Literature DB >> 26477994

Salty Food Preference and Intake and Risk of Gastric Cancer: The JACC Study.

Mitsumasa Umesawa1, Hiroyasu Iso, Yoshihisa Fujino, Shogo Kikuchi, Akiko Tamakoshi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High sodium intake is a potential risk factor of gastric cancer. However, limited information is available on the relationship between salty food preference or intake and risk of gastric cancer. The aim of the present study was to determine the association between these variables among the Japanese population.
METHODS: Between 1988 and 1990, 15,732 men and 24,997 women aged 40-79 years old with no history of cancer or cardiovascular disease completed a lifestyle questionnaire that included information about food intake. The subjects were enrolled in the Japan Collaborative Cohort (JACC) Study for Evaluation of Cancer Risk Sponsored by Monbusho. After a median follow-up of 14.3 years, 787 incident gastric cancers were documented. We examined the associations between salty food preference and intake and gastric cancer incidence using the Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS: The risk of gastric cancer among subjects with a strong preference for salty food was approximately 30% higher than among those who preferred normal-level salty food (hazard ratio [HR] 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.67). The risk of gastric cancer in subjects who consumed 3 and ≥ 4 bowls/day of miso soup was approximately 60% higher than in those who consumed less miso soup (HR 1.67; 95% CI, 1.16-2.39 and HR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.11-2.42, respectively). Sodium intake correlated positively and linearly with risk of gastric cancer (P for trend = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that salty food preference, consumption of large quantities of miso soup, and high sodium intake were associated with increased risk of gastric cancer among Japanese people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26477994      PMCID: PMC4728120          DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20150023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0917-5040            Impact factor:   3.211


INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer is one of the main causes of cancer deaths. According to the World Health Organization, gastric cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer deaths, with 736 000 gastric cancer-related deaths worldwide in 2008. Another study showed that the incidence of gastric cancer in Eastern Asia is the highest in the world; the incidence rates in Eastern Asia were 42.4/100 000 in men and 18.3/100 000 in women, which were over four times higher than in Western Europe and over 7 times higher than in North America.[1] Excess salt intake is an important risk factor of gastric cancer. Several epidemiological studies showed a positive association between salt intake and risk of gastric cancer.[2],[3] The association between salty food intake and risk of gastric cancer has also been examined in several epidemiological studies.[3]–[7] The results of these studies suggest that salty preserved animal food intake correlates with risk of gastric cancer; however, findings on the association between the intake of salty preserved plant foods (eg, miso [soybean-paste] soup) and risk of gastric cancer have been inconsistent. In addition, recent Asian epidemiological studies showed that salty taste preference was positively associated with risk of gastric cancer.[8],[9] However, the evidence is limited in Japanese people. The aim of the present study was to determine the correlation between salty food preference/salty food intake and risk of gastric cancer. We tested our a priori hypothesis that both salty food preference and salty food intake are associated with risk of gastric cancer using data of a large prospective cohort study of middle-aged Japanese people from the general population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

The Japan Collaborative Cohort (JACC) Study for Evaluation of Cancer Risks, sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Science, was conducted from 1988 to 1990. A total of 110 585 subjects (46 395 men and 64 190 women) aged 40 to 79 years completed self-administered questionnaires about their lifestyles and medical histories on cancer and cardiovascular disease. The population sample was recruited from 45 communities across Japan, and most of the participants completed questionnaires and municipal health screening examinations according to the Health Law for the Aged in their communities.[10] The sampling methods and protocols of the JACC Study have been described in detail previously.[10],[11] We excluded from the present analysis 5850 subjects (2574 men and 3276 women) with medical history of cancer, stroke, and coronary heart disease at baseline. Of the remaining 104 735 subjects, 58 645 subjects (23 099 men and 35 546 women) provided valid responses to the dietary intake-related questions. Of these, we used the data of 40 729 subjects (15 732 men and 24 997 women) who lived in 24 communities and underwent follow-up research on cancer incidence to examine the association between salty food preference and salty food intake and risk of gastric cancer.

