Le H Hua1, Tracey H Fan2, Devon Conway3, Nicolas Thompson4, Tyler G Kinzy4. 1. Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Cleveland Clinic, Las Vegas, NV, USA; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 2. School of Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA. 3. Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 4. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The risk-benefit ratio of continuing immunomodulating disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in older multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical and patient-reported outcomes after stopping DMT in older MS patients. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study identifying patients from our MS clinics who were aged over 60 and on DMT > 2 years. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression modeled time to discontinuation and time to reinitiation of therapy. Pre- and post-discontinuation comparisons of Performance Scales (PS), Timed 25-Foot Walk, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) were analyzed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: A total of 600 patients were included, with 178 (29.7%) discontinuing. Discontinuers were 2.2 years older, had 3.2 years longer disease duration, and 1.6 years lesser treatment exposure. Providers initiated discontinuation more than patients (68.0%). Only one clinical relapse occurred in discontinuers. A proportion (10.7%) reinitiated DMT. Provider-initiated discontinuers restarted less often (hazard ratio (HR): 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12-0.9). In discontinuers, relapsing-remitting patients had lower PS on average than primary progressive. Provider-initiated discontinuation was associated with lower PS than patient- initiated discontinuation. PHQ9 scores appeared higher in those stopping intravenous (IV) therapies than interferons. Lower PS and PHQ9 indicate better outcomes. CONCLUSION: Most patients over age 60, who discontinued DMT, remained off DMT. This study provides real-world data that may guide clinicians considering discontinuing DMT.
BACKGROUND: The risk-benefit ratio of continuing immunomodulating disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in older multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical and patient-reported outcomes after stopping DMT in older MSpatients. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study identifying patients from our MS clinics who were aged over 60 and on DMT > 2 years. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression modeled time to discontinuation and time to reinitiation of therapy. Pre- and post-discontinuation comparisons of Performance Scales (PS), Timed 25-Foot Walk, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) were analyzed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: A total of 600 patients were included, with 178 (29.7%) discontinuing. Discontinuers were 2.2 years older, had 3.2 years longer disease duration, and 1.6 years lesser treatment exposure. Providers initiated discontinuation more than patients (68.0%). Only one clinical relapse occurred in discontinuers. A proportion (10.7%) reinitiated DMT. Provider-initiated discontinuers restarted less often (hazard ratio (HR): 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12-0.9). In discontinuers, relapsing-remitting patients had lower PS on average than primary progressive. Provider-initiated discontinuation was associated with lower PS than patient- initiated discontinuation. PHQ9 scores appeared higher in those stopping intravenous (IV) therapies than interferons. Lower PS and PHQ9 indicate better outcomes. CONCLUSION: Most patients over age 60, who discontinued DMT, remained off DMT. This study provides real-world data that may guide clinicians considering discontinuing DMT.
Authors: Natalie A Schwehr; Karen M Kuntz; Eva A Enns; Nathan D Shippee; Elaine Kingwell; Helen Tremlett; Adam F Carpenter; Mary Butler Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Jennifer H Yang; Torge Rempe; Natalie Whitmire; Anastasie Dunn-Pirio; Jennifer S Graves Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Caila B Vaughn; Dejan Jakimovski; Katelyn S Kavak; Murali Ramanathan; Ralph H B Benedict; Robert Zivadinov; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Sarah L Minden; R Philip Kinkel; Helene T Machado; Jonathan S Levin; Meredith B Rosenthal; Lisa I Iezzoni Journal: Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Date: 2019-02-20
Authors: Abdulrahman M Al Turaiki; Maha A Al Ammari; Dalal A Alabdulkarim; Abdullah U Althemery Journal: Saudi Med J Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Su-Hyun Kim; Hyunmin Jang; Na Young Park; Yeseul Kim; So-Yeon Kim; Min Young Lee; Jae-Won Hyun; Ho Jin Kim Journal: Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Date: 2021-02-23