Andrew J Clulow1, Malinda Salim1, Adrian Hawley2, Elliot P Gilbert3, Ben J Boyd1,4. 1. Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics , Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences , 381 Royal Parade , Parkville , Victoria 3052 , Australia. 2. Australian Synchrotron, ANSTO , 800 Blackburn Road , Clayton , Victoria 3168 , Australia. 3. Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering , Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation , Locked Bag 2001, Kirrawee DC , New South Wales 2232 , Australia. 4. ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Monash University (Parkville Campus) , 381 Royal Parade , Parkville , Victoria 3052 , Australia.
Abstract
Efforts to develop orally administered drugs tend to place an exceptional focus on aqueous solubility as this is an essential criterion for their absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. In this work we examine the solid state behavior and solubility of OZ439, a promising single-dose cure for malaria being developed as the highly water-soluble mesylate salt. The aqueous phase behavior of the OZ439 mesylate salt was determined using a combination of small angle neutron and X-ray scattering (SANS and SAXS, respectively). It was found that this salt has low solubility at low concentrations with the drug largely precipitated in free base aggregates. However, with increasing concentration these crystalline aggregates were observed to dissociate into cationic micelles and lamellar phases, effectively increasing the dissolved drug concentration. It was also found that the dissolved OZ439 spontaneously precipitated in the presence of biologically relevant anions, which we attribute to the high lattice energies of most of the salt forms of the drug. These findings show that aqueous solubility is not always what it seems in the context of amphiphilic drug molecules and highlights that its use as the principal metric in selecting drug candidates for development can be perilous.
Efforts to develop orally administered drugs tend to place an exceptional focus on aqueous solubility as this is an essential criterion for their absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. In this work we examine the solid state behavior and solubility of OZ439, a promising single-dose cure for malaria being developed as the highly water-soluble mesylate salt. The aqueous phase behavior of the OZ439 mesylate salt was determined using a combination of small angle neutron and X-ray scattering (SANS and SAXS, respectively). It was found that this salt has low solubility at low concentrations with the drug largely precipitated in free base aggregates. However, with increasing concentration these crystalline aggregates were observed to dissociate into cationic micelles and lamellar phases, effectively increasing the dissolved drug concentration. It was also found that the dissolved OZ439 spontaneously precipitated in the presence of biologically relevant anions, which we attribute to the high lattice energies of most of the salt forms of the drug. These findings show that aqueous solubility is not always what it seems in the context of amphiphilic drug molecules and highlights that its use as the principal metric in selecting drug candidates for development can be perilous.
Malaria is one of the
world’s greatest unmet medical needs,
that leads to the death of around half a million patients per year,
mostly pediatric patients in tropical low economy communities. The
treatment of malaria in such communities is challenging due to supply
and adherence issues. Pharmacological intervention is still regarded
as a key strategy to address malaria as a disease, with a strong push
for new candidate drugs to which the parasite has no or limited resistance
and with sufficient potency and favorable pharmacokinetic profiles
to enable a single dose treatment.[1]Artefenomel (OZ439) is a promising candidate against multiple malaria
parasites.[2] The trioxolane pharmacophore
is retained from the natural antimalarial artemisinin, but the remaining
structure of artefenomel is a synthetic novel structure (Figure ). OZ439 was designed
and evaluated in the early to mid-2000s specifically to extend exposure
to the drug by optimization of the structure to yield favorable pharmacokinetics,[3] with OZ439 displaying enhanced bioavailability
in the presence of food in humans.[4]
Figure 1
Image of mixtures
of the OZ439 mesylate salt with H2O and the chemical structure
of the OZ439 mesylate salt. The OZ439
mesylate concentration increases from left to right (5, 10, 15, 20,
25, and 30 mg mL–1) illustrating the reduction in
turbidity with increasing concentration.
Image of mixtures
of the OZ439 mesylate salt with H2O and the chemical structure
of the OZ439 mesylate salt. The OZ439
mesylate concentration increases from left to right (5, 10, 15, 20,
25, and 30 mg mL–1) illustrating the reduction in
turbidity with increasing concentration.Although OZ439 shows outstanding pharmacokinetics and offers
promise
as a single dose cure for malaria, a major target population for the
compound is children under the age of five for whom a conventional
tablet or capsule is not considered to be an appropriate dose form.
The most viable formulation approach is a liquid dose form and therefore
an understanding of the behavior of OZ439 in aqueous environments
in terms of solid state, dissolution, and molecular disposition in
solution is critical to anticipate the impact of dispersion of a solid
dose form for oral administration. The solution behavior of OZ439,
which is under development in its highly soluble mesylate salt form,
has not been reported.The structure of OZ439 notably contains
an ionizable polar morpholino
moiety at one end of the molecule and a hydrophobic adamantyl group
at the opposite end, lending the molecule an amphiphilic tendency.