Follow-up

The median follow-up period was 14.3 years. The number of subjects who moved out of the study area was 1921 (4.7%). The incidence of cancer was mainly based on the records of population-based cancer registries and systematic review of death certificates. In some study areas, the medical records of hospitals were also reviewed. The incidence data were coded according to the 10th Revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). We defined gastric cancer as C16.0 to C16.9. The present study was approved by the ethics committee of Hokkaido University.

Dietary intake, nutrition intake, and salty taste preference

The questionnaire included items on salty taste preference, with five potential responses: “not favored at all”, “slightly not favored”, “no opinion”, “slightly favored”, and “strongly favored”. Each participant was asked to record the frequency of intake of 35 foods. Five responses were possible for 33 of the food items: “rarely”, “1 to 2 days per month”, “1 to 2 days per week”, “3 to 4 days per week”, and “almost every day”. Four responses were possible for miso (salty soybean paste) soup intake: “rarely”, “a few times per month”, “almost every other day”, and “every day”. Those who chose “everyday” were asked about the number of servings (bowls) per day. Rice intake was quantified as bowls (140 g) per day. The reproducibility and validity of this dietary questionnaire have been reported elsewhere.[12] The average daily intake of nutrients and total energy was calculated by multiplying the frequency of consumption of each item by its nutrient content and energy per serving and totaling the nutrient intake for all food items. The energy-adjusted nutrient intake was calculated by the residual method.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was based on age- and sex-adjusted incidence rates of gastric cancer during the follow-up period from 1989 to 2009. For each participant, the person-years of follow-up were calculated from the date of filling out the baseline questionnaire to the incidence of gastric cancer, death, moving out of the community, or the end of the follow-up, whichever occurred first. Age- and sex-adjusted and multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of gastric cancer were defined as the incidence rate according to the salty food preference and the frequency of salty food intake. The HRs of gastric cancer and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated after adjustment for age, sex, and potential confounding factors using the Cox proportional hazard model. We analyzed the HR according to salty food preference using subjects who selected “no opinion” as the answer to their salty food preference for the reference group. We also tested for a linear trend across the categories of salty food preference by assigning 1 to 5 to the corresponding category. We defined salty food as miso (salty soybean paste) soup, ham/sausage, fish paste, dried and salted fish, salty pickles, preserved foods using soy sauce, and boiled beans. We used subjects who rarely consumed each of the foods (except for miso soup) as the reference group. Since subjects who never consume miso soup are rare among Japanese people, the reference group comprised subjects who consumed miso soup only a few times per week. Furthermore, we analyzed the HR according to sex-specific quintiles of sodium intake: the median values of the lowest to highest quintiles of sodium intake were 1052, 1572, 1951, 2376, and 3017 mg/day, respectively. We used the lowest quintile as a reference. We tested sex interaction in each analysis and found no significant interactions. Thus, we present the data of the entire study population rather than separate data for men and women. The mean values and proportions of gastric cancer risk factors are presented according to salty food preference and frequency of salty food intake. Age- and sex-adjusted and multivariate-adjusted HRs and their 95% CIs were calculated after adjustment for age, sex, and potential confounding factors, including family history of gastric cancer, body mass index (BMI; kg/m2), alcohol intake (current drinker, not current drinker, and missing information), smoking status (never, ex-smoker, current smoker, and missing information), walking time/day (never, about 30 min, 30–60 min, ≥60 min/day, and missing information), educational status (education until 12, 13 to 15, 16 to 18, or ≥19 years of age, and missing information) and perceived mental stress (low, medium, high, extremely high, and missing information). We also used the frequency of total vegetable intake (sex-specific quintiles of sum of frequency of consumption of green leafy vegetables, carrot or pumpkin, tomatoes, cabbage or head lettuce, and Chinese cabbage and missing information) and fruit intake (sex-specific quintiles of sum of frequency of consumption of citrus fruits and other fruits and missing information) as confounding variables. As for salty food preference, we calculated multivariate-adjusted HRs and their 95% CIs with adjustment for sodium intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing information). All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.3 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A P value less than 0.05 denoted the presence of statistical significance, and those of 0.05–0.10 were regarded as borderline significance.

