| Literature DB >> 29558855 |
Alejandro Torrejón1, Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández2, G Gregory Haff3, Amador García-Ramos1,4.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the suitability of the load-velocity relationship to prescribe the relative load (%1RM) in women, as well as to compare the load-velocity profile between sexes and participants with different strength levels. The load-velocity relationship of 14 men (1RM: 1.17 ± 0.19) and 14 women (1RM: 0.66 ± 0.13) were evaluated in the bench press exercise. The main findings revealed that: (I) the load-velocity relationship was always strong and linear (R2 range: 0.987-0.993), (II) a steeper load-velocity profile was observed in men compared to women (Effect size [ES]: 1.09), with men showing higher velocities for light loads (ES: - 0.81 and - 0.40 for the y-intercept and 30%1RM, respectively), but women reporting higher velocities for the heavy loads (ES: 1.14 and 1.50 at 90%1RM and 100%1RM, respectively); and (III) while the slope of the load-velocity profile was moderately steeper for weak men compared to their strong counterpart (ES: 1.02), small differences were observed between strong and weak women (ES: - 0.39). While these results support the use of the individual load-velocity relationship to prescribe the %1RM in the bench press exercise for women, they also highlight the large disparities in their load-velocity profile compared to men.Entities:
Keywords: Velocity-based resistance training; bench press; movement velocity; one-repetition maximum; relative load
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29558855 DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2018.1433872
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports Biomech ISSN: 1476-3141 Impact factor: 2.832