Drugs possessing an amphiphilic structure have been known to self-assemble
to form micellar structures or liquid crystals,[5] which can improve stability[6] and have consequences for activity.[7] The
potential for OZ439 to self-assemble in solution therefore complicates
its likely solution behavior and a thorough characterization of the
phase behavior of OZ439 is of interest to both the pharmaceutical
and colloid science communities. To this end, the solution and solid
state phases of OZ439 mesylate were determined using a combination
of small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering. Intriguingly, the OZ439
mesylate salt appears to increase in solubility with increasing concentration
in simple aqueous solution, and this is related to the self-assembled
phases formed by the drug. However, these colloidal structures were
found to precipitate out as the hydrochloride and then the free base
forms of the drug under simulated gastric and intestinal conditions,
highlighting that apparent aqueous solubility alone can be a poor
metric when selecting amphiphilic drugs for development in oral dosage
forms.
Experimental Section
Materials
The OZ439 mesylate salt
was supplied by the
Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) and was used as received. H2O from Milli-Q water purification systems was used for all
experiments, and D2O for the SANS experiments was supplied
by the Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering (ANSTO, Sydney, Australia).
Sodium hydroxide pellets were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany),
and hydrochloric acid (36%) was purchased from LabServ (Ireland).
Both sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid were diluted with Milli-Q
water to make solutions with concentrations between 0.1 and 2.0 M
for pH adjustment. Sodium chloride (USP grade) was supplied by ANSTO
and was purchased from Research Organics (Cleveland, OH, USA). Unless
otherwise stated all chemicals were used as received without further
purification.
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS)
For SANS experiments,
30 mg mL–1 stock solutions of the OZ439 mesylatesalt were prepared in mixtures of Milli-Q H2O and D2O (H/D = 100:0, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100) supplied by ANSTO.
These solutions were subsequently diluted in the same H2O/D2O solvent mixture to give solutions with lower concentrations.
Samples were mixed by vortexing immediately after preparation and
were then equilibrated for at least 1 h before they were loaded into
Hellma cells. SANS measurements were performed on the Quokka instrument
at OPAL.[8] Three instrument configurations
were used, two with equal source-to-sample and sample-to-detector
distances of 20 and 8 m, and the final configuration with a source-to-sample
distance of 12 m and a sample-to-detector distance of 1.3 m with a
300 mm lateral detector offset to increase the maximum observable Q. Source and sample aperture diameters of 50 mm and 12.5
mm, respectively, were used. Neutrons with wavelength of 5 Å
(Δλ/λ = 10%) were used at all configurations. These
configurations provided a continuous Q range from
0.003 to 0.751 Å–1 where Q is the magnitude of the scattering vector, defined by Q = (4π/λ)sin(θ), where λ is the neutron wavelength
and 2θ is the scattering angle. All samples
were enclosed in Hellma cells with path lengths of either 1 mm (H/D
= 100:0 and 50:50) or 2 mm (H/D = 25:75 and 0:100). The temperature
of the samples was controlled by a Julabo thermostated bath that was
held at 25 °C throughout the measurements. All data were corrected
for blocked beam measurements, normalized, radially averaged, and
placed on an absolute scale, following attenuated direct beam measurements,
using a package of macros in Igor Pro software (Wavemetrics, Lake
Oswego, OR, U.S.A.), and modified to accept HDF5 data files from Quokka.[9] The reduced data were analyzed using the SASView
fitting software accounting for the experimental uncertainty in both I(Q) and Q.[10]
Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS)
SAXS measurements
were performed at the Small and Wide Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS/WAXS)
beamline of the Australian Synchrotron, part of ANSTO.[11] The autoloader sample environment developed
at the Australian Synchrotron was used for all measurements at the
ambient temperature of the SAXS/WAXS experimental hutch, which is
typically 27 °C. Samples were all prepared in Milli-Q H2O by dilution of four stock solutions as described in Table S1. Samples were mixed by vortexing immediately
after preparation and again after 45–60 min. The samples were
then left to equilibrate for at least 1 h before 100 μL aliquots
were loaded into 96-well plates and covered with a silicone mat to
prevent evaporation. The samples were drawn one at a time into a quartz
capillary held stationary in the X-ray beam, and up to 13 scattering
measurements were performed as the solution was drawn into and then
ejected from the capillary back into the sample well. The capillary
was then washed with water and 2% Helmanex detergent solution. The
capillary was filled with water, and the background scattering from
the water-filled capillary was recorded to monitor capillary contamination
due to beam damage prior to the next sample being measured. This was
observed to be negligible for the OZ439 mesylate dispersions measured
under flow. Scattering was recorded at sample–detector distances
of 7159 and 1426 mm with a photon energy of 12 keV (λ = 1.033
Å). 2D scattering patterns were radially integrated into 1D scattering
functions I(Q) using the in-house
developed software package ScatterBrain. The scattering functions
were put on an absolute scale with units of cm–1 using the scattering from water as a standard. The low- and high-Q data were stitched together using the IRENA data analysis
suite (Version 2.61)[12] in the Igor Pro
7 environment and the data were analyzed using the SASView fitting
software[10] (Version 4.0.1). In order to
model the data sets in which strong Bragg peaks overlapped with the
scattering features from charged OZ439 mesylate micelles (Figure c), the data points
relating to the Bragg peaks were removed and the remaining data points
were modeled.