RESULTS

Table 1 summarizes the age- and sex-adjusted characteristics of subjects based on salty food preference. Of 40 729 subjects, 37 672 responded to the question regarding salty taste preference. Salty food preference correlated positively with gender (men), BMI, current alcohol drinking, and current smoking and negatively with age and frequency of vegetable and fruit intake, but did not correlate with family history of gastric cancer. In addition, the estimated sodium intake was higher in subjects who preferred salty food than in those who did not.
Table 1.

Age- and sex-adjusted characteristics of the subjects according to preference for salty food

 Preference of salty foodP fordifference

not favored at allslightly not favoredno opinionslightly favoredstrongly favored
n813524318 95894843174 
Age, years57.956.356.455.254.4<0.001
Men, %3227335055<0.001
Body mass index, kg/m222.522.522.722.923.0<0.001
Current drinker, %3941434851<0.001
Current smoker, %2021222632<0.001
Family history of gastric cancer, %12.214.113.513.214.30.258
Frequency of total vegetable intake, servings/week17.816.315.715.315.6<0.001
Frequency of fruit intake, servings/week8.28.07.97.87.90.002
Mean sodium intake, mg/day18281827198019922037<0.001
Table 2 lists the age- and sex-adjusted characteristics of subjects based on the frequency of miso soup intake. Of 40 729 subjects, 38 763 responded to the question regarding miso soup intake. The frequency of miso soup intake correlated positively with gender (men), frequency of total vegetable intake, and sodium intake and negatively with current smoking. Subjects who drank miso soup almost every other day or 1–2 bowls per day tended to be younger, have lower mean BMI, and be less likely to have a family history of gastric cancer compared with the other subjects.
Table 2.

Age- and sex-adjusted characteristics of the subjects according to frequency of miso soup intake

 Frequency of miso soup intake

NeverA few timesper monthAlmost everysecond dayEverydayP fordifference

1 bowl per day2 bowls per day3 bowls per day4 bowls or more per day
n2160376456556979866984763060 
Age, years56.356.454.254.554.858.160.7<0.001
Men, %29343332414360<0.001
Body mass index, kg/m222.822.822.722.622.722.923.1<0.001
Current drinker, %44484544444245<0.001
Current smoker, %26252523232423<0.001
Family history of gastric cancer, %13.613.613.313.312.913.914.10.029
Frequency of total vegetable intake, servings/week13.313.414.816.216.317.017.0<0.001
Frequency of fruit intake, servings/week7.47.27.67.68.18.27.2<0.001
Mean sodium intake, mg/day1136118714211808217625622818<0.001
Table 3 shows the age- and sex-adjusted characteristics of subjects based on sex-specific quintiles of sodium intake. Sodium intake correlated positively with age, frequency of vegetable intake, and fruit and miso soup intake but negatively with current drinking and current smoking. Subjects in the middle quintile of sodium intake had lower BMI compared to those with the highest and lowest intake.
Table 3.

Age- and sex-adjusted characteristics of the subjects according to sex-specific quintiles of sodium intake

 Quintiles of sodium intakeP fordifference

1 (lowest)2345 (highest)
n81458147814581478145 
Median sodium intake, mg/day10521572195123763017 
Age, years54.855.755.956.457.9<0.001
Men, %3939393939
Body mass index, kg/m222.922.722.722.822.9<0.001
Current drinker, %4947444339<0.001
Current smoker, %2623242423<0.001
Family history of gastric cancer, %13.413.213.514.013.10.466
Frequency of total vegetable intake, servings/week13.315.116.216.617.9<0.001
Frequency of fruit intake, servings/week6.97.78.08.28.2<0.001
Frequency of miso soup intake, servings/week3.27.211.616.620.7<0.001
During the median 14.3-year follow-up period of the 40 729 subjects, 787 incident cases of gastric cancer were documented. Table 4 presents the age- and sex-adjusted and multivariate-adjusted HRs (and 95% CIs) and P value for the linear trend in gastric cancer risk across the categories according to salty food preference. The risk of gastric cancer was significantly higher among subjects who considered their salty food preference “strongly favored” compared with subjects who considered it “no opinion”, even after adjustment for potential confounding factors, such as vegetable and fruit intake (HR 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03–1.68). The association did not change even after further adjustment for sodium intake (HR 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02–1.67).
Table 4.

