Literature DB >> 29555852

EEG Correlates of Preparatory Orienting, Contextual Updating, and Inhibition of Sensory Processing in Left Spatial Neglect.

Stefano Lasaponara1, Marianna D'Onofrio2,3, Mario Pinto2,3, Alessio Dragone2,3, Dario Menicagli4,5, Domenica Bueti6,7, Marzia De Lucia7, Francesco Tomaiuolo4, Fabrizio Doricchi1,3.   

Abstract

Studies with event-related potentials have highlighted deficits in the early phases of orienting to left visual targets in right-brain-damaged patients with left spatial neglect (N+). However, brain responses associated with preparatory orienting of attention, with target novelty and with the detection of a match/mismatch between expected and actual targets (contextual updating), have not been explored in N+. Here in a study in healthy humans and brain-damaged patients of both sexes we demonstrate that frontal activity that reflects supramodal mechanisms of attentional orienting (Anterior Directing Attention Negativity, ADAN) is entirely spared in N+. In contrast, posterior responses that mark the early phases of cued orienting (Early Directing Attention Negativity, EDAN) and the setting up of sensory facilitation over the visual cortex (Late Directing Attention Positivity, LDAP) are suppressed in N+. This uncoupling is associated with damage of parietal-frontal white matter. N+ also exhibit exaggerated novelty reaction to targets in the right side of space and reduced novelty reaction for those in the left side (P3a) together with impaired contextual updating (P3b) in the left space. Finally, we highlight a drop in the amplitude and latency of the P1 that over the left hemisphere signals the early blocking of sensory processing in the right space when targets occur in the left one: this identifies a new electrophysiological marker of the rightward attentional bias in N+. The heterogeneous effects and spatial biases produced by localized brain damage on the different phases of attentional processing indicate relevant functional independence among their underlying neural mechanisms and improve the understanding of the spatial neglect syndrome.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Our investigation answers important questions: are the different components of preparatory orienting (EDAN, ADAN, LDAP) functionally independent in the healthy brain? Is preparatory orienting of attention spared in left spatial neglect? Does the sparing of preparatory orienting have an impact on deficits in reflexive orienting and in the assignment of behavioral relevance to the left space? We show that supramodal preparatory orienting in frontal areas is entirely spared in neglect patients though this does not counterbalance deficits in preparatory parietal-occipital activity, reflexive orienting, and contextual updating. This points at relevant functional dissociations among different components of attention and suggests that improving voluntary attention in N+ might be behaviorally ineffective unless associated with stimulations boosting the response of posterior parietal-occipital areas.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/383792-17$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EDAN/ADAN/LDAP; ERPs; P1/N1; P300; attention; spatial neglect

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29555852      PMCID: PMC6705915          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2817-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  72 in total

Review 1.  Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Masud Husain; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage.

Authors:  L Pizzamiglio; G Antonucci; A Judica; P Montenero; C Razzano; P Zoccolotti
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  Human brain white matter atlas: identification and assignment of common anatomical structures in superficial white matter.

Authors:  Kenichi Oishi; Karl Zilles; Katrin Amunts; Andreia Faria; Hangyi Jiang; Xin Li; Kazi Akhter; Kegang Hua; Roger Woods; Arthur W Toga; G Bruce Pike; Pedro Rosa-Neto; Alan Evans; Jiangyang Zhang; Hao Huang; Michael I Miller; Peter C M van Zijl; John Mazziotta; Susumu Mori
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The central role of the prefrontal cortex in directing attention to novel events.

Authors:  K R Daffner; M M Mesulam; L F Scinto; D Acar; V Calvo; R Faust; A Chabrerie; B Kennedy; P Holcomb
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Impact of alertness training on spatial neglect: a behavioural and fMRI study.

Authors:  M Thimm; G R Fink; J Küst; H Karbe; W Sturm
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  On-line brain potential correlates of right parietal patients' attentional deficit.

Authors:  R Verleger; W Heide; C Butt; E Wascher; D Kömpf
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11

7.  Impaired visual processing of contralesional stimuli in neglect patients: a visual-evoked potential study.

Authors:  Francesco Di Russo; Teresa Aprile; Grazia Spitoni; Donatella Spinelli
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  White matter (dis)connections and gray matter (dys)functions in visual neglect: gaining insights into the brain networks of spatial awareness.

Authors:  Fabrizio Doricchi; Michel Thiebaut de Schotten; Francesco Tomaiuolo; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  The anatomy of visual neglect.

Authors:  Dominic J Mort; Paresh Malhotra; Sabira K Mannan; Chris Rorden; Alidz Pambakian; Chris Kennard; Masud Husain
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-06-23       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Reward modulates spatial neglect.

Authors:  Paresh A Malhotra; David Soto; Korina Li; Charlotte Russell
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 13.654

View more
  8 in total

1.  Neurophysiological correlates of visuospatial attention and the social dynamics of gaze processing.

Authors:  Grace Wei; Jacqueline A Rushby; Frances M De Blasio
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  The relationship between attention and consciousness: an expanded taxonomy and implications for 'no-report' paradigms.

Authors:  Michael A Pitts; Lydia A Lutsyshyna; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The Hemispheric Distribution of α-Band EEG Activity During Orienting of Attention in Patients with Reduced Awareness of the Left Side of Space (Spatial Neglect).

Authors:  Stefano Lasaponara; Mario Pinto; Marilena Aiello; Francesco Tomaiuolo; Fabrizio Doricchi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Enhancing allocation of visual attention with emotional cues presented in two sensory modalities.

Authors:  Ulrike Zimmer; Mike Wendt; Marlene Pacharra
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.950

5.  Deficits of hierarchical predictive coding in left spatial neglect.

Authors:  Fabrizio Doricchi; Mario Pinto; Michele Pellegrino; Fabio Marson; Marilena Aiello; Serena Campana; Francesco Tomaiuolo; Stefano Lasaponara
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-06-04

6.  EEG Microstates Change in Response to Increase in Dopaminergic Stimulation in Typical Parkinson's Disease Patients.

Authors:  J Ignacio Serrano; María Dolores Del Castillo; Verónica Cortés; Nuno Mendes; Aida Arroyo; Jorge Andreo; Eduardo Rocon; María Del Valle; Jaime Herreros; Juan Pablo Romero
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Xiangfei Hong; Ke Bo; Sreenivasan Meyyappan; Shanbao Tong; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Hemispheric differences in altered reactivity of brain oscillations at rest after posterior lesions.

Authors:  Jessica Gallina; Mattia Pietrelli; Marco Zanon; Caterina Bertini
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.270

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.