Figure 2
(a) Small angle X-ray scattering profiles of the OZ439
mesylate
salt in H2O at concentrations from 3 mg mL–1 to 33.3 mg mL–1. Individual colored points indicate
recorded data, and the dashed arrows indicate changes in intensity
with increasing OZ439 mesylate concentration. Scattering intensities
are on an absolute scale. (b) High-Q Bragg peaks
observed at low OZ439 mesylate concentrations (1–16 mg mL–1, absolute scale) and (c) low-Q Bragg
peaks observed in the intermediate concentration region (16–26
mg mL–1, arbitrary scale as profiles are offset
for clarity). (d) Lattice parameters determined from the Bragg peaks
of the OZ439 lamellar phases in panels b and c.
(a) Small angle X-ray scattering profiles of the OZ439
mesylate
salt in H2O at concentrations from 3 mg mL–1 to 33.3 mg mL–1. Individual colored points indicate
recorded data, and the dashed arrows indicate changes in intensity
with increasing OZ439 mesylate concentration. Scattering intensities
are on an absolute scale. (b) High-Q Bragg peaks
observed at low OZ439 mesylate concentrations (1–16 mg mL–1, absolute scale) and (c) low-Q Bragg
peaks observed in the intermediate concentration region (16–26
mg mL–1, arbitrary scale as profiles are offset
for clarity). (d) Lattice parameters determined from the Bragg peaks
of the OZ439 lamellar phases in panels b and c.
X-ray Diffraction Measurements on OZ439 Free Base (OZ439-FB)
Powders/Dispersions
SAXS patterns of the OZ439-FB form 1
and form 2 powders were collected by loading the samples into glass
microcapillaries (1.5 mm outer diameter) that were placed in the X-ray
beam. OZ439-FB form 1 powders were prepared from the dispersion of
OZ439 mesylate in water (99 mg OZ439 mesylate in 2.5 mL water), and
the pH was adjusted to ∼8 using 1 M NaOH solution. The samples
were vacuum filtered, and the powders were collected for SAXS measurements
within 1 h of preparation. The OZ439-FB form 1 powder was also stored
at room temperature for 2 weeks, and the resultant powder (that had
converted to OZ439-FB form 2) was analyzed. An X-ray beam with a photon
energy of 13 keV (λ = 0.954 Å) and a sample-to-detector
distances between 562 and 568 mm were used. For dispersion measurements
(Figure ) a dispersion
was placed in a thermostatted sample holder at 37 °C. Dispersions
were circulated through a capillary mounted in the X-ray beam using
a peristaltic pump and 0.2 M aqueous NaOH solution was added to the
dispersion to raise the pH.
Figure 5
X-ray diffractograms of OZ439 hydrochloride
in water during titration
with NaOH solution beginning with OZ439-HCl at pH 1.87. Changes in
the diffractograms were observed with increasing pH, as the OZ439
hydrochloride salt transitioned to a free base polymorph (FB form
1). The dashed arrows indicate which peaks decrease in intensity (belonging
to OZ439 hydrochloride) and which peaks increase in intensity (belonging
to OZ439-FB form 1) as the pH of the suspension was increased. The
background intensity from water in the capillary used for the measurements
has been subtracted from all data sets.
Thermal Analysis of OZ439 Free Base Powders:
SAXS
Analysis
of the solid state forms of OZ439-FB form 1 powders with temperature
were performed using a Mettler Toledo FP82HT hot stage with the sample
window placed in the X-ray beam. OZ439-FB form 1 was prepared from
an OZ439 mesylate dispersion (99 mg of OZ439 mesylate in 2.5 mL of
water with a pH of ∼8 adjusted using 1 M NaOH solution) and
an OZ439 hydrochloride dispersion (99 mg of OZ439 mesylate in 2.5
mL of water with a pH of ∼1 adjusted using 1 M HCl solution).
The resulting dispersions were vacuum filtered and the collected powders
of OZ439-FB form 1 were transferred to a glass microscope slide covered
with a glass coverslip and placed on the hot stage. The samples were
heated from 30 to 120 °C with a heating rate of 5 °C min–1. The SAXS patterns were recorded at a sample-to-detector
distance of 575 mm using a photon energy of 13 keV (λ = 0.954
Å).
Thermal Analysis of OZ439 Free Base Powders: DSC and TGA
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms of the OZ439-FB
powders obtained from the first heating cycles were recorded on a
PerkinElmer DSC 8500 (Waltham, MA, USA) between 25 and 120 °C
with a heating rate of 5 °C min–1 under nitrogen.
The thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) of the OZ439-FB powders in platinum
sample pans were carried out on a Pyris 1 TGA (PerkinElmer, Waltham,
MA, USA) between 25 and 300 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
The OZ439-FB powders were prepared from the OZ439 mesylate dispersion
as described previously and the samples were kept in vacuum for about
2 h prior to the experiments.
