Literature DB >> 18024488

Impaired visual processing of contralesional stimuli in neglect patients: a visual-evoked potential study.

Francesco Di Russo1, Teresa Aprile, Grazia Spitoni, Donatella Spinelli.   

Abstract

Transient visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded in 11 patients with right brain damage and spatial neglect. High-resolution EEG was recorded using focal stimuli located in the four visual quadrants. VEPs to left stimuli, i.e. located in the neglected side, were compared to VEPs to right stimuli. Results showed that bottom-up processing of a visual stimulus located in the neglected hemifield was intact up to approximately 130 ms from stimulus onset. Hemispheric differences were not significant for either C1 or P1 components representing the activity of striate and extrastriate areas, respectively. In contrast, visual processing in more dorsal areas adjacent to the superior parietal lobe was changed from normal. We failed to record the N1a component for left visual field stimuli expected in the 130-160 ms time range. Furthermore, the N1p (140-180 ms) and P2 (180-220) components were delayed and/or reduced in amplitude for stimuli located on the neglected side. The source of the N1a was previously localized in the intraparietal sulcus in the dorsal occipital cortex; N1p may represent a reactivation of area V3A and P2 reactivation of occipital visual areas including V1 due to top-down feedbacks. Six patients with left brain damage (LBD) and no neglect and 21 healthy subjects were also tested in the same experimental conditions used for patients with neglect. In LBD patients, all components evoked by contralesional stimuli were comparable to ipsilesional components. Overall, data allow localizing in time and space the processing deficit specific for patients with neglect. The first takes place around 130 ms in the bottom-up processing at the level of the anatomically intact dorsal parietal areas; the second is located at the level of the reactivation of the striate and extrastriate areas via feedback connections from higher visual areas. The two functional impairments were limited to left-field stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18024488     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awm281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  23 in total

1.  Perceptual grouping operates independently of attentional selection: evidence from hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Sarah Shomstein; Ruth Kimchi; Maxim Hammer; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Event-related brain potentials and the efficiency of visual search for vertically and horizontally oriented stimuli.

Authors:  Bruno Kopp; Jasmin Kizilirmak; Carolin Liebscher; Julia Runge; Karl Wessel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Visuospatial Asymmetries Arise from Differences in the Onset Time of Perceptual Evidence Accumulation.

Authors:  Daniel P Newman; Gerard M Loughnane; Simon P Kelly; Redmond G O'Connell; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Chinese-English bilinguals processing temporal-spatial metaphor.

Authors:  Jin Xue; Jie Yang; Qian Zhao
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-06-03

5.  Two subdivisions of macaque LIP process visual-oculomotor information differently.

Authors:  Mo Chen; Bing Li; Jing Guang; Linyu Wei; Si Wu; Yu Liu; Mingsha Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Spatial neglect and attention networks.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Spatiotemporal brain mapping of spatial attention effects on pattern-reversal ERPs.

Authors:  Francesco Di Russo; Alessandra Stella; Grazia Spitoni; Francesca Strappini; Stefano Sdoia; Gaspare Galati; Steven A Hillyard; Donatella Spinelli; Sabrina Pitzalis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The Hemispheric Distribution of α-Band EEG Activity During Orienting of Attention in Patients with Reduced Awareness of the Left Side of Space (Spatial Neglect).

Authors:  Stefano Lasaponara; Mario Pinto; Marilena Aiello; Francesco Tomaiuolo; Fabrizio Doricchi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  EEG Correlates of Preparatory Orienting, Contextual Updating, and Inhibition of Sensory Processing in Left Spatial Neglect.

Authors:  Stefano Lasaponara; Marianna D'Onofrio; Mario Pinto; Alessio Dragone; Dario Menicagli; Domenica Bueti; Marzia De Lucia; Francesco Tomaiuolo; Fabrizio Doricchi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  EEG-based neglect assessment: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Aya Khalaf; Jessica Kersey; Safaa Eldeeb; Gazihan Alankus; Emily Grattan; Laura Waterstram; Elizabeth Skidmore; Murat Akcakaya
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.