jolanta Miadlikowska; Andrew Miller; Jean-Marc Moncalvo; Sharon Mozley-Standridge; Franz Oberwinkler; Erast Parmasto; Valérie Reeb; Jack D Rogers; Claude Roux; Leif Ryvarden; José Paulo Sampaio; Arthur Schüssler; Junta Sugiyama; R Greg Thorn; Leif Tibell; Wendy A Untereiner; Christopher Walker; Zheng Wang; Alex Weir; Michael Weiss; Merlin M White; Katarina Winka; Yi-Jian Yao; Ning Zhang Journal: Mycol Res Date: 2007-03-13
Authors: James Michel Tchotet Tchoumi; Martin Petrus Albertus Coetzee; Mario Rajchenberg; Jolanda Roux Journal: Mycologia Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck Journal: Syst Biol Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 15.683