Results and Discussion
SAXS and
SANS Profiles of the OZ439 Mesylate Salt in Water
The appearance
of mixtures of the OZ439 mesylate salt with water
(H2O) at different concentrations is shown in Figure . The solutions were
prepared by diluting a 30 mg mL–1 stock solution
and show that as the concentration of the OZ439 salt was decreased the solutions became more turbid. This was contrary to expectation
and suggested that either the salt was less soluble at lower concentrations
or that large colloidal structures were forming upon dilution that
led to increased light scattering. To address these hypotheses, a
combined small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering (SAXS and SANS,
respectively) study was performed to obtain a model for the structures
of the particles that were forming as a function of OZ439 concentration.In the X-ray study, four stock solutions were prepared with concentrations
of 5, 10, 20, and 33.3 mg mL–1 in H2O.
These stock solutions were diluted as indicated in Table S1 to afford solutions with concentrations between 1
and 30 mg mL–1 (1 mg mL–1 increments)
to generate a concentration series. Four duplicate solutions were
also prepared from the different stock solutions to confirm that the
structures formed were the same, which they were (Figure S1). In the corresponding neutron scattering experiments,
solutions with OZ439 mesylate salt concentrations of 5, 10, 20, and
30 mg mL–1 were prepared in H2O/D2O mixtures with ratios of 100:0, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100 to
provide different solvent scattering length density (SLD) contrasts
with the colloidal species forming.Initial qualitative analysis
of the SAXS profiles (Figure a) revealed that at low concentrations
(<4 mg mL–1) only large particles were present
in the solutions, as indicated by the sharp upturn in scattering intensity
at low Q, with Bragg peaks corresponding to a lamellar
phase observed at Q = 0.195 and 0.390 Å–1 (lattice parameter = 32.2 Å) (Figure b). As the concentration of
the OZ439 mesylate salt increased above 4 mg mL–1, the scattering intensity from large particles at low Q became weaker and smaller particles were observed in the mixtures
through the increase in scattered X-ray intensity between Q = 0.01 and 0.30 Å–1. The signal
from these particles increased in intensity with the concentration
of OZ439 mesylate salt in the solution and the downturn in scattered
intensity from these smaller particles below Q =
0.03 Å–1 combined with the profiles having
weak fringes indicated that interparticle interactions were leading
to measurable structure factor effects. In addition, the Bragg peaks
at 0.195 and 0.390 Å–1 were present up to an
OZ439 mesylate concentration of 16 mg mL–1, above
which they were no longer present but were replaced by Bragg peaks
at much lower Q values between 0.02 and 0.14 Å–1 (Figure c). These Bragg peaks shifted to higher Q values between 17 and 26 mg mL–1 and their intensity
decreased, indicating a decrease in the lattice parameter (Figure d) of the lamellar
phases and a commensurate decrease in concentration of the lamellar
phase with increasing OZ439 mesylate concentration. Above 27 mg mL–1, neither Bragg peaks or low Q scattering
from large particles was observed in the SAXS profiles, leaving only
the scattering feature from the small particles.When the corresponding
samples were prepared in H2O/D2O mixtures for
the SANS measurements, it was observed that
they were less turbid than the corresponding solutions prepared in
H2O for the SAXS measurements. This suggested that the
structure formation by the OZ439 mesylate salt might be affected by
deuteration of the solvent. This was borne out in the lamellar phases
observed in Figure c, which had larger lattice parameters (Bragg peaks at lower Q) and were observed in the SANS profiles at lower concentrations
when D2O was incorporated into the solvent rather than
at 20 mg mL–1 as they were in the SAXS profiles
in H2O (Figure and Figure S3). Furthermore, due
to the extended duration of the SANS measurements (up to 24 h to complete
measurements at all sample–detector distances), the larger
particles had time to sediment out of the mixtures. This settling
process was accompanied by the absence of the lamellar peaks at sample–detector
distances recorded later in time (Figure S2), indicating that the lamellar peaks were generated by the larger
particles in the mixtures that cause them to be turbid. A common feature
of both the SAXS and SANS profiles (Figure a) was the presence of small particles presenting
structure factor effects and the structures of these particles were
modeled as described forthwith.
Figure 3
(a) Small angle neutron scattering profiles
of the OZ439 mesylate
salt in H2O/D2O mixtures (% D = 50, 75, or 100) with concentrations
of 20 and 30 mg mL–1. Individual colored points
indicate recorded data and the solid black lines indicate model fits
to polydisperse charged spherical particles. The intensities of 100%
D and 75% D data have been multiplied by factors of 8 and 1.7, respectively,
for clarity. The data was placed on an absolute scale and the background
scattering from the sample environment was subtracted for fitting.
(b) Square root of the peak SANS intensity minus the background intensity
(I1/2) versus % D2O in the
H2O/D2O solvent. The I1/2 values for 50, 75, and 100% D2O have been ascribed
negative values to allow linear fitting of the data. The contrast
match point at I1/2 = 0 is marked with
the arrow.
(a) Small angle neutron scattering profiles
of the OZ439 mesylatesalt in H2O/D2O mixtures (% D = 50, 75, or 100) with concentrations
of 20 and 30 mg mL–1. Individual colored points
indicate recorded data and the solid black lines indicate model fits
to polydisperse charged spherical particles. The intensities of 100%
D and 75% D data have been multiplied by factors of 8 and 1.7, respectively,
for clarity. The data was placed on an absolute scale and the background
scattering from the sample environment was subtracted for fitting.
