Literature DB >> 29548643

Droplet digital PCR improves absolute quantification of viable lactic acid bacteria in faecal samples.

Guillaume Gobert1, Aurélie Cotillard2, Candice Fourmestraux3, Laurence Pruvost4, Jean Miguet5, Mickaël Boyer6.   

Abstract

Analysing correlations between the observed health effects of ingested probiotics and their survival in digestive tract allows adapting their preparations for food. Tracking ingested probiotic in faecal samples requires accurate and specific tools to quantify live vs dead cells at strain level. Traditional culture-based methods are simpler to use but they do not allow quantifying viable but non-cultivable (VBNC) cells and they are poorly discriminant below the species level. We have set up a viable PCR (vPCR) assay combining propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment and either real time quantitative PCR (qPCR) or droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to quantify a Lactobacillus rhamnosus and two Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei strains in piglet faeces. Adjustments of the PMA treatment conditions and reduction of the faecal sample size were necessary to obtain accurate discrimination between dead and live cells. The study also revealed differences of PMA efficiency among the two L. paracasei strains. Both PCR methods were able to specifically quantify each strain and provided comparable total bacterial counts. However, quantification of lower numbers of viable cells was best achieved with ddPCR, which was characterized by a reduced lower limit of quantification (improvement of up to 1.76 log10 compared to qPCR). All three strains were able to survive in the piglets' gut with viability losses between 0.78 and 1.59 log10/g faeces. This study shows the applicability of PMA-ddPCR to specific quantification of small numbers of viable bacterial cells in the presence of an important background of unwanted microorganisms, and without the need to set up standard curves. It also illustrates the need to adapt PMA protocols according to the final matrix and target strain, even for closely related strains. The PMA-ddPCR approach provides a new tool to quantify bacterial survival in faecal samples from a preclinical and clinical trial.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lactobacillus; PMA ddPCR; Piglet faeces; Propidium monoazide; Viability PCR

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29548643     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  17 in total

1.  Enumeration of Probiotic Strain Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) Using Viability Real-time PCR.

Authors:  Hanan R Shehata; Steven G Newmaster
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Precise measurement of the fitness effects of spontaneous mutations by droplet digital PCR in Burkholderia cenocepacia.

Authors:  Anita Rana; David Patton; Nathan T Turner; Marcus M Dillon; Vaughn S Cooper; Way Sung
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Detection and quantification of Campylobacter in foods: New analytic approaches to detect and quantify Campylobacter spp. in food samples.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Peruzy; Yolande Thérèse Rose Proroga; Federico Capuano; Federica Corrado; Serena Santonicola; Dario De Medici; Elisabetta Delibato; Nicoletta Murru
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2020-08-28

4.  Hemophilia A ameliorated in mice by CRISPR-based in vivo genome editing of human Factor VIII.

Authors:  Hainan Chen; Mi Shi; Avital Gilam; Qi Zheng; Yin Zhang; Ivka Afrikanova; Jinling Li; Zoya Gluzman; Ruhong Jiang; Ling-Jie Kong; Ruby Yanru Chen-Tsai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Rapid Detection of β-Lactamase-Producing Bacteria Using the Integrated Comprehensive Droplet Digital Detection (IC 3D) System.

Authors:  Yiyan Li; Hemanth Cherukury; Louai Labanieh; Weian Zhao; Dong-Ku Kang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  The International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics.

Authors:  Seppo Salminen; Maria Carmen Collado; Akihito Endo; Colin Hill; Sarah Lebeer; Eamonn M M Quigley; Mary Ellen Sanders; Raanan Shamir; Jonathan R Swann; Hania Szajewska; Gabriel Vinderola
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 73.082

7.  ddPCR allows 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of very small DNA amounts from low-biomass samples.

Authors:  Isabel Abellan-Schneyder; Andrea Janina Schusser; Klaus Neuhaus
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 8.  Assessing Viability and Stress Tolerance of Probiotics-A Review.

Authors:  Ulrika Wendel
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  How to Count Our Microbes? The Effect of Different Quantitative Microbiome Profiling Approaches.

Authors:  Gianluca Galazzo; Niels van Best; Birke J Benedikter; Kevin Janssen; Liene Bervoets; Christel Driessen; Melissa Oomen; Mayk Lucchesi; Pascalle H van Eijck; Heike E F Becker; Mathias W Hornef; Paul H Savelkoul; Frank R M Stassen; Petra F Wolffs; John Penders
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  Accurate quantification of bacterial abundance in metagenomic DNAs accounting for variable DNA integrity levels.

Authors:  Caterina Manzari; Annarita Oranger; Bruno Fosso; Elisabetta Piancone; Graziano Pesole; Anna Maria D'Erchia
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2020-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.