Age- and sex-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios of gastric cancer according to preference of salty food

 Preference of salty foodP fortrend

not favored at allslightly not favoredno opinionslightly favoredstrongly favored
n813524318 95894843174 
Person-years997166 249247 940125 42842 534 
Number of incidents138233319382 
Number of incidents per 1000 person years1.301.241.341.541.93 
Age- and sex-adjusted HR (95% CI)0.87 (0.50–1.51)0.92 (0.72–1.16)1.001.02 (0.86–1.21)1.30 (1.03–1.66)0.020
Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)a0.92 (0.53–1.61)0.97 (0.76–1.23)1.001.05 (0.88–1.25)1.32 (1.04–1.69)0.038
Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)b0.91 (0.52–1.58)0.96 (0.76–1.22)1.001.05 (0.88–1.26)1.31 (1.03–1.68)0.035
Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)c0.94 (0.54–1.63)0.99 (0.78–1.26)1.001.05 (0.88–1.25)1.31 (1.02–1.67)0.059

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

aAdjusted further for body mass index (kg/m2), ethanol intake (current drinker or not and missing), smoking status (four categories), family history of gastric cancer, walking time (five categories), educational status (five categories), and perceived mental stress (four categories).

bAdjusted further for frequency of total vegetable intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing) and fruit intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing).

cAdjusted further for sodium intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing).

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. aAdjusted further for body mass index (kg/m2), ethanol intake (current drinker or not and missing), smoking status (four categories), family history of gastric cancer, walking time (five categories), educational status (five categories), and perceived mental stress (four categories). bAdjusted further for frequency of total vegetable intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing) and fruit intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing). cAdjusted further for sodium intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing). Table 5 shows the HRs (and 95% CIs) of gastric cancer according to the frequency of miso soup intake. Compared with subjects who took miso soup a few times per month, the risk of gastric cancer was significantly higher among those who drank more than 4 bowls per day (HR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.11–2.42) and subjects who took 3 bowls per day (HR 1.67; 95% CI, 1.16–2.39). The risk of gastric cancer also tended to be higher among subjects who took 2 bowls of miso soup per day than in the reference group, though with only borderline statistical significance (HR 1.42; 95% CI, 0.98–2.04, P = 0.063).
Table 5.

Age- and sex-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios of gastric cancer according to frequency of miso soup intake

 NeverA few timesper monthAlmost everysecond dayEveryday

1 bowl per day2 bowls per day3 bowls per day4 bowls or more per day
n2160376456556979866984763060
Person-years23 92736 67066 62683 550126 481127 91944 163
Number of incidents28356981171249112
Number of incidents per 1000 person years1.170.951.040.971.351.952.54
Age- and sex-adjusted HR (95% CI)1.31 (0.80–2.16)1.001.21 (0.80–1.82)1.13 (0.76–1.67)1.44 (1.00–2.07)1.71 (1.20–2.43)1.70 (1.16–2.49)
Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)a1.30 (0.79–2.14)1.001.21 (0.81–1.82)1.13 (0.76–1.67)1.43 (0.99–2.06)1.68 (1.18–2.40)1.66 (1.13–2.45)
Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)b1.30 (0.79–2.14)1.001.21 (0.81–1.82)1.11 (0.75–1.66)1.42 (0.98–2.04)1.67 (1.16–2.39)1.64 (1.11–2.42)

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

aAdjusted further for body mass index (kg/m2), ethanol intake (current drinker or not and missing), smoking status (four categories), family history of gastric cancer, walking time (five categories), educational status (five categories), and perceived mental stress (four categories).

bAdjusted further for frequency of total vegetable intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing) and fruit intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing).

