Literature DB >> 1852943

Scientific view of low-level radiation risks.

E J Hall1.   

Abstract

The average number of diagnostic x-ray procedures per year in the United States equals the total population and results in an annual collective effective dose equivalent of about 9 million person-rem. Possible deleterious effects include (a) genetic consequences, the risks of which can be assessed only from animal studies; (b) carcinogenesis, which can be assessed from survivors of nuclear bombings and patients exposed for medical reasons; and (c) effects on the developing embryo or fetus. For stochastic endpoints such as cancer and genetic anomalies, it is estimated that the current practice of radiology in the United States increases spontaneous frequency by less than 1%. No single procedure is likely to produce harm to the conceptus, but an accumulation of procedures in a pregnant woman could be hazardous during the sensitive period of 8-15 weeks after conception, with microcephaly and mental retardation the most likely deleterious effects. The balance of risk versus benefit in diagnostic radiology is heavily weighted toward benefit, but the risks are there, and constant efforts are needed to reduce radiation doses to the minimum necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1852943     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.11.3.1852943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  11 in total

1.  Cecal volvulus in pregnancy: report of a case and review of the safety and utility of medical diagnostic imaging in the assessment of the acute abdomen during pregnancy.

Authors:  Brian A Hogan; Carl J Brown; Jacqueline A Brown
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2007-07-03

2.  The Lessons Learned from Patients We Didn't Help.

Authors:  Varun K Chowdhry
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-03-06

3.  Retrospective analysis of radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholagiopancreatography: critical determinants.

Authors:  Edward Kim; Mark McLoughlin; Eric C Lam; Jack Amar; Michael Byrne; Jennifer Telford; Robert Enns
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 4.  ERCP in the management of choledocholithiasis in pregnancy.

Authors:  Calvin H Y Chan; Robert A Enns
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-12

5.  Efficacy and Safety of Pancreatobiliary Endoscopic Procedures during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Jae Joon Lee; Sung Koo Lee; Sang Hyung Kim; Ga Hee Kim; Do Hyun Park; Sangsoo Lee; Dongwan Seo; Myung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 6.  Breast cancer in pregnancy: a literature review.

Authors:  S Deckers; F Amant
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

7.  Maternal aldehyde elimination during pregnancy preserves the fetal genome.

Authors:  Nina Oberbeck; Frédéric Langevin; Gareth King; Niels de Wind; Gerry P Crossan; Ketan J Patel
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Usefulness of low dose chest CT for initial evaluation of blunt chest trauma.

Authors:  Sung Jung Kim; Anjali Basnyat Bista; Young Gi Min; Eun Young Kim; Kyung Joo Park; Doo Kyoung Kang; Joo Sung Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  Diagnosing cardiac disease during pregnancy: imaging modalities.

Authors:  Ntobeko A Ntusi; Petronella Samuels; Sulaiman Moosa; Ana O Mocumbi
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.167

10.  Low-dose irradiation of mouse embryos increases Smad-p21 pathway activity and preserves pluripotency.

Authors:  Masami Hayashi; Kayo Yoshida; Kohei Kitada; Akane Kizu; Daisuke Tachibana; Mitsuru Fukui; Takashi Morita; Masayasu Koyama
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.