| Literature DB >> 29559669 |
Dong Tian1, Shuai-Jia Mo2, Lian-Kui Han3, Liang Cheng1, Heng Huang2, Shuai Hao2, Ye-Lan Guan2, Kai-Yuan Jiang2, Jing-Ya Deng2, Hu-Hao Feng2, Hong-Ying Wen4, Mao-Yong Fu5.
Abstract
To compare the differences in dietary status and knowledge of esophageal cancer (EC) between residents of high- and low-incidence areas. We investigated dietary conditions and EC knowledge among residents in high- and low-EC incidence areas (Yanting and Qingzhen counties). Residents in Yanting consumed more pickled vegetables, salted meat and barbecued food (P < 0.05). Analysis of the past ten-year trend in Yanting consumed fresh vegetables/fruits, beans, sauerkraut, hot food, and barbecued food had gradually increased, and the trend was less than that in Qingzhen County. However, the gradual increasing trend in consumption of pickled vegetables, pickled meat, and spicy food over the past 10 years was greater (P < 0.05). Drinking water in Yanting County was healthier than that in Qingzhen County (P < 0.05). In terms of EC knowledge, the proportions of residents in Yanting who had a clear understanding, knowledge or had heard of EC or knew the common causes, primary symptoms, therapeutic measures, preventive measures, and government interventions for EC were all higher than in Qingzhen (P < 0.05). Residents in Yanting had greater EC knowledge but more harmful dietary habits than those in Qingzhen.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29559669 PMCID: PMC5861081 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23251-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Personal dietary habits of the rural residents in the high- and low-EC incidence areas. The survey defines the tastes of the respondents by referring to the family members’ evaluations. The degree of saltiness was depended on the median sodium intake, that was slightly salty <1 g/day, moderately salty 1–3 g/day and very salty >3 g/day, respectively. The “eating speed” was described as “rapid”, which indicated finishing their meal in 10 minutes; “usual”, which indicated finishing their meal in “30 minutes”; or “slow”, which indicated finishing their meal in “1 hour or more”. The “food temperature” was described as “hot” (over 60 °C), “cold” (less than 5 °C), or “moderate temperature” (5 °C–60 °C).
| Dietary habits | Yanting County of Sichuan Province (n = 920) | Qingzhen County of Guizhou Province (n = 313) | χ2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.523 | 0.823 | ||
| Very salty | 157(17.1%) | 32(10.2%) | ||
| Moderately salty | 375(40.8%) | 195(62.3%) | ||
| Slightly salty | 388(42.2%) | 86(27.5%) | ||
|
| 6.496 | 0.370 | ||
| Hard | 136(14.8%) | 16(5.1%) | ||
| Moderate hardness | 414(45.0%) | 219(70.0%) | ||
| Soft | 369(40.1%) | 78(24.9%) | ||
|
| 6.917 | 0.329 | ||
| Rapid | 295(32.1%) | 76(24.3%) | ||
| Usual | 395(42.9%) | 143(45.7%) | ||
| Slow | 228(24.8%) | 94(30.0%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Hot | 176(19.1%) | 18(5.8%) | 2.544 | 0.637 |
| Moderate temperature | 612(66.5%) | 281(89.8%) | ||
| Cold | 132(14.3%) | 14(4.5%) | ||
Family dietary status of the rural residents in the high- and low-EC incidence areas in the past year. We designed the degree of spicy food with the Scoville rating of 300,000. That meant participants who intake the habanero peppers. A check signifies having eaten the food every day and is defined by the term “many”, an average intake per month of no more than 1 time is denoted as “few”, and other values are defined as “moderate”. *P < 0.05 is statistically significant.
| Dietary status | Yanting County of Sichuan Province (n = 920) | Qingzhen County of Guizhou Province (n = 313) | χ2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.115 | 0.909 | ||
| Many | 343(37.3%) | 117(37.4%) | ||
| Moderate | 200(21.7%) | 114(36.4%) | ||
| Few | 377(41.0%) | 82(26.2%) | ||
|
| 2.717 | 0.843 | ||
| Many | 285(31.0%) | 79(25.2%) | ||
| Moderate | 231(25.1%) | 136(43.5%) | ||
| Few | 404(43.9%) | 98(31.3%) | ||
|
| 12.881 | 0.045 | ||
| Many | 306(33.3%) | 8(2.6%) | ||
| Moderate | 172(18.7%) | 70(22.4%) | ||
| Few | 442(48.0%) | 235(75.1%) | ||
|
| 20.580 | 0.002 | ||
| Many | 143(15.5%) | 6(1.9%) | ||
| Moderate | 168(18.3%) | 50(16.0%) | ||
| Few | 609 (66.2%) | 257(82.1%) | ||
|
| 13.442 | 0.137 | ||
| Many | 197(21.4%) | 74(23.6%) | ||
| Moderate | 178(19.3%) | 122(39.0%) | ||
| Few | 545(59.2%) | 117(37.4%) | ||
|
| 6.334 | 0.387 | ||
| Many | 124(13.5%) | 46(14.7%) | ||
| Moderate | 174(18.9%) | 145(46.3%) | ||
| Few | 622(67.6%) | 122(39.0%) | ||
|
| 6.394 | 0.380 | ||
| Many | 268(28.0%) | 93(29.7%) | ||
| Moderate | 174(18.9%) | 144(46.0%) | ||
| Few | 488(53.0%) | 76(24.3%) | ||
|
| 50.120 | 0.000 | ||
| Many | 114(12.4%) | 10(3.2%) | ||
| Moderate | 94(10.2%) | 76(24.3%) | ||
| Few | 711(77.3%) | 227(72.5%) |
Family dietary status of the rural residents in the high- and low-EC incidence areas in the past 10 years. Δ Each questionnaire surveyed the food intake of only one household over 10 years. *P < 0.05 is statistically significant.