(b) Square root of the peak SANS intensity minus the background intensity
(I1/2) versus % D2O in the
H2O/D2O solvent. The I1/2 values for 50, 75, and 100% D2O have been ascribed
negative values to allow linear fitting of the data. The contrast
match point at I1/2 = 0 is marked with
the arrow.
SAXS/SANS Data Modeling
The structure factor that gave
reasonable fits to the scattering data in Figures and 3 was the Hayter–Penfold
structure factor, used to model the interactions between charged particles
in solution.[13] Given the miscibility of
the mesylate counterions in
water, this was consistent with the formation of cationic micelles
containing more protonated OZ439-H+ molecules than water-miscible
mesylate anions. The SAXS and SANS profiles were commensurately modeled
as polydisperse charged spheres (which will be referred to as either
spheres or micelles) and this yielded the fits depicted in Figure (SANS) and Figure S3 (SAXS). This fitting model had 11 fitting
parameters. To reduce the number of free parameters, a number of common
fitting parameters (scale factor, solvent SLD, particle SLD, temperature,
dielectric constant of the solvent,[14] polydispersity
in radius, and background intensity) were determined and are described
in Table S2 and were not allowed to vary
during data modeling.The SLD contrast match point for the OZ439-H+/OZ439 mesylate in the micelles was determined to be 26% D2O from the peak intensity in the SANS profiles at different
H2O/D2O ratios (Figure b), which corresponded to a neutron scattering
length density (SLD) of 1.26 × 10–6 Å–2 and a mass density of 1.31 g cm–3 for both the OZ439 mesylate salt (C29H43NO8S) and the OZ493-H+ cation (C28H40NO5+). Attempts to model the SANS data
using this SLD as the sphere SLD and the SAXS data with the corresponding
X-ray SLDs [(12.0–12.1) × 10–6 Å–2] gave poor fits to the observed data, which suggested
that the particles contained some solvent molecules. Corefinement
of the SAXS and SANS data gave an optimum volume fraction of solvent
(H/D2O) within the particles of 0.128, leading to average
particle SLDs of 11.5 (X-ray), 1.90 (neutron, 100% D2O),
1.68 (neutron, 75% D2O), and 1.46 (neutron, 50% D2O) × 10–6 Å–2. These
values were used as the sphere SLDs in all fits for each given solvent.
Similarly, a common polydispersity in particle radius of 0.13 (ratio
of the standard deviation to the mean) was found to give acceptable
fits to both the SAXS and SANS data. Once the common parameters were
determined, the remaining fitting parameters (salt concentration,
sphere radius, charge, and volume fraction) were determined using
SASView fitting software (Table and Figure ). The full SAXS data set with fitting models is given in Figure S3.
Table 1
Model Fitting Parameters for the SANS
Data Shown in Figure
sample
sphere charge
sphere radius
(Å)
sphere volume
fraction
[salt] (mM)
fraction
of OZ439 dissolveda
30 mg mL–1 (100% D)
25
26.5
0.0235
0.9
0.94
30 mg mL–1 (75% D)
24
26.5
0.0236
0.7
0.94
30 mg mL–1 (50% D)
23
27.0
0.0236
0.9
0.95
20 mg mL–1 (100%
D)
22
26.5
0.0155
1.1
0.95
20 mg mL–1 (75% D)
21
26.4
0.0155
1.0
0.94
20 mg mL–1 (50% D)
19
26.8
0.0161
1.0
0.97
Represents the fraction of OZ439
molecules either incorporated into charged micelles or in dissolved
salt form.
Figure 4
Model parameters determined from the SAXS
analysis of OZ439 mesylate/water
mixtures. (a) Sphere radius and OZ439 aggregation number, (b) sphere
charge and salt concentration, and (c) sphere volume fraction determined
by the SASView fitting software from the SAXS profiles. (d) Mole fraction
of OZ439 molecules present as dissolved salt and in charged micelles
as a function of OZ439 mesylate concentration.
Model parameters determined from the SAXS
analysis of OZ439 mesylate/water
mixtures. (a) Sphere radius and OZ439 aggregation number, (b) sphere
charge and salt concentration, and (c) sphere volume fraction determined
by the SASView fitting software from the SAXS profiles. (d) Mole fraction
of OZ439 molecules present as dissolved salt and in charged micelles
as a function of OZ439 mesylate concentration.Represents the fraction of OZ439
molecules either incorporated into charged micelles or in dissolved
salt form.Initially it
was assumed that the solution had an ionic strength
of zero (salt concentration = 0 mM) and the optimum values of micelle
charge were determined. The models produced revealed a steadily increasing
micelle charge with OZ439 concentration but were nonoptimal as they
did not accurately reproduce the low-Q downturn in
scattered intensity, particularly where it was more clearly observed
at higher OZ439 mesylate concentrations containing few large particles.
When the fits were performed, while allowing both the salt concentration
and micelle charge to be free parameters, a steady increase in micelle
charge was still observed but there was no clear trend in the behavior
of the dissolved salt concentration, which had an average and standard
deviation of 4.9 ± 1.5 mM across the concentration range studied.
