Literature DB >> 29550992

The concentration of console surgeons: prospective evaluation of the loss of attention in robotic-assisted procedures.

Andreas Martinschek1,2, G Welzel3, M Ritter4, E Heinrich4,5, C Bolenz4,6, L Trojan4,7.   

Abstract

To prospectively evaluate the possible loss of attention among console surgeons performing robotic-assisted procedures using a validated psychological test. The concentration of one console surgeon was assessed before and after 25 robotic-assisted procedures (radical prostatectomies) using the validated d2 attention test (computer-assisted, Hogrefe test systems, Germany). Error frequency, work rate, and accuracy of task performance were evaluated as parameters of the fluctuation in concentration. Data were correlated with clinical parameters, including console times, positive surgical margin rates and the use of a nerve-sparing procedure. Pre- and post-operative test results revealed no differences in the number of items performed, but a significant decline in the error-corrected performance between the pre- and post-operative tests was observed with increasing console time (p = 0.046; median console time 123 min.). No differences in the pre-operative tests for consecutive procedures (mean time between procedures 93 min.) were found, whereas the number of errors (missed items) increased in the post-operative tests (p = 0.0025). The measured differences in test results showed no association with the positive surgical margin rate. A planned nerve-sparing procedure tended to result in a lower level of concentration found in pre-operative testing (p = 0.07). Concentration decrease and loss of attention during robotic-assisted procedures can be measured validly using the d2 attention test. Longer console times lead to loss of attention but consecutive procedures do not decrease the test or surgical performance. Further studies need to address whether similar effects apply to the comparable open or other robotic procedures or to different levels of surgeons experience.

Keywords:  Attention; Concentration; Prostatectomy; Robot-assisted

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29550992     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0800-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  19 in total

1.  Laparoscopic performance after one night on call in a surgical department: prospective study.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; L Bardram; P Funch-Jensen; J Rosenberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-24

2.  VDU workstations and vision in post office and bank operators.

Authors:  Cheikh El-Bachir Tebboune; Bouhafs Mebarki
Journal:  Work       Date:  2012

3.  Effects of 24 h working on-call on psychoneuroendocrine and oculomotor function: a randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Florian Ernst; Markus Rauchenzauner; Heinz Zoller; Andrea Griesmacher; Angelika Hammerer-Lercher; Roger Carpenter; Gerhard Schuessler; Michael Joannidis
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.905

4.  Effect of sleep deprivation on surgeons' dexterity on laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  N J Taffinder; I C McManus; Y Gul; R C Russell; A Darzi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-10-10       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Combating stress and burnout in surgical practice: a review.

Authors:  Charles M Balch; Tait Shanafelt
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.750

Review 6.  Advances in laparoscopic surgery in urology.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Dogu Teber
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.

Authors:  John W Yaxley; Geoffrey D Coughlin; Suzanne K Chambers; Stefano Occhipinti; Hema Samaratunga; Leah Zajdlewicz; Nigel Dunglison; Rob Carter; Scott Williams; Diane J Payton; Joanna Perry-Keene; Martin F Lavin; Robert A Gardiner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Objective evaluation of visual fatigue in VDU workers.

Authors:  S Gur; S Ron; A Heicklen-Klein
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.611

9.  Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic.

Authors:  Adrian Park; Gyusung Lee; F Jacob Seagull; Nora Meenaghan; David Dexter
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 10.  Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dragan Ilic; Sue M Evans; Christie Ann Allan; Jae Hung Jung; Declan Murphy; Mark Frydenberg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.