J W MacKay1, S B L Low2, T O Smith3, A P Toms4, A W McCaskie5, F J Gilbert6. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: jwm37@cam.ac.uk. 2. Department of Radiology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK. Electronic address: samantha.low@nnuh.nhs.uk. 3. School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. Electronic address: toby.smith@ndorms.ox.ac.uk. 4. Department of Radiology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK. Electronic address: andoni.toms@nnuh.nhs.uk. 5. Division of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge UK. Electronic address: awm41@cam.ac.uk. 6. Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: fjg28@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess reliability and discriminative validity of cartilage compositional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: The study was carried out per PRISMA recommendations. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (1974 - present) for eligible studies. We performed qualitative synthesis of reliability data. Where data from at least two discrimination studies were available, we estimated pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) between subjects with and without OA. Discrimination analyses compared controls and subjects with mild OA (Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 1-2), severe OA (KL grade 3-4) and OA not otherwise specified (NOS) where not possible to stratify. We assessed quality of the evidence using Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tools. RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies were included in the reliability analysis and 26 studies were included in the discrimination analysis, with data from a total of 2,007 knees. Intra-observer, inter-observer and test-retest reliability of compositional techniques were excellent with most intraclass correlation coefficients >0.8 and coefficients of variation <10%. T1rho and T2 relaxometry were significant discriminators between subjects with mild OA and controls, and between subjects with OA (NOS) and controls (P < 0.001). T1rho showed best discrimination for mild OA (SMD [95% CI] = 0.73 [0.40 to 1.06], P < 0.001) and OA (NOS) (0.60 [0.41 to 0.80], P < 0.001). Quality of evidence was moderate for both parts of the review. CONCLUSIONS: Cartilage compositional MRI techniques are reliable and, in the case of T1rho and T2 relaxometry, can discriminate between subjects with OA and controls.
OBJECTIVE: To assess reliability and discriminative validity of cartilage compositional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: The study was carried out per PRISMA recommendations. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (1974 - present) for eligible studies. We performed qualitative synthesis of reliability data. Where data from at least two discrimination studies were available, we estimated pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) between subjects with and without OA. Discrimination analyses compared controls and subjects with mild OA (Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 1-2), severe OA (KL grade 3-4) and OA not otherwise specified (NOS) where not possible to stratify. We assessed quality of the evidence using Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tools. RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies were included in the reliability analysis and 26 studies were included in the discrimination analysis, with data from a total of 2,007 knees. Intra-observer, inter-observer and test-retest reliability of compositional techniques were excellent with most intraclass correlation coefficients >0.8 and coefficients of variation <10%. T1rho and T2 relaxometry were significant discriminators between subjects with mild OA and controls, and between subjects with OA (NOS) and controls (P < 0.001). T1rho showed best discrimination for mild OA (SMD [95% CI] = 0.73 [0.40 to 1.06], P < 0.001) and OA (NOS) (0.60 [0.41 to 0.80], P < 0.001). Quality of evidence was moderate for both parts of the review. CONCLUSIONS: Cartilage compositional MRI techniques are reliable and, in the case of T1rho and T2 relaxometry, can discriminate between subjects with OA and controls.
Authors: Federico Bruno; Francesco Arrigoni; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Raffaele Natella; Nicola Maggialetti; Alfonso Reginelli; Alessandra Splendiani; Ernesto Di Cesare; Luca Brunese; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Andrea Giovagnoni; Carlo Masciocchi; Antonio Barile Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: J Kim; K Mamoto; R Lartey; K Xu; K Nakamura; W Shin; C S Winalski; N Obuchowski; M Tanaka; E Bahroos; T M Link; P A Hardy; Q Peng; R Reddy; A Botto-van Bemden; K Liu; R D Peters; C Wu; X Li Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Marc Sebastian Huppertz; Justus Schock; Karl Ludger Radke; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Manuel Post; Christiane Kuhl; Daniel Truhn; Sven Nebelung Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2021-03-05
Authors: Benedikt Kamp; Miriam Frenken; Jan M Henke; Daniel B Abrar; Armin M Nagel; Lena V Gast; Georg Oeltzschner; Lena M Wilms; Sven Nebelung; Gerald Antoch; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Anja Müller-Lutz Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-12-08