As no other salts had been added, it was deemed that the nonzero salt
concentration must result from an increase in the concentration of
OZ439 mesylate dissolved in the bulk solution at concentrations on
the order of millimolar. Attempts to control the salt concentration
by adding sodium chloride led to precipitation of the OZ439 micelles,
presumably as the highly insoluble hydrochloride salt and this will
be discussed in more detail in a later section. The SAXS data could
be satisfactorily modeled in each case using the average salt concentration
of 4.9 mM, and this was used throughout the SAXS modeling.It
was found from the SAXS data that the volume fraction of micelles
increased linearly with OZ439 mesylate concentration above 3.9 mg
mL–1 (Figure a), which is the apparent critical micelle concentration (CMC)
of the system. This is an apparent CMC because not all of the OZ439
mesylate added is in the form of fully dissolved salt at this concentration.
Below the apparent CMC the pH of the solutions was observed to decrease
from around 3.1 to around 2.6, and above it a pH of 2.58 ± 0.05
was observed for all dispersions (Figure a). As the concentration of OZ439 mesylatesalt was increased, the charge on the spherical micelles was found
to increase (Figure b) and so was the radius/aggregation number (which includes OZ439
in both cationic and salt forms) of the micelles (Figure c), which may be related to
the increased electrostatic repulsion due to having more OZ439-H+ groups lacking their mesylate counterions in the micelles.
The fraction of dissolved OZ439 molecules in micelles and present
in the bulk as dissolved salt was calculated as described in the Supporting Information and is shown in Figure d. It was found that
as the concentration of OZ439 mesylate was increased that the fraction
of OZ439 molecules (either incorporated into charged micelles or dissolved
as free salt) rose to be 1.0 at the concentrations at which the solutions
become visually transparent. It was therefore posited that the remaining
OZ439 in the lower concentration solutions was dispersed in large
particles with lamellar structures, and the nature of these particles
will be discussed in a later section in the context of the solid state
behavior of OZ439 salts.When the same model was applied to
the SANS profiles of OZ439 mesylate
dispersions recorded in H2O/D2O, similar trends
were observed but the distribution of the OZ439 between micelles and
dissolved salt was found to be different in the deuterated solvents.
Only the 20 and 30 mg mL–1 data were modeled in
the higher contrast solvents as the other SANS profiles either had
weak intensity over the incoherent background scattering (particularly
the samples in H2O) or had lamellar peaks of variable intensity
due to sedimentation that would interfere with the analysis (Figure S2). The volume fraction of micelles determined
from the SANS profiles of solutions containing D2O (Table ) was slightly higher
than that determined from the corresponding SAXS profiles in H2O (Figure a), and the concentrations of dissolved salt were commensurately
lower, being 0.9 ± 0.1 mM. This difference is likely due to differing
solubility of the OZ439 mesylate salt in D2O, which was
observed visually in the difference in turbidity of the dispersions
containing D2O. Overall, the concentrations of dissolved
OZ439 were similar in the H2O/D2O solvent mixtures,
being between 0.94 and 0.97 at the high OZ439 mesylate concentrations.
Precipitation of the OZ439 Hydrochloride Salt and Formation
of Free Base Polymorphs
When taken orally, the OZ439 mesylatesalt passes through the stomach on its way to the intestines, where
the majority of drug absorption should occur. This exposes the drug
to acidic conditions rich in chloride ions. In the current study,
as mentioned earlier, when aqueous OZ439 mesylate solutions were exposed
to sodium chloride, precipitation of the component micelles occurred.
To study the precipitation behavior of the OZ439 mesylate salt and
simulate passage through the gastrointestinal tract, dispersions of
the OZ439 mesylate salt in water were diluted using 10 vol % of 0.1
M hydrochloric acid solution, and the SAXS profile of the dispersion
was recorded as 0.2 M sodium hydroxide solution was added to raise
the pH (Figure ).X-ray diffractograms of OZ439 hydrochloride
in water during titration
with NaOH solution beginning with OZ439-HCl at pH 1.87. Changes in
the diffractograms were observed with increasing pH, as the OZ439hydrochloride salt transitioned to a free base polymorph (FB form
1). The dashed arrows indicate which peaks decrease in intensity (belonging
to OZ439 hydrochloride) and which peaks increase in intensity (belonging
to OZ439-FB form 1) as the pH of the suspension was increased. The
background intensity from water in the capillary used for the measurements
has been subtracted from all data sets.X-ray diffractograms of the OZ439 hydrochloride dispersion
are
shown in Figure with
pH ranging from 1.87 to 10.20. As the pH was raised above 2.8, the
OZ439 hydrochloride salt transformed into a free base (FB) polymorph,
which we have named form 1 for reasons that shall become clear. The
characteristic Bragg peaks of OZ439-FB form 1 were confirmed separately
by isolation of its powder from both OZ439 mesylate and OZ439 hydrochloride
dispersions at pH 6.5 (Figure a). The FB form 1 diffractograms possessed four Bragg peaks
corresponding to a lamellar phase in the range 0.19 ≤ Q ≤ 0.80 (Figure b), the first two of which correlate with the lamellar
peaks observed in the SAXS profiles of OZ439 mesylate dispersions
(Figure b). This suggests
that the large particles observed in the SAXS experiments that make
low concentration (<17 mg mL–1) OZ439 mesylate
dispersions turbid are composed of OZ439-FB form 1.
