To the Editor,Lamb and Syed [1] reviewed the pharmacological and clinical properties of LY2963016insulinglargine 100 U/ml (LY insulinglargine), a biosimilar to insulinglargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100, Lantus®). They considered several studies that compared LY insulinglargine and Gla-100 and concluded that the efficacy and safety profiles of these two insulins are similar.I would like to draw to readers’ attention that, while the authors refer to Gla-100 as the reference insulin, this definition is only provided within the abstract and introduction. The main body of the article simply referred to “reference insulinglargine,” and I believe this may create some confusion. Indeed, since 2015, in most countries, a different formulation of insulinglargine has also been available in addition to insulinglargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100). This formulation is insulinglargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300), which has different characteristics (a prolonged duration of action, more even steady-state pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic [2] profile, and lower incidence of hypoglycemia [3, 4] than Gla-100).To avoid potential misinterpretation by the reader on the similarities of LY insulinglargine and the reference molecule, I believe it should be clarified that Gla-100 is the “reference insulin” in the studies reviewed, not Gla-300.Best regards,Riccardo Perfetti
Authors: Reinhard H A Becker; Raphael Dahmen; Karin Bergmann; Anne Lehmann; Thomas Jax; Tim Heise Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Philip D Home; Richard M Bergenstal; Geremia B Bolli; Monika Ziemen; Maria Rojeski; Melanie Espinasse; Matthew C Riddle Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: R Ritzel; R Roussel; G B Bolli; L Vinet; C Brulle-Wohlhueter; S Glezer; H Yki-Järvinen Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 6.577