Literature DB >> 29553968

Fresh Cut Versus Stored Cut Paraffin-embedded Tissue: Effect on Immunohistochemical Staining for Common Breast Cancer Markers.

Catherine L Forse1, Dushanthi Pinnaduwage2, Shelley B Bull2,3, Anna Marie Mulligan1,4, Irene L Andrulis1,2,5,6.   

Abstract

The proper handling of unstained paraffin slides for immunohistochemistry has been a matter of debate, with several studies demonstrating loss of antigenicity with prolonged storage at room temperature, 4°C and -20°C. The purpose of this study was to determine whether long-term storage of unstained slides at -80°C would impact the staining intensity and expression distribution of markers used to molecularly subtype breast cancer specimens [estrogen receptor (ER), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), cytokeratin 5 (CK5), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and Ki67]. The staining pattern of previously unstained breast tumor slides (n=39 to 64) stored at -80°C for a minimum of 9.93 years (avg., 12.8 y) was compared with the staining pattern of fresh cut slides from the same tumors. The Allred scoring method was used to score ER (0 to 2, negative; 3 to 8, positive), CK5 (≥4, positive), and EGFR (≥4, positive). ASCO/CAP guidelines were used to assess HER2 (0/1+, 2+, or 3+). Ki67 scores were determined based on the proportion of cells stained of any intensity, with 20% staining used as a cut-off. Agreement was assessed using concordance rates and chance-corrected agreement statistics. The chance-corrected agreements were as follows: 0.94 (38/39) for ER, 0.92 (53/55) for CK5, 0.87 (61/64) for EGFR, 0.86 (37/39) for HER2, and 0.67 (46/54) for Ki67. Long-term storage of cut unstained slides at -80°C does not significantly impact the scoring interpretation of ER, CK5, EGFR, and HER2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29553968      PMCID: PMC6141355          DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol        ISSN: 1533-4058


  19 in total

1.  Long-term preservation of antigenicity on tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Kyle A DiVito; Lori A Charette; David L Rimm; Robert L Camp
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.662

2.  A molecular model of antigen retrieval using a peptide array.

Authors:  Seshi R Sompuram; Kodela Vani; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Variability of immunohistochemical reactivity on stored paraffin slides.

Authors:  P Bertheau; D Cazals-Hatem; V Meignin; A de Roquancourt; O Vérola; A Lesourd; C Séné; C Brocheriou; A Janin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Factors influencing the degradation of archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections.

Authors:  Ran Xie; Joon-Yong Chung; Kris Ylaya; Reginald L Williams; Natalie Guerrero; Nathan Nakatsuka; Cortessia Badie; Stephen M Hewitt
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Torsten O Nielsen; Forrest D Hsu; Kristin Jensen; Maggie Cheang; Gamze Karaca; Zhiyuan Hu; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Chad Livasy; Dave Cowan; Lynn Dressler; Lars A Akslen; Joseph Ragaz; Allen M Gown; C Blake Gilks; Matt van de Rijn; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Antigenicity testing by immunohistochemistry after tissue oxidation.

Authors:  C Blind; A Koepenik; M Pacyna-Gengelbach; G Fernahl; N Deutschmann; M Dietel; V Krenn; I Petersen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Menacalc, a quantitative method of metastasis assessment, as a prognostic marker for axillary node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Catherine L Forse; Seema Agarwal; Dushanthi Pinnaduwage; Frank Gertler; John S Condeelis; Juan Lin; Xiaonan Xue; Kimberly Johung; Anna Marie Mulligan; Thomas E Rohan; Shelley B Bull; Irene L Andrulis
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Molecular subtypes, histopathological grade and survival in a historic cohort of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  M J Engstrøm; S Opdahl; A I Hagen; P R Romundstad; L A Akslen; O A Haugen; L J Vatten; A M Bofin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Decline in Antigenicity of Tumor Markers by Storage Time Using Pathology Sections Cut From Tissue Microarrays.

Authors:  Fiona M Blows; Hamid R Ali; Sarah-J Dawson; John Le Quesne; Elena Provenzano; Carlos Caldas; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2016-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of Preanalytical Factors on the Measurement of Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Using Immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Aditi Bagchi; Zachary Madaj; Kelly B Engel; Ping Guan; Daniel C Rohrer; Dana R Valley; Emily Wolfrum; Kristin Feenstra; Nancy Roche; Galen Hostetter; Helen M Moore; Scott D Jewell
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.479

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.