Literature DB >> 29557860

Increasing Burden of Total Hip Arthroplasty Revisions in Patients Between 45 and 64 Years of Age.

Sean S Rajaee1, Joshua C Campbell1, James Mirocha1, Guy D Paiement1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions in the U.S. from 2007 to 2013.
METHODS: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were used to identify all THA revisions in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2007 to 2013. The diagnoses leading to the revisions, types of revisions, major inpatient complications, and hospital and patient characteristics were compared between 2007 and 2013. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for complications in 2013 versus 2007.
RESULTS: This study identified 320,496 THA revisions performed between 2007 and 2013. From 2007 to 2013, the THA revision rate adjusted for U.S. population growth increased by 30.4% in patients between 45 and 64 years of age and decreased in all other age groups. The rate of surgically treated THA dislocations decreased by 14.3% from 2007 to 2013 (p < 0.0001). The mean length of the hospital stay and hospital costs for THA revision were significantly lower in 2013 than in 2007 (4.6 versus 5.8 days and $20,463 versus $25,401 both p < 0.0001). A multivariable model showed that the odds of a patient undergoing THA revision having the following inpatient complications were significantly lower in 2013 than in 2007: deep vein thrombosis (OR = 0.57, p = 0.004), pulmonary embolism (OR = 0.45, p = 0.047), myocardial infarction (OR = 0.52, p = 0.003), transfusion (OR = 0.64, p < 0.0001), pneumonia (OR = 0.56, p < 0.0001), urinary tract infection (OR = 0.66, p < 0.0001), and mortality (OR = 0.50, p = 0.0009). Notably, the odds of being discharged to a skilled nursing facility were also lower in 2013 than in 2007 (OR = 0.71, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The THA revision rate has significantly increased in patients between 45 and 64 years of age. However, the rate of surgically treated THA dislocations has decreased significantly. This may indicate that evolving techniques and implants are improving stability. The rate of inpatient complications following THA revision also decreased significantly from 2007 to 2013. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29557860     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Which Classification System Is Most Useful for Classifying Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head?

Authors:  Michael J Grecula
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Vancomycin prophylaxis for revision hip arthroplasty in penicillin and cephalosporin sensitive patients: Is dose adjustment necessary in accordance with blood loss and fluid replacement?

Authors:  Ömür Çağlar; Mehmet Kaymakoğlu; Akın Çil; Bülent Atilla; Fatma Sarıcaoğlu; Mazhar Tokgözoğlu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.511

3.  Preoperative Depression Is Associated With Increased Risk Following Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jacob M Wilson; Kevin X Farley; Greg A Erens; Thomas L Bradbury; George N Guild
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Indian Experience.

Authors:  Gaurav Mittal; Vikas Kulshrestha; Santhosh Kumar; Barun Datta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 5.  Surface Texturing of Prosthetic Hip Implant Bearing Surfaces: A Review.

Authors:  Quentin Allen; Bart Raeymaekers
Journal:  J Tribol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.045

6.  Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: an analysis of 1,037 revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Martijn F L Kuijpers; Gerjon Hannink; Liza N van Steenbergen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Long-term survival and clinical outcomes of non-vascularized autologous and allogeneic fibular grafts are comparable for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Ke Jie; Wenjun Feng; Feilong Li; Keliang Wu; Jinlun Chen; Guanming Zhou; Huiliang Zeng; Yirong Zeng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Association of Sex With Risk of 2-Year Revision Among Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Amanda Chen; Liz Paxton; Xinyan Zheng; Raquel Peat; Jialin Mao; Alexander Liebeskind; Laura E Gressler; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Vincent Devlin; Terri Cornelison; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01

9.  Is Spinal Anesthesia Safer than General Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Revision THA? Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Database.

Authors:  Jacob M Wilson; Kevin X Farley; Thomas L Bradbury; George N Guild
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Are short-stem prostheses superior to conventional stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Hao-Dong Liang; Wei-Yi Yang; Jian-Ke Pan; He-Tao Huang; Ming-Hui Luo; Ling-Feng Zeng; Jun Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.