Figure 6
(a) X-ray diffractograms
of OZ439-FB form 1 powders precipitated
from OZ439 hydrochloride (red) and OZ439 mesylate (green) dispersions
in water by pH adjustment to 6.5. (b) Comparison between the X-ray
diffractograms of OZ439-FB form 1 powder freshly prepared from an
OZ439 mesylate solution at pH 6.5 and the same powder after 10 days
of storage at room temperature to form OZ439-FB form 2. The asterisks
indicate prominent characteristic peaks allowing the identification
of OZ439-FB form 1 (red) and form 2 (blue).
(a) X-ray diffractograms
of OZ439-FB form 1 powders precipitated
from OZ439 hydrochloride (red) and OZ439 mesylate (green) dispersions
in water by pH adjustment to 6.5. (b) Comparison between the X-ray
diffractograms of OZ439-FB form 1 powder freshly prepared from an
OZ439 mesylate solution at pH 6.5 and the same powder after 10 days
of storage at room temperature to form OZ439-FB form 2. The asterisks
indicate prominent characteristic peaks allowing the identification
of OZ439-FB form 1 (red) and form 2 (blue).An independent solid–solid structural transformation
of
isolated OZ439-FB form 1 powder occurred during 10 days of storage
at room temperature into a more thermodynamically stable form OZ439-FB
form 2. Prominent and characteristic Bragg peaks of OZ439-FB form
2 at Q = 1.27 and 1.35 Å–1 were found to appear, with the disappearance of the prominent OZ439-FB
form 1 peak at Q = 1.31 Å–1 (Figure b). To elucidate
whether OZ439-FB form 2 was a polymorph or a different hydrate form,
thermal analyses of the compound using thermal gravimetric analysis
(TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were conducted.DSC analysis of the OZ439-FB form 1 and 2 powders (Figure a) suggested that both powders
were indeed free base forms of OZ439 and not a salt form, indicated
by the occurrence of the melting peak at low temperatures around 100–115
°C. DSC thermograms for the OZ439 mesylate and hydrochloride
salts did not reveal a melting transition below the observed onset
of decomposition at around 160 °C (data not shown). The observed
melting temperature of OZ439-FB form 2 was slightly higher than that
of OZ439-FB form 1, suggesting that OZ439-FB form 2 was more thermally
stable. No significant mass loss was observed in the TGA thermograms
of either OZ439-FB form 1 or form 2 below 140 °C, which was around
30 °C above their melting points and indicates that both were
anhydrous solid forms of the OZ439 free base.
Figure 7
(a) DSC thermograms indicating
the melting ranges of crystalline
OZ439-FB form 1 and OZ439-FB form 2. The peak melting temperatures
of OZ439-FB form 1 and form 2 were around 105 and 109 °C, respectively.
(b) The thermogravimetric weight loss profiles of OZ439-FB form 2
as a function of temperature.
(a) DSC thermograms indicating
the melting ranges of crystalline
OZ439-FB form 1 and OZ439-FB form 2. The peak melting temperatures
of OZ439-FB form 1 and form 2 were around 105 and 109 °C, respectively.
(b) The thermogravimetric weight loss profiles of OZ439-FB form 2
as a function of temperature.Although the free base forms of the OZ439 were characterized
separately
by XRD prior to the DSC measurements, changes in the polymorphic form
of the metastable FB form 1 during heating also occurred. In situ monitoring of the crystallinity of OZ439-FB form
1 was performed using a hot stage with the sample window placed in
the X-ray beam of the SAXS/WAXS beamline at the Australian Synchrotron.
OZ439-FB form 1 powder was freshly prepared from an OZ439 hydrochloride
dispersion as described in the Experimental Section. The X-ray diffractograms in Figure show that OZ439-FB form 1 (prepared from the hydrochloridesalt) transformed into form 2 on heating, supporting the hypothesis
that FB form 2 is a more thermodynamically stable polymorph than FB
form 1.
Figure 8
X-ray diffractograms OZ439-FB form 1 as a function of temperature.
The FB form 1 transforms into FB form 2, which subsequently transforms
to the isotropic melt.
X-ray diffractograms OZ439-FB form 1 as a function of temperature.
The FB form 1 transforms into FB form 2, which subsequently transforms
to the isotropic melt.
