Literature DB >> 29556867

Needle lost in minimally invasive surgery: management proposal and literature review.

Luis G Medina1, Oscar Martin2, Giovannni E Cacciamani3, Nariman Ahmadi3, Juan C Castro4, Rene Sotelo3.   

Abstract

The reported incidence of intraoperative retained instruments, such as needles, hangs around 0.06-0.11%. Leaving a needle inside the abdominal cavity can have significant medical and legal consequences. In addition, the retrieval can be hampered due to the limited visualization of the scope during minimally invasive surgery. Factors associated with an increased probability for NL have been described. Prevention for this situation includes: having one needle at a time inside the cavity, effective communication between all personnel in the operating room, evaluation of the strength of the suture-needle connection, avoid parking of needles intraoperatively, and a proper needle withdrawal. Notwithstanding, no agreement has been made regarding NL management. Herein, we present a literature review, and a management proposal in which through a series of systematic steps, the surgical team can efficiently locate and retrieve a lost needle such as: examination of the surgical field, trocar visualization, trocar disassembly, and revision of the suction device. Finally, intraoperative or postoperative imaging can be utilized.

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Needle loss; Robotic

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29556867     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0802-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  15 in total

1.  Laparoscopic needle-retrieval device for improving quality of care in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Alexander C Small; Daniel M Gainsburg; Miguel A Mercado; Richard E Link; Sean P Hedican; Michael A Palese
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  An intraoperative method of localizing a missing piece of a broken laparoscopic instrument.

Authors:  A Ostrzenski
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Needle in a haystack: lost in transition.

Authors:  Aditya Prakash Sharma; Uttam Kumar Mete; Durgaprasad Bendapuddi; Girdhar Singh Bora; Ravimohan S Mavuduru
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-04-05

4.  Lost needle: a dilemma in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  M A Omar; A Davidson; O M A Karim
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-10-14

Review 5.  State of the art of produced water treatment.

Authors:  S Jiménez; M M Micó; M Arnaldos; F Medina; S Contreras
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  The lost needle: a laparoscopic dilemma.

Authors:  B M Smith; R A Brown; T E Lobe
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1993-08

7.  Robot-assisted video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for melanoma.

Authors:  Alexis Sánchez; Rene Sotelo; Omaira Rodriguez; Renata Sánchez; José Rosciano; Luis Medina; Liumariel Vegas
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-12

Review 8.  Safer Surgery by Learning from Complications: A Focus on Robotic Prostate Surgery.

Authors:  René J Sotelo; Alexander Haese; Victor Machuca; Luis Medina; Luciano Nuñez; Flavio Santinelli; Andrés Hernandez; Ali Riza Kural; Alexander Mottrie; Camilo Giedelman; Mariano Mirandolino; Kenneth Palmer; Ronney Abaza; Reza Ghavamian; Arieh Shalhav; Alireza Moinzadeh; Vipul Patel; Michael Stifelman; Ingolf Tuerk; David Canes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery.

Authors:  Atul A Gawande; David M Studdert; E John Orav; Troyen A Brennan; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Retained surgical items and minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Verna C Gibbs
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  3 in total

1.  Intraoperative loss of surgical needle with 8-0 nylon: radiographic findings.

Authors:  Taro Yanagawa; Yoichi Harada; Keiichi Yamashita; Toru Hatayama
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-12-22

2.  Three Different Learning Curves Have an Independent Impact on Perioperative Outcomes After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Philip Zeuschner; Irmengard Meyer; Stefan Siemer; Michael Stoeckle; Gudrun Wagenpfeil; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Matthias Saar; Martin Janssen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel Weprin; Fabio Crocerossa; Dielle Meyer; Kaitlyn Maddra; David Valancy; Reginald Osardu; Hae Sung Kang; Robert H Moore; Umberto Carbonara; Fernando J Kim; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2021-07-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.