Literature DB >> 29554179

Medicare Accountable Care Organization Enrollment and Appropriateness of Cancer Screening.

Matthew J Resnick1,2,3, Amy J Graves1, Sunita Thapa2, Robert Gambrel2, Mark D Tyson4, Daniel Lee1, Melinda B Buntin2, David F Penson1,2,3.   

Abstract

Importance: Despite rapid diffusion of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), whether ACO enrollment results in observable changes in cancer screening remains unknown. Objective: To determine whether Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) ACO enrollment changes the appropriateness of screening for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this population-based analysis of Medicare beneficiaries, we used Medicare data from 2007 through 2014 and evaluated changes in screening associated with ACO enrollment using differences-in-differences (DD) analyses. We then performed difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) analyses to determine whether observed changes in cancer screening associated with ACO enrollment were different across strata of appropriateness, defined using age (65-74 years vs ≥75 years) and predicted survival (top vs bottom quartile). Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening measured yearly as a proportion of eligible Medicare beneficiaries undergoing relevant screening services.
Results: Among Medicare beneficiaries, comprising 39 218 652 person-years before MSSP enrollment and 17 252 345 person-years after MSSP enrollment, breast cancer screening declined among both ACO (42.7% precontract, 38.1% postcontract) and non-ACO (37.3% precontract, 34.1% postcontract) populations. The adjusted rate of decline (DD) in the ACO population exceeded the non-ACO population by 0.79% (P < .001). This decline was most pronounced among elderly women (-2.1%), with minimal observed change among younger women (-0.26%). Baseline colorectal cancer screening rates were lower than those for breast cancer among both ACO (10.1% precontract, 10.3% postcontract) and non-ACO (9.2% precontract, 9.1% postcontract) populations. We observed an adjusted 0.24% (P = .03) increase in screening associated with ACO enrollment, most pronounced among younger Medicare beneficiaries (0.36%). For breast and colorectal cancer, we observed statistically significant differences in estimates of effect between age strata, suggesting that the ACO effect on cancer screening is mediated by age (DDD for both P < .001). Prostate cancer screening declined among ACO (35.1% precontract, 28.5% postcontract) and non-ACO (31.2% precontract, 25.7% postcontract) populations. The adjusted rate of decline in the ACO population exceeded that of the non-ACO population by 1.2%. We observed no difference in estimate of effect between age strata, suggesting that the ACO-mediated changes in prostate cancer screening are similar among younger and elderly men. Results characterizing appropriateness with predicted survival mirrored those when stratified by age. Conclusions and Relevance: Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO enrollment is associated with more appropriate breast and colorectal screening, although the magnitude of the observed ACO effect is modest in the early ACO experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29554179      PMCID: PMC5876897          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  24 in total

1.  Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening After 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.

Authors:  Jesse D Sammon; Firas Abdollah; Toni K Choueiri; Philip W Kantoff; Paul L Nguyen; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Performance differences in year 1 of pioneer accountable care organizations.

Authors:  J Michael McWilliams; Michael E Chernew; Bruce E Landon; Aaron L Schwartz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Ruth Etzioni; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Lynn Greene; Lars Holmberg; Philip Kantoff; Badrinath R Konety; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David F Penson; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Setting value-based payment goals--HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care.

Authors:  Sylvia M Burwell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The US Preventive Services Task Force 2017 Draft Recommendation Statement on Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Invitation to Review and Comment.

Authors:  Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Susan J Curry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The role of private payers in payment reform.

Authors:  Zirui Song; Dave A Chokshi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Cancer screening rates in individuals with different life expectancies.

Authors:  Trevor J Royce; Laura H Hendrix; William A Stokes; Ian M Allen; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Fostering accountable health care: moving forward in medicare.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; Mark B McClellan; John Bertko; Steven M Lieberman; Julie J Lee; Julie L Lewis; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Changes in health care spending and quality for Medicare beneficiaries associated with a commercial ACO contract.

Authors:  J Michael McWilliams; Bruce E Landon; Michael E Chernew
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The cost of breast cancer screening in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Cary P Gross; Jessica B Long; Joseph S Ross; Maysa M Abu-Khalaf; Rong Wang; Brigid K Killelea; Heather T Gold; Anees B Chagpar; Xiaomei Ma
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 21.873

View more
  10 in total

1.  Geographic Variation in Overscreening for Colorectal, Cervical, and Breast Cancer Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moss; Siddhartha Roy; Chan Shen; Joie D Cooper; Robert P Lennon; Eugene J Lengerich; Alan Adelman; William Curry; Mack T Ruffin
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 2.  Trends in the Cost of Cancer Care: Beyond Drugs.

Authors:  Aaron A Laviana; Amy N Luckenbaugh; Matthew J Resnick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Spending outcomes among patients with cancer in accountable care organizations 4 years after implementation.

Authors:  Parsa Erfani; Jessica Phelan; E John Orav; Jose F Figueroa; Ashish K Jha; Miranda B Lam
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Primary care physicians' participation in the Medicare shared savings program and preventive services delivery: Evidence from the first 7 years.

Authors:  Huang Huang; Xi Zhu; George L Wehby
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.734

5.  Medicare Accountable Care Organizations Reduce Spending on Surgery.

Authors:  Parth K Modi; Nicholas Moloci; Lindsey A Herrel; Brent K Hollenbeck; John M Hollingsworth
Journal:  Am J Accountable Care       Date:  2020-09-15

6.  Association of Clinician Health System Affiliation With Outpatient Performance Ratings in the Medicare Merit-based Incentive Payment System.

Authors:  Kenton J Johnston; Timothy L Wiemken; Jason M Hockenberry; Jose F Figueroa; Karen E Joynt Maddox
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The Effect of Network-Level Payment Models on Care Network Performance: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Literature.

Authors:  Thomas Reindersma; Sandra Sülz; Kees Ahaus; Isabelle Fabbricotti
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.120

8.  How Do Accountable Care Organizations Deliver Preventive Care Services? A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Adam D M Briggs; Taressa K Fraze; Andrew L Glick; Laura B Beidler; Stephen M Shortell; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  What Can Canada Learn From Accountable Care Organizations: A Comparative Policy Analysis.

Authors:  Allie Peckham; David Rudoler; Dominika Bhatia; Sara Allin; Reham Abdelhalim; Gregory P Marchildon
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.120

10.  Taking account of accountable care.

Authors:  Zirui Song
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.734

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.