Literature DB >> 29555709

Venous Thromboembolism Quality Measures Fail to Accurately Measure Quality.

Brandyn D Lau1,2,3,4, Michael B Streiff3,5,6, Peter J Pronovost3,7,4, Elliott R Haut3,7,8,4.   

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is 1 of the most common causes of preventable harm for patients in hospitals. Consequently, the Joint Commission, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the United Kingdom Care Quality Commission, the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission, and the American College of Surgeons have prioritized measuring and reporting VTE outcomes with the goal of reducing the incidence of and preventable harm from VTE. We developed a rubric for defect-free VTE prevention, graded each organizational VTE quality measure, and found that none of the current VTE-related quality measures adequately characterizes VTE prevention efforts or outcomes in hospitalized patients. Effective VTE prevention is multifactorial: clinicians must assess patients' risk for VTE and prescribe therapy appropriate for each patient's risk profile, patients must accept the prescribed therapy, and nurses must administer the therapy as prescribed. First, an ideal, defect-free VTE prevention process measure requires: (1) documentation of a standardized VTE risk assessment; (2) prescription of optimal, risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis; and (3) administration of all risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis as prescribed. Second, an ideal VTE outcome measure should define potentially preventable VTE as VTE that developed in patients who experienced any VTE prevention process failures.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health care quality, access and evaluation; health information technology; quality improvement; quality indicators, health care; quality of health care; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29555709     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  13 in total

1.  What the 2018 ASH venous thromboembolism guidelines omitted: nonadministration of pharmacologic prophylaxis in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Oluwafemi P Owodunni; Brandyn D Lau; Michael B Streiff; Peggy S Kraus; Deborah B Hobson; Dauryne L Shaffer; Kristen L W Webster; Mujan Varasteh Kia; Christine G Holzmueller; Elliott R Haut
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-02-26

2.  Whose Benchmark Is Right? Validating Venous Thromboembolism Events Between Trauma Registries and Hospital Administrative Databases.

Authors:  Todd A Miano; Grigor Abelian; Mark J Seamon; Kristen Chreiman; Patrick M Reilly; Niels D Martin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Effectiveness of ambulation to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to hospital: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brandyn D Lau; Patrick Murphy; Anthony J Nastasi; Stella Seal; Peggy S Kraus; Deborah B Hobson; Dauryne L Shaffer; Christine G Holzmueller; Jonathan K Aboagye; Michael B Streiff; Elliott R Haut
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-12-08

4.  Low anti-Factor Xa level predicts 90-day Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients Receiving Enoxaparin Prophylaxis: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Kory I Fleming; Thomas K Varghese; John Stringham; Lyen C Huang; T Bartley Pickron; Ann Marie Prazak; Corinne Bertolaccini; Arash Momeni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  A Real-World Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Thromboprophylactic Use of Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Abdominal Surgery Patients in a Large U.S. Hospital Database.

Authors:  S P Veeranki; Z Xiao; A Levorsen; M Sinha; B Shah
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2021-01-19

6.  Venous thromboembolism research priorities: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Authors:  Mary Cushman; Geoffrey D Barnes; Mark A Creager; Jose A Diaz; Peter K Henke; Kellie R Machlus; Marvin T Nieman; Alisa S Wolberg
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-07-08

7.  Missed Doses of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: a Growing Problem Without an Active Management Strategy.

Authors:  Brandyn D Lau; Jiangxia Wang; Deborah B Hobson; Peggy S Kraus; Dauryne L Shaffer; Michael B Streiff; Elliott R Haut
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Association Between Missed Doses of Chemoprophylaxis and VTE Incidence in a Statewide Colectomy Cohort.

Authors:  Rhami Khorfan; Lindsey Kreutzer; Remi Love; Cary Jo R Schlick; Matthew Chia; Karl Y Bilimoria; Anthony D Yang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 13.787

9.  Effect of Real-time Patient-Centered Education Bundle on Administration of Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Elliott R Haut; Jonathan K Aboagye; Dauryne L Shaffer; Jiangxia Wang; Deborah B Hobson; Gayane Yenokyan; Elizabeth A Sugar; Peggy S Kraus; Norma E Farrow; Joseph K Canner; Oluwafemi P Owodunni; Katherine L Florecki; Kristen L W Webster; Christine G Holzmueller; Peter J Pronovost; Michael B Streiff; Brandyn D Lau
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-11-02

10.  Evaluation of Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Who Underwent Gynecological Surgery and Validation of a Fast-Rating Assessment Table.

Authors:  Ting Yang; Sijuan Tian; Yaohui Wang; Juan Zhao; Meili Pei; Minyi Zhao; Li Wang; Yanping Guo; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.