Literature DB >> 21741718

Hearing preservation after low dose linac radiosurgery for acoustic neuroma depends on initial hearing and time.

Daniel E Roos1, Andrew E Potter, Andrew C Zacest.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess long term outcomes and factors determining hearing preservation after low dose linac stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for acoustic neuroma (AN) at the Royal Adelaide Hospital using prospectively collected data.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 2010, 102 patients had SRS for AN. Five patients had neurofibromatosis type 2, six sporadic cases had relapsed after surgery, and the remaining 91 sporadic cases had primary SRS. Dose was 12 or 14 Gy. Sustained changes ≥ 2 mm in any diameter were deemed significant, and useful hearing was defined as inter-aural pure tone average (PTA) ≤ 50 dB. Possible prognostic factors for hearing retention were tested by dividing the patients at pre-specified cutpoints: age (60 years), maximum tumour diameter (20mm), initial PTA (20 dB) and dose (12 vs 14 Gy).
RESULTS: Eighty-four of the 91 sporadic primary SRS cases were evaluable for tumour control with at least one post-treatment MRI. Their median follow-up was 65 mo (range 10-184 mo). Eighty-two (97.6%) were controlled, the remaining two requiring salvage surgery for progression at 5.75 and 9.75 years. Also, one of the post-operative cases required surgery at 2.1 years after SRS. For the 50 sporadic primary SRS patients with initially useful hearing, median age was 56 (range 21-76), median initial PTA 16 dB (range -11 to +45 dB) and median tumour diameter 21 mm (range 10-33 mm). Four received 14 Gy, the rest 12 Gy. After SRS, 19 patients (38%) retained useful hearing. The Kaplan-Meier estimated preservation rate at 5 years was 50% (95% CI 36-64%) but by 10 years, this had fallen to 23% (95% CI 12-41%). On univariate analysis, the only significant factor was initial PTA (P < 0.0001). The estimated risk of hearing loss after SRS for patients with initial PTA ≥ 20 dB was 5.0 (95% CI 2.2-11.2) times that with PTA < 20 dB.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumour control was excellent (99/102=97% freedom from surgical salvage). Hearing preservation was strongly dependent on initial PTA, but there was a steady fall-off in hearing out to at least 10 years. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21741718     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.06.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  12 in total

1.  Low-Dose Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: Tumor Control and Cranial Nerve Function Preservation After 11 Gy.

Authors:  Andrew J Schumacher; Rohan R Lall; Rishi R Lall; Allan Nanney; Amit Ayer; Samir Sejpal; Benjamin P Liu; Maryanne Marymont; Plato Lee; Bernard R Bendok; John A Kalapurakal; James P Chandler
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-05-31

2.  Five-year outcomes following hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy delivered in five fractions for acoustic neuromas: the mean cochlear dose may impact hearing preservation.

Authors:  Zhiping Chen; Keiichi Takehana; Takashi Mizowaki; Megumi Uto; Kengo Ogura; Katsuyuki Sakanaka; Yoshiki Arakawa; Yohei Mineharu; Yuki Miyabe; Nobutaka Mukumoto; Susumu Miyamoto; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Long term results of primary radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Stephen Johnson; Hideyuki Kano; Andrew Faramand; Matthew Pease; Aya Nakamura; Mohab Hassib; David Spencer; Nathaniel Sisterson; Amir H Faraji; Yoshio Arai; Edward Monaco; Ajay Niranjan; John C Flickinger; L Dade Lunsford
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Long-term hearing outcomes after gamma knife surgery in patients with vestibular schwannoma with hearing preservation: evaluation in 92 patients with serial audiograms.

Authors:  Toshinori Hasegawa; Takenori Kato; Takashi Yamamoto; Takehiro Naito; Naoki Kato; Jun Torii; Kazuki Ishii
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  The Management and Imaging of Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  E P Lin; B T Crane
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Twelve-year results of LINAC-based radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Paola Anselmo; Michelina Casale; Fabio Arcidiacono; Fabio Trippa; Rossella Rispoli; Lorena Draghini; Sara Terenzi; Alessandro Di Marzo; Ernesto Maranzano
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Systematic Review of Hearing Preservation After Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannoma.

Authors:  Adam R Coughlin; Tyler J Willman; Samuel P Gubbels
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Clinical evaluation of CyberKnife in the treatment of vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Jo-Ting Tsai; Jia-Wei Lin; Chien-Min Lin; Yuan-Hao Chen; Hsin-I Ma; Yee-Min Jen; Yi-Hsun Chen; Da-Tong Ju
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Stereotactic radiosurgery vs. fractionated radiotherapy for tumor control in vestibular schwannoma patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Oscar Persson; Jiri Bartek; Netanel Ben Shalom; Theresa Wangerid; Asgeir Store Jakola; Petter Förander
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Cochlea-sparing acoustic neuroma treatment with 4π radiation therapy.

Authors:  Kaley Woods; Percy Lee; Tania Kaprealian; Isaac Yang; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.