Literature DB >> 29556918

Five-year outcomes following hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy delivered in five fractions for acoustic neuromas: the mean cochlear dose may impact hearing preservation.

Zhiping Chen1, Keiichi Takehana1, Takashi Mizowaki2, Megumi Uto1, Kengo Ogura1, Katsuyuki Sakanaka1, Yoshiki Arakawa3, Yohei Mineharu3, Yuki Miyabe1, Nobutaka Mukumoto1, Susumu Miyamoto3, Masahiro Hiraoka1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of acoustic neuromas (ANs) treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hypo-FSRT) prescribed at a uniform dose.
METHODS: Forty-seven patients with a unilateral AN were treated consecutively with hypo-FSRT between February 2007 and March 2012. Nineteen patients maintained a serviceable hearing status at the beginning of hypo-FSRT. The prescribed dose was 25 Gy delivered in five fractions per week to the isocenter, and the planning target volume was covered by the 80% isodose line.
RESULTS: The median follow-up and audiometric follow-up periods were 61 and 52 months, respectively. The estimated tumor control rate at 5 years was 90% (95% CI 76-96). The existence of the cystic component before hypo-FSRT had a significantly worse impact on tumor control (p = 0.02). The estimated hearing preservation rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 68% (95% CI 42-84), 41% (95% CI 20-62) and 36% (95% CI 15-57), respectively. A borderline significant difference was identified in the mean biological effective dose with an α/β value of 3 Gy (BED3) to the ipsilateral cochlea between the preserved hearing and hearing loss groups (19 Gy vs. 28 Gy) (p = 0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: Hypo-FSRT delivered in five fractions for unilateral ANs may achieve excellent tumor control with no severe facial or trigeminal complications. The mean BED3 in the cochlea may impact the hearing preservation rate. Therefore, the cochlear dose should be as low as possible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic neuroma; Hearing preservation; Hypofractionation; Radiotherapy; Stereotactic irradiation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29556918     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1267-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  44 in total

Review 1.  The linear-quadratic transformation of dose-volume histograms in fractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  T E Wheldon; C Deehan; E G Wheldon; A Barrett
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Single fraction versus fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Christine Collen; Ben Ampe; Thierry Gevaert; Maarten Moens; Nadine Linthout; Mark De Ridder; Dirk Verellen; Jean D'Haens; Guy Storme
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Hearing preservation after low dose linac radiosurgery for acoustic neuroma depends on initial hearing and time.

Authors:  Daniel E Roos; Andrew E Potter; Andrew C Zacest
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: clinical results at long-term follow-up in a series of 379 patients.

Authors:  Nicola Boari; Michele Bailo; Filippo Gagliardi; Alberto Franzin; Marco Gemma; Antonella del Vecchio; Angelo Bolognesi; Piero Picozzi; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Outcomes of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for metastatic brain tumors with high risk factors.

Authors:  Kengo Ogura; Takashi Mizowaki; Masakazu Ogura; Katsuyuki Sakanaka; Yoshiki Arakawa; Susumu Miyamoto; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Serial follow-up MR imaging after gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  H Nakamura; H Jokura; K Takahashi; N Boku; A Akabane; T Yoshimoto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Cochlea radiation dose correlates with hearing loss after stereotactic radiosurgery of vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Melanie G Hayden Gephart; Ake Hansasuta; Raymond R Balise; Clara Choi; Gordon T Sakamoto; Andrew S Venteicher; Scott G Soltys; Iris C Gibbs; Griffith R Harsh; John R Adler; Steven D Chang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Long-term follow-up studies of Gamma Knife surgery with a low margin dose for vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Shibin Sun; Ali Liu
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Seiji Fukuoka; Masami Takanashi; Atsufumi Hojyo; Masanori Konishi; Chiharu Tanaka; Hirohiko Nakamura
Journal:  Prog Neurol Surg       Date:  2009

10.  Hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of five fractions with linear accelerator for vestibular schwannomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thien Nguyen; Courtney Duong; John P Sheppard; Seung Jin Lee; Amar U Kishan; Percy Lee; Stephen Tenn; Robert Chin; Tania B Kaprealian; Isaac Yang
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 1.876

View more
  3 in total

1.  LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery versus hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy delivered in 3 or 5 fractions for vestibular schwannomas: comparative assessment from a single institution.

Authors:  Linn Söderlund Diaz; Andreas Hallqvist
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Umberto Tosi; Omri Maayan; Anjile An; Miguel E Tusa Lavieri; Sergio W Guadix; Antonio P DeRosa; Paul J Christos; Susan Pannullo; Philip E Stieg; Andrew Brandmaier; Jonathan P S Knisely; Rohan Ramakrishna
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Efficacy and comorbidities of hypofractionated and single-dose radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Umberto Tosi; Sergio Guadix; Anjile An; Drew Wright; Paul J Christos; Susan Pannullo; Andrew Brandmaier; Jonathan P S Knisely; Philip E Stieg; Rohan Ramakrishna
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2021-02-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.