Literature DB >> 29556763

How do season, on-farm fasting interval and lairage period affect swine welfare, carcass and meat quality traits?

Filipe Antonio Dalla Costa1, Osmar Antonio Dalla Costa2, Arlei Coldebella3, Gustavo Júlio Mello Monteiro de Lima3, Antonio Sérgio Ferraudo1.   

Abstract

This study was carried out in order to determine the effects of different combinations of on-farm fasting intervals (8, 12, 16, 20 h) and 1.5 h of transport plus lairage periods (1, 3, 6 h) at different seasons (summer/winter) on blood stress parameters (cortisol and lactate), stomach content and weight, skin lesion and meat quality in a total of 960 pigs from eight farms. Blood lactate levels were greater in the summer (P < 0.001) and stomach content was affected (P < 0.05) by season, on-farm fasting interval (P < 0.001), lairage time (P < 0.0001). Stomach content weight reduces as the total feed withdrawal time increases up to on-farm fasting of 17 and 1 h of lairage. Stomach content can be influenced by feed and water in different ways according to treatments. Only 8 h of on-farm fasting is not enough to empty stomachs from feed content. However, an on-farm fasting period of 16 h or longer can also increase the occurrence of more water in the stomachs. Carcass lesions caused by fighting were greater (P ≤ 0.005) in the winter, mainly after 3 and 6 h of lairage (P ≤ 0.005). Loin and ham pHu was lower (P ≤ 0.05) for pigs slaughtered after 6 h of lairage during the summer. The application of 12 h of on-farm fasting with 6 h of lairage seemed to be best combination to reduce stomach content weight (feed and water). In the winter, shorter lairage period can be used to reduce percentage of skin lesions and better pork quality traits in pigs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortisol; Feed withdrawal; Lactate; Skin lesion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29556763     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-018-1527-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  30 in total

1.  Combined effects of pre-slaughter treatments and lairage time on carcass and meat quality in pigs of different halothane genotype.

Authors:  L Nanni Costa; D P Lo Fiego; S Dall'olio; R Davoli; V Russo
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Muscle protein changes post mortem in relation to pork quality traits.

Authors:  R D Warner; R G Kauffman; M L Greaser
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Risk assessment of PSE condition due to pre-slaughter conditions and RYR1 gene in pigs.

Authors:  M D Guàrdia; J Estany; S Balasch; M A Oliver; M Gispert; A Diestre
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  A survey of pre-slaughter conditions, halothane gene frequency, and carcass and meat quality in five Spanish pig commercial abattoirs.

Authors:  M Gispert; L Faucitano; M A Oliver; M D Guàrdia; C Coll; K Siggens; K Harvey; A Diestre
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Influence of lairage environmental conditions and resting time on meat quality in pigs.

Authors:  C Santos; J M Almeida; E C Matias; M J Fraqueza; C Roseiro; L Sardina
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Relationship between food deprivation before transport and aggression in pigs held in lairage before slaughter.

Authors:  S N Brown; T G Knowles; J E Edwards; P D Warriss
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1999-11-27       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 7.  Road transport of cattle, swine and poultry in North America and its impact on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality: a review.

Authors:  K S Schwartzkopf-Genswein; L Faucitano; S Dadgar; P Shand; L A González; T G Crowe
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Effect of withholding feed from swine before slaughter on carcass and viscera weights and meat quality.

Authors:  K B Kephart; E W Mills
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Risk assessment of skin damage due to pre-slaughter conditions and RYR1 gene in pigs.

Authors:  M D Guàrdia; J Estany; S Balasch; M A Oliver; M Gispert; A Diestre
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Factors affecting the mortality of pigs being transported to slaughter.

Authors:  X Averós; T G Knowles; S N Brown; P D Warriss; L F Gosálvez
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 2.695

View more
  4 in total

1.  Ease of Handling and Physiological Parameters of Stress, Carcasses, and Pork Quality of Pigs Handled in Different Group Sizes.

Authors:  Filipe Antonio Dalla Costa; Osmar Antonio Dalla Costa; Izabela Cruvinel Di Castro; Neville George Gregory; Melissa Selaysim Di Campos; Guilherme Brunno de Medeiros Leal; Fernando de Castro Tavernari
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling: infrared and thermal imaging applications.

Authors:  Salvador Flores-Peinado; Daniel Mota-Rojas; Isabel Guerrero-Legarreta; Patricia Mora-Medina; Rosy Cruz-Monterrosa; Jocelyn Gómez-Prado; María Guadalupe Hernández; Jesús Cruz-Playas; Julio Martínez-Burnes
Journal:  Int J Vet Sci Med       Date:  2020-09-27

Review 3.  Fasting Finisher Pigs before Slaughter Influences Pork Safety, Pork Quality and Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Bert Driessen; Louis Freson; Johan Buyse
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Effects of Fermented Tea Residue on Fattening Performance, Meat Quality, Digestive Performance, Serum Antioxidant Capacity, and Intestinal Morphology in Fatteners.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Ding; Huaiyu Li; Zhiwei Wen; Yong Hou; Genliang Wang; Jinghui Fan; Lichun Qian
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.