| Literature DB >> 29554900 |
Sándor Hornok1, László Sugár2, Isabel G Fernández de Mera3, José de la Fuente3,4, Gábor Horváth5, Tibor Kovács6, Attila Micsutka7, Enikő Gönczi8, Barbara Flaisz9, Nóra Takács9, Róbert Farkas9, Marina L Meli8, Regina Hofmann-Lehmann8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hunting constitutes an important industry in Europe. However, data on the prevalence of vector-borne bacteria in large game animal species are lacking from several countries. Blood or spleen samples (239 and 270, respectively) were taken from red, fallow and roe deer, as well as from water buffaloes, mouflons and wild boars in Hungary, followed by DNA extraction and molecular analyses for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, haemoplasmas and rickettsiae.Entities:
Keywords: Anaplasma phagocytophilum; Mycoplasma suis; Mycoplasma wenyonii; Rickettsia helvetica; ‘Candidatus Mycoplasma haemobos’
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29554900 PMCID: PMC5859536 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1403-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Technical data and references of molecular methods used in this study
| Target pathogen categories (target gene) | Oligonucleotides (sequence 5′-3′) | Reference for original method (modified protocol) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ApMSP2f (ATG GAA GGT AGT GTT GGT TAT GGT ATT) | ([ |
| haemoplasmas | Sybr_For (AGC AAT RCC ATG TGA ACG ATG AA) | [ |
| MwenyoniiF (CCA CGT GAA CGA TGA AGG TCT T) | [ | |
| ‘ | Mwen_short.forw (CCA TGT GAA CGA TGA AGG TCT TT) | [ |
|
| RTsuisF (CCC TGA TTG TAC TAA TTG AAT AAG) | [ |
|
| Rickhelv.147f (TTT GAA GGA GAC ACG GAA CAC A) | [ |
| other rickettsiae | CS-F (TCG CAA ATG TTC ACG GTA CTT T) | [ |
Results of molecular analyses of DNA samples from water buffalos and large game animal species
| Species (body weight range)a | Sample type | PCR positives/all tested (percentage) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| haemotropic |
| ||||
|
|
| |||||
| Water buffalo (300–500 kg) | blood | 0/60 | 55/60 (91.2%)c, B | 44/60 (73.3%)c, A | – | 0/60 |
| Red deer (100–200 kg) | blood | 47/48 (97.9%)c | 31/48 (64.6%)b | 22/48 (45.8%)b | – | 0/48 |
| spleen | 95/96 (99%) | 24/96 (25%)B
| 4/96 (4.2%)A
| – | 0/96 | |
| Fallow deer (50–100 kg) | blood | 24/33 (72.7%)b
| 10/33 (30.3%)a | 3/33 (9.1%)a | – | 0/33 |
| spleen | 81/85 (95.3%) | 6/85 (7.1%) | 10/85 (11.8%) | – | 1/85 (1.2%) [1/85] | |
| Roe deer (25 kg) | blood | 39/65 (60%)b | 13/65 (20%)a, B | 1/65 (1.5%)a, A | – | 0/65 |
| spleen | 3/6 (50%) | 3/6 (50%) | 0/6 | – | 0/6 | |
| Mouflon | blood | 1/16 (6.3%)a | [1/16 (6.3%)] | 0/16 | – | 1/16 (6.3%) |
| spleen | 4/4 (100%) | [1/4 (25%)] | 0/4 | – | 0/4 | |
| Wild boar | blood | 6/17 (35.3% | – | – | 8/17 (47.1%) | 0/17 |
| spleen | 31/79 (39.2%) | – | – | 23/79 (29.1%) | 0/79 | |
aEstimated body weight range characteristic of the species (i.e. minimum to maximum acc. to females and males) based on local hunting bags (provided by Prof. L. Sugár)
Significance: (1) blood sample-based prevalences, which are significantly different between host species, are marked with different superscript lower case letter within columns, increasing from “a” to “c”; (2) the prevalence of M. wenyonii is marked with superscript capital letter “B”, if significantly higher than that of C. M. haemobos marked with superscript capital letter “A” in the same row; (3) arrows in circle with inverse color point to the significantly higher prevalence, when comparing the two kinds of sampled tissues (blood vs. spleen) for the same host and pathogen
Fig. 1Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree based on the msp4 gene of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, including sequences obtained in this study (indicated with yellow background) and representative sequences from GenBank. Before the accession number, the country and host of origin is shown. Branch lengths represent the number of substitutions per site inferred according to the scale shown