The Combined Picture
Based on the combined SAXS/SANS
analysis of the solution phase behavior and the diffractometry analysis
of the precipitated powders, the sequence of structural transformations
of OZ439 mesylate in solution can be inferred (Scheme ). At low concentrations (<4 mg mL–1) where pH is not especially low, the OZ439 mesylatesalt disperses in water as large aggregates of free base form 1 with
a fraction of dissolved OZ439 mesylate salt on the order of <10
mM. Above the apparent CMC at 3.9 mg mL–1, charged
micelles begin to form in solution among the free base aggregates
and dissolved salt, with the volume fraction of micelles increasing
in proportion to the amount of OZ439 mesylate thereafter. As the concentration
of OZ439 mesylate increases, less of the salt added is dispersed as
large free base aggregates, and at 17 mg mL–1 the
aggregates undergo a structural transformation to a species with a
much larger lattice parameter (Figure d). Given the large lattice parameter of the aggregates
above 17 mg mL–1, it is hypothesized that these
are multilamellar vesicles that are converted to micelles as the concentration
of OZ439 mesylate is further increased. Above 27 mg mL–1, only the charged micelles and dissolved salt are resolved by the
SAXS and SANS measurements, and at this point the solutions are no
longer turbid but become translucent with almost all of the OZ439
mesylate dissolved either as micelles or as free salt in the bulk
solution.
Scheme 1
Proposed Phase Transitions of the OZ439 Mesylate Salt
as a Function
of Concentration in Water, Determined Using a Combination of Solution
Small Angle Neutron and X-ray Scattering Data and Powder X-ray Diffractometry
MLV = multilamellar vesicle;
the individual structures are not drawn to scale.
Proposed Phase Transitions of the OZ439 Mesylate Salt
as a Function
of Concentration in Water, Determined Using a Combination of Solution
Small Angle Neutron and X-ray Scattering Data and Powder X-ray Diffractometry
MLV = multilamellar vesicle;
the individual structures are not drawn to scale.Upon the addition of hydrochloric acid, the OZ439 precipitates
out as the highly insoluble OZ439 hydrochloride salt and this would
be expected to happen in the stomach after oral administration. This
phenomenon has not been reported in the academic literature but is
cited as the motivation for a clinical trial in which the free powder
of the drug was compared to an enteric-coated capsule on the basis
that hydrochloride formation was leading to variable bioavailability.[15]The hydrochloride salt is converted to
a free base form upon raising
the pH to near neutral levels as would be the case in the intestine.
The free base initially formed (form 1) is thermodynamically unstable
with respect to a second polymorph (form 2) to which it can be converted
by heating or by storage at room temperature. These insoluble hydrochloride
and free base forms are therefore expected to dominate the species
present in vivo and therefore are the primary forms
of OZ439 immediately prior to absorption of the active drug.Thus, in considering future formulation approaches for the delivery
of OZ439, the interactions of the free base form with exogenous formulation
components need to be considered. The poorly soluble, hydrophobic
nature of the free base forms of OZ439 predicate that a lipid formulation
approach may be of utility in enhancing oral delivery of this drug
and in clinical trials the absorption of OZ439 has been shown to be
promoted by the presence of food. In forthcoming studies we will interrogate
the behavior of OZ439 in the presence of lipid-containing formulations
and study the behavior of the drug during the digestion process to
better enlighten the nature of this food effect.
Conclusion
It has been shown that the antimalarial drug OZ439 displays a rich
variety of structural behavior both in solution and in the solid state.
In solution, the drug forms a concentration-dependent mixture of dissolved
salt, charged micelles, free base aggregates, and potentially multilamellar
vesicles. When these mixtures were exposed to biorelevant conditions
reflective of the gastrointestinal tract, the drug precipitated due
to the extreme insolubility of many salts of OZ439. The OZ439 hydrochloridesalt formed under simulated gastric conditions can be converted to
a free base form by raising the pH to intestinal levels. A slow transformation
of the free base formed initially (form 1) to a more thermodynamically
stable form (form 2) occurred upon aging the free base at room temperature
and upon heating. The premise that improving the aqueous solubility
of a poorly water-soluble drug by incorporating it into a salt form
is well established but self-assembly and subsequent interactions
with endogenous salts and environments of changing pH are also vital
determinants of intestinal solubility, as clearly shown by the case
of OZ439. To understand the absorption of this drug after oral administration,
it appears pertinent to focus on the solubility of the free base polymorphs
of OZ439 in the preabsorptive intestinal environment and not the initially
soluble mesylate salt when designing formulations for OZ439 administration.
Authors: Stephanie J Wallace; Jian Li; Roger L Nation; Richard J Prankerd; Tony Velkov; Ben J Boyd Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Susan A Charman; Sarah Arbe-Barnes; Ian C Bathurst; Reto Brun; Michael Campbell; William N Charman; Francis C K Chiu; Jacques Chollet; J Carl Craft; Darren J Creek; Yuxiang Dong; Hugues Matile; Melanie Maurer; Julia Morizzi; Tien Nguyen; Petros Papastogiannidis; Christian Scheurer; David M Shackleford; Kamaraj Sriraghavan; Lukas Stingelin; Yuanqing Tang; Heinrich Urwyler; Xiaofang Wang; Karen L White; Sergio Wittlin; Lin Zhou; Jonathan L Vennerstrom Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-02-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christopher M Woodley; Gemma L Nixon; Nicoletta Basilico; Silvia Parapini; Weiqian David Hong; Stephen A Ward; Giancarlo A Biagini; Suet C Leung; Donatella Taramelli; Keiko Onuma; Takashi Hasebe; Paul M O'Neill Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 4.632