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. aAdjusted further for body mass index (kg/m2), ethanol intake (current drinker or not and missing), smoking status (four categories), family history of gastric cancer, walking time (five categories), educational status (five categories), and perceived mental stress (four categories). bAdjusted further for frequency of total vegetable intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing) and fruit intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing). Table 6 shows the HRs and 95% CIs of gastric cancer according to quintiles of sodium intake. The risk of gastric cancer was higher in subjects with the highest and middle quintiles of sodium intake compared to those of the lowest quintile (high sodium intake: HR 1.51; 95% CI, 1.17–1.94, middle sodium intake: HR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.05–1.76, P for trend = 0.002). With regard to subjects of the second highest quintile of sodium intake (the fourth quintile), the risk of gastric cancer tended to be significant, though with borderline statistical significance (HR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.00–1.67, P = 0.051).
Table 6.

Associations between sex-specific quintiles of sodium intake and risk of gastric cancer

 Quintiles of sodium intakeP fortrend

1 (low)2345 (high)
n81458147814581478145 
Person-years90 60396 858107 271118 984121 564 
Number of incidents92127161178229 
Number of incidents per 1000 person years1.021.311.501.501.88 
Age- and sex-adjusted HR (95% CI)1.001.20 (0.92–1.57)1.36 (1.05–1.76)1.31 (1.02–1.69)1.51 (1.18–1.93)<0.001
Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)a1.001.21 (0.92–1.58)1.37 (1.06–1.77)1.30 (1.01–1.68)1.53 (1.19–1.96)<0.001
Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)b1.001.20 (0.92–1.58)1.36 (1.05–1.76)1.29 (1.00–1.67)1.51 (1.17–1.94)0.002

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

aAdjusted further for body mass index (kg/m2), ethanol intake (current drinker or not and missing), smoking status (four categories), family history of gastric cancer, walking time (five categories), educational status (five categories), and perceived mental stress (four categories).

bAdjusted further for frequency of total vegetable intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing) and fruit intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing).

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. aAdjusted further for body mass index (kg/m2), ethanol intake (current drinker or not and missing), smoking status (four categories), family history of gastric cancer, walking time (five categories), educational status (five categories), and perceived mental stress (four categories). bAdjusted further for frequency of total vegetable intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing) and fruit intake (sex-specific quintiles and missing). Finally, we examined the associations between the frequency of salty food intake (excluding miso soup) and risk of gastric cancer. The risk of gastric cancer did not correlate with consumption of ham/sausage, fish paste, dried and salted fish, salty pickles, or boiled beans (data not shown). The risk of gastric cancer did tend to be higher among subjects who consumed foods preserved using soy sauce almost every day compared to those who consumed these products rarely; however, the association was of borderline statistical significance (HR 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97–1.71, P = 0.087).

