Literature DB >> 29556697

MRI in mild pediatric traumatic brain injury: diagnostic overkill or useful tool?

Gesa Cohrs1, Monika Huhndorf2, Nils Niemczyk1, Lukas J Volz3, Alexander Bernsmeier4, Ash Singhal5, Naomi Larsen2, Michael Synowitz1, Friederike Knerlich-Lukoschus6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive imaging tool which lacks the burden of ionizing radiation. It is not established as primary diagnostic tool in traumatic brain injury (TBI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of MRI as initial imaging modality in the emergency management of mild pediatric TBI.
METHODS: Children (0-18 years, sub-divided in four age-groups) with mild TBI who received MRI in the emergency department were identified. Clinical characteristics and trauma mechanisms were evaluated retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify clinical factors that might be indicative for trauma sequelae on MRI scans.
RESULTS: An institutional case series of 569 patients (322 male/247 female; age < 18years; (GCS ≥ 13), who received MRI for mild TBI, was analyzed. Multi-sequence imaging (including T2, T2*, FLAIR, and diffusion-weighted sequences) was feasible without sedation in 96.8% of cases (sedation, 1.8%; general anesthesia, 1.4%). MRI revealed trauma-associated findings in 13% of all cases; incidental findings were detected in 4.7%. In our cohort, GCS deterioration, scalp hematoma, clinical signs of skull base fractures, and horseback riding accidents were related to structural trauma sequelae on MRI.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI is a practical primary imaging tool for evaluating children with mild TBI in the emergency department. The presented analyses demonstrated that in our institution, MRI imaging is performed frequently in the emergency department. It resulted mostly in normal findings. This may reflect uneasiness of when to perform imaging in mild TBI and appears retrospectively as an "overdo." There are clinical factors that are more likely associated with MRI-positive findings. Their reliability has to be evaluated in prospective studies in order to formulate further decision rules of when to perform MRI imaging or not.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative imaging; Children; Head injury; Imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29556697     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-018-3771-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  17 in total

1.  Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-07

Review 2.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Computed tomography vs magnetic resonance imaging for identifying acute lesions in pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Sandra D W Buttram; Pamela Garcia-Filion; Jeffrey Miller; Mostafa Youssfi; S Danielle Brown; Heidi J Dalton; P David Adelson
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2015-02

4.  Comparison of non-sedated brain MRI and CT for the detection of acute traumatic injury in children 6 years of age or less.

Authors:  Joseph Yeen Young; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Paul Albert Caruso; Sandra Patricia Rincon
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-05-11

5.  Mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  P E Vos; Y Alekseenko; L Battistin; E Ehler; F Gerstenbrand; D F Muresanu; A Potapov; C A Stepan; P Traubner; L Vecsei; K von Wild
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.089

6.  QuickBrain MRI for the detection of acute pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  David C Sheridan; Craig D Newgard; Nathan R Selden; Mubeen A Jafri; Matthew L Hansen
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI and CT: adverse events and outcomes.

Authors:  S Malviya; T Voepel-Lewis; O P Eldevik; D T Rockwell; J H Wong; A R Tait
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Emergency department computed tomography utilization in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Carl T Berdahl; Marian J Vermeulen; David B Larson; Michael J Schull
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Eric Johnson; Andrew Williams; Robert T Greenlee; Sheila Weinmann; Leif I Solberg; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Douglas Roblin; Michael J Flynn; Nicholas Vanneman; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 10.  Current clinical evidence on the effect of general anesthesia on neurodevelopment in children: an updated systematic review with meta-regression.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Zheng Xu; Chang-Hong Miao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Role of follow-up CT scans in the management of traumatic pediatric epidural hematomas.

Authors:  D Clay Samples; Michael T Bounajem; David J Wallace; Lillian Liao; Izabela Tarasiewicz
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Prevalence of incidental intracranial findings on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Divya Elizabeth Sunny; Michael Amoo; Maryam Al Breiki; Elite Dong Wen Teng; Jack Henry; Mohsen Javadpour
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 2.816

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.