| Dietary status | Yanting County of Sichuan Province (n = 920) | Qingzhen City of Guizhou Province (n = 313) | χ2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 19.066 | 0.004 | ||
| Invariant | 530(57.6%) | 144(46.0%) | ||
| Gradual increase | 241(26.2%) | 153(48.9%) | ||
| Gradual decrease | 149(16.2%) | 16(5.1%) | ||
|
| 17.213 | 0.009 | ||
| Invariant | 611 (66.4%) | 217(69.3%) | ||
| Gradual increase | 170 (18.5%) | 72(23.0%) | ||
| Gradual decrease | 139(15.1%) | 24(7.7%) | ||
|
| 41.960 | 0.000 | ||
| Invariant | 548 (59.5%) | 207(66.1%) | ||
| Gradual increase | 100 (10.9%) | 10(3.2%) | ||
| Gradual decrease | 272 (29.6%) | 96(30.7%) | ||
|
| 38.065 | 0.000 | ||
| Invariant | 533(57.9%) | 231(73.8%) | ||
| Gradual increase | 62(6.7%) | 10(3.2%) | ||
| Gradual decrease | 325(35.3%) | 72(23.0%) | ||
|
| 47.441 | 0.000 | ||
| Invariant | 547(59.4%) | 229(73.2%) | ||
| Gradual increase | 65(7.1%) | 34(10.8%) | ||
| Gradual decrease | 308(33.5%) | 50(16.0%) | ||
|
| 32.428 | 0.000 | ||
| Invariant | 550(59.8%) | 238(76.0%) | ||
| Gradual increase | 72(7.8%) | 29(9.3%) | ||
| Gradual decrease | 298(32.4%) | 46(14.7%) | ||
|
| 17.179 | 0.009 | ||
| Invariant | 532(57.8%) | 245(78.3%) | ||
| Gradual increase | 87(9.5%) | 16(5.1%) | ||
| Gradual decrease | 301(32.7%) | 52(16.6%) | ||
|
| 38.582 | 0.000 | ||
| Invariant | 565(61.4%) | 221(67.4%) | ||
| Gradual increase | 51(5.5%) | 20(6.4%) | ||
| Gradual decrease | 304(33.1%) | 82(26.2%) |
Family drinking water sources of the rural residents in the high- and low-EC incidence areas. ΔIn the permissible value of Drinking Water Quality Standards in China. *P < 0.05 is statistically significant.
| Yanting County of Sichuan Province (n = 920) | Qingzhen City of Guizhou Province (n = 313) | χ2 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 111.075 | 0.000 | ||
| Tap waterΔ | 667(72.5%) | 185(59.1%) | ||
| Deep water in a pressurized well | 101(11.0%) | 10(3.2%) | ||
| Shallow water in a pressurized well | 54(5.9%) | 14(4.5%) | ||
| Deep water in a water injection well | 56(6.1%) | 12(3.8%) | ||
| Shallow water in a water injection well | 3(0.3%) | 6(1.9%) | ||
| Spring in a water injection well | 39(4.2%) | 86(27.5%) |
Personal knowledge of EC among the rural residents in the high- and low-incidence areas. ΔThe common causes, main symptoms, treatment measures and preventive measures for EC were found in the 8th edition of the AJCC & UICC (2017). EC, Esophageal cancer. *P < 0.05 is statistically significant.
| Contents of the survey | Yanting County of Sichuan Province (n = 920) | Qingzhen City of Guizhou Province (n = 313) | χ2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18.761 | 0.027 | ||
| Never heard of | 239(26.0%) | 176(56.2%) | ||
| Know of | 525(57.1%) | 123(39.3%) | ||
| Clear understanding of | 156(17.0%) | 14(4.5%) | ||
|
| 20.267 | 0.016 | ||
| Never heard of | 613(66.6%) | 279(89.1%) | ||
| Know of | 196(21.3%) | 20(6.4%) | ||
| Clear understanding of | 111(12.1%) | 14(4.5%) | ||
|
| 11.048 | 0.042 | ||
| Never heard of | 605(65.8%) | 276(88.2%) | ||
| Know of | 191(20.8%) | 25(8.0%) | ||
| Clear understanding of | 124(13.5%) | 12(3.8%) | ||
|
| 20.733 | 0.014 | ||
| Never heard of | 629(75.2%) | 297(97.9%) | ||
| Know of | 156(17.0%) | 10(3.2%) | ||
| Clear understanding of | 77(7.8%) | 6(1.9%) | ||
|
| 10.282 | 0.028 | ||
| Never heard of | 704(76.5%) | 297(87.9%) | ||
| Know of | 135(14.7%) | 32(10.2%) | ||
| Clear understanding of | 81(8.9%) | 6(1.9%) | ||
|
| 11.548 | 0.031 | ||
| Never heard of | 749(81.4%) | 275(87.9%) | ||
| Know of | 107(11.6%) | 32(10.2%) | ||
| Clear understanding of | 64(6.9%) | 6(1.9%) |