DISCUSSION

The main findings of the present study were that strong salty food preference was associated with approximately 30% higher risk of gastric cancer than subjects who preferred normal-level salty food, and miso soup intake of 3 or more bowls per day was associated with approximately 60% higher risk of gastric cancer than subjects who took miso soup a few times per month. The estimated sodium intake itself also correlated with risk of gastric cancer. Our findings in Japanese individuals add support to the findings of previous studies from other Asian countries. A prospective study of Korean men and women reported that the risk of gastric cancer was 10% higher in subjects who preferred salty foods compared to those who did not.[8] A cross-sectional study of Chinese subjects showed that patients with gastric cancer preferred salty taste compared with healthy individuals.[9] With regard to the consumption of high-salt foods, a prospective study of Japanese subjects showed that the risk of gastric cancer was about 80% to 100% higher in subjects who took miso soup every day compared with subjects who did not.[3] Another prospective study of Japanese subjects showed a positive association between miso soup intake and risk of gastric cancer, although the association was not statistically significant.[6] Several epidemiological studies showed a positive association between salty pickle intake and risk of gastric cancer.[3],[4],[6] However, in the present study, there was no association between salty pickle intake and risk of gastric cancer. As for sodium intake, two prospective studies of Japanese subjects showed a positive association between high sodium intake and risk of gastric cancer,[2],[3] which is similar to the finding of the present study. In addition, we found a significant association between salty food preference and risk of gastric cancer even after adjustment for sodium intake. The mechanisms for that association may include tissue damage caused by high concentrations of sodium in the diet[13] and carcinogenesis by N-Methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine enhanced by high concentrations of sodium in the diet.[14] The strength of the present study was its community-based prospective cohort design and inclusion of a large free-living population. In addition, the questionnaire included direct and detailed questions about salty food preference, which allowed the exact relationship between salty food preference and risk of gastric cancer in the Japanese subjects to be defined. The main limitation of the present study relates to the effect of Helicobacter pylori infection. This issue was not investigated in this study due to lack of information for all subjects on such infection. High sodium intake is reported to weaken the protective effect of the mucous barrier and promote the carcinogenic effect of H. pylori infection,[15],[16] a recognized risk factor of gastric cancer. Therefore, we also examined the relationship between salty food preference/salty food intake and risk of gastric cancer based on information on H. pylori infection, which was measured in a case-control study,[17] although the number of subjects included in this analysis was limited (n = 579). Adjustment for H. pylori infection did not alter the association between salty food preference/salty food intake and risk of gastric cancer (data not shown). Several mechanisms may account for the association between salty food intake and risk of gastric cancer. First, a high concentration of sodium in the stomach is reported to cause acute damage of the surface mucosal cells and transient cell proliferation.[13] Second, a salty diet alters mucin production and enhances gastric chemical carcinogenesis.[18] Both mechanisms are salt dose-dependent. In addition, the relationship between high sodium intake and H. pylori infection stated above may enhance the development of gastric cancer. In conclusion, our large prospective study of Japanese men and women showed that salty food preference correlated positively with risk of gastric cancer. Intake of large quantities of miso soup was also associated with risk of gastric cancer. These findings suggest that education about the potential harmful effects of salty food preference and reduction of sodium intake (especially miso soup) may help prevent the development of gastric cancer among Japanese people.
  18 in total

1.  High salt diets dose-dependently promote gastric chemical carcinogenesis in Helicobacter pylori-infected Mongolian gerbils associated with a shift in mucin production from glandular to surface mucous cells.

Authors:  Sosuke Kato; Tetsuya Tsukamoto; Tsutomu Mizoshita; Harunari Tanaka; Toshiko Kumagai; Hiroyoshi Ota; Tsutomu Katsuyama; Masahiro Asaka; Masae Tatematsu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Gastric cancer and salt preference: a population-based cohort study in Korea.

Authors:  Jeongseon Kim; Sohee Park; Byung-Ho Nam
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Protective factor against progression from atrophic gastritis to gastric cancer--data from a cohort study in Japan.

Authors:  M Inoue; K Tajima; S Kobayashi; T Suzuki; A Matsuura; T Nakamura; M Shirai; S Nakamura; K Inuzuka; S Tominaga
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1996-05-03       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Lifestyle factors, radiation and gastric cancer in atomic-bomb survivors (Japan).

Authors:  Catherine Sauvaget; Frédéric Lagarde; Jun Nagano; Midori Soda; Kojiro Koyama; Kazunori Kodama
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  A prospective study of dietary salt intake and gastric cancer incidence in a defined Japanese population: the Hisayama study.

Authors:  Kentaro Shikata; Yutaka Kiyohara; Michiaki Kubo; Koji Yonemoto; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Tomoko Shirota; Yumihiro Tanizaki; Yasufumi Doi; Keiichi Tanaka; Yoshinori Oishi; Takayuki Matsumoto; Mitsuo Iida
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  High-salt diet induces gastric epithelial hyperplasia and parietal cell loss, and enhances Helicobacter pylori colonization in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  J G Fox; C A Dangler; N S Taylor; A King; T J Koh; T C Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Effects in rats of sodium chloride on experimental gastric cancers induced by N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine or 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide.

