| Literature DB >> 29546598 |
Masami Hayashi1, Kayo Yoshida2, Kohei Kitada1, Akane Kizu3, Daisuke Tachibana1, Mitsuru Fukui4, Takashi Morita3, Masayasu Koyama1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the outcomes of mouse preimplantation embryos irradiated with low doses of X-rays (≤ 1 Gy) and investigate apoptosis and pluripotency of the irradiated embryos.Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; Embryo culture; Pluripotency; Preimplantation embryo development; X-ray irradiation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29546598 PMCID: PMC6030001 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1156-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet ISSN: 1058-0468 Impact factor: 3.412
Preimplantation embryo development after X-ray irradiation
| Irradiation dose (Gy) | Number of embryos | Number of blastocysta (%) | Number of abnormal embryosa (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 152 | 146 | 96.1% | 6 | 3.9% |
| (52, 40, 35, 25)b | (49, 39, 33, 25)b | (3, 1, 2, 0)b | |||
| 0.1 | 143 | 132 | 92.3% | 11 | 7.7% |
| (52, 40, 26, 25)b | (48, 35, 24, 25)b | (4, 5, 2, 0)b | |||
| 0.5 | 152 | 139 | 91.4% | 13 | 8.6% |
| (55, 40, 35, 22)b | (51, 34, 33, 21)b | (4, 6, 2, 1)b | |||
| 1.0 | 152 | 137 | 90.1% | 16 | 9.9% |
| (52, 40, 35, 25)b | (47, 35, 32, 23)b | (5, 2, 3, 2)b | |||
aThe difference in the developmental rate was not significant among control, 0.1-, 0.5-, and 1.0-Gy-irradiated embryos by the exact t test
bEach number of embryos of four times experiments
Fig. 1Development of preimplantation embryos irradiated with X-rays. a Representative micrographs of blastocysts with or without X-ray irradiation (0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 Gy). Asterisks indicate abnormal blastocysts. b The developmental rate of embryos irradiated with X-rays. Bars represent the maximum and minimum percentage of each experiment
Pregnancy outcome of irradiation
| Irradiation dose (Gy) | Number of pregnant mice analyzed | Number of implantationsa (average) | Number of fetusesa (average) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5 | 8.4 ± 1.6 | 7.7 ± 1.6 |
| 0.1 | 5 | 8.7 ± 1.3 | 6.5 ± 2.0 |
| 0.5 | 5 | 8.6 ± 0.9 | 6.0 ± 1.1 |
| 1.0 | 5 | 8.1 ± 1.3 | 6.7 ± 1.9 |
aThere was no significant difference in the number of implantations or fetuses between each group by the exact t test
Fig. 2γH2AX expression in blastocysts after X-ray irradiation. Representative images showing the immunofluorescence intensity of γH2AX (green) in control (0 Gy) and 1-Gy X-ray-irradiated embryos. Merged micrographs show the localization of γH2AX (green) with DAPI staining (blue)
Fig. 3Cleaved caspase-3 expression in blastocysts after X-ray irradiation. a Representative images showing the immunofluorescence intensity of cleaved caspase-3 (green) in control (0 Gy) and 1-Gy X-ray-irradiated embryos. Merged micrographs show the localization of cleaved caspase-3 (green) with DAPI staining (blue). Bar = 20 μm. b Average percentages of apoptotic cell-containing blastocysts X-irradiated at 0, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 Gy are shown. Bars represent maximum and minimum percentages of each experiment. The immunofluorescence staining was repeated three times using more than 10 blastocysts in each dose
Number and percentage of apoptotic cells in a blastocyst
| Irradiation dose (Gy) | Number of apoptotic cells in a blastocyst (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1–4 | > 5 | Total | ||||
| 0 | 23 | 59.0% | 15 | 38.5% | 1 | 2.6% | 39 |
| (6, 10, 7)a | (4, 7, 4)a | (0, 0, 1)a | (10, 17, 12)a | ||||
| 0.1 | 33 | 55.9% | 21 | 35.6% | 5 | 8.5% | 59 |
| (9, 12, 12)a | (4, 9, 8)a | (2, 1, 2)a | (15, 22, 22)a | ||||
| 0.5 | 23 | 41.8% | 21 | 38.2% | 11 | 20% | 55 |
| (8, 8, 7)a | (4, 10, 7)a | (5, 3, 3)a | (17, 21, 17)a | ||||
| 1.0 | 22 | 37.3% | 21 | 35.6% | 16 | 27.1% | 59 |
| (9, 10, 3)a | (5, 6, 10)a | (7, 5, 4)a | (21, 21, 17)a | ||||
There are significant differences between each group by Kruskal-Wallis test. Blastocysts without apoptotic cells were significantly (p < 0.05) decreased, when the embryos were irradiated at 0.5 and 1.0 Gy comparing with 0 Gy by Shirley-Williams test. On the contrary, the blastocysts with more than five apoptotic cells were significantly (p < 0.05) increased, when the embryos were irradiated at 0.5 and 1.0 Gy comparing with 0 Gy by Shirley-Williams test
aEach number of embryos of triplicate experiments
Fig. 4RT-PCR analysis of p21, Smad 2, Foxo1, Oct4, Cdx2, and Nanog mRNAs in blastocysts after low-dose irradiation. RT-PCR was conducted using three replicates of RNA samples from 20 X-ray-irradiated blastocysts (0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 Gy). The relative amount of mRNA was normalized to the 18S rRNA level and expressed the fold change compared the control sample. RT-PCR was conducted using three replicates of RNA samples. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. *p < 0.05 versus control. a p21, b Smad 2, c Foxo1, d Oct4, e Cdx2, and f Nanog