Authors:  M Tatematsu; M Takahashi; S Fukushima; M Hananouchi; T Shirai
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Cause and effect between concentration-dependent tissue damage and temporary cell proliferation in rat stomach mucosa by NaCl, a stomach tumor promoter.

Authors:  C Furihata; H Ohta; T Katsuyama
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire used in the JACC study.

Authors:  Chigusa Date; Mitsuru Fukui; Akio Yamamoto; Kenji Wakai; Azusa Ozeki; Yutaka Motohashi; Chieko Adachi; Naoyuki Okamoto; Michiko Kurosawa; Yuko Tokudome; Yoko Kurisu; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Kotaro Ozasa; Shuichi Nakagawa; Noritaka Tokui; Takesumi Yoshimura; Akiko Tamakoshi
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  Individual and joint impact of family history and Helicobacter pylori infection on the risk of stomach cancer: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  H Yatsuya; H Toyoshima; A Tamakoshi; S Kikuchi; K Tamakoshi; T Kondo; T Mizoue; N Tokui; Y Hoshiyama; K Sakata; N Hayakawa; T Yoshimura
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

1.  Dietary Sodium Intake and Health Indicators: A Systematic Review of Published Literature between January 2015 and December 2019.

Authors:  Katherine J Overwyk; Zerleen S Quader; Joyce Maalouf; Marlana Bates; Jacqui Webster; Mary G George; Robert K Merritt; Mary E Cogswell
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 2.  Dietary Reference Intakes of sodium for Koreans: focusing on a new DRI component for chronic disease risk reduction.

Authors:  Hyun Ja Kim; Yeon-Kyung Lee; Hoseok Koo; Min-Jeong Shin
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 1.992

Review 3.  The Lifelong Health Support 10: a Japanese prescription for a long and healthy life.

Authors:  Ahmed Arafa; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Rena Kashima; Masayuki Teramoto; Yukie Sakai; Saya Nosaka; Youko M Nakao; Emi Watanabe
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.395

Review 4.  More evidence that salt increases blood pressure and risk of kidney disease from the Science of Salt: A regularly updated systematic review of salt and health outcomes (April-July 2016).

Authors:  JoAnne Arcand; Michelle M Y Wong; Joseph Alvin Santos; Alexander A Leung; Kathy Trieu; Sudhir Raj Thout; Jacqui Webster; Norm R C Campbell
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Meta-analysis of Soy Consumption and Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Demin Lu; Chi Pan; Chenyang Ye; Huijie Duan; Fei Xu; Li Yin; Wei Tian; Suzhan Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Mapping and Predicting Patterns of Chinese Adolescents' Food Preferences.

Authors:  Shaojing Sun; Jinbo He; Xitao Fan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Investigation of Dietary Factors and Esophageal Cancer Knowledge: Comparison of Rural Residents in High- and Low-incidence Areas.

Authors:  Dong Tian; Shuai-Jia Mo; Lian-Kui Han; Liang Cheng; Heng Huang; Shuai Hao; Ye-Lan Guan; Kai-Yuan Jiang; Jing-Ya Deng; Hu-Hao Feng; Hong-Ying Wen; Mao-Yong Fu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Occupational inequalities in female cancer incidence in Japan: Hospital-based matched case-control study with occupational class.

Authors:  Masayoshi Zaitsu; Rena Kaneko; Takumi Takeuchi; Yuzuru Sato; Yasuki Kobayashi; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2018-06-08

9.  Dietary intake and breast cancer risk in black South African women: the South African Breast Cancer study.

Authors:  Inarie Jacobs; Christine Taljaard-Krugell; Cristian Ricci; Hester Vorster; Sabina Rinaldi; Herbert Cubasch; Ria Laubscher; Maureen Joffe; Tertia van Zyl; Shane A Norris; Isabelle Romieu
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.718

10.  Adherence to "dietary approaches to stop hypertension" eating plan in relation to gastric cancer.

Authors:  Fatemeh Toorang; Bahareh Sasanfar; Maryam Hadji; Ahmad Esmaillzadeh; Kazem Zendehdel
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.